{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/jo1002.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/jo1002.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/jo1002.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nMy little children (\u03c4\u03b5\u03ba\u03bd\u03af\u03b1 \u03bc\u03bf\u03c5)\n\u03a4\u03b5\u03ba\u03bd\u03af\u03bf\u03bd, little child, diminutive of \u03c4\u03ad\u03ba\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd child, occurs in Joh 8:33; Jo1 2:12, Jo1 2:28; Jo1 3:7, Jo1 3:18; Jo1 4:4; Jo1 5:21. This particular phrase is found only here (best texts omit my in Jo1 3:18). Used as a term of affection, or possibly with reference to the writer's advanced age. Compare Christ's word, \u03c0\u03b1\u03b9\u03b4\u03af\u03b1 children (Joh 21:5) which John also uses (Jo1 2:13, Jo1 2:18). In the familiar story of John and the young convert who became a robber, it is related that the aged apostle repaired to the robber's haunt, and that the young man, on seeing him, took to flight. John, forgetful of his age, ran after him, crying: \"O my son why dost thou fly from me thy father? Thou, an armed man, - I, an old, defenseless one! Have pity upon me! My son, do not fear! There is still hope of life for thee. I wish myself to take the burden of all before Christ. If it is necessary, I will die for thee, as Christ died for us. Stop! Believe! It is Christ who sends me.\"\nI write\nMore personal than we write (Jo1 1:4), and thus better suiting the form of address, my little children.\nIf any man sin, we have\nThe change from the indefinite third person, any man, to the first person, we have, is significant. By the we have, John assumes the possibility of sinful acts on the part of Christians, and of himself in common with them, and their common need of the intervention of the divine Advocate. So Augustine: \"He said, not 'ye have,' nor 'ye have me,' nor 'ye have Christ himself;' but he put Christ, not himself, and said 'we have,' and not 'ye have.' He preferred to place himself in the number of sinners, so that he might have Christ for his advocate, rather than to put himself as the advocate instead of Christ, and to be found among the proud who are destined to condemnation.\"\nAn advocate (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03ac\u03ba\u03bb\u03b7\u03c4\u03bf\u03bd)\nSee on Joh 14:16.\nWith the Father (\u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03c0\u03b1\u03c4\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1)\nSee on with God, Joh 1:1. An active relation is indicated. On the terms the Father and my Father, see on Joh 4:21.\nThe righteous\nCompare righteous, Jo1 1:9. There is no article in the Greek. Jesus Christ righteous. See on Jo1 1:9.\nAnd He (\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78\u03c2)\nThe He is emphatic: that same Jesus: He himself.\nThe propitiation (\u1f31\u03bb\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03cc\u03c2)\nOnly here and Jo1 4:10. From \u1f31\u03bb\u03ac\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 to appease, to conciliate to one's self, which occurs Luk 18:13; Heb 2:17. The noun means originally an appeasing or propitiating, and passes, through Alexandrine usage, into the sense of the means of appeasing, as here. The construction is to be particularly noted; for, in the matter of (\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u03af) our sins; the genitive case of that for which propitiation is made. In Heb 2:17, the accusative case, also of the sins to be propitiated. In classical usage, on the other hand, the habitual construction is the accusative (direct objective case), of the person propitiated. So in Homer, of the gods. \u0398\u03b5\u1f78\u03bd \u1f31\u03bb\u03ac\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03c3\u03b8\u03b1\u03b9 is to make a God propitious to one. See \"Iliad,\" i., 386, 472. Of men whom one wishes to conciliate by divine honors after death. So Herodotus, of Philip of Crotona. \"His beauty gained him honors at the hands of the Egestaeans which they never accorded to any one else; for they raised a hero-temple over his grave, and they still propitiate him (\u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u1f31\u03bb\u03ac\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9) with sacrifices\" (v., 47). Again, \"The Parians, having propitiated Themistocles (\u0398\u03b5\u03bc\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03ba\u03bb\u03ad\u03b1 \u1f31\u03bb\u03b1\u03c3\u03ac\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9) with gifts, escaped the visits of the army\" (viii., 112). The change from this construction shows, to quote Canon Westcott, \"that the scriptural conception of the verb is not that of appeasing one who is angry, with a personal feeling, against the offender; but of altering the character of that which, from without, occasions a necessary alienation, and interposes an inevitable obstacle to fellowship. Such phrases as 'propitiating God,' and God 'being reconciled' are foreign to the language of the New Testament. Man is reconciled (Co2 5:18 sqq.; Rom 5:10 sq.). There is a propitiation in the matter of the sin or of the sinner.\"\nFor the sins of the whole world (\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1\u1f76 \u1f45\u03bb\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5)\nThe sins of (A. V., italicized) should be omitted; as in Revelation, for the whole world. Compare Jo1 4:14; Joh 4:42; Joh 7:32. \"The propitiation is as wide as the sin\" (Bengel). If men do not experience its benefit, the fault is not in its efficacy. Dsterdieck (cited by Huther) says, \"The propitiation has its real efficacy for the whole world; to believers it brings life, to unbelievers death.