{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/co2012.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/co2012.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/co2012.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nRevelations (\u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03cd\u03c8\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2)\nSee on Rev 1:1.\nI knew (\u03bf\u1f36\u03b4\u03b1)\nRev., correctly, I know.\nAbove fourteen years ago (\u03c0\u03c1\u1f78 \u1f10\u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u03b4\u03b5\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u03c3\u03c3\u03ac\u03c1\u03c9\u03bd)\nAbove, of A.V., is due to a misunderstanding of the Greek idiom. Lit., before fourteen years, that is, fourteen years ago, as Rev.\nCaught up (\u1f01\u03c1\u03c0\u03b1\u03b3\u03ad\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1)\nCompare Dante:\n\"Thou knowest, who didst lift me with thy light\"\n\"Paradiso,\" i., 75.\nThe verb suits the swift, resistless, impetuous seizure of spiritual ecstasy. See on Mat 11:12; and compare Act 8:39; Th1 4:17; Rev 12:5.\nThird heaven\nIt is quite useless to attempt to explain this expression according to any scheme of celestial gradation. The conception of seven heavens was familiar to the Jews; but according to some of the Rabbins there were two heavens - the visible clouds and the sky; in which case the third heaven would be the invisible region beyond the sky. Some think that Paul describes two stages of his rapture; the first to the third heaven, from which he was borne, as if from a halting-point, up into Paradise.\nParadise\nSee on Luk 23:43.\nUnspeakable words (\u1f04\u1fe4\u1fe5\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1 \u1fe5\u03ae\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1)\nAn oxymoron, speaking which may not be spoken.\nAbundance (\u1f51\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b2\u03bf\u03bb\u1fc7)\nRev., more correctly, the exceeding greatness.\nThorn (\u03c3\u03ba\u03cc\u03bb\u03bf\u03c8)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Frequent in classical Greek in the sense of a pale or stake. It occurs once in Euripides, meaning a stump (\"Bacchae,\" 983). It is a stake for a palisade, or for impaling; a surgical instrument; the point of a fish-hook. In the Septuagint it occurs three times, translated thorn in Hos 2:6, where, however, it is distinguished from \u1f00\u03ba\u03ac\u03bd\u03b8\u03b1\u03b9\u03c2 thorns; brier in Eze 28:24, and prick in Num 33:55. Nine different Hebrew words are rendered by thorn, for which, in the great majority of cases, Septuagint gives \u1f04\u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03b8\u03b1. The rendering thorn for \u03c3\u03ba\u03cc\u03bb\u03bf\u03c8 has no support. The figure is that of the impaling stake. Herodotus, alluding to this punishment, uses \u1f00\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03c0\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd (i., 128; 3, 132). In the ninth book of his history, Lampon says to Pausanias: \"When Leonidas was slain at Thermopylae, Xerxes and Mardonius beheaded and crucified (\u1f00\u03bd\u03b5\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03cd\u03c1\u03c9\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd) him. Do thou the like by Mardonius.... for by crucifying (\u1f00\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03b1\u03c2) thou wilt avenge Leonidas\" (ix., 78). The verb seems, therefore, to have been used interchangeably with crucify; and clear instances of this occur in Philo and Lucian. At least one text of the Septuagint gives \u1f00\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03c0\u03af\u03b6\u03c9 in Est 7:10, of Haman's being hanged. See further, on Gal 2:20. The explanations of the peculiar nature of this affliction are numerous. Opinions are divided, generally, between mental or spiritual and bodily trials. Under the former head are sensual desires, faint-heartedness, doubts, temptations to despair, and blasphemous suggestions from the devil. Under the latter, persecution, mean personal appearance, headache, epilepsy, earache, stone, ophthalmia. It was probably a bodily malady, in the flesh; but its nature must remain a matter of conjecture. Very plausible reasons are given in favor of both epilepsy and ophthalmia. Bishop Lightfoot inclines to the former, and Archdeacon Farrar thinks that it was almost certainly the latter.\nMessenger of Satan (\u1f04\u03b3\u03b3\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 \u03a3\u03b1\u03c4\u1fb6\u03bd)\nThe torment is thus personified. Messenger is the word commonly rendered angel in the New Testament, though sometimes used of human messengers, as Luk 7:24, Luk 7:27; Luk 9:52; Jam 2:25; see also on the angels of the churches, Rev 1:20. Messenger and Satan are not to be taken in apposition - a messenger who was Satan - because Satan is never called \u1f04\u03b3\u03b3\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 in the New Testament. Messenger is figurative, in the sense of agent. Satan is conceived in the New Testament as the originator of bodily evil. Thus, in the gospel narrative, demoniac possession is often accompanied with some form of disease. Compare Luk 13:16; Act 10:38, and see on Co1 5:5.\nBuffet (\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03b1\u03c6\u03af\u03b6\u1fc3)\nConnect with messenger, which better suits depart; not with thorn, which would be a confusion of metaphor, a stake buffeting. For the verb, meaning to strike with the fist, see Mat 26:67; Mar 14:65; Pe1 2:20. Compare Job 2:5, Job 2:7, where the Septuagint has \u1f05\u03c8\u03b1\u03b9 touch, and \u1f14\u03c0\u03b1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b5 smote.\nFor this thing (\u1f51\u03c0\u1f72\u03c1 \u03c4\u03bf\u03cd\u03c4\u03bf\u03c5)\nRev., concerning this thing. But it is better to refer this to messenger: concerning this or whom. For, of A.V., is ambiguous.