{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/jam003.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/jam003.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/jam003.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nMasters (\u03b4\u03b9\u03b4\u03ac\u03c3\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03b9)\nLiterally, and better, teachers, with a reference to the exhortation to be slow to speak (Jam 1:19). Compare Co1 14:26-34. James is warning against the too eager and general assumption of the privilege of teaching, which was not restricted to a particular class, but was exercised by believers generally.\nOffend (\u03c0\u03c4\u03b1\u03af\u03bf\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd)\nLit., stumble, as Rev. Compare Jam 2:10.\nTo bridle\nSee on Jam 1:26.\nBehold\nFollowing the old reading, \u1f34\u03b4\u03b5. All the best texts read \u03b5\u1f30 \u03b4\u1f72, now if. So Rev.\nBits (\u03c7\u03b1\u03bb\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2)\nOnly here and Rev 14:20. It may be rendered either bit, as A. V., or bridle, as Rev., but bridle is preferable because it corresponds with the verb to bridle (Jam 3:2) which is compounded with this noun.\nHorses\nThe position in the sentence is emphatic.\nWe turn about (\u03bc\u03b5\u03c4\u03ac\u03b3\u03bf\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd)\nUsed by James only.\nThe ships\nSee Introduction, on James' local allusions. Dean Howson observes that \"there is more imagery drawn from mere natural phenomena in the one short epistle of James than in all St. Paul's epistles put together.\"\nSo great\nAs the ship which conveyed Paul to Malta, which contained two hundred and seventy-six persons (Act 27:37).\nFierce (\u03c3\u03ba\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u1ff6\u03bd)\nMore literally, and better, as Rev., rough. The word primarily means hard, harsh\nHelm (\u03c0\u03b7\u03b4\u03b1\u03bb\u03af\u03bf\u03c5)\nBetter, rudder, as Rev. The rudder was an oar worked by a handle. Helm and rudder were thus one. The word occurs only here and Act 27:40.\nThe governor listeth (\u1f21 \u1f41\u03c1\u03bc\u1f74 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03b5\u1f50\u03b8\u03cd\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b2\u03bf\u03cd\u03bb\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nLit., the impulse or desire of the steersman wisheth. \u1f49\u03c1\u03bc\u1f74, impulse, only here and Act 14:5, of an assault, onset.\nThe governor (\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03b5\u1f50\u03b8\u03cd\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2)\nRev., steersman. Lit., of him who is guiding. Only here and Joh 1:23. From \u03b5\u1f50\u03b8\u03cd\u03c2 straight.\nBoasteth great things (\u03bc\u03b5\u03b3\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03c5\u03c7\u03b5\u1fd6)\nThe best texts separate the compound, and read \u03bc\u03b5\u03b3\u03ac\u03bb\u03b1 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c7\u03b5\u1fd6, of course with the same meaning. \u0391\u1f50\u03c7\u03b5\u1fd6, boasteth, only here in New Testament.\nHow great a matter a little fire kindleth (\u1f21\u03bb\u03af\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd \u03c0\u1fe6\u03c1 \u1f21\u03bb\u03af\u03ba\u03b7\u03bd \u1f55\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd \u1f00\u03bd\u03ac\u03c0\u03c4\u03b5\u03b9)\nThe word \u1f55\u03bb\u03b7 (only here in New Testament) means wood or a forest, and hence the matter or raw material of which a thing is made. Later, it is used in the philosophical sense of matter - \"the foundation of the manifold\" - opposed to the intelligent or formative principle \u03bd\u03bf\u1fe6\u03c2, mind. The authorized version has taken the word in one of its secondary senses, hardly the philosophical sense it would seem; but any departure from the earlier sense was not only needless, but impaired the vividness of the figure, the familiar and natural image of a forest on fire. So Homer:\n\"As when a fire\nSeizes a thick-grown forest, and the wind\nDrives it along in eddies, while the trunks\nFall with the boughs amid devouring flames.