\" Luther: \"It is a patent fact that thou too art a part of the whole world; so that thine heart cannot deceive itself, and think, the Lord died for Peter and Paul, but not for me.\" On \u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5 see on Joh 1:9.\nHereby (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u03cd\u03c4\u1ff3)\nLit., in this. Characteristic of John. See Joh 8:35; Joh 15:8; Joh 16:30; Jo1 2:5; Jo1 3:24; Jo1 4:13; Jo1 5:2; Jo1 3:16; Jo1 3:19; Jo1 4:2. The expression points to what follows, \"if we keep His commandments,\" yet with a covert reference to that idea as generally implied in the previous words concerning fellowship with God and walking in the light.\nWe know (\u03b3\u03b9\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd)\nOr, perceive. By experience, from day to day; distinguished from \u03bf\u1f34\u03b4\u03b1\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd we know, expressing absolute, immediate knowledge of a fact once for all. Compare Jo1 3:2.\nThat we know (\u1f45\u03c4\u03b9 \u1f10\u03b3\u03bd\u03ce\u03ba\u03b1\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd)\nOr, more literally, have come to know. John does not use the compound forms \u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03b3\u03b9\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd and \u1f10\u03c0\u03af\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 (see on Mat 7:16. See Luk 1:4; Act 4:13; Rom 1:28; Eph 1:17, etc.), nor the kindred word \u03b3\u03bd\u1ff6\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 knowledge (Luk 1:77; Rom 2:20, etc.).\nWe keep His commandments (\u03c4\u1f70\u03c2 \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf\u03bb\u1f70\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c1\u1ff6\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd)\nA phrase peculiar to John and occurring elsewhere only Mat 19:17; Ti1 6:14. In Co1 7:19, we find \u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b7\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf\u03bb\u1ff6\u03bd the keeping of the commandments. On \u03c4\u03b7\u03c1\u03ad\u03c9 to keep, see on Pe1 1:5.\nA liar\nCompare we lie, Jo1 1:6.\nIn him (\u1f10\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u03cd\u03c4\u1ff3)\nEmphatic. Lit., in this one the truth is not. See on Jo1 1:8.\nKeepeth His word (\u03c4\u03b7\u03c1\u1fc7 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03bd)\nNote the changed phrase: word for commandments. The word is the revelation regarded as a whole, which includes all the separate commandments or injunctions. See the use of \u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03c2 word, and \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf\u03bb\u03ae precept, in Joh 14:21-24.\nIs the love of God perfected (\u1f21 \u1f00\u03b3\u03ac\u03c0\u03b7 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u0398\u03b5\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c4\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03c9\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nRev., rendering the perfect tense more closely, hath the love of God been perfected. The change in the form of this antithetic clause is striking. He who claims to know God, yet lives in disobedience, is a liar. We should expect as an offset to this: He that keepeth His commandments is of the truth; or, the truth is in him. Instead we have, \"In him has the love of God been perfected.\" In other words, the obedient child of God is characterized, not by any representative trait or quality of his own personality, but merely as the subject of the work of divine love: as the sphere in which that love accomplishes its perfect work.\nThe phrase \u1f21 \u1f00\u03b3\u03ac\u03c0\u03b7 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u0398\u03b5\u03bf\u1fe6 the love of God, may mean either the love which God shows, or the love of which God is the object, or the love which is characteristic of God whether manifested by Himself or by His obedient child through His Spirit. John's usage is not decisive like Paul's, according to which the love of God habitually means the love which proceeds from and is manifested by God. The exact phrase, the love of God or the love of the Father, is found in Jo1 3:16; Jo1 4:9, in the undoubted sense of the love of God to men. The same sense is intended in Jo1 3:1, Jo1 3:9, Jo1 3:16, though differently expressed. The sense is doubtful in Jo1 2:5; Jo1 3:17; Jo1 4:12. Men's love to God is clearly meant in Jo1 2:15; Jo1 5:3. The phrase occurs only twice in the Gospels (Luk 6:42; Joh 5:42), and in both cases the sense is doubtful. Some, as Ebrard, combine the two, and explain the love of God as the mutual relation of love between God and men.\nIt is not possible to settle the point decisively, but I incline to the view that the fundamental idea of the love of God as expounded by John is the love which God has made known and which answers to His nature. In favor of this is the general usage of \u1f00\u03b3\u03ac\u03c0\u03b7 love, in the New Testament, with the subjective genitive. The object is more commonly expressed by \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 towards, or to. See Th1 3:12; Col 1:4; Pe1 4:8. Still stronger is John's treatment of the subject in ch. 4. Here we have, Jo1 4:9, the manifestation of the love of God in us (\u1f10\u03bd \u1f21\u03bc\u1fd6\u03bd) By our life in Christ and our love to God we are a manifestation of God's love. Directly following this is a definition of the essential nature of love. \"In this is love; i.e., herein consists love: not that we have loved God, but that He loved us\" (Jo1 4:10). Our mutual love is a proof that God dwells in us. God dwelling in us, His love is perfected in us (Jo1 4:12). The latter clause, it would seem, must be explained according to Jo1 4:10. Then (Jo1 4:16), \"We have known and believed the love that God hath in us\" (see on Joh 16:22, on the phrase have love). \"God is love;\" that is His nature, and He imparts this nature to be the sphere in which His children dwell. \"He that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God.