{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/co1013.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/co1013.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/co1013.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nTongues\nMentioned first because of the exaggerated importance which the Corinthians attached to this gift.\nAngels\nReferring to the ecstatic utterances of those who spoke with tongues.\nCharity (\u1f00\u03b3\u03ac\u03c0\u03b7\u03bd)\nRev., love. The word does not occur in the classics, though the kindred verbs \u1f00\u03b3\u03b1\u03c0\u03ac\u03c9 and \u1f00\u03b3\u03b1\u03c0\u03ac\u03b6\u03c9 to love, are common. It first appears in the Septuagint, where, however, in all but two of the passages, it refers to the love of the sexes. Eleven of the passages are in Canticles. See, also, Sa2 13:15, Sept. The change in the Rev. from charity to love, is a good and thoroughly defensible one. Charity follows the caritas of the Vulgate, and is not used consistently in the A.V. On the contrary, in the gospels, \u1f00\u03b3\u03ac\u03c0\u03b7 is always rendered love, and mostly elsewhere, except in this epistle, where the word occurs but twice. Charity, in modern usage, has acquired the senses of tolerance and beneficence, which express only single phases of love. There is no more reason for saying \"charity envieth not,\" than for saying \"God is charity;\" \"the charity of Christ constraineth us;\" \"the charity of God is shed abroad in our hearts.\" The real objection to the change on the part of unscholarly partisans of the A.V. is the breaking of the familiar rhythm of the verses.\nSounding brass (\u03c7\u03b1\u03bb\u03ba\u1f78\u03c2 \u1f20\u03c7\u1ff6\u03bd)\nThe metal is not properly brass, the alloy of copper and zinc, but copper, or bronze, the alloy of copper and tin, of which the Homeric weapons were made. Being the metal in common use, it came to be employed as a term for metal in general. Afterward it was distinguished; common copper being called black or red copper, and the celebrated Corinthian bronze being known as mixed copper. The word here does not mean a brazen instrument, but a piece of unwrought metal, which emitted a sound on being struck. In the streets of Seville one may see pedlers striking, together two pieces of brass instead of blowing a horn or ringing a bell.\nTinkling cymbal (\u03ba\u03cd\u03bc\u03b2\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd \u1f00\u03bb\u03b1\u03bb\u03ac\u03b6\u03bf\u03bd)\nThe verb rendered tinkling, alalazo, originally meant to repeat the cry alala, as in battle. It is used by Mark (Mar 6:38) of the wailings of hired mourners. Hence, generally, to ring or clang. Rev., clanging. \u039a\u03cd\u03bc\u03b2\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd cymbal, is derived from \u03ba\u03cd\u03bc\u03b2\u03bf\u03c2 a hollow or a cup. The cymbal consisted of two half-globes of metal, which were struck together. In middle-age Latin, cymbalum was the term for a church or convent-bell. Ducange defines: \"a bell by which the monks are called to meals, and which is hung in the cloister.\" The comparison is between the unmeaning clash of metal, and music; between ecstatic utterances which are jargon, and utterances inspired by love, which, though unintelligible to the hearers, may carry a meaning to the speaker himself and to God, Co1 14:4, Co1 14:7.\nAll mysteries (\u03c4\u1f70 \u03bc\u03c5\u03c3\u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1)\nThe mysteries, all of them. See on Rom 11:25. The article indicates the well-known spiritual problems which exercise men's minds.\nAll faith (\u03c0\u1fb6\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd)\nAll the special faith which works miracles.\nBestow (\u03c8\u03c9\u03bc\u03af\u03c3\u03c9)\nOnly here and Rom 12:20. See on sop, Joh 13:26. The verb means to feed out in morsels, dole out.\nTo be burned (\u1f35\u03bd\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c5\u03b8\u03ae\u03c3\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9)\nThe latest critical text reads \u03ba\u03b1\u03c5\u03c7\u03ae\u03c3\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 in order that I may glory, after the three oldest MSS. The change to burned might have been suggested by the copyist's familiarity with christian martyrdoms, or by the story of the three Hebrews. Bishop Lightfoot finds a possible reference to the case of an Indian fanatic who, in the time of Augustus, burned himself alive at Athens. His tomb there was visible in Paul's time, and may have been seen by him. It bore the inscription: \"Zarmochegas the Indian from Bargosa, according to the ancient customs of India, made himself immortal and lies here.