{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/col001.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/col001.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/col001.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nColossae\nThe form of the name appears to have been both Kolossai and Kolassai, the former being probably the earlier.\nThe city was in Phrygia, in the valley of the Lycus, about ten or twelve miles beyond Laodicaea and Hierapolis. The region is volcanic, and the earthquakes common to large portions of Asia Minor are here peculiarly severe. The tributaries of the Lycus carried calcareous matter which formed everywhere deposits of travertine, said to be among the most remarkable formations of this character in the world. \"Ancient monuments are buried, fertile lands overlaid, river-beds choked up, and streams diverted, fantastic grottos and cascades and arches of stone formed by this strange, capricious power, at once destructive and creative, working silently and relentlessly through long ages. Fatal to vegetation, these incrustations spread like a stony shroud over the ground. Gleaming like glaciers on the hillside, they attract the eye of the traveler at a distance of twenty miles, and form a singularly striking feature in scenery of more than common beauty and impressiveness\" (Lightfoot).\nThe fertility of the region was nevertheless great. The fine sheep, and the chemical qualities of the streams which made the waters valuable for dyeing purposes, fostered a lively trade in dyed woolen goods. All the three cities were renowned for the brilliancy of their dyes.\nColossae stood at the junction of the Lycus with two other streams, on a highway between eastern and western Asia, and commanding the approaches to a pass in the Cadmus mountains. Both Herodotus and Xenophon speak of it as a prosperous and great city; but in Paul's time its glory had waned. Its site was at last completely lost, and was not identified until the present century. Its ruins are insignificant. Paul never visited either of the three cities. The church at Colossae was the least important of any to which Paul's epistles were addressed.\nTo the saints\nA mode of address which characterizes Paul's later epistles. The word is to be taken as a noun, and not construed as an adjective with faithful brethren: to the holy and faithful brethren.\nAnd faithful brethren in Christ\nOr believing brethren. Compare Eph 1:1. There is no singling out of the faithful brethren from among others who are less faithful.\nOur Father\nThe only instance in which the name of the Father stands in the opening benediction of an epistle without the addition and Jesus Christ.\nAnd the Father\nSome of the best texts omit and. So Rev. The form with and is the more common. Compare Col 3:17.\nPraying always for you\nRather connect always with we give thanks, and render we give thanks for you always, praying, or in our prayers. According to the Greek order, praying for you (as Rev. and A.V.), would make for you unduly emphatic.\nFor the hope (\u03b4\u03b9\u1f70 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u1f10\u03bb\u03c0\u03af\u03b4\u03b1)\nThe A.V. connects with we give thanks (Col 1:3). But the two are too far apart, and Paul's introductory thanksgiving is habitually grounded on the spiritual condition of his readers, not on something objective. See Rom 1:8; Co1 1:4; Eph 1:15. Better connect with what immediately precedes, love which ye have, and render as Rev., because of the hope, etc. Faith works by love, and the ground of their love is found in the hope set before them. Compare Rom 8:24. The motive is subordinate, but legitimate. \"The hope laid up in heaven is not the deepest reason or motive for faith and love, but both are made more vivid when it is strong. It is not the light at which their lamps are lit, but it is the odorous oil which feeds their flame\" (Maclaren). Hope. See on Pe1 1:3. In the New Testament the word signifies both the sentiment of hope and the thing hoped for. Here the latter. Compare Tit 2:13; Gal 5:5; Heb 6:18; also Rom 8:24, where both meanings appear. Lightfoot observes that the sense oscillates between the subjective feeling and the objective realization. The combination of faith, hope, and love is a favorite one with Paul. See Th1 1:3; Co1 13:13; Rom 5:1-5; Rom 12:6-12.\nLaid up (\u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b7\u03bd)\nLit., laid away, as the pound in the napkin, Luk 19:20. With the derivative sense of reserved or awaiting, as the crown, Ti2 4:8. In Heb 9:27, it is rendered appointed (unto men to die), where, however, the sense is the same: death awaits men as something laid up. Rev., in margin, laid up for. Compare treasure in heaven, Mat 6:20; Mat 19:21; Luk 12:34. \"Deposited, reserved, put by in store out of the reach of all enemies and sorrows\" (Bishop Wilson).\nYe heard before (\u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03b7\u03ba\u03bf\u03cd\u03c3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5)\nOnly here in the New Testament, not in Septuagint, and not frequent in classical Greek. It is variously explained as denoting either an undefined period in the past, or as contrasting the earlier Christian teaching with the later heresies, or as related to Paul's letter (before I wrote), or as related to the fulfillment of the hope (ye have had the hope pre-announced). It occurs several times in Herodotus in this last sense, as ii. 5, of one who has heard of Egypt without seeing it: v., 86, of the Aeginetans who had learned beforehand what the Athenians intended. Compare viii. 79; vi. 16. Xenophon uses it of a horse, which signifies by pricking up its ears what it hears beforehand. In the sense of mere priority of time without the idea of anticipation, Plato: \"Hear me once more, though you have heard me say the same before\" (\"Laws,\" vii., 797). I incline to the more general reference, ye heard in the past. The sense of hearing before the fulfillment of the hope would seem rather to require the perfect tense, since the hope still remained unfulfilled.\nThe word of the truth of the Gospel\nThe truth is the contents of the word, and the Gospel defines the character of the truth.\nWhich is come unto you (\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03cc\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u1f51\u03bc\u1fb6\u03c2)\nLit., which is present unto you. Has come and is present. Compare Luk 11:7, \"are with me into bed.