{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/col002.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/col002.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/col002.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nI would that ye knew (\u03b8\u03ad\u03bb\u03c9 \u1f51\u03bc\u1fb6\u03c2 \u03b5\u1f30\u03b4\u03ad\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9)\nPaul's more usual form of expression is, I would not have you to be ignorant. See on Rom 1:13.\nWhat great conflict I have (\u1f21\u03bb\u03af\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd \u1f00\u03b3\u1ff6\u03bd\u03b1 \u1f14\u03c7\u03c9)\nRev., how greatly I strive. \u1f29\u03bb\u03af\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd what great, only here and Jam 3:5. Conflict, continuing the metaphor of Col 1:29. Here of inward conflict, anxiety, prayer, as Col 4:12.\nLaodicaea\nSee on Rev 3:14.\nAnd for as many as (\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f45\u03c3\u03bf\u03b9)\nIncluding all who come under the same category as the Colossians and Laodicaeans. Hence equivalent to all who, like yourselves, have not seen, etc. See, for a similar usage, Act 4:6; Rev 18:17. Indicating that the Colossians and Laodicaeans were both personally unknown to Paul.\nComforted (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03ba\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u1ff6\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nNot so much tranquilized as braced. See on Joh 14:16.\nKnit together (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bc\u03b2\u03b9\u03b2\u03b1\u03c3\u03b8\u03ad\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2)\nSee on proving, Act 9:22. In the Septuagint it means to instruct, as Exo 18:16; Deu 4:9; Isa 40:13 (compare Co1 2:16); Psa 31:8. Used of putting together in one's mind, and so to conclude by comparison. Thus Act 16:10, assuredly gathering, Rev., concluding.\nFull assurance (\u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03bf\u03c6\u03bf\u03c1\u03af\u03b1\u03c2)\nOr fullness. See Heb 6:11; Heb 10:22.\nOf understanding (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c3\u03b5\u03c9\u03c2)\nSee on Mar 12:33; see on Luk 2:47.\nTo the acknowledgment (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u1f10\u03c0\u03af\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nWrong. \u1f19\u03c0\u03af\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 is the full knowledge, as Col 1:9 (note). Rev., that they may know.\nOf God\nThe best textual authorities add \u03a7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 of Christ. So Rev., of God, even Christ. Christ is in apposition with mystery. Compare Col 1:27.\nHid (\u1f00\u03c0\u03cc\u03ba\u03c1\u03c5\u03c6\u03bf\u03b9)\nOnly here, Mar 4:22; Luk 8:17. Compare Co1 2:7. Not to be joined with are, as A.V. Its position at the end of the sentence, and so far from are, shows that it is added as an emphatic secondary predicate. Hence, as Rev., in whom are all the treasures, etc., hidden. For a similar construction, see Col 3:1, \"where Christ is on the right hand of God seated (there).\" Jam 1:17, \"Every perfect gift is from above, coming down.\" Grammatically, hidden may be taken as an attribute of treasures; \"in whom the hidden treasures are contained;\" but the other is preferable. The words which immediately follow in Col 2:4, suggest the possibility that hidden may convey an allusion to the Apocrypha or secret writings of the Essenes, whose doctrines entered into the Colossian heresy. Such writings, which, later, were peculiar also to the Gnostics, contained the authoritative secret wisdom, the esoteric teaching for the learned few. If such is Paul's allusion, the word suggests a contrast with the treasures of christian wisdom which are accessible to all in Christ.\nWisdom and knowledge\nSee on Rom 11:33.\nBeguile (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b6\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nOnly here and Jam 1:22. See note. Rev., delude. So Ignatius, speaking of the duty of obedience to the bishop, says: \"He that fails in this, does not deceive the visible bishop, but attempts to cheat (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9) the Invisible\" (Epistle to Magnesians, 3). The word is found in the Septuagint, Jos 9:22; Sa1 19:17; Sa2 21:5.\nEnticing words (\u03c0\u03b9\u03b8\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u1fb3)\nRev., persuasiveness of speech. Only here in the New Testament. In classical Greek, of probable argument as opposed to demonstration. So Plato: \"Reflect whether you are disposed to admit of probability (\u03c0\u03b9\u03b8\u03b1\u03bd\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u1fb3) and figures of speech in matters of such importance\" (\"Theaetetus,\" 163). Compare Co1 2:4.\nOrder (\u03c4\u03ac\u03be\u03b9\u03bd)\nOr orderly array. A military metaphor, quite possibly suggested by Paul's intercourse with the soldiers in his confinement. See on Phi 1:13.\nSteadfastness (\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ad\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1)\nOnly here in the New Testament. See on Pe1 5:9. The kindred adjective \u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03b5\u03cc\u03c2 solid, occurs Ti2 2:19; Heb 5:12; Pe1 5:9; and the verb \u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03b5\u03cc\u03c9 to make solid, Act 3:7; Act 16:5. The military metaphor is continued. Faith is represented as a host solidly drawn up: your solid front, close phalanx. The verb is found in this sense in the Apocrypha, 1 Macc. 10:50, \"\u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ad\u03c9\u03c3\u03b5 \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03c0\u03cc\u03bb\u03b5\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd, he solidified the battle; massed his lines. Compare Eze 13:5, where the noun has the sense of stronghold: \"They stood not \u1f10\u03bd \u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ad\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9 in the stronghold.