{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/joh012.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/joh012.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/joh012.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nWhich had been dead\n(Omit.)\nHe raised\nFor He, read Jesus.\nA pound (\u03bb\u03af\u03c4\u03c1\u03b1\u03bd)\nOnly here and Joh 19:39. Matthew and Mark, \u1f00\u03bb\u03ac\u03b2\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd, a flask.\nOf spikenard (\u03bd\u03ac\u03c1\u03b4\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u1fc6\u03c2)\nSo Mark. See on Mar 14:3.\nVery precious (\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03c5\u03c4\u03af\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5)\nLiterally, of much value. Matthew has \u03b2\u03b1\u03c1\u03c5\u03c4\u03af\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5, of weighty value.\nAnointed\nSee on Joh 11:2.\nFeet\nThe Synoptists mention only the pouring on the head.\nSimon's son\nOmit.\nThree hundred pence (\u03c4\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1\u03ba\u03bf\u03c3\u03af\u03c9\u03bd \u03b4\u03b7\u03bd\u03b1\u03c1\u03af\u03c9\u03bd)\nOr three hundred denarii. On the denarius, see on Mat 20:2. Mark says more than three hundred pence. Three hundred denarii would be about fifty dollars, or twice that amount if we reckon according to the purchasing power.\nThe poor (\u03c0\u03c4\u03c9\u03c7\u03bf\u1fd6\u03c2)\nSee on Mat 5:3. No article: to poor people.\nAnd had the bag, and bare what was put therein (\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03c4\u1f78 \u03b3\u03bb\u03c9\u03c3\u03c3\u03cc\u03ba\u03bf\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd \u03b5\u1f36\u03c7\u03b5, \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u03c4\u1f70 \u03b2\u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03b1 \u1f10\u03b2\u03ac\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03b6\u03b5\u03bd)\nThe best texts read \u1f14\u03c7\u03c9\u03bd, having, and omit the second \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 and. The rendering would then be, and having the bag bare, etc.\nThe bag (\u03b3\u03bb\u03c9\u03c3\u03c3\u03cc\u03ba\u03bf\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd)\nOnly here and Joh 13:29. Originally a box for keeping the mouth-pieces of wind instruments. From \u03b3\u03bb\u1ff6\u03c3\u03c3\u03b1, tongue, and \u03ba\u03bf\u03bc\u03ad\u03c9, to tend. The word was also used for a coffin. Josephus applies it to the coffer in which the golden mice and emerods were preserved (Sa1 6:11). In the Septuagint, of the chest which Joash had provided for receiving contributions for the repairing of the Lord's house (Ch2 24:8). Rev. gives box, in margin.\nBare (\u1f10\u03b2\u03ac\u03c3\u03c4\u03b1\u03b6\u03b5\u03bd)\nCarried away or purloined. This meaning is rather imparted by the context than residing in the verb itself, i.e., according to New Testament usage (see on Joh 10:21). Unquestionably it has this meaning in later Greek, frequently in Josephus. Render, therefore, as Rev., took away. The rendering of the A.V. is tautological.\nLet her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this (\u1f04\u03c6\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03ae\u03bd \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f74\u03bd \u1f21\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03c6\u03b9\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u1fe6)\nThis passage presents great difficulty. According to the reading just given, the meaning is that Mary had kept the ointment, perhaps out of the store provided for Lazarus' burial, against the day of Christ's preparation for the tomb. The word \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03c6\u03b9\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u1fe6 is wrongly rendered burial. It means the preparation for burial, the laying out, or embalmment. It is explained by Joh 19:40, as the binding in linen cloths with spices, \"as the manner of the Jews is \u1f10\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03c6\u03b9\u03ac\u03b6\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd to prepare for burial,\" not to bury. It is the Latin pollingere, to wash and prepare a corpse for the funeral pile. Hence the name of the servant to whom this duty was committed was pollinctor. He was a slave of the libitinarius, or furnishing undertaker. Mary, then, has kept the ointment in order to embalm Jesus with it on this day, as though He were already dead. This is the sense of the Synoptists. Matthew (Mat 26:12) says, she did it with reference to my preparation for burial. Mark, she anticipated to anoint.