{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/co1002.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/co1002.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/co1002.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nWith excellency (\u03ba\u03b1\u03b8 \u1f51\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf\u03c7\u1f74\u03bd)\nLit., according to elevation or superiority. The noun occurs only here and Ti1 2:2, where it is rendered authority. The phrase expresses the mode of his preaching. For similar adverbial phrases, see \u03ba\u03b1\u03b8 \u1f51\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b2\u03bf\u03bb\u03ae\u03bd exceedingly or according to excess, Rom 8:13; \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u1f70 \u03ba\u03c1\u03ac\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 mightily or according to might, Act 19:20. Construe with declaring.\nDeclaring (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03b3\u03b3\u03ad\u03bb\u03bb\u03c9\u03bd)\nRev., proclaiming. See on Jo1 1:5; see on Act 17:23. Authoritative proclamation is implied. The word is found only in the Acts and in Paul.\nTestimony (\u03bc\u03b1\u03c1\u03c4\u03cd\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd)\nSome of the best texts read \u03bc\u03c5\u03c3\u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd mystery. So Rev. See on Rom 11:25.\nCrucified\nEmphatic. That which would be the main stumbling-block to the Corinthians he would emphasize.\nI was with you (\u1f10\u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03cc\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd \u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u1f51\u03bc\u1fb6\u03c2)\nI was is rather I became. I fell into a state of weakness, etc., after I had come among you. With you, i.e., in intercourse with. See on with God, Joh 1:1. The implication is that his condition grew out of the circumstances in which he found himself in Corinth.\nIn demonstration (\u1f10\u03bd \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03b4\u03b5\u03af\u03be\u03b5\u03b9)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Lit., a showing forth.\nWisdom\nEmphatic. Lest his depreciation of worldly wisdom should expose him and his companions to the charge of not preaching wisdom at all, he shows that they do preach wisdom, though not of a worldly kind, among matured Christians.\nThem that are perfect (\u03c4\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03c4\u03b5\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03bf\u03b9\u03c2)\nAmerican Rev., them that are full-grown. Paul's term for matured Christians. See Eph 4:13, where a perfect (\u03c4\u03ad\u03bb\u03b5\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd) man is contrasted with children (\u03bd\u03ae\u03c0\u03b9\u03bf\u03b9, Eph 4:14). So Co1 14:20 : \"In malice children, in understanding men (lit., perfect);\" Phi 3:15. \"This wisdom is the Christian analogue to philosophy in the ordinary sense of the word\" (Meyer), and the perfect to whom he delivered it would recognize it as such.\nThat come to nought (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03c1\u03b3\u03bf\u03c5\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03c9\u03bd)\nThe A.V. states a general proposition, but the Greek present participle a fact in process of accomplishment: which are coming to nought. So Rev.\nIn a mystery\nConnect with we speak. See on Mat 13:11; see on Rom 11:25. The in (\u1f10\u03bd) has a kind of instrumental force: by means of a mystery; i.e., by delivering a doctrine hidden from the human understanding and revealed to us by God.\nLord of glory\nThe Lord whose attribute is glory. Compare Psa 29:1; Act 7:2; Eph 1:17; Jam 2:1.\nEye hath not seen, etc.\nFrom Isa 64:4, freely rendered by Septuagint. The Hebrew reads: \"From of old men have not heard, not perceived with the ear, eye has not seen a God beside Thee who does (gloriously) for him who waits on Him.\" Septuagint, \"From of old we have not heard, nor have our eyes seen a God beside Thee, and Thy works which Thou wilt do for those who wait for mercy.\" Paul takes only the general idea from the Old-Testament passage. The words are not to be limited to future blessings in heaven. They are true of the present.\nHave entered (\u1f00\u03bd\u03ad\u03b2\u03b7)\nLit., went up. See on Act 7:23. Compare Dan 2:29, Sept.\nHeart (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c1\u03b4\u03af\u03b1\u03bd)\nSee on Rom 1:21.\nSearcheth (\u1f10\u03c1\u03b5\u03c5\u03bd\u1fb6)\nSee on Joh 5:39. Not, searcheth in order to discover; but of the ever active, accurate, careful sounding of the depths of God by the Spirit.\nSpirit (\u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1)\nSee on Rom 8:4. The things of God can be recognized only by the highest element of the human personality. They have not entered into the heart (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c1\u03b4\u03af\u03b1, see on Rom 1:21), but into the spirit, which is the highest and principal point of contact with the Spirit of God.\nThe spirit of the world (\u03c4\u1f78 \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5)\nFor this use of \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1, see on Rom 8:4, under 7. \u039a\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 world, is used with the ethical sense. See on Joh 1:9, under 4, e, The phrase means the principle of evil which animates the unregenerate world; not the personal spirit of evil or Satan, since Paul does not use \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1 spirit, elsewhere in the personal sense of an evil spirit. See note on Eph 2:2.\nOf God (\u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u0398\u03b5\u03bf\u1fe6)\nLit., from God: proceeding forth from Him. \"God in us reveals God in our nature\" (Edwards).\nNot in the words which man's wisdom teacheth\nLit., not in the taught words of human wisdom. Compare Plato: \"Through love all the intercourse and speech of God with man, whether awake or asleep, is carried on. The wisdom which understands this is spiritual; all other wisdom, such as that of arts and handicrafts, is mean and vulgar\" (\"Symposium,\" 203).\nWhich the Spirit teacheth (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b4\u03b9\u03b4\u03b1\u03ba\u03c4\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u03cd\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2)\nLit., in the taught (words) of the Spirit. Taught; not mechanically uttered, but communicated by a living Spirit.