\" So Psa 17:2, \"The Lord is my strength;\" stronghold or bulwark. The firmament, Gen 1:6; Eze 1:22. In Est 9:22, of the confirmation of a letter.\nYe received (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b5\u03bb\u03ac\u03b2\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5)\nBy transmission from (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03ac) your teachers.\nChrist Jesus the Lord (\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03a7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03cc\u03bd \u1f39\u03b7\u03c3\u03bf\u1fe6\u03bd \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u039a\u1f51\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd)\nThe Christ, specially defined by the following words, thus emphasizing the personal Christ rather than the Gospel, because the true doctrine of Christ's person was perverted by the Colossian teachers. The Christ, even Jesus, the Lord.\nRooted - built up (\u1f10\u1fe4\u1fe5\u03b9\u03b6\u03c9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 - \u1f10\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03b4\u03bf\u03bc\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9)\nNote the change of metaphor from the solidity of military array to walking, rooting of a tree, and then to building. The metaphors of rooting and being founded occur together, Eph 3:17. Compare Co1 3:9. In Jer 1:10, \u1f10\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03b6\u03bf\u1fe6\u03bd to root out is applied to a kingdom, and the words to build and to plant follow. It must be said that \u1fe5\u03b9\u03b6\u03cc\u03c9 to cause to take root is often used in the sense of firmness or fixedness without regard to its primary meaning. Built up. The preposition \u1f10\u03c0\u03af upon indicates the placing of one layer upon another. See on Act 20:32, and see on Co1 3:9. Compare Co1 3:10-14; Eph 2:20. note also the change of tenses: having been rooted (perfect participle), being (in process of) built up and strengthened (present participle).\nIn Him (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff6)\nRather than upon Him, as might have been expected. In this and in the Ephesian epistle, Christ is represented as the sphere within which the building goes on. Compare Eph 2:20. The whole upbuilding of the Church proceeds within the compass of Christ's personality, life, and power.\nThanksgiving (\u03b5\u1f50\u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03af\u1fb3)\nFor Paul's emphasis on thanksgiving, see Rom 1:21; Rom 14:6; Co2 1:11; Co2 4:15; Co2 9:11, Co2 9:12; Eph 5:20; Ti1 2:1, etc. \u0395\u1f50\u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03cc\u03c2 thankful, \u03b5\u1f50\u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd to give thanks, \u03b5\u1f50\u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03af\u03b1 thanksgiving, are found only in Paul's writings.\nBeware (\u03b2\u03bb\u03ad\u03c0\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5)\nLit., see to it.\nLest any man spoil you (\u03bc\u1f74 \u03c4\u1f76\u03c2 \u1f14\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u1f51\u03bc\u1fb6\u03c2 \u1f41 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bb\u03b1\u03b3\u03c9\u03b3\u1ff6\u03bd)\nThe Greek is more precise and personal: lest there shall be any one that maketh spoil. So Rev. \u03a3\u03c5\u03bb\u03b1\u03b3\u03c9\u03b3\u03ad\u03c9 to carry off booty, only here in the New Testament. A very strong expression for the work of the false teachers; make you yourselves a booty. The A.V. is ambiguous, and might be taken to mean corrupt or damage you.\nPhilosophy and vain deceit (\u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03c6\u03b9\u03bb\u03bf\u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03af\u03b1\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03ba\u03b5\u03bd\u1fc6\u03c2 \u1f00\u03c0\u03ac\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2)\nRev. gives the force of the article, his philosophy: \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 and is explanatory, philosophy which is also vain deceit. Hence the warning is not against all philosophy. \u03a6\u03b9\u03bb\u03bf\u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03af\u03b1, philosophy, only here in the New Testament. It had originally a good meaning, the love of wisdom, but is used by Paul in the sense of vain speculation and with special reference to its being the name by which the false teachers at Colossae designated not only their speculative system, but also their practical system, so that it covered their ascetic practices no less than their mysticism. Bishop Lightfoot remarks upon the fact that philosophy, by which the Greeks expressed the highest effort of the intellect, and virtue (\u1f00\u03c1\u03b5\u03c4\u03ae), their expression for the highest moral excellence, are each used but once by Paul, showing \"that the Gospel had deposed the terms as inadequate to the higher standard, whether of knowledge or practice, which it had introduced.\"\nAfter the tradition\nConnect with the whole phrase philosophy and vain deceit, as descriptive of its source and subject matter. Others connect with make spoil. The term is especially appropriate to the Judaeo-Gnostic teachings in Colossae, which depended for their authority, not on ancient writings, but on tradition. The later mystical theology or metaphysic of the Jews was called Kabbala, literally meaning reception or received doctrines, tradition.\nRudiments (\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03c7\u03b5\u1fd6\u03b1)\nSee on Pe2 3:10. Rudimentary teachings, as in Heb 5:12; applicable alike to Jewish and to Gentile teaching. Ceremonialism - meats, drinks, washings, Essenic asceticism, pagan symbolic mysteries and initiatory rites - all belonged to a rudimentary moral stage. Compare Col 2:11, Col 2:21, and Gal 4:9.