\" Finally, our love is engendered by His love to us. \"We love Him because He first loved us\" (Jo1 4:19).\nIn harmony with this is Joh 15:9. \"As the Father loved me, I also loved you. Continue ye in my love.\" My love must be explained by I loved you. This is the same idea of divine love as the sphere or element of renewed being; and this idea is placed, as in the passage we are considering, in direct connection with the keeping of the divine commandments. \"If ye keep my commandments ye shall abide in my love.\"\nThis interpretation does not exclude man's love to God. On the contrary, it includes it. The love which God has, is revealed as the love of God in the love of His children towards Him, no less than in His manifestations of love to them. The idea of divine love is thus complex. Love, in its very essence, is reciprocal. Its perfect ideal requires two parties. It is not enough to tell us, as a bare, abstract truth, that God is love. The truth must be rounded and filled out for us by the appreciable exertion of divine love upon an object, and by the response of the object. The love of God is perfected or completed by the perfect establishment of the relation of love between God and man. When man loves perfectly, his love is the love of God shed abroad in his heart. His love owes both its origin and its nature to the love of God.\nThe word verily (\u1f00\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u1ff6\u03c2) is never used by John as a mere formula of affirmation, but has the meaning of a qualitative adverb, expressing not merely the actual existence of a thing, but its existence in a manner most absolutely corresponding to \u1f00\u03bb\u03ae\u03b8\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 truth. Compare Joh 1:48; Joh 8:31. Hath been perfected. John is presenting the ideal of life in God. \"This is the love of God that we keep His commandments.\" Therefore whosoever keepeth God's word, His message in its entirety, realizes the perfect relation of love.\nWe are in Him\nCompare Act 17:28. See note on Jo1 2:15.\nHe abideth in Him (\u1f10\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff7 \u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd)\nTo abide in God is a more common expression with John than to be in God, and marks an advance in thought. The phrase is a favorite one with John. See Joh 15:4 sqq.; Joh 6:56; Jo1 2:24, Jo1 2:27, Jo1 2:28; Jo1 3:6, Jo1 3:24; Jo1 4:12 sq.; Jo1 4:15 sq. Bengel notes the gradation in the three phrases \"to know Him, to be in Him, to abide in Him; knowledge, fellowship, constancy.\"\nOught (\u1f40\u03c6\u03b5\u03af\u03bb\u03b5\u03b9)\nAn obligation, put as a debt. See Luk 17:10, and on debts, Mat 6:12. The word expresses a special, personal obligation, and not as \u03b4\u03b5\u1fd6 must, an obligation in the nature of things. See Joh 20:9, and compare Jo1 3:16; Jo1 4:11; Jo3 1:8.\nHe (\u1f10\u03ba\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nAlways of Christ in the Epistles of John. See \u1f10\u03ba\u03b5\u03af\u03bd\u03b7\u03c2, referring to \u1f01\u03bc\u03b1\u03c1\u03c4\u03af\u03b1 sin, Jo1 5:16.\nBrethren (\u1f00\u03b4\u03b5\u03bb\u03c6\u03bf\u1f76)\nThe correct reading is \u1f00\u03b3\u03b1\u03c0\u03b7\u03bf\u03af beloved. The first occurrence of this title, which is suggested by the previous words concerning the relation of love.\nNo new commandment (\u03bf\u1f50\u03ba \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf\u03bb\u1f74\u03bd \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u1f74\u03bd)\nThe Rev., properly, places these words first in the sentence as emphatic, the point of the verse lying in the antithesis between the new and the old. On new, see on Mat 26:29.\nOld (\u03c0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03b9\u1f70\u03bd)\nFour words are used in the New Testament for old or elder. Of these \u03b3\u03ad\u03c1\u03c9\u03bd and \u03c0\u03c1\u03b5\u03c3\u03b2\u03cd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf\u03c2 refer merely to the age of men, or, the latter, to official position based primarily upon age. Hence the official term elder. Between the two others, \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03c2 and \u03c0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03b9\u03cc\u03c2, the distinction is not sharply maintained. \u1f09\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03c2 emphasizes the reaching back to a beginning (\u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03ae) Thus Satan is \"that old (\u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03c2) serpent,\" whose evil work was coeval with the beginning of time (Rev 7:9; Rev 20:2). The world before the flood is \"the old (\u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03c2) world\" (Pe2 2:5). Mnason was \"an old (\u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03c2) disciple;\" not aged, but having been a disciple from the beginning (Act 21:16). Sophocles, in \"Trachiniae,\" 555, gives both words. \"I had an old (\u03c0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03b9\u1f78\u03bd) gift,\" i.e., received long ago, \"from the old (\u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u03af\u03bf\u03c5) Centaur.\" The Centaur is conceived as an old-world creature, belonging to a state of things which has passed away. It carries, therefore, the idea of old fashioned: peculiar to an obsolete state of things.