\"\nIn all the world\nHyperbolical. Compare Rom 1:8; Th1 1:8; Act 17:6. Possibly with a suggestion of the universal character of the Gospel as contrasted with the local and special character of false Gospels. Compare Col 1:23.\nAnd bringeth forth fruit (\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f14\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c1\u03c0\u03bf\u03c6\u03bf\u03c1\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd)\nLit., and is bearing fruit. The text varies. The best texts omit and. Some join \u1f14\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9 is with the previous clause, as it is in all the world, and take bearing fruit as a parallel participle. So Rev. Others, better, join is with the participle, \"even as it is bearing fruit.\" This would emphasize the continuous fruitfulness of the Gospel. The middle voice of the verb, of which this is the sole instance, marks the fruitfulness of the Gospel by its own inherent power. Compare the active voice in Col 1:10, and see Mar 4:28, \"the earth bringeth forth fruit \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u03bc\u03ac\u03c4\u03b7 of herself, self-acting. For a similar use of the middle, see show, Eph 2:7; worketh, Gal 5:6.\nIncreasing (\u03b1\u1f50\u03be\u03b1\u03bd\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03b7\u03bd)\nNot found in Tex. Rec., nor in A.V., but added in later and better texts, and in Rev. \"Not like those plants which exhaust themselves in bearing fruit. The external growth keeps pace with the reproductive energy\" (Lightfoot). \"It makes wood as well\" (Maclaren).\nFellow-servant\nUsed by Paul only here and Col 4:7.\nMinister (\u03b4\u03b9\u03ac\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nSee on Mat 20:26; see on Mar 9:35.\nFor you (\u1f51\u03c0\u1f72\u03c1 \u1f51\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd)\nRead \u1f21\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd, us as Rev., on our behalf: as Paul's representative.\nDeclared (\u03b4\u03b7\u03bb\u03ce\u03c3\u03b1\u03c2)\nOr made manifest. See on Co1 1:11.\nIn the Spirit\nConnect with your love. Compare Gal 5:22.\nWe also\nMarking the reciprocal feeling of Paul and Timothy with that of the Colossians.\nPray - desire (\u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03b5\u03c5\u03c7\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 - \u03b1\u1f30\u03c4\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9)\nThe words occur together in Mar 11:24. The former is general, the latter special. Rev. make request is better than desire. The A.V. renders indiscriminately ask and desire. Rev. alters desire to ask. Desire in the sense of ask occurs in Shakespeare and Spenser.\nKnowledge (\u1f10\u03c0\u03af\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nSee on Rom 3:20; see on Plm 1:6. Full knowledge. See Rom 1:21, Rom 1:28; Co1 13:12, where Paul contrasts \u03b3\u03b9\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd to know \u03b3\u03bd\u1ff6\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 knowledge, with \u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03b3\u03b9\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd to know fully, \u1f10\u03c0\u03af\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 full knowledge. Here appropriate to the knowledge of God in Christ as the perfection of knowledge.\nWisdom and spiritual understanding (\u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03af\u1fb3 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u03c5\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u1fc7)\nRev., better, applies spiritual to both - spiritual wisdom and understanding. The kindred adjectives \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c2 wise and \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03cc\u03c2 prudent, occur together, Mat 11:25; Luk 10:21. For \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03af\u03b1 wisdom, see on Rom 11:33, and on wise, Jam 3:13. For \u03c3\u03cd\u03bd\u03b5\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 understanding, see on Mar 12:33, and see on prudent, Mat 11:25. The distinction is between general and special. Understanding is the critical apprehension of particulars growing out of wisdom, which apprehension is practically applied by \u03c6\u03c1\u03cc\u03bd\u03b7\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 prudence, see on Luk 1:17; see on Eph 1:8. Spiritual is emphatic, as contrasted with the vain philosophy of false teachers.\nWalk worthy (\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b9\u03c0\u03b1\u03c4\u1fc6\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9 \u1f00\u03be\u03af\u03c9\u03c2)\nThe phrase occurs Eph 4:1; Th1 2:12. Rev. gives the correct adverbial rendering worthily.\nUnto all pleasing (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c0\u1fb6\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u1f00\u03c1\u03ad\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1\u03bd)\nSo as to please God in all ways. Compare Th1 4:1, \u1f09\u03c1\u03ad\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 pleasing, only here in the New Testament. In classical Greek it has a bad sense, obsequiousness, cringing. Compare men-pleasers, Col 3:22.\nIn the knowledge (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u1f10\u03c0\u03af\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nLit. unto the knowledge. The best texts read \u03c4\u1fc7 \u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03b3\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \"by the knowledge:\" by means of.\nStrengthened (\u03b4\u03c5\u03bd\u03b1\u03bc\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9)\nOnly here in the New Testament, but found in Septuagint. The compound (\u1f10\u03bd\u03b4\u03c5\u03bd\u03b1\u03bc\u03cc\u03c9 to make strong) is frequent in Paul, Rom 4:20; Eph 6:10; Phi 4:13; Ti1 1:12.\nPower - might (\u03b4\u03c5\u03bd\u03ac\u03bc\u03b5\u03b9 - \u03ba\u03c1\u03ac\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2)\nSee on Pe2 2:11; see on Joh 1:12.\nGlory\nSee on Rom 3:23.\nPatience - long-suffering (\u1f51\u03c0\u03bf\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u1f74\u03bd - \u03bc\u03b1\u03ba\u03c1\u03bf\u03b8\u03c5\u03bc\u03af\u03b1\u03bd)\nSee on Pe2 1:6; see on Jam 5:7.