\nOf the world\nMaterial as contrasted with spiritual.\nFullness\nSee on Col 1:19.\nGodhead (\u03b8\u03b5\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2)\nOnly here in the New Testament. See on Rom 1:20, where \u03b8\u03b5\u03b9\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 divinity or godhood is used. Appropriate there, because God personally would not be known from His revelation in nature, but only His attributes - His majesty and glory. Here Paul is speaking of the essential and personal deity as belonging to Christ. So Bengel: \"Not the divine attributes, but the divine nature.\"\nBodily (\u03c3\u03c9\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u1ff6\u03c2)\nIn bodily fashion or bodily-wise. The verse contains two distinct assertions: 1. That the fullness of the Godhead eternally dwells in Christ. The present tense \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9\u03ba\u03b5\u1fd6 dwelleth, is used like \u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd is (the image), Col 1:15, to denote an eternal and essential characteristic of Christ's being. The indwelling of the divine fullness in Him is characteristic of Him as Christ, from all ages and to all ages. Hence the fullness of the Godhead dwelt in Him before His incarnation, when He was \"in the form of God\" (Phi 2:6). The Word in the beginning, was with God and was God (Joh 1:1). It dwelt in Him during His incarnation. It was the Word that became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth, and His glory which was beheld was the glory as of the Only begotten of the Father (Joh 1:14; compare Jo1 1:1-3). The fullness of the Godhead dwells in His glorified humanity in heaven.\n2. The fullness of the Godhead dwells in Him in a bodily way, clothed the body. This means that it dwells in Him as one having a human body. This could not be true of His preincarnate state, when He was \"in the form of God,\" for the human body was taken on by Him in the fullness of time, when \"He became in the likeness of men\" (Phi 2:7), when the Word became flesh. The fullness of the Godhead dwelt in His person from His birth to His ascension. He carried His human body with Him into heaven, and in His glorified body now and ever dwells the fullness of the Godhead.\n\"O, for a sight, a blissful sight\nOf our Almighty Father's throne!\nThere sits the Savior crowned with light,\nClothed in a body like our own.\n\"Adoring saints around Him stand,\nAnd thrones and powers before Him fall;\nThe God shines gracious through the man,\nAnd sheds sweet glories on them all.\"\nWatts\n\"What a contrast to the human tradition and the rudiments of the world\" (Meyer). What a contrast to the spiritual agencies conceived as intermediate between God and men, in each of which the divine fullness was abridged and the divine glory shaded, in proportion to the remoteness from God in successive emanation.\nYe are complete in Him (\u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5 \u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff7 \u03c0\u03b5\u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03c9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9)\nRev., made full. Compare Joh 1:16; Eph 1:23; Eph 3:19; Eph 4:13. Not, ye are made full in Him, but ye are in Him, made full. In Him dwells the fullness; being in Him, ye are filled. Compare Joh 17:21; Act 17:28.\nNot made with hands\nCompare Mar 14:58; Co2 5:1. In allusion to the literal circumcision insisted on by the false teachers.\nIn the putting off (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u1fc7 \u1f00\u03c0\u03b5\u03ba\u03b4\u03cd\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9)\nOnly here in the New Testament; and the kindred verb \u1f00\u03c0\u03b5\u03ba\u03b4\u03cd\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 to put off only Col 2:15 and Col 3:9. The verb \u1f10\u03ba\u03b4\u03cd\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 means to strip off from one's self, as clothes or armor; \u1f10\u03ba out of, having the force of getting out of one's garments. By the addition to the verb of \u1f00\u03c0\u03cc from, there is added to the idea of getting out of one's clothes that of getting away from them; so that the word is a strong expression for wholly putting away from one's self. In the putting off, is in the act or process of. Not by.\nThe body of the sins of the flesh (\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c3\u03ce\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u1f01\u03bc\u03b1\u03c1\u03c4\u03b9\u1ff6\u03bd \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03c3\u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u1f78\u03c2)\nOmit of the sins. The body of the flesh (compare on Col 1:22) is the body which consists of the flesh, flesh having its moral sense of that material part which is the seat and organ of sin, \"the flesh with its passions and lusts\" (Gal 5:24; compare Jo1 2:16). See on Col 1:24. For the distinction between \u03c3\u1ff6\u03bc\u03b1 body and \u03c3\u03ac\u03c1\u03be flesh, see on flesh, Rom 7:5, sec. 3.\nIn the circumcision of Christ (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u1fc7 \u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03b9\u03c4\u03bf\u03bc\u1fc7 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03a7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6)\nThe spiritual circumcision effected through Christ. See Eph 2:11; Phi 3:3; Rom 2:29. In, as above. The fleshly circumcision removed only a portion of the body. In spiritual circumcision, through Christ, the whole corrupt, carnal nature is put away like a garment which is taken off and laid aside.