\n\u03a0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03b9\u03cc\u03c2 carries the sense of worn out by time, injury, sorrow, or other causes. Thus the old garment (Mat 9:16) is \u03c0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03b9\u03cc\u03bd. So the old wine-skins (Mat 9:17). The old men of a living generation compared with the young of the same generation are \u03c0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03b9\u03bf\u03af. In \u03c0\u03b1\u03bb\u03b1\u03b9\u03cc\u03c2 the simple conception of time dominates. In \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03b1\u1fd6\u03bf\u03c2 there is often a suggestion of a character answering to the remote age.\nThe commandment is here called old because it belonged to the first stage of the Christian church. Believers had had it from the beginning of their Christian faith.\nCommandment\nThe commandment of love. Compare Joh 13:34. This commandment is fulfilled in walking as Christ walked. Compare Eph 5:1, Eph 5:2.\nNew commandment\nThe commandment of love is both old and new. Old, because John's readers have had it from the beginning of their Christian experience. New, because, in the unfolding of Christian experience, it has developed new power, meaning, and obligation, and closer correspondence \"with the facts of Christ's life, with the crowning mystery of His passion, and with the facts of the Christian life.\"\nWhich thing is true (\u1f45 \u1f10\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03bd \u1f00\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u1f72\u03c2)\nThe expression which thing, or that which, refers either to the commandment of love, or to the fact stated, viz., that the old commandment is new. The fact that the old commandment is new is true in Him and in us. On the whole I prefer this.\nIn Him and in us\nFor us, read you. The fact that the old commandment is new, is true in Him (Christ), since He gave it as a new commandment, and illustrated it by His word and example. It is true in you, since you did not receive it until Christ gave it, and since the person and life of Christ are appealing to you in new lights and with fresh power as your Christian life develops. In Him, points back to as He walked.\nBecause\nExplaining the apparent paradox.\nThe darkness (\u1f21 \u03c3\u03ba\u03bf\u03c4\u03af\u03b1)\nSee on Joh 1:5. God is light; and whatever is not in fellowship with God is therefore darkness. In all cases where the word is not used of physical darkness, it means moral insensibility to the divine light; moral blindness or obtuseness. Compare Joh 8:12; Joh 12:35, Joh 12:46; Jo1 2:9, Jo1 2:11.\nIs past (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03ac\u03b3\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nWrong. The passing is not represented as accomplished, but as in progress. Rev., rightly rendering the present tense, is passing away.\nThe true light (\u03c4\u1f78 \u03c6\u1ff6\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f78 \u1f00\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u03b9\u03bd\u1f78\u03bd)\nLit., the light, the true (light). See on that eternal life (Jo1 1:2). True, not as distinguished from false, but as answering to the true ideal. See on Joh 1:9. The true light is the revelation of God in Christ. See on Jo1 1:5.\nShineth (\u03c6\u03b1\u03af\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9)\nSee on Joh 1:5. Compare Rev 1:16; Rev 8:12; Rev 21:23; Pe2 1:19. See also Rom 13:11 sqq.; Tit 2:11; Tit 3:4.\nHateth (\u03bc\u03b9\u03c3\u1ff6\u03bd)\nThe sharp issue is maintained here as in Christ's words, \"He that is not with me is against me\" (Luk 11:23). Men fall into two classes, those who are in fellowship with God, and therefore walk in light and love, and those who are not in fellowship with God, and therefore walk in darkness and hatred. \"A direct opposition,\" says Bengel; where love is not, there is hatred. \"The heart is not empty.\" See Joh 3:20; Joh 7:7; Joh 15:18 sqq.; Joh 17:14. The word hate is opposed both to the love of natural affection (\u03c6\u03b9\u03bb\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd), and to the more discriminating sentiment - love founded on a just estimate (\u1f00\u03b3\u03b1\u03c0\u1fb6\u03bd). For the former see Joh 12:25; Joh 15:18, Joh 15:19; compare Luk 14:26. For the latter, Jo1 3:14, Jo1 3:15; Jo1 4:20, Mat 5:43; Mat 6:24; Eph 5:28, Eph 5:29. \"In the former case, hatred, which may become a moral duty, involves the subjection of an instinct. In the latter case it expresses a general determination of character\" (Westcott).\nHis brother (\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u1f00\u03b4\u03b5\u03bb\u03c6\u03cc\u03bd)\nHis fellow-Christian. The singular, brother, is characteristic of this Epistle. See Jo1 2:10, Jo1 2:11; Jo1 3:10, Jo1 3:15, Jo1 3:17; Jo1 4:20, Jo1 4:21; Jo1 5:16. Christians are called in the New Testament, Christians (Act 11:26; Act 26:28; Pe1 4:16), mainly by those outside of the Christian circle. Disciples, applied to all followers of Christ (Joh 2:11; Joh 6:61) and strictly to the twelve (Joh 13:5 sqq.). In Act 19:1, to those who had received only John's baptism. Not found in John's Epistles nor in Revelation. Brethren. The first title given to the body of believers after the Ascension (Act 1:15, where the true reading is \u1f00\u03b4\u03b5\u03bb\u03c6\u1ff6\u03bd brethren, for \u03bc\u03b1\u03b8\u03b7\u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd disciples). See Act 9:30; Act 10:23; Act 11:29; Th1 4:10; Th1 5:26; Jo1 3:14; Jo3 1:5, Jo3 1:10; Joh 21:23. Peter has \u1f21 \u1f00\u03b4\u03b5\u03bb\u03c6\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 the brotherhood (Pe1 2:17; Pe1 5:9). The believers. Under three forms: The believers (\u03bf\u1f31 \u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03af; Act 10:45; Ti1 4:12); they that believe (\u03bf\u1f31 \u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2; Pe1 2:7; Th1 1:7; Eph 1:19); they that believed (\u03bf\u1f31 \u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2; Act 2:44; Act 4:32; Heb 4:3). The saints (\u03bf\u1f31 \u1f05\u03b3\u03b9\u03bf\u03b9); characteristic of Paul and Revelation. Four times in the Acts (Act 9:13, Act 9:32, Act 9:41; Act 26:10), and once in Jude (Jde 1:3). Also Heb 6:10; Heb 13:24. In Paul, Co1 6:1; Co1 14:33; Eph 1:1, Eph 1:15, etc. In Rev 5:8; Rev 8:3, Rev 8:4; Rev 11:18, etc.