\" Calanus, an Indian gymnosophist who followed Alexander, in order to get rid of his sufferings, burned himself before the Macedonian army (see Plutarch, \"Alexander\"). Martyrdom for the sake of ambition was a fact of early occurrence in the Church, if not in Paul's day. Farrar says of his age, \"both at this time and in the persecution of Diocletian, there were Christians who, oppressed by debt, by misery, and sometimes even by a sense of guilt, thrust themselves into the glory and imagined redemptiveness of the baptism of blood.... The extravagant estimate formed of the merits of all who were confessors, became, almost immediately, the cause of grave scandals. We are horified to read in Cyprian's letter that even in prison, even when death was imminent, there were some of the confessors who were puffed up with vanity and pride, and seemed to think that the blood of martyrdom would avail them to wash away the stains of flagrant and even recent immoralities\" (\"Lives of the Fathers,\" ch. vi., sec. 2).\nSuffereth long (\u03bc\u03b1\u03ba\u03c1\u03bf\u03b8\u03c5\u03bc\u03b5\u1fd6)\nSee on Jam 5:7.\nIs kind (\u03c7\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nOnly here in the New Testament. See on \u03c7\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03c4\u1f78\u03c2, A.V., easy, Mat 11:30, and see on \u03c7\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03c4\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 good, Rom 3:12.\n\"The high charity which makes us servants\nPrompt to the counsel which controls the world.\"\nDante, \"Paradiso,\" xxi., 70, 71.\nVaunteth (\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b5\u03cd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nFrom \u03c0\u03ad\u03c1\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf\u03c2 a braggart. Used of one who sounds his own praises. Cicero introduces a compound of the word in one of his letters to Atticus, describing his speech in the presence of Pompey, who had just addressed the senate on his return from the Mithridatic war. He says: \"Heavens! How I showed off (\u1f10\u03bd\u03b5\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b5\u03c5\u03c3\u03ac\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd) before my new auditor Pompey,\" and describes the various rhetorical tricks which he employed.\nPuffed up (\u03c6\u03c5\u03c3\u03b9\u03bf\u1fe6\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nSee on Co1 4:6, and compare Co1 8:1. Of inward disposition, as the previous word denotes outward display. The opposite is put by Dante:\n\"That swells with love the spirit well-disposed.\"\n\"Paradiso,\" x., 144.\nEasily provoked (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03bf\u03be\u03cd\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nEasily is superfluous, and gives a wrong coloring to the statement, which is absolute: is not provoked or exasperated. The verb occurs only here and Act 17:16. The kindred noun \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03bf\u03be\u03c5\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc\u03c2, in Act 15:39, describes the irritation which arose between Paul and Barnabas. In Heb 10:24, stimulating to good works. It is used of provoking God, Deu 9:8; Psa 105:29; Isa 65:3.\nThinketh no evil (\u03bf\u1f50 \u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u1f78 \u03ba\u03b1\u03ba\u03cc\u03bd)\nLit., reckoneth not the evil. Rev., taketh not account of. The evil; namely, that which is done to love. \"Love, instead of entering evil as a debt in its account-book, voluntarily passes the sponge over what it endures\" (Godet).\nRejoiceth in the truth (\u03c3\u03c5\u03b3\u03c7\u03b1\u03af\u03c1\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c4\u1fc7 \u1f01\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u03b5\u03af\u1fb3)\nRev., correctly, rejoiceth with. Truth is personified as love is. Compare Psa 85:10.\nBeareth (\u03c3\u03c4\u03ad\u03b3\u03b5\u03b9)\nSee on suffer, Co1 9:12. It keeps out resentment as the ship keeps out the water, or the roof the rain.\nEndureth (\u1f51\u03c0\u03bf\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9)\nAn advance on beareth: patient acquiescence, holding its ground when it can no longer believe nor hope.\n\"All my days are spent and gone;\nAnd ye no more shall lead your wretched life,\nCaring for me. hard was it, that I know,\nMy children! Yet one word is strong to loose,\nAlthough alone, the burden of these toils,\nFor love in larger store ye could not have\nFrom any than from him who standeth here.\"\nSophocles, \"Oedipus at Colonus,\" 613-618.