\nThe reading of the Received Text is, however, disputed. The best textual critics agree that the perfect, \u03c4\u03b5\u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b7\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd, she hath kept, was substituted for the original reading \u03c4\u03b7\u03c1\u03ae\u03c3\u1fc3, the aorist, she may keep, or may have kept, by some one who was trying to bring the text into harmony with Mar 14:8; not understanding how she could keep for His burial that which she poured out now. Some, however, urge the exact contrary, namely, that the perfect is the original reading, and that the aorist is a correction by critics who were occupied with the notion that no man is embalmed before his death, or who failed to see how the ointment could have been kept already, as it might naturally be supposed to have been just purchased. (So Godet and Field.)\nAccording to the corrected reading, \u1f35\u03bd\u03b1, in order that, is inserted after \u1f04\u03c6\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f74\u03bd, let her alone, or suffer her; \u03c4\u03b5\u03c4\u03ae\u03c1\u03b7\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd, hath kept, is changed to \u03c4\u03b7\u03c1\u03ae\u03c3\u1fc3, may keep, and the whole is rendered, suffer her to keep it against the day of my burying. So Rev.\nBut it is difficult to see why Christ should desire to have kept for His embalmment what had already been poured out upon Him. Some, as Meyer, assume that only a part of the ointment was poured out, and refer \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03cc, it, to the part remaining. \"Let her alone, that she may not give away to the poor this ointment, of which she has just used a portion for the anointing of my feet, but preserve it for the day of my embalmming.\" Canon Westcott inclines to this view of the use of only a part. But the inference from the synoptic narratives can be only that the whole contents of the flask were used, and the mention of the pound by John, and the charge of waste are to the same effect. There is nothing whatever to warrant a contrary supposition.\nOthers explain, suffer her to have kept it, or suffer that she may have kept it. So Westcott, who says: \"The idiom by which a speaker throws himself into the past, and regards what is done as still a purpose, is common to all languages.\"\nOthers, again, retain the meaning let her alone, and render \u1f35\u03bd\u03b1, in order that, with an ellipsis, thus: \"Let her alone: (she hath not sold her treasure) in order that she might keep it,\" etc.\nThe old rendering, as A.V., is the simplest, and gives a perfectly intelligible and consistent sense. If, however, this must be rejected, it seems, on the whole, best to adopt the marginal reading of the Rev., with the elliptical \u1f35\u03bd\u03b1: let her alone: it was that she might keep it. This preserves the prohibitory force of \u1f04\u03c6\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03ae\u03bd, which is implied in Mat 26:10, and is unquestionable in Mar 14:6. Compare Mat 15:14; Mat 19:14; Mat 27:49.\nNote that the promise of the future repute of this act (Mat 26:13; Mar 14:9) is omitted by the only Evangelist who records Mary's name in connection with it.\nMuch people (\u1f44\u03c7\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u1f7a\u03c2)\nThe best texts insert the article, which converts the expression into the current phrase, the common people. So Rev.\nKnew (\u1f14\u03b3\u03bd\u03c9)\nRev., more correctly, learned. They came to know.\nThe chief priests\nSee on Joh 12:47.\nWent away (\u1f51\u03c0\u1fc6\u03b3\u03bf\u03bd)\nWithdrew from their company.\nA great multitude (\u1f44\u03c7\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 \u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u1f7a\u03c2)\nSome editors add the article and render, the common people.\nBranches of palms (\u03c4\u1f70 \u03b2\u03b1\u0390\u0301\u03b1 \u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u03c6\u03bf\u03b9\u03bd\u03af\u03ba\u03c9\u03bd)\nThe A.V. overlooks both the articles, the branches of the palms. \u03b2\u03b1\u0390\u0301\u03b1 occurs only here in the New Testament, and means palm branches, or, strictly, tops of the palms where the fruit is produced. Of the palms may have been added by John for readers unacquainted with the technical term, but the expression palm branches of the palms, is similar to housemaster of the house (\u03bf\u1f30\u03ba\u03bf\u03b4\u03b5\u03c3\u03c0\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03bf\u1f30\u03ba\u03af\u03b1\u03c2, Luk 22:11). The articles are commonly explained as marking the trees which were by the wayside on the route of the procession. Some think that they point to the well-known palm branches connected with the Feast of Tabernacles. On the different terms employed by the Evangelists for \"branches,\" see on Mar 11:8.