\nWith joyfulness\nCompare Col 1:24; Jam 1:2, Jam 1:3; Pe1 4:13. Some connect with giving thanks, Col 1:12, and this is favored by the construction of the previous clauses: in every good work bearing fruit: with all power strengthened: with joy giving thanks. But Paul is not always careful to maintain the symmetry of his periods. The idea of joy is contained in thanksgiving, which would make the emphatic position of with joy inexplicable; besides which we lose thus the idea of joyful endurance (Col 1:24) and of joyful suffering expressing itself in thanksgiving. Compare Rom 5:3.\nMade us meet (\u1f31\u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9)\nSee on Co2 3:6.\nTo be partakers of the inheritance (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03bc\u03b5\u03c1\u03af\u03b4\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03ba\u03bb\u03ae\u03c1\u03bf\u03c5).\nLit., for the portion of the lot; that is, the portion which is the lot. Compare Act 8:21, where the two words are coordinated.\nIn light (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u1ff7 \u03c6\u03c9\u03c4\u03af)\nConnect with inheritance: the inheritance which is in light. This need not be limited to future glory. The children of God walk in light on earth. See Joh 3:21; Joh 11:9; Joh 12:36; Eph 5:8; Th1 5:5; Jo1 1:7; Jo1 2:10.\nPower (\u1f10\u03be\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03c2)\nSee on Mar 2:10.\nTranslated (\u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03ad\u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd)\nThe word occurs five times in the New Testament: of putting out of the stewardship, Luk 16:4; of the removal of Saul from the kingdom, Act 13:22; of Paul turning away much people, Act 19:26; and of removing mountains, Co1 13:2. A change of kingdoms is indicated.\nKingdom\nHence God's kingdom is in the present, no less than in heaven. See on Luk 6:20.\nOf His dear Son (\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c5\u1f31\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u1f00\u03b3\u03ac\u03c0\u03b7\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6)\nLit., of the Son of His love. So Rev. The Son who is the object of His love, and to whom, therefore, the kingdom is given. See Psa 2:7, Psa 2:8; Heb 1:3-9. It is true that love is the essence of the Son as of the Father; also, that the Son's mission is the revelation of the Father's love; but, as Meyer correctly says, \"the language refers to the exalted Christ who rules.\"\nRedemption (\u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03cd\u03c4\u03c1\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nSee on Rom 3:24. Continuing the image of an enslaved and ransomed people. Omit through His blood.\nForgiveness (\u1f04\u03c6\u03b5\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nSee on remission, Rom 3:25; see on forgiven, Jam 5:15. Forgiveness defines redemption. Lightfoot's suggestion is very interesting that this precise definition may convey an allusion to the perversion of the term \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03cd\u03c4\u03c1\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 by the Gnostics of a later age, and which was possibly foreshadowed in the teaching of the Colossian heretics. The Gnostics used it to signify the result of initiation into certain mysteries. Lightfoot quotes from Irenaeus the baptismal formula of the Marcosians \"into unity and redemption (\u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03cd\u03c4\u03c1\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd) and communion of powers.\" The idea of a redemption of the world, and (in a perverted form) of the person and work of Christ as having part in it, distinctively marked the Gnostic schools. That from which the world was redeemed, however; was not sin, in the proper sense of the term, but something inherent in the constitution of the world itself, and therefore due to its Creator.\nIn the following passage the person of Christ is defined as related to God and to creation; and absolute supremacy is claimed for Him. See Introduction to this volume, and compare Eph 1:20-23, and Phi 2:6-11.\nThe image (\u03b5\u1f30\u03ba\u03ce\u03bd)\nSee on Rev 13:14. For the Logos (Word) underlying the passage, see on Joh 1:1. Image is more than likeness which may be superficial and incidental. It implies a prototype, and embodies the essential verity of its prototype. Compare in the form of God, Phi 2:6 (note), and the effulgence of the Father's glory, Heb 1:3. Also Jo1 1:1.\nOf the invisible God (\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u0398\u03b5\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u1f00\u03bf\u03c1\u03ac\u03c4\u03bf\u03c5)\nLit., of the God, the invisible. Thus is brought out the idea of manifestation which lies in image. See on Rev 13:14.\nThe first born of every creature (\u03c0\u03c1\u03c9\u03c4\u03cc\u03c4\u03bf\u03ba\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c3\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03ba\u03c4\u03af\u03c3\u03b5\u03c9\u03c2)\nRev., the first-born of all creation. For first-born, see on Rev 1:5; for creation, see on Co2 5:17. As image points to revelation, so first-born points to eternal preexistence. Even the Rev. is a little ambiguous, for we must carefully avoid any suggestion that Christ was the first of created things, which is contradicted by the following words: in Him were all things created. The true sense is, born before the creation. Compare before all things, Col 1:17. This fact of priority implies sovereignty. He is exalted above all thrones, etc., and all things are unto (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2) Him, as they are elsewhere declared to be unto God. Compare Psa 89:27; Heb 1:2.\nBy him (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff6)\nRev., in Him. In is not instrumental but local; not denying the instrumentality, but putting the fact of creation with reference to its sphere and center. In Him, within the sphere of His personality, resides the creative will and the creative energy, and in that sphere the creative act takes place. Thus creation was dependent on Him. In Christ is a very common phrase with Paul to express the Church's relation to Him. Thus \"one body in Christ,\" Rom 12:5; \"fellow-workers in Jesus Christ,\" Rom 16:3. Compare Rom 16:7, Rom 16:9, Rom 16:11; Co1 1:30; Co1 4:15, etc.\nAll things (\u03c4\u1f70 \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1)\nThe article gives a collective sense - the all, the whole universe of things. Without the article it would be all things severally.\nWere created (\u1f10\u03ba\u03c4\u03af\u03c3\u03b8\u03b7)\nSee on Joh 1:3. The aorist tense, denoting a definite historical event.