\"\nIliad, xi., 155.\nHence, Rev., rightly, \"Behold how much wood or how great a forest is kindled by how small a fire.\nThis, too, is the rendering of the Vulgate: quam magnam silvam.\nWorld of iniquity (\u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u1f00\u03b4\u03b9\u03ba\u03af\u03b1\u03c2)\n\u039a\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2, primarily, means order, and is applied to the world or universe as an orderly system. A world of iniquity is an organism containing within itself all evil essence, which from it permeates the entire man. World is used in the same sense as in the latter part of Proverbs 17:6 (Sept.), which is not given in the A. V. \"The trusty hath the whole world of things, but the faithless not a groat.\"\nIs the tongue (\u03ba\u03b1\u03b8\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nThis differs a little from the simple is, though it is not easy to render it accurately. The verb means to appoint, establish, institute, and is used of the tongue as having an appointed and definite place in a system (among our members). It might be rendered hath its place.\nDefileth (\u03c3\u03c0\u03b9\u03bb\u03bf\u1fe6\u03c3\u03b1)\nLit., defiling. Only here and Jde 1:23. See on Pe2 2:13.\nSetteth on fire (\u03c6\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b6\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03b1)\nLit., setting on fire. Only in this verse in New Testament.\nThe course of nature (\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c7\u1f78\u03bd \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c3\u03b5\u03c9\u03c2)\nA very obscure passage. \u03a4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c7\u03cc\u03c2, (only here in New Testament), from \u03c4\u03c1\u03ad\u03c7\u03c9, to run, applies generally to anything round or circular which runs or rolls, as a wheel or sphere. Hence, often a wheel. Used of the circuit of fortifications and of circles or zones of land or sea. From the radical sense, to run, comes the meaning course, as the course of the sun; and from this a place for running, a race-course. \u0393\u03b5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c3\u03b5\u03c9\u03c2 rendered nature, means origin, beginning, birth, manner of birth, production, and is used by Plato for the creation, or the sum of created things. It also means a race, and a generation or age. In the New Testament it occurs but twice outside of this epistle, viz., at Mat 1:1, \"the book of the generation of Jesus Christ,\" where the meaning is origin or birth; the birth-book of Jesus Christ. The other passage is Mat 1:18, according to the best texts, also meaning birth. In Jam 1:23, as we have seen, \u03c0\u03c1\u03cc\u03c3\u03c9\u03c0\u03bf\u03bd \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03ad\u03c3\u03b5\u03c9\u03c2, is the face of his birth. We may then safely translate \u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c7\u03cc\u03c2 by wheel; and as birth is the meaning of \u03b3\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 in every New-Testament passage where it occurs, we may give it the preference here and render the wheel of birth - i.e., the wheel which is set in motion at birth and runs on to the close of life. It is thus a figurative description of human life. So Anacreon:\n\"The chariot-wheel, like life, runs rolling round,\"\nTertullian says: \"The whole revolving wheel of existence bears witness to the resurrection of the dead.\" The Rev., which gives nature, puts birth in margin. This revolving wheel is kindled by the tongue, and rolls on in destructive blaze. The image is justified by the fact. The tongue works the chief mischief, kindles the most baleful fires in the course of life.\nKind (\u03c6\u03cd\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2)\nWrong. James is not speaking of the relation between individual men and individual beasts, but of the relation between the nature of man and that of beasts, which may be different in different beasts. Hence, as Rev., in margin, nature.