\nBuried (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03c6\u03ad\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2)\nSee on Rom 6:4. The aorist tense puts the burial as contemporaneous with the circumcision. Ye were circumcised when ye were buried, etc.\nIn baptism (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u1ff7 \u03b2\u03b1\u03c0\u03c4\u03af\u03c3\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9 or \u03b2\u03b1\u03c0\u03c4\u03b9\u03c3\u03bc\u1ff7)\nThe article, the baptism points to the familiar rite, or may have the force of your.\nWherein also (\u1f10\u03bd \u1fa7 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76)\nReferring to baptism, not to Christ.\nYe were raised with Him (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b7\u03b3\u03ad\u03c1\u03b8\u03b7\u03c4\u03b5)\nThe burial and the raising are both typified in baptism. The raising is not the resurrection to eternal life at Christ's second coming, but the moral resurrection to a new life. This corresponds with the drift of the entire passage, with the figurative sense of buried, and with Rom 6:4, which is decisive.\nThrough the faith of the operation of God\nNot the faith which God works, but your faith in God's working: faith in God's energy as displayed in Christ's resurrection. Hence the emphasis which is laid on faith in the resurrection. See Co1 15:3, Co1 15:4 (note); Rom 10:9; Eph 1:19. Col 2:11, Col 2:12 should be compared with Rom 6:2-6.\nDead (\u03bd\u03b5\u03ba\u03c1\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2)\nMorally, as Ephesians 2, Eph 1:5; Rom 6:11. In your sins (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03c0\u03c4\u1ff6\u03bc\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd) The best texts omit \u1f10\u03bd in, and the dative is instrumental, through or by. Rev., through your trespasses. See on Mat 6:14.\nThe uncircumcision of your flesh\nThat sinful, carnal nature of which uncircumcision was the sign, and which was the source of the trespasses. Compare Eph 2:11.\nHe quickened together (\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b5\u03b6\u03c9\u03bf\u03c0\u03bf\u03af\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd)\nOnly here and Eph 2:5. Endowed with a new spiritual life, as Col 2:12. This issues in immortal life. Compare Eph 2:6.\nHaving forgiven us (\u03c7\u03b1\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03ac\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 \u1f21\u03bc\u1fd6\u03bd)\nFreely (\u03c7\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03c2 grace, free gift), as Luk 7:42; Co2 2:7, Co2 2:10; Col 3:13. Note the change of pronoun from you to us, believers generally, embracing himself. This change from the second to the first person, or, vice versa, is common in Paul's writings. See Col 1:10-13; Col 3:3, Col 3:4; Eph 2:2, Eph 2:3, Eph 2:13, Eph 2:14; Eph 4:31, Eph 4:32.\nBlotting out (\u1f10\u03be\u03b1\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03c8\u03b1\u03c2)\nSee on Act 3:19 : compare Rev 3:5. The simple verb \u1f00\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03c6\u03c9 means to anoint, see on Joh 11:2. Hence to besmear. The compounded preposition \u1f10\u03be means completely. The compound verb here is used by Thucydides of whitewashing a wall; Ch1 29:4, of overlaying walls with gold. The preposition also carries the sense of removal; hence to smear out; to wipe away.\nThe handwriting (\u03c4\u1f78 \u03c7\u03b5\u03b9\u03c1\u03cc\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03c6\u03bf\u03bd)\nThe A.V. has simply translated according to the composition of the noun, \u03c7\u03b5\u03af\u03c1 hand, \u03b3\u03c1\u03ac\u03c6\u03c9 to write. Properly an autograph, and specially a note of hand, bond. Compare Tobit 5:3; 9:5. Transcribed, chirographus and chirographon, it appears often in Latin authors, especially in law-books. So Juvenal, of a rascally neighbor, who declares his note of hand void, and the tablets on which it is written as so much useless wood (xvi., 41). Suetonius, of the promise of marriage given by Caligula to Ennia Naevia \"under oath and bond\" (chirographo, \"Caligula,\" 12).\nOf ordinances (\u03c4\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2 \u03b4\u03cc\u03b3\u03bc\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nSee on Luk 2:1. Lit., in ordinances; consisting in, or, as Rev., written in, as suggested by handwriting. As Paul declares this bond to be against us, including both Jews and Gentiles, the reference, while primarily to the Mosaic law, is to be taken in a wider sense, as including the moral law of God in general, which applied to the Gentiles as much as to the Jews. See Rom 3:19. The law is frequently conceived by Paul with this wider reference, as a principle which has its chief representative in the Mosaic law, but the applications of which are much wider. See on Rom 2:12. This law is conceived here as a bond, a bill of debt, standing against those who have not received Christ. As the form of error at Colossae was largely Judaic, insisting on the Jewish ceremonial law, the phrase is probably colored by this fact. Compare Eph 2:15.\nWhich was contrary to us (\u1f43 \u1f26\u03bd \u1f51\u03c0\u03b5\u03bd\u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03af\u03bf\u03bd \u1f21\u03bc\u1fd6\u03bd)\nHe has just said which was against us (\u03c4\u03bf \u03ba\u03b1\u03b8' \u1f21\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd); which stood to our debit, binding us legally. This phrase enlarges on that idea, emphasizing the hostile character of the bond, as a hindrance. Compare Rom 4:15; Rom 5:20; Co1 15:56; Gal 3:23. \"Law is against us, because it comes like a taskmaster, bidding us do, but neither putting the inclination into our hearts nor the power into our hands. And law is against us, because the revelation of unfulfilled duty is the accusation of the defaulter, and a revelation to him of his guilt. And law is against us, because it comes with threatenings and foretastes of penalty and pain. Thus, as standard, accuser, and avenger it is against us\" (Maclaren).