\nVisible - invisible\nNot corresponding to earthly and heavenly. There are visible things in heaven, such as the heavenly bodies, and invisible things on earth, such as the souls of men.\nThrones, dominions, principalities, powers (\u03b8\u03c1\u03cc\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9, \u03ba\u03c5\u03c1\u03b9\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2, \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1f76, \u1f10\u03be\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03b9)\nCompare Eph 1:21; Eph 3:10; Eph 6:12; Co1 15:24; Rom 8:38; Col 2:10, Col 2:15; Tit 3:1. In Tit 3:1, they refer to earthly dignities, and these are probably included in Co1 15:24. It is doubtful whether any definite succession of rank is intended. At any rate it is impossible to accurately define the distinctions. It has been observed that wherever principalities (\u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1f76) and powers (\u1f10\u03be\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03b9) occur together, principalities always precedes, and that \u03b4\u03cd\u03bd\u03b1\u03bc\u03b9\u03c2 power (see Eph 1:21) when occurring with either of the two, follows it; or, when occurring with both, follows both. The primary reference is, no doubt, to the celestial orders; but the expressions things on earth, and not only in this world in the parallel passage, Eph 1:21, indicate that it may possibly include earthly dignities. Principalities and powers are used of both good and evil powers. See Eph 3:10; Eph 6:12; Col 2:15. The passage is aimed at the angel-worship of the Colossians (see Introduction); showing that while they have been discussing the various grades of angels which fill the space between God and men, and depending on them as media of communion with God, they have degraded Christ who is above them all, and is the sole mediator. Compare Heb 1:5-14, where the ideas of the Son as Creator and as Lord of the angels are also combined. Thrones occurs only here in enumerations of this kind. It seems to indicate the highest grade. Compare Rev 4:4, \u03b8\u03c1\u03cc\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 thrones, A.V. seats, and see note. Thrones here probably means the enthroned angels. Dominions or dominations, also Eph 1:21. Principalities or princedoms. In Rom 8:38, this occurs without powers which usually accompanies it.\nRecapitulating. Collectively as before.\nWere created (\u1f14\u03ba\u03c4\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nRev., correctly, have been created. The perfect tense instead of the aorist, as at the beginning of the verse. \"The latter describes the definite, historical act of creation; the former the continuous and present relations of creation to the Creator\" (Lightfoot). So Joh 1:3. \"Without Him did not any thing come into being (\u1f10\u03b3\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03bf, aorist) which hath come into being\" (and exists, \u03b3\u03ad\u03b3\u03bf\u03bd\u03b5\u03bd, see note).\nBy Him and for Him (\u03b4\u03b9' \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd)\nRev., better, through Him and unto Him. See on Rom 11:36. Compare in Him at the beginning of the verse. There Christ was represented as the conditional cause of all things. All things came to pass within the sphere of His personality and as dependent upon it. Here He appears as the mediating cause; through Him, as Co1 8:6. Unto Him. All things, as they had their beginning in Him, tend to Him as their consummation, to depend on and serve Him. Compare Rev 22:13; and Heb 2:10; \"for whose sake (\u03b4\u03b9' \u1f43\u03bd) and through whose agency (\u03b4\u03b9' \u03bf\u1f57) are all things\" Rev., \"for whom and through whom.\" See also Eph 1:10, Eph 1:23; Eph 4:10; Phi 2:9-11; Co1 15:28. The false teachers maintained that the universe proceeded from God indirectly, through a succession of emanations. Christ, at best, was only one of these. As such, the universe could not find its consummation in Him.\nHe is (\u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78\u03c2 \u1f14\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd)\nBoth words are emphatic. \u1f1c\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd is, is used as in Joh 8:58 (see note), to express Christ's absolute existence. \"He emphasizes the personality, is the preexistence\" (Lightfoot). For similar emphasis on the pronoun, see Eph 2:14; Eph 4:10, Eph 4:11; Jo1 2:2; Rev 19:15.\nBefore all things\nIn time.\nBy Him (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff7)\nIn Him as Col 1:16. So Rev.\nConsist (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd)\nCohere, in mutual dependence. Compare Act 27:28; Heb 1:3. For other meanings of the verb, see on Rom 3:5. Christ not only creates, but maintains in continuous stability and productiveness. \"He, the All-powerful, All-holy Word of the Father, spreads His power over all things everywhere, enlightening things seen and unseen, holding and binding all together in Himself. Nothing is left empty of His presence, but to all things and through all, severally and collectively, He is the giver and sustainer of life.... He, the Wisdom of God, holds the universe in tune together. He it is who, binding all with each, and ordering all things by His will and pleasure, produces the perfect unity of nature and the harmonious reign of law. While He abides unmoved forever with the Father, He yet moves all things by His own appointment according to the Father's will\" (Athanasius).\nAnd He\nEmphatic. The same who is before all things and in whom all things consist.\nThe head of the body, the Church\nThe Church is described as a body, Rom 12:4 sq.; 1 Corinthians 12:12-27; Co1 10:17, by way of illustrating the functions of the members. Here the image is used to emphasize the position and power of Christ as the head. Compare Col 2:19; Eph 1:22, Eph 1:23; Eph 4:4, Eph 4:12, Eph 4:15, Eph 4:16; Eph 5:23, Eph 5:30.\nWho is the beginning (\u1f45\u03c2 \u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u1f74)\nWho is, equivalent to seeing He is. Beginning, with reference to the Church; not the beginning of the Church, but of the new life which subsists in the body - the Church.\nThe first-born from the dead (\u03c0\u03c1\u03c9\u03c4\u03cc\u03c4\u03bf\u03ba\u03bf\u03c2 \u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u03bd\u03b5\u03ba\u03c1\u1ff6\u03bd)\nDefining how Christ is the beginning of the new spiritual life: by His resurrection. Compare Co1 15:20, Co1 15:23, and Prince of life, Act 3:15 (note) See on Rev 1:5, where the phrase is slightly different, \"first-born of the dead.