\nTo meet (\u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u1f51\u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nVery literally, to a going to meet.\nCried (\u1f14\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03b6\u03bf\u03bd)\nImperfect, kept crying as he advanced.\nHosanna\nMeaning O save!\nBlessed (\u03b5\u1f50\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nA different word from the blessed of Mat 5:3 (\u03bc\u03b1\u03ba\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2). This is the perfect participle of the verb \u03b5\u1f50\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03ad\u03c9, to speak well of, praise, hence our eulogy. Matthew's word applies to character; this to repute. The ascription of praise here is from Psa 118:25, Psa 118:26. This Psalm, according to Perowne, was composed originally for the first celebration of the Feast of Tabernacles after the completion of the sacred temple. The words of the twenty-fifth verse were sung during that feast, when the altar of burnt-offering was solemnly compassed; that is, once on each of the first six days of the feast, and seven times on the seventh day. This seventh day was called \"the Great Hosanna,\" and not only the prayers for the feast, but even the branches of trees, including the myrtles which were attached to the palm branch, were called \"Hosannas.\"\nThe King of Israel\nThe best texts add \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76, even the king, etc.\nA young ass (\u1f40\u03bd\u03ac\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd)\nOnly here in the New Testament. Matthew mentions an ass and a colt; Mark and Luke a colt only.\nMet (\u1f51\u03c0\u03ae\u03bd\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd)\nThe verb means to go to meet. Hence Rev., went and met.\nIs gone after Him (\u1f40\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03c9 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u1f00\u03c0\u1fc6\u03bb\u03b8\u03b5\u03bd)\nThe phrase occurs only here. Literally, is gone away.\nGreeks (\u1f1d\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b5\u03c2)\nGentiles, not Hellenists. See on Act 6:1. Jesus comes into contact with the Gentile world at His birth (the Magi) and at the close of His ministry.\nPhilip - Andrew\nThey appear together in Joh 1:45; Joh 6:7, Joh 6:8. Compare Mar 3:18.\nAnswered (\u1f00\u03c0\u03b5\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf)\nThe best texts read \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9, answereth.\nThe hour is come, that (\u1f10\u03bb\u03ae\u03bb\u03c5\u03b8\u03b5\u03bd \u1f21 \u1f65\u03c1\u03b1 \u1f35\u03bd\u03b1)\nThis is not equivalent to \"the hour is come in which.\" The hour is used absolutely: the critical hour is come in order that the Son, etc.\nVerily, verily\nSee on Joh 1:51; see on Joh 10:1.\nA corn (\u1f41 \u03ba\u03cc\u03ba\u03ba\u03bf\u03c2)\nProperly, the corn or grain. The article should be inserted in the translation, because Jesus is citing the wheat-grain as a familiar type of that which contains in itself the germ of life. So wheat has the article: the corn of the wheat. The selection of the corn of wheat as an illustration acquires a peculiar interest from the fact of its being addressed to Greeks, familiar with the Eleusinian mysteries celebrated in their own country. These mysteries were based on the legend of Dionysus (Bacchus). According to the legend his original name was Zagreus. He was the son of Zeus (Jupiter) by his own daughter Persephone (Proserpina), and was destined to succeed to supreme dominion and to the wielding of the thunderbolt. The jealousy of Here (Juno), the wife of Zeus, incited the Titans against him, who killed him while he was contemplating his face in a mirror, cut up his body, and boiled it in a caldron, leaving only the heart. Zeus, in his wrath, hurled the Titans to Tartarus, and Apollo collected the remains of Zagreus and buried them. The heart was given to Semele, and Zagreus was born again from her under the form of Dionysus. The mysteries represented the original birth from the serpent, the murder and dismemberment of the child, and the revenge inflicted by Zeus; and the symbols exhibited - the dice, ball, top, mirror, and