\nBeasts (\u03b8\u03b7\u03c1\u03af\u03c9\u03bd)\nQuadrupeds. Not beasts generally, nor wild beasts only. In Act 28:4, Act 28:5, the word is used of the viper which fastened on Paul's hand. In Peter's vision (Act 10:19; Act 11:6) there is a different classification from the one here; quadrupeds being denoted by a specific term, \u03c4\u03b5\u03c4\u03c1\u03ac\u03c0\u03bf\u03b4\u03b1, four-footed creatures. There \u03b8\u03b7\u03c1\u03af\u03b1 includes fishes, which in this passage are classed as \u1f10\u03bd\u03b1\u03bb\u03af\u03c9\u03bd, things in the sea.\nBy mankind (\u03c4\u1fc7 \u03c6\u03cd\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9 \u03c4\u1fc7 \u1f00\u03bd\u03b8\u03c1\u03c9\u03c0\u03af\u03bd\u1fc3)\nRather, by the nature of man, \u03c6\u03cd\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2, as before, denoting the generic character. Every nature of beasts is tamed by the nature of man. Compare the fine chorus in the \"Antigone\" of Sophocles, 343-352:\n\"The thoughtless tribe of birds,\nThe beasts that roam the fields\nThe brood in sea-depths born,\nHe takes them all in nets,\nKnotted in snaring mesh,\nMan, wonderful in skill.\nAnd by his subtle arts\nHe holds in sway the beasts\nThat roam the fields or tread the mountain's height\nAnd brings the binding yoke\nUpon the neck of horse with shaggy mane,\nOr bull on mountain crest,\nUntamable in strength.\"\nNo man (\u03bf\u1f50\u03b4\u03b5\u1f76\u03c2 \u1f00\u03bd\u03b8\u03c1\u03ce\u03c0\u03c9\u03bd)\nA strong expression. Lit., no on of men.\nUnruly (\u1f00\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03ac\u03c3\u03c7\u03b5\u03c4\u03bf\u03bd)\nLit., not to be held back. The proper reading, however, is \u1f00\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03ac\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03bd, unsettled. See on \u03ba\u03b1\u03b8\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9, hath its place, Jam 3:6. Rev., correctly, restless.\nDeadly (\u03b8\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03c4\u03b7\u03c6\u03cc\u03c1\u03bf\u03c5)\nLit., death-bearing, or-bringing. Only here in New Testament.\nPoison (\u1f30\u03bf\u1fe6)\nRendered rust at Jam 5:3; and found only in these two passages and in Rom 3:13, in the citation of Psa 140:3.\nGod, even the Father (\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u0398\u03b5\u1f78\u03bd \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c4\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1)\nThe proper reading is \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u039a\u03cd\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd, the Lord, and the \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76, and, is simply connective. Read, therefore, as Rev., the Lord and Father. This combination of terms for God is uncommon. See Jam 1:27.\nWhich\nNot who, which would designate personally certain men; whereas James designates them generically.\nDoth a fountain, etc\nThe interrogative particle, \u03bc\u03ae\u03c4\u03b9, which begins the sentence, expects a negative answer. Fountain has the article, \"the fountain,\" generic. See Introduction, on James' local allusions. The Land of Promise was pictured to the Hebrew as a land of springs (Deu 8:7; Deu 11:11). \"Palestine,\" says Dean Stanley, \"was the only country where an Eastern could have been familiar with the language of the Psalmsist: 'He sendeth the springs into the valleys which run among the mountains.' Those springs, too, however short-lived, are remarkable for their copiousness and beauty. Not only not in the East, but hardly in the West, can any fountains and sources of streams be seen, so clear, so full-grown even at their birth, as those which fall into the Jordan and its lakes throughout its whole course from north to south\" (\"Sinai and Palestine\"). The Hebrew word for a fountain or spring is \u00e1yin, meaning an eye. \"The spring,\" says the same author, \"is the bright, open source, the eye of the landscape.\"\nSend forth (\u03b2\u03c1\u03cd\u03b5\u03b9)\nAn expressive word, found nowhere else in the New Testament, and denoting a full, copious discharge. Primarily it means to be full to bursting; and is used, therefore, of budding plants, teeming soil, etc., as in the charming picture of the sacred grove at the opening of the \"Oedipus Coloneus\" of Sophocles: \"full (\u03b2\u03c1\u03cd\u03c9\u03bd) of bay, olive, and vine.