\" He comes forth from among the dead as the first-born issues from the womb. Compare Act 2:4, \"having loosed the pains of death,\" where the Greek is \u1f60\u03b4\u1fd6\u03bd\u03b1\u03c2 birth-throes. There is a parallelism between first-born of the creation and first-born from the dead as regards the relation of headship in which Christ stands to creation and to the Church alike; but the parallelism is not complete. \"He is the first-born from the dead as having been Himself one of the dead. He is not the first-born of all creation as being himself created\" (Dwight).\nIn all things\nThe universe and the Church.\nMight have the preeminence (\u03b3\u03ad\u03bd\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c0\u03c1\u03c9\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03c9\u03bd)\nLit., might become being first. \u03a0\u03c1\u03c9\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03c9 to be first only here in the New Testament. \u0393\u03ad\u03bd\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 become states a relation into which Christ came in the course of time: \u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd is (the first-born of all creation) states a relation of Christ's absolute being. He became head of the Church through His incarnation and passion, as He is head of the universe in virtue of His absolute and eternal being. Compare Phi 2:6, \"being (\u1f51\u03c0\u03ac\u03c1\u03c7\u03c9\u03bd) in the form of God - was made (\u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2) obedient unto death.\" This sense is lost in the rendering might have the preeminence.\nIt pleased the Father that in Him should all fullness dwell (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff7 \u03b5\u1f50\u03b4\u03cc\u03ba\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd \u03c0\u1fb6\u03bd \u03c4\u1f78 \u03c0\u03bb\u03ae\u03c1\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u1fc6\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9)\n\u0395\u1f50\u03b4\u03bf\u03ba\u03ad\u03c9 to think it good, to be well pleased is used in the New Testament, both of divine and of human good-pleasure; but, in the former case, always of God the Father. So Mat 3:17; Luk 12:32; Co1 1:21. The subject of was well pleased, God, is omitted as in Jam 1:12, and must be supplied; so that, literally, the passage would read, God was well pleased that in Him, etc. Rev., it was the good pleasure of the Father. Fullness, Rev, correctly, the fullness. See on Rom 11:12; see on Joh 1:16. The word must be taken in its passive sense - that with which a thing is filled, not that which fills. The fullness denotes the sum-total of the divine powers and attributes. In Christ dwelt all the fullness of God as deity. The relation of essential deity to creation and redemption alike, is exhibited by John in the very beginning of his gospel, with which this passage should be compared. In John the order is: 1. The essential nature of Christ; 2. Creation; 3. Redemption. Here it is: 1. Redemption (Col 1:13); 2. Essential being of the Son (Col 1:15); 3. The Son as Creator (Col 1:16); 4. The Church, with Christ as its head (Col 1:18). Compare Co2 5:19; Eph 1:19, Eph 1:20, Eph 1:23. Paul does not add of the Godhead to the fullness, as in Col 2:9 since the word occurs in direct connection with those which describe Christ's essential nature, and it would seem not to have occurred to the apostle that it could be understood in any other sense than as an expression of the plenitude of the divine attributes and powers.\nThus the phrase in Him should all the fullness dwell gathers into a grand climax the previous statements - image of God, first-born of all creation, Creator, the eternally preexistent, the Head of the Church, the victor over death, first in all things. On this summit we pause, looking, like John, from Christ in His fullness of deity to the exhibition of that divine fullness in redemption consummated in heaven (Col 1:20-22).\nThere must also be taken into the account the selection of this word fullness with reference to the false teaching in the Colossian church, the errors which afterward were developed more distinctly in the Gnostic schools. Pleroma fullness was used by the Gnostic teachers in a technical sense, to express the sum-total of the divine powers and attributes. \"From the pleroma they supposed that all those agencies issued through which God has at any time exerted His power in creation, or manifested His will through revelation. These mediatorial beings would retain more or less of its influence, according as they claimed direct parentage from it, or traced their descent through successive evolutions. But in all cases this pleroma was distributed, diluted, transformed, and darkened by foreign admixture. They were only partial and blurred images, often deceptive caricatures, of their original, broken lights of the great Central Light\" (Lightfoot). Christ may have been ranked with these inferior images of the divine by the Colossian teachers. Hence the significance of the assertion that the totality of the divine dwells in Him.\nDwell (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u1fc6\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9)\nPermanently. See on Luk 11:26. Compare the Septuagint usage of \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd permanent dwelling, and \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd transient sojourning. Thus Gen 37:1, \"Jacob dwelt (permanently, \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u1ff4\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9) in the land where his father sojourned (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u1ff7\u03ba\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd A.V., was a stranger). Perhaps in contrast with the partial and transient connection of the pleroma with Christ asserted by the false teachers. The word is used of the indwelling of the Father, Eph 2:22 (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u03b7\u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u0398\u03b5\u03bf\u1fe6 habitation of God); of the Son, Eph 3:17; and of the Spirit, Jam 4:5.