\nHe said (\u03b5\u1f34\u03c1\u03b7\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd)\nRev., correctly, He hath said. The force of the perfect tense is to be insisted on. It shows that the affliction was still clinging to Paul, and that there was lying in his mind when he wrote, not only the memory of the incident, but the sense of the still abiding power and value of Christ's grace; so that because the Lord hath said \"my grace,\" etc., Paul can now say, under the continued affliction, wherefore I take pleasure, etc., for Christ's sake; for when I am weak, then am I strong. A more beautiful use of the perfect it would be difficult to find in the New Testament.\nMy strength\nThe best texts omit my, thus turning the answer into a general proposition: strength is perfected in weakness; but besides the preeminent frigidity of replying to a passionate appeal with an aphorism, the reference to the special power of Christ is clear from the words power of Christ, which almost immediately follow. Compare Co1 2:3, Co1 2:4; Co2 4:7; Heb 11:34. Rev., rightly, retains my italicized.\nMay rest upon (\u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03ba\u03b7\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u1fc3)\nOnly here in the New Testament. The simple verb \u03c3\u03ba\u03b7\u03bd\u03cc\u03c9 to dwell in a tent is used by John, especially in Revelation. See on Joh 1:14. The compound verb here means to fix a tent or a habitation upon; and the figure is that of Christ abiding upon him as a tent spread over him, during his temporary stay on earth.\nFor Christ's sake\nThis may be taken with all the preceding details, weaknesses, etc., endured for Christ's sake, or with I take pleasure, assigning the specific motive of his rejoicing: I take pleasure for Christ's sake.\nI am become a fool in glorying\nIronical. By the record I have presented I stand convicted of being foolish.\nI ought to have been commended of you\nYou ought to have saved me the necessity of recounting my sufferings, and thus commending myself as not inferior to those preeminent apostles (Co2 11:5).\nSigns (\u03c3\u03b7\u03bc\u03b5\u1fd6\u03b1)\nSee on Mat 24:24. Stanley observes that the passage is remarkable as containing (what is rare in the history of miracles) a direct claim to miraculous powers by the person to whom they were ascribed. Compare Co1 2:4; Rom 15:19.\nWere wrought (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u03b9\u03c1\u03b3\u03ac\u03c3\u03b8\u03b7)\nThe testimony was decisive. They were fully wrought out.\nExcept that I was not a burden\nAlluding to the possible objection that his refusal to receive pay was a sign either of his want of power to exact it, or of his want of affection for them (Co2 11:7).\nForgive, etc.\nIronical.\nBe spent (\u1f10\u03ba\u03b4\u03b1\u03c0\u03b1\u03bd\u03b7\u03b8\u03ae\u03c3\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9)\nOnly here in the New Testament. To spend utterly. Later Greek writers use the simple verb \u03b4\u03b1\u03c0\u03b1\u03bd\u03ac\u03c9 to expend, of the consumption of life.\nWith guile\nAlluding to a charge that he availed himself of the collection for the poor to secure money for himself. He uses his adversaries' words.\nStrifes (\u1f10\u03c1\u03b9\u03b8\u03b5\u1fd6\u03b1\u03b9)\nRev., better, factions. See on Jam 3:14.\nWraths (\u03b8\u03c5\u03bc\u03bf\u03af)\nFor the plural, compare deaths, Co2 11:33; drunkennesses, Gal 5:21; bloods, Joh 1:13 (see note); the willings of the flesh, Eph 2:3; mercies, Phi 2:1. Excitements or outbursts of wrath.\nWhisperings (\u03c8\u03b9\u03b8\u03c5\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03af)\nPsithurismoi, the sound adapted to the sense. Only here in the New Testament. Secret slanders. In Sept., Ecc 10:11, it is used of the murmuring of a snake-charmer. \u03a8\u03b9\u03b8\u03c5\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03ae\u03c2 whisperer, occurs Rom 1:29.\nSwellings (\u03c6\u03c5\u03c3\u03b9\u03ce\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Conceited inflation. For the kindred verb \u03c6\u03c5\u03c3\u03b9\u03ac\u03c9 to puff up, see on Co1 4:6.\nTumults (\u1f00\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03b9)\nSee on Co2 6:5.\nAmong you (\u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u1f51\u03bc\u1fb6\u03c2)\nBetter, as Rev., before. In my relation to you.\nShall bewail (\u03c0\u03b5\u03bd\u03b8\u03ae\u03c3\u03c9)\nLament with a true pastor's sorrow over the sin.\nMany (\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2)\nWith special reference to the unchaste.\nSinned - already (\u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03b7\u03bc\u03b1\u03c1\u03c4\u03b7\u03ba\u03cc\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd)\nRev., heretofore. Only here and Co2 13:2. The perfect tense denotes the continuance of the sin. Heretofore probably refers to the time before his second visit.\nHave not repented (\u03bc\u1f74 \u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03b7\u03c3\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd)\nThe only occurrence of the verb in Paul's writings. \u039c\u03b5\u03c4\u03ac\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9\u03b1 repentance, occurs only three times: Rom 2:4; Co2 7:9, Co2 7:10.\nOf the uncleanness (\u1f10\u03c0\u1f76 \u03c4\u1fc7 \u1f00\u03ba\u03b1\u03b8\u03b1\u03c1\u03c3\u03af\u1fb3)\nConnect with bewail, not with repent. There are no examples in the New Testament of the phrase \u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd \u1f10\u03c0\u03af to repent over, though such occur in the Septuagint.\nLasciviousness (\u1f00\u03c3\u03b5\u03bb\u03b3\u03b5\u03af\u1fb3)\nSee on Mar 7:22.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: 2 Corinthians: 2 Corinthians Chapter 12","type":"page"}