\nTook it out of the way (\u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78 \u1f26\u03c1\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd \u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03bc\u03ad\u03c3\u03bf\u03c5)\nLit., out of the midst.\nNailing it to His cross (\u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03b7\u03bb\u03ce\u03c3\u03b1\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78 \u03c4\u1ff7 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03c5\u03c1\u1ff7)\nRev., the cross. The verb occurs nowhere else. The law with its decrees was abolished in Christ's death, as if crucified with Him. It was no longer in the midst, in the foreground, as a debtor's obligation is perpetually before him, embarrassing his whole life. Ignatius: \"I perceived that ye were settled in unmovable faith, as if nailed (\u03ba\u03b1\u03b8\u03b7\u03bb\u03c9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2) upon the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, both in flesh and spirit\" (To Smyrna, 1).\nHaving spoiled principalities and powers (\u1f00\u03c0\u03b5\u03ba\u03b4\u03c5\u03c3\u03ac\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f70\u03c2 \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u1f70\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03c4\u1f70\u03c2 \u1f10\u03be\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03c2)\nFor the verb spoiled, see on putting off, Col 2:11. The principalities and powers are the angelic hosts through whose ministry the law was given. See Deu 33:2; Act 7:53; Heb 2:2; Gal 3:19. Great importance was attached, in the later rabbinical schools, to the angels who assisted in giving the law; and that fact was not without influence in shaping the doctrine of angelic mediators, one of the elements of the Colossian heresy, which was partly Judaic. This doctrine Paul strikes at in Col 1:16; Col 2:10; here, and Col 2:18. God put off from himself, when the bond of the law was rendered void in Christ's crucifixion, that ministry of angels which waited on the giving of the law, revealing Christ as the sole mediator, the head of every principality and power (Col 2:10). The directness of the gospel ministration, as contrasted with the indirectness of the legal ministration, is touched upon by Paul in Gal 3:19 sqq.; Co2 3:12 sqq.; Heb 2:2.\nHe made a show of them (\u1f10\u03b4\u03b5\u03b9\u03b3\u03bc\u03ac\u03c4\u03b9\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd)\nOnly here and Mat 1:19, see note. The compound \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03b4\u03b5\u03b9\u03b3\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b6\u03c9 to expose to public infamy, is found Heb 6:6; and \u03b4\u03b5\u1fd6\u03b3\u03bc\u03b1 example, in Jde 1:7. The word is unknown to classical Greek. The meaning here is to make a display of, exhibit. He showed them as subordinate and subject to Christ. Compare especially Heb 1:1-14 throughout, where many points of contact with the first two chapters of this epistle will be found.\nOpenly (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c0\u03b1\u1fe4\u1fe5\u03b7\u03c3\u03af\u1fb3)\nOr boldly. See on Plm 1:8. Not publicly, but as by a bold stroke putting His own ministers, chosen and employed for such a glorious and dignified office, in subjection before the eyes of the world.\nTriumphing over them (\u03b8\u03c1\u03b1\u03b9\u03bc\u03b2\u03b5\u03cd\u03c3\u03b1\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2)\nSee on Co2 2:14. If we take this phrase in the sense which it bears in that passage, leading in triumph, there seems something incongruous in picturing the angelic ministers of the law as captives of war, subjugated and led in procession. The angels \"do His commandments and hearken unto the voice of His word.\" But while I hold to that explanation in 2 Corinthians, I see no reason why the word may not be used here less specifically in the sense of leading a festal procession in which all share the triumph; the heavenly ministers, though set aside as mediators, yet exulting in the triumph of the one and only Mediator. Even in the figure in 2 Corinthians, the captives rejoice in the triumph. Compare Rev 19:11. Our knowledge of the word \u03b8\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1\u03bc\u03b2\u03b5\u03cd\u03c9 is not so extensive or accurate as to warrant too strict limitations in our definition.\nIn it (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff7)\nThe cross. Many expositors, however, render in Him, Christ. This I adopt as harmonizing with the emphatic references to Christ which occur in every verse from Col 2:5 to Col 2:14; Christ, four times; in Him, four; in whom, two; with Him, three. In it is necessary only if the subject of the sentence is Christ; but the very awkward change of subject from God (quickened us together, Col 2:13) is quite unnecessary. God is the subject throughout.\nTherefore\nConclusion from the canceling of the bond. The allusions which follow (Col 2:16-19) are to the practical and theoretical forms of the Colossian error, as in Col 2:9-15; excessive ritualism, asceticism, and angelic mediation.\nJudge (\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03bd\u03ad\u03c4\u03c9)\nSit in judgment.\nMeat - drink (\u03b2\u03c1\u03ce\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 - \u03c0\u03cc\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9)\nProperly, eating, drinking, as Co1 8:4; but the nouns are also used for that which is eaten or drunk, as Joh 4:32 (see note); Joh 6:27, Joh 6:55; Rom 14:17. For the subject-matter compare Rom 14:17; Co1 8:8; Heb 9:10, and note on Mar 7:19. The Mosaic law contained very few provisions concerning drinks. See Lev 10:9; Lev 11:34, Lev 11:36; Num 6:3. Hence it is probable that the false teachers had extended the prohibitions as to the use of wine to all Christians. The Essenes abjured both wine and animal food.