\nHaving made peace (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c1\u03b7\u03bd\u03bf\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03ae\u03c3\u03b1\u03c2)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Having concluded peace; see on Joh 3:21. The participle is parallel with to reconcile, and marks peace-making and reconciliation as contemporaneous. The kindred \u03b5\u1f30\u03c1\u03b7\u03bd\u03bf\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03cc\u03c2 peacemaker, only in Mat 5:9. The phrase making peace, in which the two factors of this verb appear separately, occurs only Eph 2:15.\nTo reconcile (\u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03be\u03b1\u03b9)\nOnly here, Col 1:21, and Eph 2:16. The connection is: it was the good pleasure of the Father (Col 1:19) to reconcile. The compounded preposition \u1f00\u03c0\u03cc gives the force of back, hinting at restoration to a primal unity. So, in Eph 2:12-16, it occurs as in Col 1:21, in connection with \u1f00\u03c0\u03b7\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf\u03c4\u03c1\u03b9\u03c9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 alienated, as if they had not always been strangers. See on Eph 2:12. Others explain to reconcile wholly. For the verb \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03c3\u03c3\u03c9 to reconcile, see on Rom 5:10.\nMust be taken in the same sense as in Col 1:16, Col 1:17, Col 1:18, the whole universe, material and spiritual. The arrangement of clauses adopted by Rev. is simpler.\nEnemies\nTo God, in the active sense.\nMind (\u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03af\u1fb3)\nSee on imagination, Luk 1:51. The spiritual seat of enmity.\nBy wicked works (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u1f14\u03b3\u03c1\u03bf\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03bd\u03b7\u03c1\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2)\nRev., better, in your evil works. In the performance of - the sphere in which, outwardly, their alienation had exhibited itself.\nBody of His flesh\nWhich consisted of flesh; without which there could have been no death (see next clause).\nTo present (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u1fc6\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9)\nPurpose of the reconciliation. Compare Rom 8:30. See on shewed himself, Act 1:3. Compare Rom 12:1, where it is used of presenting a sacrifice.\nHoly, unblamable, unreprovable (\u1f01\u03b3\u03af\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2, \u1f00\u03bc\u03ce\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2, \u1f00\u03bd\u03b5\u03b3\u03ba\u03bb\u03ae\u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2)\nHoly, see on saints, Act 26:10; see on Rev 3:7. The fundamental idea of the word is separation unto God and from worldly defilement. Unblamable, Rev. much better, without blemish. Compare Eph 1:4; Eph 5:27; and see on Pe1 1:19, and see on blemishes, Pe2 2:13. Unreprovable, not only actually free from blemish, but from the charge of it. See on Co1 1:8, and compare Ti1 6:14.\nIn His sight (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u03ce\u03c0\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03bf\u03c4\u1fe6)\nRev., before Him. Him refers to God, not Christ. Whether the reference is to God's future judgment or to His present approval, can hardly be determined by the almost unexceptional usage of \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u03bd\u03ce\u03c0\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd before, in the latter sense, as is unquestionably the case in Eph 1:4. The simple \u1f10\u03bd\u03ce\u03c0\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd before, is used in the former sense, Luk 12:9. \u1f1c\u03bc\u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03b8\u03b5\u03bd before, occurs in both senses. The reference to the future judgment seems the more natural as marking the consummation of the redemptive work described in Col 1:20-22. Compare Th1 3:13, and Eph 5:27, which corresponds with the figure of the bride, the Lamb's wife, in Rev 21:9 sqq. This view is further warranted by the following words, if ye continue, etc., the final presentation being dependent on steadfastness.\nContinue in the faith (\u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5 \u03c4\u1fc7 \u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03b9)\nThe verb means to stay at or with (\u1f10\u03c0\u03af). So Phi 1:24, to abide by the flesh. See on Rom 6:1. The faith is not the gospel system (see on Act 6:7), but the Colossians' faith in Christ. Your faith would be better.\nGrounded and settled (\u03c4\u03b5\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03b5\u03c9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f11\u03b4\u03c1\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03b9)\nFor grounded, see on settle, Pe1 5:10; compare Luk 6:48, Luk 6:49; Eph 3:17. Settled, from \u1f15\u03b4\u03c1\u03b1 a seat. Rev., steadfast. See Co1 7:37; Co1 15:58, the only other passages where it occurs. Compare \u1f11\u03b4\u03c1\u03b1\u03af\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1 ground, Ti1 3:15. Bengel says: \"The former is metaphorical, the latter more literal. The one implies greater respect to the foundation by which believers are supported; but settled suggests inward strength which believers themselves possess.\"\nMoved away (\u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03ba\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9)\nThe present participle signifying continual shifting. Compare Co1 15:58.\nTo every creature (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c0\u03ac\u03c3\u1fc3 \u03ba\u03c4\u03af\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9)\nRev, correctly, in all creation. See on Co2 5:17, and compare Col 1:15.\nWho now\nOmit who. Now is temporal: in the midst of my imprisonment and sufferings, after having become a minister of the Gospel, and having preached it.\nIn my sufferings\nNot as our idiom, rejoice in, as rejoice in the Lord, but in the midst of; while enduring.\nFill up (\u1f00\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u1ff6)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Lit., fill up in turn. Rev., on my part (\u1f00\u03bd\u03c4\u03af) \u1f09\u03bd\u03b1\u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03cc\u03c9 to fill up occurs Co1 14:16; Co1 16:17; Gal 6:2, and elsewhere. The double compound \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03cc\u03c9 to fill up by adding, Co2 9:12 (note); Co2 11:9. \u1f09\u03bd\u03c4\u03af on my part offsets Christ in the next clause. Lightfoot explains well: \"It signifies that the supply comes from an opposite quarter to the deficiency, and so describes the correspondence of the personal agents,\" and not merely the correspondence of the supply with the deficiency.