\nUntil now (\u1f15\u03c9\u03c2 \u1f04\u03c1\u03c4\u03b9)\nThough the light has been increasing, and though he may claim that he has been in the light from the first. The phrase occurs in Joh 2:10; Joh 5:17; Joh 16:24; and is used by Paul, Co1 4:13; Co1 8:7; Co1 15:6.\nAbideth (\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9)\nSee on Jo1 2:6. Compare Jo1 2:9, is in.\nOccasion of stumbling (\u03c3\u03ba\u03ac\u03bd\u03b4\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd)\nSee on offend, Mat 5:29. For the image in John, see Joh 6:61; Joh 11:9; Joh 16:1; Rev 2:14. The meaning is not that he gives no occasion of stumbling to others, but that there is none in his own way. See Joh 11:9, Joh 11:10.\nIs - walketh - whither\nThe condition of him who hates is viewed as related to being, action, and tendency.\nHe goeth (\u1f51\u03c0\u03ac\u03b3\u03b5\u03b9)\nOr, is going. See on Joh 6:21; see on Joh 8:21.\nHath blinded (\u1f10\u03c4\u03cd\u03c6\u03bb\u03c9\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd)\nFor the image see Isa 6:10. See on closed, Mat 13:15. Compare Joh 1:5, and see note on \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03ad\u03bb\u03b1\u03b2\u03b5\u03bd, overtook; Joh 11:35, Joh 11:40. The aorist tense, blinded, indicates a past, definite, decisive act. When the darkness overtook, it blinded. The blindness is no new state into which he has come.\nLittle children\nSee on Jo1 2:1, and Joh 1:12. Not children in age, but addressed to the readers generally.\nName\nSee on Joh 1:12; see on Joh 2:23.\nFathers\nIndicating age and authority.\nHave known (\u1f10\u03b3\u03bd\u03ce\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5)\nRev., correctly, ye know. Knowledge is the characteristic of fathers; knowledge as the fruit of experience. Ye have perceived, therefore ye know.\nHave overcome (\u03bd\u03b5\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5)\nCompare Joh 16:33. The image is characteristic of Revelation and First Epistle. See Rev 2:7, Rev 2:11, Rev 2:17, Rev 2:26; Rev 12:11; Rev 21:7; Jo1 2:14; Jo1 4:4; Jo1 5:4, Jo1 5:5.\nThe evil one (\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03c0\u03bf\u03bd\u03b7\u03c1\u03cc\u03bd)\nSee on wickedness, Mar 7:22; see on evils, Luk 3:19; see on evil spirits, Luk 7:21. The prince of darkness is styled by John \u1f41 \u03b4\u03b9\u03ac\u03b2\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 the false accuser (Joh 8:44; Joh 13:2; Jo1 3:8, Jo1 3:10. See on Mat 4:1): \u1f41 \u03a3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd\u1fb6\u03c2 Satan, the adversary (Joh 13:27; compare \u1f41 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03ae\u03b3\u03c9\u03c1 the accuser, properly, in court, Rev 12:10): \u1f41 \u03c0\u03bf\u03bd\u03b7\u03c1\u03cc\u03c2 the evil one (Joh 17:15; Jo1 2:13, Jo1 2:14; Jo1 3:12; Jo1 5:18, Jo1 5:19): \u1f41 \u1f04\u03c1\u03c7\u03c9\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c4\u03bf\u03cd\u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 the ruler of this world (Joh 12:31; Joh 14:30; Joh 16:11). Note the abrupt introduction of the word here, as indicating something familiar.\nI have written (\u1f14\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03c8\u03b1)\nOr, strictly, I wrote. Compare I write (Jo1 2:12, Jo1 2:13), and note the change of tense. The past tense, I wrote, does not refer to some previous writing, as the Gospel, but, like the present, to this Epistle. The present, I write, refers to the immediate act of writing: the aorist is the epistolary aorist, by which the writer places himself at the reader's stand-point, regarding the writing as past. See on Pe1 5:12. I write, therefore, refers to the Apostle's immediate act of writing; I have written, or I wrote, to the reader's act of reading the completed writing.\nLittle children (\u03c0\u03b1\u03b9\u03b4\u03af\u03b1)\nCompare \u03c4\u03b5\u03ba\u03bd\u03af\u03b1 little children (Jo1 2:1), which emphasizes the idea of kinship, while this word emphasizes the idea of subordination and consequent discipline. Hence it is the more appropriate word when spoken from the stand-point of authority rather than of affection.\nYe have known (\u1f10\u03b3\u03bd\u03ce\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5)\nRev., correctly, ye known.\nThe Father\nIn His rightful authority, as a Father over little children.\nHim that is from the beginning\nThe eternal, pre-existent Christ, who was from the beginning (Joh 1:1). The eternal Son, through whom men are brought into the relation of children of God, and learn to know the\nFather\nThe knowledge of God involves, on the part of both fathers and children, the knowledge of Christ.\nStrong (\u1f30\u03c3\u03c7\u03c5\u03c1\u03bf\u03af)\nSee on was not able, Luk 14:30; see on I cannot, Luk 16:3.\nThe world (\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd)\nSee on Joh 1:9.\nThe love of the Father (\u1f21 \u1f00\u03b3\u03ac\u03c0\u03b7 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2)\nThe phrase occurs only here in the New Testament. It means love towards the Father, yet as generated by the Father's love to man. Compare Jo1 3:1. See on love of God, Jo1 2:5.\nIs not in him\nThis means more than that he does not love God: rather that the love of God does not dwell in him as the ruling principle of his life. Westcott cites a parallel from Philo: \"It is impossible for love to the world to coexist with love to God, as it is impossible for light and darkness to coexist.