\" Hence, to burst forth or gush. Though generally in-transitive, it is used transitively here.\nPlace (\u1f40\u03c0\u1fc6\u03c2)\nRather, opening or hole in the earth or rock. Rev., opening. Compare caves, Heb 11:38. The word is pleasantly suggestive in connection with the image of the eye of the landscape. See above.\nSweet water and bitter\nThe readers of the epistle would recall the bitter waters of Marah (Exo 15:23), and the unwholesome spring at Jericho (Kg2 2:19-21).\nSo can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh\nThe best texts omit so can no fountain, and the and between salt and fresh. Thus the text reads, \u03bf\u1f54\u03c4\u03b5 \u1f01\u03bb\u03c5\u03ba\u1f78\u03bd \u03b3\u03bb\u03c5\u03ba\u1f7a \u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u1fc6\u03c3\u03b1\u03b9 \u1f55\u03b4\u03c9\u03c1. Render, as Rev., neither can salt water yield sweet. Another of James' local allusions, salt waters. The Great Salt Sea was but sixteen miles from Jerusalem. Its shores were lined with salt-pits, to be filled when the spring freshets should raise the waters of the lake. A salt marsh also terminated the valley through which the Jordan flows from the Lake of Tiberius to the Dead Sea, and the adjoining plain was covered with salt streams and brackish springs. Warm springs impregnated with sulphur abound in the volcanic valley of the Jordan. \u1f09\u03bb\u03c5\u03ba\u1f78\u03bd, salt, occurs only here in the New Testament.\nWise and endued with knowledge (\u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f10\u03ba\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c0\u03ae\u03bc\u03c9\u03bd)\nA rendering needlessly verbose, yet substantially correct. Probably no very nice distinction was intended by the writer. It is somewhat difficult to fix the precise sense of \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c2, since there is no uniformity in its usage in the New Testament. In classical Greek it primarily means skilled in a handicraft or art. Thence it runs into the sense of clever, in matters of common life, worldly wise. Then, in the hands of the philosophers, it acquires the sense of learned in the sciences; and, ironically, abstruse, subtle, obscure, like the English cunning, which originally meant knowing or skilful, and is often used in that sense in the English Bible (see Gen 25:27; Sa1 16:16).\nIn the New Testament \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c2 is used - 1. In the original classical sense, skilled in handicraft (Co1 3:10). 2. Accomplished in letters, learned (Rom 1:14, Rom 1:22; Co1 1:19, Co1 1:26; Co1 3:18). So of the Jewish theologians and doctors (Mat 11:25), and of Christian teachers (Mat 23:34). 3. In a practical sense, of the practice of the law of piety and honesty; so Eph 5:15, where it is joined with walking circumspectly, and Co1 6:5, where it is represented as the quality adapted to adjust differences in the church. 4. In the higher, philosophical sense, of devising the best counsels and employing the best means to carry them out. So of God, Rom 16:27; Ti1 1:17; Jde 1:25; Co1 1:25. In this passage the word appears to be used in the sense of 3: practical wisdom in pious living.\n\u1f18\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03ae\u03bc\u03c9\u03bd occurs only here in the New Testament. In classical Greek it is often used like \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c2, in the sense of skilled, versed; and by the philosophers in the higher sense of scientifically versed, in which sense it is opposed by Plato to \u03b4\u03bf\u03be\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03ae\u03c2, a mere conjecturer. In this passage \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c2 would seem to be the broader, more general, and perhaps more dignified term of the two, as denoting the habit or quality, while \u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03ae\u03bc\u03c9\u03bd indicates the special development and intelligent application of the quality to particular things. The Rev., wise and understanding, gives the distinction, on the whole, as nearly as is necessary.