\nIn respect (\u1f10\u03bd \u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b5\u03b9)\nSee on Co2 3:10. Lit., in the division or category.\nHolyday (\u1f11\u03bf\u03c1\u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2)\nFestival or feast-day. The annual festivals. The word holyday is used in its earlier sense of a sacred day.\nNew moon (\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd\u03af\u03b1\u03c2)\nOnly here in the New Testament. The monthly festivals. The festival of the new moon is placed beside the Sabbath, Isa 1:13; Eze 46:1. The day was celebrated by blowing of trumpets, special sacrifices, feasting, and religious instruction. Labor was suspended, and no national or private fasts were permitted to take place. The authorities were at great pains to fix accurately the commencement of the month denoted by the appearance of the new moon. Messengers were placed on commanding heights to watch the sky, and as soon as the new moon appeared, they hastened to communicate it to the synod, being allowed even to travel on the Sabbath for this purpose. The witnesses were assembled and examined, and when the judges were satisfied the president pronounced the words it is sanctified, and the day was declared new moon.\nSabbath days (\u03c3\u03b1\u03b2\u03b2\u03ac\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd)\nThe weekly festivals. Rev., correctly, day, the plural being used for the singular. See on Luk 4:31; see on Act 20:7. The plural is only once used in the New Testament of more than a single day (Act 17:2). The same enumeration of sacred seasons occurs Ch1 23:31; Ch2 2:4; Ch2 31:3; Eze 45:17; Hos 2:11.\nWhich are\nExplanatory. Seeing they are. Referring to all the particulars of Col 2:16.\nShadow of things to come\nShadow, not sketch or outline, as is shown by body following. The Mosaic ritual system was to the great verities of the Gospel what the shadow is to the man, a mere general type or resemblance.\nThe body is Christ's\nThe substance belongs to the Christian economy. It is derived from Christ, and can be realized only through union with Him.\nBeguile of reward (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03b2\u03c1\u03b1\u03b2\u03b5\u03c5\u03ad\u03c4\u03c9)\nOnly here in the New Testament. From \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03ac against, \u03b2\u03c1\u03b1\u03b2\u03b5\u03cd\u03c9 to act as a judge or umpire. Hence to decide against one, or to declare him unworthy of the prize. Bishop Lightfoot's rendering rob you of your prize, adopted by Rev., omits the judicial idea, which, however, I think must be retained, in continuation of the idea of judgment in Col 2:16, \"let no man judge,\" etc. The attitude of the false teachers would involve their sitting in judgment as to the future reward of those who refused their doctrine of angelic mediation. Paul speaks from the standpoint of their claim.\nIn a voluntary humility (\u03b8\u03ad\u03bb\u03c9\u03bd \u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03b1\u03c0\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u03c6\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3\u03cd\u03bd\u1fc3)\nRender delighting in humility. This rendering is well supported by Septuagint usage. See Sa1 18:22; Sa2 15:26; Kg1 10:9; Ch2 9:8. It falls in, in the regular participial series, with the other declarations as to the vain conceit of the teachers; signifying not their purpose or their wish to deprive the Christians of their reward, but their vain enthusiasm for their false doctrine, and their conceited self-complacency which prompted them to sit as judges. The worship of angels involved a show of humility, an affectation of superior reverence for God, as shown in the reluctance to attempt to approach God otherwise than indirectly: in its assumption that humanity, debased by the contact with matter, must reach after God through successive grades of intermediate beings. For humility, see on Mat 11:29.\nWorship of angels (\u03b8\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03af\u1fb3)\nSee on religious, Jam 1:26. Defining the direction which their humility assumed. The usage of the Septuagint and of the New Testament limits the meaning to the external aspects of worship. Compare Act 26:5; Jam 1:27.\nIntruding (\u1f10\u03bc\u03b2\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03c9\u03bd)\nRev., dwelling in. Only here in the New Testament. It is used in three senses: 1. To step in or upon, thence to haunt or frequent. So Aeschylus: \"A certain island which Pan frequents on its beach\" (\"Persae,\" 449). 2. To invade. So in Apocrypha, 1 Macc. 12:25; 13:20; 14:31; 15:40. 3. To enter into for examination; to investigate or discuss a subject. So 2 Macc. 2:30, and so Philo, who compares truth-seekers to well-diggers. Patristic writers use it of searching the heart, and of investigating divine mysteries. Byzantine lexicographers explain it by \u03b6\u03b7\u03c4\u03ad\u03c9 to seek; \u1f10\u03be\u03b5\u03c1\u03b5\u03c5\u03bd\u03ac\u03c9 to track out; \u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03c0\u03ad\u03c9 to consider. In this last sense the word is probably used here of the false teachers who professed to see heavenly truth in visions, and to investigate and discuss philosophically the revelation they had received.\nWhich he hath not seen\nNot must be omitted: which he imagines or professes that he has seen in vision. Ironical. \"If, as we may easily imagine, these pretenders were accustomed to say with an imposing and mysterious air, 'I have seen, ah! I have seen,' - in relating alleged visions of heavenly things, the Colossians would understand the reference well enough\" (Findlay).