\" Compare Plato. \"Evils, Theodorus, can never pass away; for there must always remain something which is antagonist to good. Having no place among the gods in heaven, of necessity they hover around the earthly nature, and this mortal sphere. Wherefore we ought to fly away from earth to heaven as quickly as we can; and to fly away is to become like God, as far as this is possible; and to become like Him is to become holy and just and wise\" (\"Theaetetus,\" 176).\nAll (\u03c0\u1fb6\u03bd)\nNot all things severally, but all that is in the world collectively, regarded as a unit.\nThe lust (\u1f21 \u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03b8\u03c5\u03bc\u03af\u03b1)\nSee on Mar 4:19.\nOf the flesh\nSensual appetite. The desire which resides in the flesh, not the desire for the flesh. For this subjective usage of the genitive with lust, see Joh 8:44; Rom 1:24; Rev 18:14. Compare Pe1 2:11; Tit 2:12. The lust of the flesh involves the appropriation of the desired object. On the flesh, see on Joh 1:14.\nThe lust of the eyes\nThis is included in the lust of the flesh, as a specific manifestation. All merely sensual desires belong to the economy which \"is not of the Father.\" The desire of the eyes does not involve appropriation. It is satisfied with contemplating. It represents a higher type of desire than the desire of the flesh, in that it seeks mental pleasure where the other seeks physical gratification. There is thus a significant hint in this passage that even high artistic gratification may have no fellowship with God.\nThe pride of life (\u1f21 \u1f00\u03bb\u03b1\u03b6\u03bf\u03bd\u03b5\u03af\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03b2\u03af\u03bf\u03c5)\nRev., vainglory. The word occurs only here and Jam 4:16, on which see note. It means, originally, empty, braggart talk or display; swagger; and thence an insolent and vain assurance in one's own resources, or in the stability of earthly things, which issues in a contempt of divine laws. The vainglory of life is the vainglory which belongs to the present life. On \u03b2\u03af\u03bf\u03c2 life, as distinguished from \u03b6\u03c9\u03b7. life, see on Joh 1:4.\nOf the Father (\u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1\u03cc\u03c2)\nDo not spring forth from the Father. On the expression \u03b5\u1f36\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9 \u1f10\u03ba to be of, see on Joh 1:46. \"He, therefore, who is always occupied with the cravings of desire and ambition, and is eagerly striving after them, must have all his opinions mortal, and, as far as man can be, must be all of him mortal, because he has cherished his mortal part. But he who has been earnest in the love of knowledge and true wisdom, and has been trained to think that these are the immortal and divine things of a man, if he attain truth, must of necessity, as far as human nature is capable of attaining immortality, be all immortal, for he is ever attending on the divine power, and having the divinity within him in perfect order, he has a life perfect and divine\" (Plato, \"Timsaeus,\" 90).\nForever (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03b1\u1f30\u1ff6\u03bd\u03b1)\nThe only form in which \u03b1\u1f30\u1ff6\u03bd age, life, occurs in the Gospel and Epistles of John, except \u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03b1\u1f30\u1ff6\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2 since the world began (Joh 9:32). Some old versions add, \"as God abideth forever.\"\nSee on Jo1 2:13.\nThe last hour (\u1f10\u03c3\u03c7\u03ac\u03c4\u03b7 \u1f65\u03c1\u03b1)\nThe phrase only here in the New Testament. On John's use of \u1f65\u03c1\u03b1 hour, as marking a critical season, see Joh 2:4; Joh 4:21, Joh 4:23; Joh 5:25, Joh 5:28; Joh 7:30; Joh 8:20; Joh 11:23, Joh 11:27; Joh 16:2, Joh 16:4, Joh 16:25, Joh 16:32. The dominant sense of the expression last days, in the New Testament, is that of a period of suffering and struggle preceding a divine victory. See Act 2:17; Jam 5:3; Pe1 1:20. Hence the phrase here does not refer to the end of the world, but to the period preceding a crisis in the advance of Christ's kingdom, a changeful and troublous period, marked by the appearance of \"many antichrists.\"\nAntichrist\nPeculiar to John in the New Testament. The absence of the article shows its currency as a proper name. It may mean one who stands against Christ, or one who stands instead of Christ; just as \u1f00\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03ac\u03c4\u03b7\u03b3\u03bf\u03c2 may mean either one who stands in the place of a \u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03b7\u03b3\u03cc\u03c2 praetor, a propraetor (see Introd. to Luke, vol. 1, p. 246, and note on Act 16:20), or an opposing general. John never uses the word \u03c8\u03b5\u03c5\u03b4\u03cc\u03c7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c2 false Christ (Mat 24:24; Mar 13:22). While the false Christ is merely a pretender to the Messianic office, the Antichrist \"assails Christ by proposing to do or to preserve what he did, while denying Him.\" Antichrist, then, is one who opposes Christ in the guise of Christ. Westcott's remark is very important, that John's sense of Antichrist is determined by the full Christian conception of Christ, and not by the Jewish conception of the promised Savior.\nCometh (\u1f14\u03c1\u03c7\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nThe prophetic present, equivalent to is about to come. The same term is used of Christ (Joh 14:3; Joh 21:22; Rev 22:20).\nAre there (\u03b3\u03b5\u03b3\u03cc\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nRev., more correctly, have there arisen.\nWhereby (\u1f45\u03b8\u03b5\u03bd)\nLit., whence. Only here in John. It is found in Matthew and Luke, and frequently in Hebrews, and not elsewhere.