apple - signified the toys with which the Titans allured the child into their power. Then followed the restoration to life; Demeter (Ceres) the goddess of agriculture, the mother of food, putting the limbs together, and giving her maternal breasts to the child. All this was preparatory to the great Eleusinia, in which the risen Dionysus in the freshness of his second life was conducted from Athens to Eleusis in joyful procession. An ear of corn, plucked in solemn silence, was exhibited to the initiated as the object of mystical contemplation, as the symbol of the god, prematurely killed, but, like the ear enclosing the seed-corn, bearing within himself the germ of a second life.\nWith this mingled the legend of Persephone, the daughter of Demeter, who was carried off by Pluto to the infernal world. The mother wandered over the earth seeking her daughter, and having found her, applied to Zeus, through whose intervention Persephone, while condemned to Hades for a part of the year, was allowed to remain upon earth during the other part. Thus the story became the symbol of vegetation, which shoots forth in spring, and the power of which withdraws into the earth at other seasons of the year. These features of the mysteries set forth, and with the same symbol as that employed by Christ here, the crude pagan conception of life rising out of death.\nAlone (\u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1f78\u03c2 \u03bc\u03cc\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nLiterally, itself alone. Rev., by itself alone.\nLife (\u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u1f74\u03bd)\nSee on Mar 12:30; see on Luk 1:46.\nShall lose (\u1f04\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03ad\u03c3\u03b5\u03b9)\nThe best texts read \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03bb\u03bb\u03cd\u03b5\u03b9, loseth. See on Luk 9:25.\nIn this world\nThis earthly economy, regarded as alien and hostile to God. The words are added in order to explain the strong phrase, hateth his life or soul.\nShall keep (\u03c6\u03c5\u03bb\u03ac\u03be\u03b5\u03b9)\nSee on Pe1 1:4.\nServe (\u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u1fc7)\nSee on Mat 20:26; see on Mar 9:35; see on Pe1 1:12.\nMe (\u1f10\u03bc\u03bf\u1f76)\nNotice the emphatic recurrence of the pronoun in this verse.\nMy Father\nRev., rightly, the Father. \"Very much of the exact force of St. John's record of the Lord's words appears to depend upon the different conceptions of the two forms under which the fatherhood of God is described. God is spoken of as 'the Father' and as 'my Father.' Generally it may be said that the former title expresses the original relation of God to being, and specially to humanity, in virtue of man's creation in the divine image; and the latter more particularly the relation of the Father to the Son incarnate, and so indirectly to man in virtue of the incarnation. The former suggests those thoughts which spring from the consideration of the absolute moral connection of man with God; the latter, those which spring from what is made known to us through revelation of the connection of the incarnate Son with God and with man. 'The Father' corresponds, under this aspect, with the group of ideas gathered up in the Lord's titles, 'the Son' 'the Son of man;' and 'my Father' with those which are gathered up in the title 'the Son of God,' 'the Christ'\" (Westcott).\nMy soul\nSee reff. on Joh 12:25. The soul, \u03c8\u03c5\u03c7\u03ae, is the seat of the human affections; the spirit (\u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u1fe6\u03bc\u03b1) of the religious affections.\nIs troubled (\u03c4\u03b5\u03c4\u03ac\u03c1\u03b1\u03ba\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nThe perfect tense; has been disturbed and remains troubled. The same verb as in Joh 11:33. Notice that there it is said. He groaned in the spirit (\u03c4\u1ff7 \u03c0\u03bd\u03b5\u03cd\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9). His inward agitation did not arise from personal sorrow or sympathy, but from some shock to His moral and spiritual sense.\nWhat shall I say?\nA natural expression out of the depths of our Lord's humanity. How shall I express my emotion? Some commentators connect this with the following clause, shall I say, Father, save me, etc. But this does not agree with the context, and represents a hesitation in the mind of Jesus which found no place there.\nSave me\nThe shrinking from suffering belongs to the human personality of our Lord (compare Mat 26:39); but the prayer, save me from this hour, is not for deliverance from suffering, but for victory in the approaching trial. See Heb 5:7. The expression is very vivid. \"Save me out of this hour.