\nVainly puffed up (\u03b5\u1f30\u03ba\u1f74 \u03c6\u03c5\u03c3\u03b9\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nVainly characterizes the emptiness of such pretension; puffed up, the swelling intellectual pride of those who make it. See on Co1 4:6; and compare Co1 8:1. The humility is thus characterized as affected, and the teachers as charlatans.\nBy his fleshly mind (\u1f51\u03c0\u1f78 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03bd\u03bf\u1f78\u03c2 \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03c3\u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u1f78\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6)\nLit., by the mind of his flesh. The intellectual faculty in its moral aspects as determined by the fleshly, sinful nature. See on Rom 8:23. Compare Rom 7:22-25; Rom 8:7. The teachers boasted that they were guided by the higher reason. Paul describes their higher reason as carnal.\nHolding the head (\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03ba\u03b5\u03c6\u03b1\u03bb\u03ae\u03bd)\nHolding by or fast, as commonly in the New Testament. Compare Sophocles: \"If thou art to rule (\u1f04\u03c1\u03be\u03b5\u03b9\u03c2) this land, even as thou holdest it (\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u1fd6\u03c2 \"Oedipus Tyrannus,\" 54). The head, Christ as contrasted with the angelic mediators.\nFrom whom (\u1f10\u03be \u03bf\u1f57)\nFixing the personal reference of the head to Christ. Compare Eph 4:16.\nBy joints and bands (\u03b4\u03b9\u1f70 \u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u1f01\u03c6\u1ff6\u03bd \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b4\u03ad\u03c3\u03bc\u03c9\u03bd)\nJoints (\u1f01\u03c6\u1ff6\u03bd) only here and Eph 4:16. The word means primarily touching, and is used in classical Greek of the touch upon harpstrings, or the grip of a wrestler. Not quite the same as joints in the sense of the parts in contact, but the relations between the adjacent parts. The actual connection is expressed by bands or ligaments.\nMinistered (\u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03c7\u03bf\u03c1\u03b7\u03b3\u03bf\u03c5\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd)\nSee on add, Pe2 1:5. Rev., supplied.\nKnit together\nSee on Col 2:2. \"The discoveries of modern physiology have invested the apostle's language with far greater distinctness and force than it can have worn to his own contemporaries. Any exposition of the nervous system more especially reads like a commentary on the image of the relations between the body and the head. At every turn we meet with some fresh illustration which kindles it with a flood of light. The volition communicated from the brain to the limbs, the sensations of the extremities telegraphed back to the brain, the absolute mutual sympathy between the head and the members, the instantaneous paralysis ensuing, on the interruption of continuity, all these add to the completeness and life of the image\" (Lightfoot).\nYe be dead (\u1f00\u03c0\u03b5\u03b8\u03ac\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5)\nRev., more correctly, ye died; the aorist tense indicating a definite event. Paul uses the word died in many different relations, expressing that with which death dissolves the connection. Thus, died unto sin, unto self, unto the law, unto the world.\nRudiments of the world\nElementary teachings and practices the peculiar sphere of which is the world. World (\u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5) has its ethical sense, the sum-total of human life in the ordered world, considered apart from, alienated from, and hostile to God, and of the earthly things which seduce from God. See on Joh 1:9.\nAre ye subject to ordinances (\u03b4\u03bf\u03b3\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03c3\u03b8\u03b5)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Rev., subject yourselves. Better passive, as emphasizing spiritual bondage. Why do ye submit to be dictated to? See on Co1 1:22, where the imperious attitude of the Jews appears in their demanding credentials of the Gospel as sole possessors of the truth. The ordinances include both those of the law and of philosophy.\nTouch - taste - handle (\u1f05\u03c8\u1fc3 - \u03b3\u03b5\u03cd\u03c3\u1fc3 - \u03b8\u03af\u03b3\u1fc3\u03c2)\n\u1f0d\u03c0\u03c4\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9, A.V., touch, is properly to fasten one's self to or cling to. So Joh 20:17 (note). Frequently rendered touch in the New Testament, and used in most cases of Christ's touching or being touched by the diseased. To get hands on so as to injure, Jo1 5:18. To have intercourse with, Co1 7:1; Co2 6:17. Thus, in every case, the contact described exerts a modifying influence, and a more permanent contact or effect of contact is often implied than is expressed by touch. \"The idea of a voluntary or conscious effort is often involved.\" No single English word will express all these phases of meaning. Handle comes, perhaps, as near as any other, especially in its sense of treatment, as when we say that a speaker or writer handles a subject; or that a man is roughly handled by his enemies. This wider and stronger sense does not attach to \u03b8\u03b9\u03b3\u03b3\u03ac\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd A.V., handle, though the two words are sometimes used interchangeably, as Exo 19:12, and though \u03b8\u03b9\u03b3\u03b3\u03ac\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd also implies a modifying contact, unlike \u03c8\u03b7\u03bb\u03b1\u03c6\u03ac\u03c9, which signifies to touch with a view of ascertaining the quality of the object; to feel after, to grope. See Luk 24:39; Act 17:27. Thus \u03c8\u03b7\u03bb\u03b1\u03c6\u03af\u03bd\u03b4\u03b1 is blind-man's-bluff. The contact implied by \u03b8\u03b9\u03b3\u03b3\u03ac\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd is more superficial and transitory. It lies between \u1f05\u03c0\u03c4\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 and \u03c8\u03b7\u03bb\u03b1\u03c6\u03ac\u03c9. Thus we have here a climax which is lost in the A.V. Handle not, taste not, do not even touch. Rev., handle not, nor taste, nor touch.