\nThey went out from us (\u1f10\u03be \u1f21\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd \u1f10\u03be\u1fc6\u03bb\u03b8\u03b1\u03bd)\nThe phrase went out from, may mean either removal (Rev 18:4; Joh 8:59) or origin (Rev 9:3; Rev 14:13, Rev 14:15, Rev 14:17; Rev 19:5, Rev 19:21). Here the latter, as appears from the following clause. Compare Act 20:30.\nWere not of\nSee on Joh 1:46.\nNo doubt\nA needless addition of the A.V.\nWith us (\u03bc\u03b5\u03b8' \u1f21\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd)\n\u1f19\u03bd \u1f21\u03bc\u1fd6\u03bd, among us, would be more according to John's ordinary usage; but his thought rests here rather on fellowship than on the unity of believers as one body.\nThey might be made manifest (\u03c6\u03b1\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03c9\u03b8\u1ff6\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nSee on Joh 21:1.\nThey were not all (\u03bf\u1f50\u03ba \u03b5\u1f30\u03c3\u1f76\u03bd \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2)\nRev., more correctly, they all are not.\nAn unction (\u03c7\u03c1\u03af\u03c3\u03bc\u03b1)\nThe word means that with which the anointing is performed - the unguent or ointment. In the New Testament only here and Jo1 2:27. Rev., an anointing. The root of this word and of \u03a7\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03cc\u03c2, Christ, is the same. See on Mat 1:1. The anointing is from the Anointed.\nThe Holy One\nChrist. See Joh 6:69; Act 3:14; Act 4:27, Act 4:30; Rev 3:7.\nYe know all things (\u03bf\u1f34\u03b4\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5 \u03c0\u03b1.\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1)\nThe best texts read \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b5\u03c2, ye all know; in which case the connection is with the following clause: \"I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it.\"\nI have not written (\u03bf\u1f50\u03ba \u1f14\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03c8\u03b1)\nOr, I wrote not. See on Jo1 2:13.\nA liar (\u1f41 \u03c8\u03b5\u03cd\u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2)\nRev., correctly, \"the liar.\" For a similar interrogative phrase see Jo1 5:5. It marks the lively feeling with which the apostle writes. By the definite article, the liar, the lie is set forth in its concrete personality: the one who impersonates all that is false, as antichrist represents every form of hostility and opposition to Christ. The denial that Jesus is the Christ is the representative falsehood. He that denies is the representative liar.\nHe that denieth (\u1f41 \u1f00\u03c1\u03bd\u03bf\u03cd\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nThe article with the participle denotes the habitual denial. Lit., the one denying, the one who habitually represents this attitude towards Christ. The words are aimed at the heresy of Cerinthus, a man of Jewish decent and educated at Alexandria. He denied the miraculous conception of Jesus, and taught that, after His baptism, the Christ descended upon Him in the form of a dove, and that He then announced the unknown Father and wrought miracles; but that, towards the end of His ministry, the Christ departed again from Jesus, and Jesus suffered and rose from the dead, while the Christ remained impassible (incapable of suffering) as a spiritual being.\nThe title the Father occurs always in its simple form in the Epistle. Never his or our Father, or the Father in heaven.\nHath not the Father (\u03bf\u1f50\u03b4\u1f72 \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03c0\u03b1\u03c4\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1 \u1f14\u03c7\u03b5\u03b9)\nProperly, \"hath not even the Father,\" though he professes to reverence the Father while rejecting the Son. Compare Joh 8:42.\nAs for you (\u1f51\u03bc\u03b5\u1fd6\u03c2)\nThis is the rendering of the Rev. The force of the emphatic you at the beginning of the sentence is utterly lost in the A.V., which takes the pronoun simply as nominative to ye have heard. You is emphatic by way of contrast with the false teachers (Jo1 2:22).\nFrom the beginning\nSee on Jo1 1:1. Notice the change in the order of the repeated sentence, that which ye heard from the beginning: \u1f43 \u1f20\u03ba\u03bf\u03cd\u03c3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5 \u1f00\u03c0' \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u1fc6\u03c2, that which ye heard; the emphasis being on their reception of the message: \u1f43 \u1f00\u03c0 \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u1fc6\u03c2 \u1f20\u03ba\u03bf\u03cd\u03c3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5, that which ye heard from the beginning; emphasizing the time of the reception as coincident with the origin of their faith.\nIn the Son and in the Father\nCompare the reverse order in Jo1 2:22. \"Here the thought is that of rising through the confession of the Son to the knowledge of the Father; there the thought is of the issue of denial culminating in the denial of the Father\" (Westcott).\nThe promise (\u1f21 \u1f10\u03c0\u03b1\u03b3\u03b3\u03b5\u03bb\u03af\u03b1)\nSee on Act 1:4.\nEternal life (\u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03b6\u03c9\u1f74\u03bd \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u03b1\u1f30\u03ce\u03bd\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd)\nLit., the life, the eternal (life).\nSeduce (\u03c0\u03bb\u03b1\u03bd\u03ce\u03bd\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd)\nSee on Jo1 1:8. Rev., lead astray.\nEmphatic, as in Jo1 2:24.\nOf Him (\u1f00\u03c0' \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6)\nSee on Jo1 1:5.\nThe same anointing (\u03c4\u1f78 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78 \u03c7\u03c1\u03af\u03c3\u03bc\u03b1)\nThe best texts read \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6, His anointing.