\nConversation (\u1f00\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c6\u1fc6\u03c2)\nSee on Pe1 1:15.\nMeekness of wisdom\nOn meekness, see on Mat 5:5. The meekness which is the proper attribute of wisdom.\n\"Knowledge is proud that she has learned so much,\nWisdom is humble that she knows no more.\"\nEnvying (\u03b6\u1fc6\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd)\nThe word is used in the New Testament both in a bad and a good sense. For the latter, see Joh 2:17; Rom 10:2; Co2 9:2. From it is our word zeal, which may be either good or bad, wise or foolish. The bad sense is predominant in the New Testament. See Act 5:17; Rom 13:13; Gal 5:20, and here, where the bad sense is defined and emphasized by the epithet bitter. It is often joined with \u1f14\u03c1\u03b9\u03c2 strife, as here with \u1f10\u03c1\u03af\u03b8\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1, intriguing or faction. The rendering envying, as A. V., more properly belongs to \u03c6\u03b8\u03cc\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2, which is never used in a good sense. Emulation is the better general rendering, which does not necessarily include envy, but may be full of the spirit of self-devotion. Rev. renders jealousy.\nStrife (\u1f10\u03c1\u03b9\u03b8\u03b5\u03af\u03b1\u03bd)\nA wrong rendering, founded on the mistaken derivation from \u1f14\u03c1\u03b9\u03c2, strife. It is derived from \u1f14\u03c1\u03b9\u03b8\u03bf\u03c2, a hired servant, and means, primarily, labor for hire. Compare Tobit 2:11: My wife did take women's work to do (\u1f20\u03c1\u03b9\u03b8\u03b5\u03cd\u03b5\u03c4\u03bf). Thus it comes to be applied to those who serve in official positions for their own selfish interest, and who, to that end, promote party spirit and faction. So Rom 2:8 : them that are contentious (\u1f10\u03be \u1f10\u03c1\u03b9\u03b8\u03b5\u03af\u03b1\u03c2), lit., of faction. Rev., factious. Also, Co2 12:20. Rev., here, rightly, faction.\nWisdom (\u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03af\u03b1)\nSee on \u03c3\u03bf\u03c6\u03cc\u03c2, Jam 3:13.\nFrom above\nCompare Jam 1:17.\nSensual (\u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae)\nSee on Jde 1:19.\nDevilish (\u03b4\u03b1\u03b9\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u03b9\u03ce\u03b4\u03b7\u03c2)\nOr demoniacal, according to the proper rendering of \u03b4\u03b1\u03af\u03bc\u03c9\u03bd (see on Mat 4:1). Only here in New Testament. Devilish, \"such,\" says Bengel, \"as even devils have.\" Compare Jam 2:19.\nConfusion (\u1f00\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03c3\u03af\u03b1)\nSee on restless, Jam 3:8.\nEvil (\u03c6\u03b1\u1fe6\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd)\nAn inadequate rendering, because it fails to bring out the particular phase of evil which is dominant in the word: worthlessness, good-for-nothingness. In classical Greek it has the meanings slight, trivial, paltry, which run into bad. In the New Testament it appears in this latest stage, and is set over against good. See Joh 3:20; Joh 5:29; Tit 2:8. Rev., vile, which, according to its etymology, Lat., vilis, follows the same process of development from cheap, or paltry, to bad.\nFirst\nEmphasizing its inner quality, pure, as distinguished from its outward expressions. The idea is not first numerically, but first essentially. The other qualities are secondary as outgrowths of this primary quality.\nGentle (\u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03b5\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae\u03c2)\nSee on Pe1 2:18.\nEasy to be intreated (\u03b5\u1f50\u03c0\u03b5\u03b9\u03b8\u03ae\u03c2)\nOnly here in New Testament.\nWithout partiality (\u1f00\u03b4\u03b9\u03ac\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2)\nOnly here in New Testament and very rare in classical Greek. Rev., without variance or doubting. See on Jam 1:6.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: James: James Chapter 3","type":"page"}