\nComparing spiritual things with spiritual (\u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u03c5\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u03c5\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u1f70 \u03c3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2)\nNotice the paronomasia. See on Rom 1:29, Rom 1:31. The dispute on this verse arises over the meanings of \u03c3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2, A.V., comparing, and \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u03c5\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 spiritual. As to the latter, whether the reference is to spiritual men, things, or words; as to the former, whether the meaning is adapting, interpreting, proving, or comparing. The principal interpretations are: adapting spiritual words to spiritual things; adapting spiritual things to spiritual men; interpreting spiritual things to spiritual men; interpreting spiritual things by spiritual words. \u03a3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 occurs only here and Co2 10:12, where the meaning is clearly compare. In classical Greek the original meaning is to compound, and later, to compare, as in Aristotle and Plutarch, and to interpret, used of dreams, and mainly in Septuagint. See Gen 40:8. The most satisfactory interpretation is combining spiritual things with spiritual words. After speaking of spiritual things (Co1 2:11, Co1 2:12, Co1 2:13), Paul now speaks of the forms in which they are conveyed - spiritual forms or words answering to spiritual matters, and says, we combine spiritual things with spiritual forms of expression. This would not be the case if we uttered the revelations of the Spirit in the speech of human wisdom.\nThe natural man (\u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03b9\u03ba\u1f78\u03c2 \u1f04\u03bd\u03b8\u03c1\u03c9\u03c0\u03bf\u03c2)\nSee on Rom 11:4, on the distinction between \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03ae soul, life, and \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1 spirit. The contrast is between a man governed by the divine Spirit and one from whom that Spirit is absent. But \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03b9\u03ba\u1f78\u03c2 natural, is not equivalent to \u03c3\u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 fleshy. Paul is speaking of natural as contrasted with spiritual cognition applied to spiritual truth, and therefore of the \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03ae soul, as the organ of human cognition, contrasted with the \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1 spirit, as the organ of spiritual cognition. The man, therefore, whose cognition of truth depends solely upon his natural insight is \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 natural, as contrasted with the spiritual man (\u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u03c5\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2) to whom divine insight is imparted. In other words, the organ employed in the apprehension of spiritual truth characterizes the man. Paul therefore \"characterizes the man who is not yet capable of understanding divine wisdom as \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2, i.e., as one who possesses in his \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03ae soul, simply the organ of purely human cognition, but has not yet the organ of religious cognition in the \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1 spirit\" (Dickson). It is perhaps impossible to find an English word which will accurately render \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2. Psychic is simply the Greek transcribed. We can do no better than hold by the A.V. natural.\nReceiveth not (\u03bf\u1f50 \u03b4\u03ad\u03c7\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nNot, does not understand, but does not admit them into his heart; thus, according to New Testament usage, when the word is used in connection with teaching. See Luk 8:13; Act 8:14; Act 11:1; Th1 1:6; Jam 1:21.\nAre foolishness\nNot merely seem. To him they are.\nNeither can he know (\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03bf\u1f50 \u03b4\u03cd\u03bd\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u03b3\u03bd\u1ff6\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9)\nRev., more strictly, and he cannot know. \"It is an utter perversion of such statements to maintain that there is in the natural man any organic, constitutional incapacity of spiritual perception requiring to be created in them by the Holy Spirit .... The uniform teaching of Scripture is that the change effected in regeneration is a purely moral and spiritual one\" (Brown).\nDiscerned (\u1f00\u03bd\u03b1\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nRev., judged. Used only by Luke and Paul, and by the latter in this epistle only. By Luke, mostly of judicial examination: Luk 23:14; Act 4:9; Act 12:19; Act 24:8; Act 28:18. Of examining the Scriptures, Act 17:11, but with the sense of proving or coming to a judgment on. The fundamental idea of the word is examination, scrutiny, following up (\u1f00\u03bd\u03ac) a series of objects or particulars in order to distinguish (\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03c9). This is its almost universal meaning in classical Greek. At Athens it was used technically in two senses: to examine magistrates with a view to proving their qualifications; and to examine persons concerned in a suit, so as to prepare the matter for trial, as a grand jury. The meaning judged is, at best, inferential, and the Rev. inserts examined in the margin. Bishop Lightfoot says: \"\u0391\u03bd\u03b1\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd is neither to judge nor to discern; but to examine, investigate, inquire into, question, as it is rightly translated, Co1 9:3; Co1 10:25, Co1 10:27. The apostle condemns all these impatient human praejudicia which anticipate the final judgment, reserving his case for the great tribunal, where at length all the evidence will be forthcoming and a satisfactory verdict can be given. Meanwhile the process of gathering evidence has begun; an \u1f00\u03bd\u03ac\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 investigation is indeed being held, not, however, by these self-appointed magistrates, but by one who alone has the authority to institute the inquiry, and the ability to sift the facts\" (\"On a Fresh Revision of the New Testament\"). See, further, on Co1 4:3, Co1 4:4.\nMind (\u03bd\u03bf\u1fe6\u03bd)\nSee on Rom 7:23. The understanding of the Lord. The divine counsels or purposes which are the results of the divine thought. See on Rom 11:34.\nInstruct (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bc\u03b2\u03b9\u03b2\u03ac\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9)\nSee on proving, Act 9:22.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: 1 Corinthians: 1 Corinthians Chapter 2","type":"page"}