\nThat which is lacking of the afflictions of Christ (\u03c4\u1f70 \u1f51\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ae\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1 \u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u03b8\u03bb\u03af\u03c8\u03b5\u03c9\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03a7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6)\nLacking, lit., behind. Used with different compounds of \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03cc\u03c9 to fill, Co1 16:17; Co2 9:12; Co2 11:9; Phi 2:30. Of the afflictions of Christ. The afflictions which Christ endured; which belonged to Him: not Paul's afflictions described as Christ's because endured in fellowship with Him (Meyer); nor the afflictions which Christ endures in His Church (Alford, Ellicott, Eadie).\nThese afflictions do not include Christ's vicarious sufferings, which are never denoted by \u03b8\u03bb\u03af\u03c8\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2 tribulations. That which is lacking of the afflictions of Christ signifies that portion of Christ's ministerial sufferings which was not endured by Him in person, but is endured in the suffering of Christians in all generations in carrying out Christ's work. Compare Co2 1:5, Co2 1:7; Phi 3:10. Hence those are mistaken interpretations which explain the filling up as a correspondence of the supply with the deficiency. The correspondence is between the two parties, Christ and His followers, and the supply does not correspond with the deficiency, but works toward supplying it. The point is not the identification of Paul with Christ in His sufferings (which is true as a fact), but the distinction between Paul and Christ. Hence the present tense, I am filling up, denoting something still in process. The full tale of sufferings will not be completed until the Church shall have finished her conflict, and shall have come up \"out of great tribulation\" to sit at the marriage-supper of the Lamb.\nIn my flesh\nConnect with fill up.\nFor His body's sake, which is the Church\n\u03a3\u03ac\u03c1\u03be flesh is never used of a metaphorical organism like the Church, but \u03c3\u1ff6\u03bc\u03b1 body. See on flesh, Rom 7:5, sec. 3. In Col 1:22, flesh was used with body in order to define the reference of body to the fleshly human organism of Christ. Compare Joh 1:14. Here \u03c3\u1ff6\u03bc\u03b1 body only, defined by Church.\nThe dispensation (\u03bf\u1f30\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03af\u03b1\u03bd)\nFrom \u03bf\u1f36\u03ba\u03bf\u03c2 house and \u03bd\u03ad\u03bc\u03c9 to dispense or manage. Hence \u03bf\u1f30\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u03cc\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 a house-steward. Here the meaning is stewardship - the office of a steward or administrator in God's house. See on Co1 9:17, and compare Luk 16:2-4; Co1 4:1; Tit 1:7; Pe1 4:10. In Eph 3:2, the word is used of the divine arrangement or economy committed to Paul. In Eph 1:10 of the divine government or regulation of the world.\nFor you (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u1f51\u03bc\u1fb6\u03c2)\nRev., more strictly, to youward. Connect with was given. The stewardship was assigned to me with you as its object. Compare Eph 3:2; Rom 15:16.\nTo fulfill (\u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u1ff6\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9)\nFully discharge my office, so that the divine intent shall be fully carried out in the preaching of the Gospel to the Gentiles no less than to the Jews. Compare fully preached, Rom 15:19.\nThe mystery\nSee on Rom 11:25. The kindred word \u03bc\u03b5\u03bc\u03cd\u03b7\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 I have been initiated (A.V., instructed) occurs Phi 4:12, in the sense drawn from the technical use of the term, denoting the induction into pagan mysteries. Ignatius addresses the Ephesians as \"fellow-initiates (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bc\u03bc\u03cd\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9), or students of the mysteries, with Paul\" (Ephesians, 12). In the New Testament the word implies something which, while it may be obscure in its nature, or kept hidden in the past, is now revealed. Hence used very commonly with words denoting revelation or knowledge. So, \"to know the mysteries,\" Mat 13:11; \"revelation of the mystery,\" Rom 16:25; made known, Eph 3:3, etc. In Colossians and Ephesians it is used, with a single exception, of the admission of the Gentiles to gospel privileges. Compare Rom 16:25, Rom 16:26.\nFrom ages - generations (\u1f00\u03c0\u1f78 - \u03b1\u1f30\u03ce\u03bd\u03c9\u03bd - \u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03b5\u1ff6\u03bd)\nThe unit and the factors: the aeon or age being made up of generations. Compare Eph 3:21, where the literal translation is unto all the generations of the age of the ages. The preposition \u1f00\u03c0\u1f78 from, differs from \u03c0\u03c1\u03cc before (Co1 2:7), as marking the point from which concealment could properly begin. Before the beginning of the ages of the world the counsel of God was ordained, but not concealed, because there were no human beings from whom to conceal it. The concealment began from the beginning of the world, with the entrance of subjects to whom it could be a fact.\nWould make known (\u1f20\u03b8\u03ad\u03bb\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd \u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c1\u03af\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9)\nLit., willed to make known. Rev., was pleased. Hence the apostles who were called to make known the Gospel were such by the will of God (Col 1:1).\nRiches\nSee on Rom 2:4.\nOf the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles\nThe mystery of the admission of the Gentiles to the gospel covenant, now revealed through Paul's preaching, was divinely rich and glorious. This glory is the manifestation of the kingdom of Christ among the Gentiles as their inheritance (Col 1:12; compare Rom 8:18, Rom 8:21; Co2 4:17). The richness exhibited itself in the free dispensation of the Gospel to the Gentile as well as to the Jew. It was not limited by national lines. Compare \"the same Lord is rich unto all,\" Rom 10:12; and beggarly elements, Gal 4:9.