\"\nFor this cause\nExplained by glorify thy name. For this use, namely, that the Father's name might be glorified.\nGlorify (\u03b4\u03cc\u03be\u03b1\u03c3\u03bf\u03bd)\n(Wyc., clarify, as the Vulgate clarifca.)\nName\nSee on Mat 28:19.\nFor my sake\nEmphatic in the Greek order. It is not for my sake that this voice hath come.\nThe prince of this world (\u1f41 \u1f04\u03c1\u03c7\u03c9\u03bd \u03c1\u03bf\u1fe6 \u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c4\u03bf\u03cd\u03c4\u03bf\u03c5)\nThe phrase occurs only in the Gospel; here, Joh 14:30; Joh 16:11.\nShall be cast out (\u1f10\u03ba\u03b2\u03bb\u03b7\u03b8\u03ae\u03c3\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9 \u1f14\u03be\u03c9)\nIn every case but one where the word \u1f10\u03ba\u03b2\u03ac\u03bb\u03bb\u03c9 occurs in John, it is used of casting out from a holy place or society. See Joh 2:15; Joh 9:34, Joh 9:3; Jo3 1:10; Rev 12:2. Compare Joh 10:4.\nBe lifted up (\u1f51\u03c8\u03c9\u03b8\u1ff6)\nSee on Joh 3:14. The primary reference is to the cross, but there is included a reference to the resurrection and ascension. Bengel says: \"In the very cross there was already something tending towards glory.\" Wyc., enhanced.\nFrom the earth (\u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u1fc6\u03c2 \u03b3\u1fc6\u03c2)\nLiterally, out of the earth.\nWill draw (\u1f11\u03bb\u03ba\u03cd\u03c3\u03c9)\nSee on Joh 6:44.\nAll men (\u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03c2)\nSome high authorities read \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1, all things.\nUnto Me (\u03c0\u03c1\u1f78\u03c2 \u1f10\u03bc\u03b1\u03c5\u03c4\u03cc\u03bd)\nRev., rightly, unto myself: in contrast with the prince of this world.\nThe law\nSee on Joh 10:34.\nWith you (\u03bc\u03b5\u03b8' \u1f51\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd)\nThe best texts read \u03c0\u03ac\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1, among you.\nWhile ye have (\u1f15\u03c9\u03c2)\nThe best texts read \u1f61\u03c2, as: walk in conformity with the fact that you have the Light among you.\nLest darkness come upon you (\u1f35\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u1f74 \u03c3\u03be\u03bf\u03c4\u03af\u03b1 \u1f51\u03bc\u1fb6\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03bb\u03ac\u03b2\u1fc3)\nRev., better, that darkness overtake you not. On overtake see on taketh, Mar 9:18; and see on perceived, Act 4:13.\nHe hath blinded, etc.\nThese words of Isaiah are repeated five times in the New Testament as the description of the Jewish people in its latest stage of decay. Mat 13:13; Mar 4:12; Luk 8:10; Joh 12:40; Act 28:26.\nHardened (\u03c0\u03b5\u03c0\u03ce\u03c1\u03c9\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd)\nSee on the kindred noun \u03c0\u03ce\u03c1\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2, hardness, Mar 3:5.\nUnderstand (\u03bd\u03cc\u03b7\u03c3\u03c9\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nRev., better, perceive. Mark has \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b9\u1ff6\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd, understand. See on understanding, Luk 2:47.\nBe converted (\u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03b1\u03c6\u1ff6\u03c3\u03b9\u03bd)\nSee on Mat 13:15; see on Luk 22:32. Rev., more accurately, turn, with the idea of turning to or toward something (\u1f10\u03c0\u03af).\nWhen (\u1f45\u03c4\u03b5)\nThe best texts read \u1f45\u03c4\u03b9, because.\nHis glory\nIn the vision in the temple, Isa 6:1, Isa 6:3, Isa 6:5.\nOf Him\nChrist.\nAmong the chief rulers (\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd \u1f00\u03c1\u03c7\u03cc\u03bd\u03c4\u03c9\u03bd)\nRev., more neatly and accurately, even of the rulers.\nBelieved on Him (\u1f10\u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c5\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u03cc\u03bd)\nSee on Joh 1:12. It is to be noted that John here uses of this imperfect faith which refused to complete itself in confession, the formula for complete faith. Compare believed in His name (Joh 2:23), and see note there.\nConfess Him (\u1f61\u03bc\u03bf\u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03c5\u03bd)\nThe Him, or, Rev., it, is not in the text. The verb is used absolutely. They did not make confession. See on Mat 7:23; see on Mat 10:32; see on Mat 14:7.