\nFaileth (\u1f10\u03ba\u03c0\u03af\u03c0\u03b5\u03b9)\nFalls off (\u1f10\u03ba) like a leaf or flower, as Jam 1:11; Pe1 1:24. In classical Greek it was used of an actor who was hissed off the stage. But the correct reading is \u03c0\u03af\u03c0\u03c4\u03b5\u03b9 falls, in a little more general sense, as Luk 16:17. Love holds its place.\nA child\nSee on Co1 3:1, and see on Co1 2:6.\nI understood (\u1f10\u03c6\u03c1\u03cc\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd)\nSee on Rom 8:5. The kindred noun \u03c6\u03c1\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03c2 occurs only once in the New Testament, Co1 14:20, where also it is associated with children in the sense of reflection or discrimination. Rev. renders felt; but the verb, as Edwards correctly remarks, is not the generic term for emotion, though it may be used for what includes emotion. The reference here is to the earlier undeveloped exercise of the childish mind; a thinking which is not yet connected reasoning. This last is expressed by \u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b6\u03bf\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd I thought or reasoned. There seems to be a covert reference to the successive stages of development; mere idle prating; thought, in the sense of crude, general notions; consecutive reasoning.\nWhen I became (\u1f44\u03c4\u03b5 \u03b3\u03ad\u03b3\u03bf\u03bd\u03b1)\nRev., better, giving the force of the perfect tense, now that I am become. Hence I have put away for I put away. Lit., have brought them to nought.\nThrough a glass (\u03b4\u1f30 \u1f10\u03c3\u03cc\u03c0\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c5)\nRev., in a mirror. Through (\u03b4\u03b9\u03ac) is by means of. Others, however, explain it as referring to the illusion by which the mirrored image appears to be on the other side of the surface: others, again, think that the reference is to a window made of horn or other translucent material. This is quite untenable. \u1f1c\u03c3\u03bf\u03c0\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd mirror occurs only here and Jam 1:23. The synonymous word \u03ba\u03ac\u03c4\u03bf\u03c0\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd does not appear in the New Testament, but its kindred verb \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03c0\u03c4\u03c1\u03af\u03b6\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 to look at one's self in a mirror, is found, Co2 3:18. The thought of imperfect seeing is emphasized by the character of the ancient mirror, which was of polished metal, and required constant polishing, so that a sponge with pounded pumice-stone was generally attached to it. Corinth was famous for the manufacture of these. Pliny mentions stone mirrors of agate, and Nero is said to have used an emerald. The mirrors were usually so small as to be carried in the hand, though there are allusions to larger ones which reflected the entire person. The figure of the mirror, illustrating the partial vision of divine things, is frequent in the rabbinical writings, applied, for instance, to Moses and the prophets. Plato says: \"There is no light in the earthly copies of justice or temperance or any of the higher qualities which are precious to souls: they are seen through a glass, dimly\" (\"Phaedrus,\" 250). Compare \"Republic,\" vii., 516.\nDarkly (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f30\u03bd\u03af\u03b3\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9)\nLit., in a riddle or enigma, the word expressing the obscure form in which the revelation appears. Compare \u03b4\u1f30 \u03b1\u1f30\u03bd\u03b9\u03b3\u03bc\u03ac\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd in dark speeches, Num 12:8.\nFace to face\nCompare mouth to mouth, Num 12:8.\nShall I know (\u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03b3\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9)\nAmerican Rev., rightly, \"I shall fully know.\" See on knowledge, Rom 3:20. The A.V. has brought this out in Co2 6:9, well known.\nI am known (\u1f10\u03c0\u03b5\u03b3\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03b8\u03b7\u03bd)\nThe tense is the aorist, \"was known,\" in my imperfect condition. Paul places himself at the future stand-point, when the perfect has come. The compound verb is the same as the preceding. Hence American Rev., \"I was fully known.\"\nAnd now (\u03bd\u03c5\u03bd\u1f76 \u03b4\u1f72)\nRev., but; better than and, bringing out the contrast with the transient gifts. Now is logical and not temporal. Thus, as it is.\nAbideth\nNot merely in this life. The essential permanence of the three graces is asserted. In their nature they are eternal.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: 1 Corinthians: 1 Corinthians Chapter 13","type":"page"}