\nWhich things\nMeats, drinks, etc.\nAre to perish (\u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c6\u03b8\u03bf\u03c1\u1f70\u03bd)\nLit., are for corruption; destined for (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2) Corruption, in the physical sense of decomposition.\nWith the using (\u03c4\u1fc7 \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03c7\u03c1\u03ae\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Rather, using up, consumption. Their very using destroys them. Which things-using form a parenthesis.\nAfter the commandments and doctrines (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u1f70 \u03c4\u1f70 \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03ac\u03bb\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03b4\u03b9\u03b4\u03b1\u03c3\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03af\u03b1\u03c2)\nConnect with Col 2:20, Col 2:21. \u1f19\u03bd\u03c4\u03ac\u03bb\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1 are specific injunctions. Rev., better, precepts: \u03b4\u03b9\u03b4\u03b1\u03c3\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03af\u03b1\u03c2, more general, doctrinal instructions. Both answer to the rudiments of the world (Col 2:20). Compare Matthew 15:1-20; Mark 7:1-23.\nWhich things (\u1f05\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd\u03b1)\nThe double relative classifies, putting these precepts and teachings, and all that are like them, in one category: a class of things which. For similar usage, see Gal 4:24; Gal 5:19; Phi 4:3.\nHave a show of wisdom (\u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd \u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03bd \u1f14\u03c7\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1 \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03af\u03b1\u03c2)\nLit., are having a reputation for wisdom. The finite verb are, with the participle having, denotes what is habitual, and marks the permanent quality of these precepts, etc. \u039b\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03bd, A.V., show, is rather plausible reason, a show of reason, and hence a reputation. They pass popularly for wisdom.\nWill-worship (\u1f10\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03b8\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03af\u1fb3)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Worship self-imposed or volunteered. Similar compounds of \u1f10\u03b8\u03ad\u03bb\u03c9 to will sometimes carry the meaning of pretence, unreality; as \u1f10\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03cc\u03ba\u03c9\u03c6\u03bf\u03c2 pretending deafness; \u1f10\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03c1\u03ae\u03c4\u03c9\u03c1 a pretentious orator. Augustine makes hybrid Latin compounds, as thelodives, one who takes on the airs of a rich man; thelosapiens, one who affects wisdom. More commonly, however, the sense is that of voluntariness or officiousness. Thus Thucydides says that Pithias acted as \u1f10\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03c0\u03c1\u03cc\u03be\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 voluntary agent or representative of the Athenians (iii., 70). \u0395\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03ba\u03af\u03bd\u03b4\u03c5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 is running voluntarily into danger, foolhardy: \u1f10\u03b8\u03b5\u03bb\u03bf\u03b4\u03bf\u03c5\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03b1 is voluntary slavery. The idea of pretense seems to be involved here along with that of self-chosen worship.\nHumility\nVoluntary and affected.\nAnd neglecting (\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f00\u03c6\u03b5\u03b9\u03b4\u03af\u1fb3)\nOnly here in the New Testament. From \u1f00 not and \u03c6\u03b5\u03af\u03b4\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 to spare. Hence unsparing treatment or severity. Also used for lavishness, extravagance of means and of life. So Thucydides: \"The running aground of the ships was reckless (\u1f00\u03c6\u03b5\u03b9\u03b4\u1f74\u03c2.\" iv. 26). Neglecting is wrong. Rev., correctly, severity. The \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 and before severity is doubtful. If omitted, severity to the body defines have a reputation for wisdom, the outward austerity being that which makes the popular impression of a higher wisdom.\nIn any honor (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u1fc7 \u03c4\u03b9\u03bd\u1f76)\nRev., better, of any value. The real value of these ascetic practices contrasted with their popular estimation. Price or value is the original meaning of \u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03ae, and its use in this sense is frequent in classical Greek. So in the New Testament, as Mat 27:9, \"the price of Him who was priced (\u03c4\u03b5\u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c5).\" In Paul, Co1 6:20; Co1 7:23. The idea of value appears in Pe1 1:19. \"Ye were redeemed - with the precious (\u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03af\u1ff3) blood of Christ;\" something of real and adequate value. So Pe1 2:4, of Christ as the living stone, precious (\u1f14\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd), of recognized value.\nTo the satisfying (\u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u1f74\u03bd)\nTo means as a remedy against. \u03a0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u1f74\u03bd denotes repletion, surfeiting. Paul says that these ascetic observances, while they appeal to men as indications of superior wisdom and piety, have no value as remedies against sensual indulgence.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: Colossians: Colossians Chapter 2","type":"page"}