\nLest they should be put out of the synagogue (\u1f35\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u1f74 \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03ac\u03b3\u03c9\u03b3\u03bf\u03b9 \u03b3\u03ad\u03bd\u03c9\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nBetter, that they should not be, etc. Compare Rev., Joh 12:35. On the phrase, be put out of the synagogue, see on Joh 9:22.\nPraise (\u03b4\u03cc\u03be\u03b1\u03bd)\nMuch better, Rev., glory, because suggesting a contrast with the vision of divine glory referred to in Joh 12:41. Compare Joh 5:44.\nThan (\u1f24\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1)\nThe word cannot be rendered by a corresponding word in English The force is, \"more than the glory of God, though He is so much more glorious.\" The word is found nowhere else in the New Testament. Some authorities read \u1f55\u03c0\u03b5\u03c1, above.\nCried (\u1f14\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03be\u03b5\u03bd)\nThis is not meant to relate a reappearance of Jesus in public. The close of His public ministry is noted at Joh 12:36. It is in continuation of the Evangelist's own remarks, and introduces a summary of Jesus' past teaching to the Jews.\nBelieveth - on Him that sent Me (\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03b5\u03b9 - \u03b5\u1f30\u03c2 \u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03c0\u03ad\u03bc\u03c8\u03b1\u03bd\u03c4\u03ac \u03bc\u03b5)\nThis is the first and almost the only place in the Gospel where the words believe on are used with reference to the Father. This rendering in Joh 5:24 is an error. See Joh 14:1. The phrase is constantly associated with our Lord. At the same time it is to be noted that it contemplates the Father as the source of the special revelation of Christ, and therefore is not absolutely an exception to the habitual usage. The same is true of Joh 14:1.\nSeeth (\u03b8\u03b5\u03c9\u03c1\u03b5\u1fd6)\nRev., properly, beholdeth. Compare Joh 14:9. The word is purposely chosen to mark an intent, continuous contemplation of Christ, issuing in ever larger knowledge of the Father.\nI am come (\u1f10\u03bb\u03ae\u03bb\u03c5\u03b8\u03b1)\nThe perfect tense, pointing to the abiding result of His manifestation. Compare Joh 5:43; Joh 7:28; Joh 8:42; Joh 16:28; Joh 18:37.\nAbide in darkness\nThe phrase occurs only here. Compare Jo1 2:9, Jo1 2:11; also Joh 8:12; Joh 12:35.\nBelieve not (\u03bc\u1f74 \u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03cd\u03c3\u1fc3)\nThe best texts read \u03c6\u03c5\u03bb\u03ac\u03be\u1fc3, keep (them).\nCame (\u1f26\u03bb\u03b8\u03bf\u03bd)\nThe aorist tense, pointing to the purpose of the coming, as I am come (Joh 12:46) to the result. Compare Joh 8:14; Joh 9:39; Joh 10:10; Joh 12:27, Joh 12:47; Joh 15:22. Both tenses are found in Joh 8:42; Joh 16:28.\nRejecteth (\u1f00\u03b8\u03b5\u03c4\u1ff6\u03bd)\nSee on Luk 7:30.\nThe word (\u1f41 \u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03c2)\nComprehending all the sayings (\u1fe5\u03ae\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1).\nThe same (\u1f10\u03ba\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2)\nThat. The pronoun of remote reference Westcott finely remarks: \"The resumptive, isolating pronoun places in emphatic prominence the teaching which is regarded as past, and separated from those to whom it was addressed. It stands, as it were, in the distance, as a witness and an accuser.\"\nThe last day\nPeculiar to John. See Joh 6:39.\nOf myself (\u1f10\u03be \u1f10\u03bc\u03b1\u03c5\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6)\nOut of myself. This formula occurs only here. The usual expression is \u1f00\u03c0' \u1f10\u03bc\u03b1\u03c5\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6. \u1f09\u03c0\u03cc, from, as distinguished from \u1f10\u03ba, out of, marks rather the point of departure, while \u1f10\u03ba, including this idea, emphasizes the point of departure as the living and impelling source of that which issues forth. In Joh 7:17, we read, \"whether it be out of God (\u1f10\u03ba \u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6 \u0398\u03b5\u03bf\u1fe6), or whether I speak from myself (\u1f00\u03c0' \u1f10\u03bc\u03b1\u03c5\u03c4\u03bf\u1fe6).\"\nGave (\u1f14\u03b4\u03c9\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd)\nThe best texts read \u03b4\u03ad\u03b4\u03b5\u03ba\u03b5\u03bd, the perfect tense, hath given, the result of the gift still abiding. So Rev.\nSay - speak (\u03b5\u1f34\u03c0\u03c9 - \u03bb\u03b1\u03bb\u03ae\u03c3\u03c9)\nThe former relating to the substance, and the latter to the form of Jesus' utterances.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: John: John Chapter 12","type":"page"}