\nIs truth, and is no lie\nThe characteristic combination of positive and negative statement. See on Jo1 1:5.\nYe shall abide (\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03b5\u1fd6\u03c4\u03b5)\nWrong. The best tests read \u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5, which may be taken either as imperative, abide ye, or as indicative, ye abide. The indicative is preferable, as answering to \u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9 abideth.\nIn Him\nChrist.\nWhen He shall appear (\u1f45\u03c4\u03b1\u03bd \u03c6\u03b1\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03c9\u03b8\u1fc7)\nThe best texts read \u1f10\u1f70\u03bd if, for when. So Rev., which gives also the proper passive force of \u03c6\u03b1\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03c9\u03b8\u1fc7, if He shall be manifested. Not expressing a doubt of the fact, but uncertainty as to the circumstances. On \u03c6\u03b1\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03cc\u03c9 to make manifest, see on Joh 21:1. John never uses \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u03cd\u03c0\u03c4\u03c9 to reveal, of the revelation of Christ. Indeed, neither the verb nor the kindred noun, \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03ac\u03bb\u03c5\u03c8\u03b9\u03c2, occurs in his writings except in Joh 12:38, which is a citation from Isaiah, and in Rev 1:1.\nWe may have\nThus identifying himself with his children in the faith. Teacher and pupil must alike abide in Him.\nWe may have confidence (\u03c3\u03c7\u1ff6\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd \u03c0\u03b1\u1fe4\u1fe5\u03b7\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03bd)\nRev., boldness. For the phrase have boldness, see Jo1 3:21; Jo1 4:17; Jo1 5:14; Heb 3:6; Heb 10:19; Plm 1:8. For the word \u03c0\u03b1\u1fe4\u1fe5\u03b7\u03c3\u03af\u03b1 boldness, see on Joh 7:13; see on Act 2:29. It is opposed, as here, to \u03b1\u1f30\u03c3\u03c7\u03cd\u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03b1\u03b9 to be ashamed, in Pro 13:5, where the Septuagint reads \"a wicked man is ashamed (\u03b1\u1f30\u03c3\u03c7\u03cd\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9) and shall not have boldness (\u03c0\u03b1\u1fe4\u1fe5\u03b7\u03c3\u03af\u03b1\u03bd). Also in Phi 1:20. Compare Co2 3:12. The idea of free, open speech lies at the bottom of the word: coming before God's bar with nothing to conceal. The thought is embodied in the general confession of the Book of Common Prayer: \"That we should not dissemble nor cloke them before the face of Almighty God our Heavenly Father, but confess them.\" So John Wesley's Hymn:\n\"Jesus, Thy blood and righteousness\nMy beauty are, my glorious dress:\n'Midst flaming worlds, in these arrayed,\nWith joy shall I lift up my head.\nBold shall I stand in Thy great day,\nFor who aught to my charge shall lay?\nFully absolved through these I am, -\nFrom sin and fear, from guilt and shame.\"\nBe ashamed before Him (\u03b1\u1f30\u03c3\u03c7\u03c5\u03bd\u03b8\u1ff6\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd \u1f00\u03c0' \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6)\nThe expression is peculiar. Lit., \"be ashamed from Him.\" The fundamental thought is that of separation and shrinking from God through the shame of conscious guilt. The same construction is found in the Septuagint. Isa 1:29, \"They shall be ashamed from their idols.\" Jer 2:36, \"Thou shalt be ashamed of (from) Egypt, as thou wast ashamed of (from) Assyria.\" Jer 12:13.\nComing (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03bf\u03c5\u03c3\u03af\u1fb3)\nLit., presence. So Co2 10:10. Hence, the presence of one coming, and so coming, especially in the New Testament, of the future, visible return of our Lord to raise the dead, judge the world, and finally establish the kingdom of God. The word does not occur elsewhere in John, nor does he use \u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03c6\u03ac\u03bd\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1, which is Paul's word for the same event.\nIf ye know - ye know (\u1f10\u1f70\u03bd \u03b5\u1f30\u03b4\u1fc6\u03c4\u03b5 - \u03b3\u03b9\u03bd\u03ce\u03c3\u03ba\u03b5\u03c4\u03b5)\nIf ye know absolutely that He is righteous, ye perceive that every one, etc. See on Joh 2:24. Ye perceive may be taken as imperative: perceive or know ye.\nIs born of Him (\u1f10\u03be \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03b3\u03b5\u03b3\u03ad\u03bd\u03bd\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nThe interpreters differ as to the reference of Him; some referring it to God, and others to Christ. Against the latter is the fact that men are not said to be born of Christ, but of God; and that to be born of God is a characteristic phrase of John, while to be born of Christ is a phrase which occurs nowhere. On the other hand, the undoubted reference to Christ in Jo1 2:28, would seem to demand a similar reference here. Men are said to abide in Christ as well as in God, and to be born of the Spirit. Westcott's remark is pertinent. \"When John thinks of God in relation to men, he never thinks of Him apart from Christ (see Jo1 5:20); and again, he never thinks of Christ in His human nature without adding the thought of His divine nature. Thus a rapid transition is possible from the one aspect of the Lord's divine-human person to the other.\"\nRighteous (\u03b4\u03af\u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2)\nUsed by John both of God and of Christ. Of God, Jo1 1:9; Joh 17:25; Rev 16:5; of Christ, Jo1 2:1; Jo1 3:7. Compare Act 3:14; Act 7:52; Act 22:14.\nRev., begotten. The first occurrence of the phrase in the Epistle.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: 1 John: 1 John Chapter 2","type":"page"}