\nWhich is Christ in you\nThe readings differ. Some read \u1f45\u03c2, masculine, which, referring to the riches: others \u1f43, neuter, which, referring to mystery. The latter corresponds with Col 2:2, the mystery of God, Christ, etc. In either case the defining words are Christ in you, i.e., in the Gentiles; either as constituting the richness of glory in this mystery, or as being the essence of the myself itself. In you may be either within you, dwelling in your hearts, or among you. The latter accords with among the Gentiles, the former with dwell in your hearts, Eph 3:17. Compare Rom 8:10; Co2 13:5; Gal 4:19.\nThe hope of glory (\u1f21 \u1f10\u03bb\u03c0\u1f76\u03c2 \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03b4\u03cc\u03be\u03b7\u03c2)\nLit., of the glory. The Gentiles, in receiving the manifestation of Christ, did not realize all its glory. The full glory of the inheritance was a hope, to be realized when Christ should appear \"the second time unto salvation\" (Heb 9:28). Compare Ti1 1:1. Glory refers to the glory of the mystery; hence the glory, but with more emphasis upon the idea of the same glory consummated at Christ's coming - the glory which shall be revealed. See Rom 8:18; Co2 4:17; Pe1 1:7\nWarning (\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03b8\u03b5\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2)\nRev., admonishing. See on Act 20:31. Compare \u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03b8\u03b5\u03c3\u03af\u1fb3 admonition, Eph 6:4.\nEvery\nThrice repeated, in order to emphasize the universality of the Gospel against the intellectual exclusiveness encouraged by the false teachers. For similar emphatic repetitions of all or every, compare Co1 10:1, Co1 10:2; Co1 12:13; Rom 9:6, Rom 9:7; Rom 11:32, etc.\nIn all wisdom (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c0\u03ac\u03c3\u1fc3 \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03af\u1fb3)\nIn every form of wisdom. Thus opposed to the idea of esoteric and exoteric wisdom represented by the false teachers; higher knowledge for the few philosophic minds, and blind faith for the masses. In christian teaching the highest wisdom is freely open to all. Compare Col 2:2, Col 2:3.\nPerfect\nCompare Co1 2:6, Co1 2:7, and see note. There may be in this word a hint of its use in the ancient mysteries to designate the fully instructed as distinguished from the novices. Peter uses the technical word \u1f10\u03c0\u03cc\u03c0\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 eye-witnesses, which designated one admitted to the highest grade in the Eleusinian mysteries, of those who beheld Christ's glory in His transfiguration, Pe2 1:16. From this point of view Bishop Lightfoot appropriately says: \"The language of the heathen mysteries is transferred by Paul to the christian dispensation, that he may the more effectively contrast the things signified. The true Gospel also has its mysteries, its hierophants, its initiation; but these are open to all alike. In Christ every believer is \u03c4\u03ad\u03bb\u03b5\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2 fully initiated, for he has been admitted as \u1f10\u03c0\u03cc\u03c0\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 eye-witness of its most profound, most awful secrets.\"\nI labor (\u03ba\u03bf\u03c0\u03b9\u1ff6)\nUnto weariness. See on Luk 5:5. The connection with the following \u1f00\u03b3\u03c9\u03bd\u03b9\u03b6\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 contending in the arena, seems to show that I labor has the special sense of labor in preparing for the contest. The same combination occurs Ti1 4:10, where the correct reading is \u1f00\u03b3\u03c9\u03bd\u03b9\u03b6\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03b8\u03b1 we strive for \u1f40\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03b4\u03b9\u03b6\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03b8\u03b1 we suffer reproach; and there is a similar combination, Phi 2:16, run and labor. So Ignatius, Epistle to Polycarp, 6: \"Labor ye one with another (\u03c3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03bf\u03c0\u03b9\u1fb6\u03c4\u03b5); strive together (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b1\u03b8\u03bb\u03b5\u1fd6\u03c4\u03b5, see Phi 1:27); run together, suffer together, go to rest together, arise together\" (the last two probably with reference to the uniform hours prescribed for athletes under training). So Clement of Rome: \"Who have labored (\u03ba\u03bf\u03c0\u03b9\u03ac\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2) much, and contended (\u1f00\u03b3\u03c9\u03bd\u03b9\u03c3\u03ac\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9) honorably\" (ii. 7). See on Co1 9:24-27.\nStriving (\u1f00\u03b3\u03c9\u03bd\u03b9\u03b6\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nFrom \u1f00\u03b3\u03ce\u03bd originally an assembly, a place of assembly, especially for viewing the games. Hence the contest itself, the word being united with different adjectives indicating the character of the contest, as \u1f31\u03c0\u03c0\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 of horses; \u03b3\u03c5\u03bc\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 gymnastic; \u03bc\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 of music; \u03c7\u03ac\u03bb\u03ba\u03b5\u03bf\u03c2, where the prize is a brazen shield, etc. Generally, any struggle or trial. Hence the verb means to enter a contest, to contend, to struggle. The metaphor is a favorite one with Paul, and, with the exception of three instances (Luk 13:24; Joh 18:36; Heb 12:1), the words \u1f00\u03b3\u03ce\u03bd contest and \u1f00\u03b3\u03c9\u03bd\u03af\u03b6\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 to contend are found only in his writings. See Ti1 6:12; Ti2 4:7; Co1 9:25 (note); Th1 2:2.\nWorking (\u1f10\u03bd\u03ad\u03c1\u03b3\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1\u03bd)\nFrom \u1f10\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03ae\u03c2 \u1f10\u03bd in, \u1f14\u03c1\u03b3\u03bf\u03bd work; lit. being in or at work. See on Co1 16:9. \u1f18\u03bd\u03ad\u03c1\u03b3\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 is the state of being at work; energy, efficiency. Used only of superhuman energy, good or evil.\nWhich worketh (\u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u1f10\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03bf\u03c5\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b7\u03bd)\nKindred with the preceding. See on Jam 5:16.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: Colossians: Colossians Chapter 1","type":"page"}