{"collection":"Bible & Christianity","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bib/cmt/vws/mat026.htm","path":"bib/cmt/vws/mat026.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/vws/mat026.htm","text":"Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent, [1886]\nIs betrayed (\u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03b4\u03af\u03b4\u03bf\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9)\nThe present tense expresses here something which, though future, is as good as present, because already determined, or because it must ensue in virtue of an unalterable law. Thus the passover is (\u03b3\u03af\u03bd\u03b5\u03c4\u03b1\u03b9): it must come round at the fixed season. The Son of Man is betrayed according to the divine decree. Compare Mat 26:24.\nPalace (\u03b1\u1f50\u03bb\u1f74\u03bd)\nBut the word never means palace in the New Testament. It is the court, the open court or hall, forming the centre of an oriental building, and often used as a meeting-place. Rev., court. Wyc., hall.\nAn alabaster box (\u1f00\u03bb\u03ac\u03b2\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd)\nRev., cruse; flask in margin. Lit., an alabaster, just as we call a drinking-vessel made of glass a glass. Luther renders glass. It was a kind of cruet, having a cylindrical form at the top. Pliny compares these vessels to a closed rosebud, and says that ointments are best preserved in them.\nTo what purpose is this waste?\nWyc., Whereto this loss? Tynd., What needed this waste? See on Joh 12:3.\nWhen Jesus understood it (\u03b3\u03bd\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2 \u03b4\u1f72 \u1f41 \u1f38\u03b7\u03c3\u03bf\u1fe6\u03c2)\nThe A. V. implies that some time elapsed before Jesus was aware of the disciples' complaint. But the statement is that Jesus perceived it at once. Rev., rightly, Jesus perceiving it.\nGood work (\u03ba\u03b1\u03bb\u1f78\u03bd)\nLit., beautiful, but in a moral sense: an excellent, morally beautiful deed.\nWhat will ye give? (\u03c4\u03af \u03b8\u03ad\u03bb\u03b5\u03c4\u03ad \u03bc\u03bf\u03b9 \u03b4\u03bf\u1fe6\u03bd\u03b1\u03b9?)\nRather, What are ye willing to give me? It brings out the chaffering aspect of the transaction. So Rev.\nThey covenanted with him for (\u1f14\u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03b1\u1f50\u03c4\u1ff7)\nBut the meaning is, they weighed unto him; or, very literally, they placed for him (in the balance). Although coined shekels were in circulation, weighing appears to have been practised, especially when considerable sums were paid out of the temple-treasury.\nThirty pieces of silver (\u03c4\u03c1\u03b9\u03ac\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1 \u1f00\u03c1\u03b3\u03cd\u03c1\u03b9\u03b1)\nMatthew refers to Zac 11:12. These pieces were shekels of the sanctuary, of standard weight, and therefore heavier than the ordinary shekel. See on Mat 17:24. Reckoning the Jerusalem shekel at seventy-two cents, the sum would be twenty-one dollars and sixty cents. This was the price which, by the Mosaic law, a man was condemned to pay if his ox should gore a servant (Exo 21:32). Our Lord, the sacrifice for men, was paid for out of the temple-money, destined for the purchase of sacrifices. He who \"took on him the form of a servant\" was sold at the legal price of a slave.\nSuch a man (\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03b4\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd\u03b1)\nThe indefiniteness is the Evangelist's, not our Lord's. He, doubtless, described the per- son and where to find him.\nHe sat down (\u1f00\u03bd\u03ad\u03ba\u03b5\u03b9\u03c4\u03bf)\nBut this rendering misses the force of the imperfect tense, which denotes something in progress. The Evangelist says he was sitting or reclining, introducing us to something which has been going on for some time.\nBegan to say (\u1f24\u03c1\u03be\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03bf)\nDenoting the commencement of a series of questions; one after the other (every one) saying, Is it I?\nIs it I? (\u03bc\u03ae\u03c4\u03b9 \u1f10\u03b3\u03ce \u03b5\u1f30\u03bc\u03b9)\nThe form of the negative expects a negative answer. \"Surely I am not the one.\"\nThe dish (\u03c4\u03c1\u03c5\u03b2\u03bb\u03af\u1ff3)\nWyc., platter. A dish containing a broth made with nuts, raisins, dates, figs, etc., into which' pieces of bread were dipped.\nWhich betrayed (\u1f41 \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03b1\u03b4\u03b9\u03b4\u03bf\u1f7a\u03c2)\nThe article with the participle has the force of an epithet: The betrayer.\nTestament (\u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03b8\u03ae\u03ba\u03b7\u03c2)\nFrom \u03b4\u03b9\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b8\u03b7\u03bc\u03b9, to distribute; dispose of. Hence of the disposition of one's property. On the idea of disposing or arranging is based that of settlement or agreement, and thence of a covenant. The Hebrew word of which this is a translation is primarily covenant, from a verb meaning to cut. Hence the phrase, to make a covenant, in connection with dividing the victims slain in ratification of covenants (Gen 15:9-18). Covenant is the general Old Testament sense of the word (Kg1 20:34; Isa 28:15; Sa1 18:3); and so in the New Testament. Compare Mar 14:24; Luk 1:72; Luk 22:20; Act 3:25; Act 7:8. Bishop Lightfoot, on Gal 3:15, observes that the word is never found in the New Testament in any other sense than that of covenant, with the exception of Heb 9:15-17, where it is testament. We cannot admit this exception, since we regard that passage as one of the best illustrations of the sense of covenant. See on Heb 9:15-17. Render here as Rev., covenant.\nIs shed (\u1f10\u03ba\u03c7\u03c5\u03bd\u03bd\u03cc\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd\u03bf\u03bd)\nThe present participle, is being shed. Christ's thought goes forward to the consummation.\nNew (\u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u1f78\u03bd)\nAnother adjective, \u03bd\u03b5\u03cc\u03bd, is employed to denote new wine in the sense of freshly-made (Mat 9:17; Mar 2:22; Luk 5:37, Luk 5:38, Luk 5:39). The difference is between newness regarded in point of time or of quality. The young, for instance, who have lately sprung up, are \u03bd\u03b5\u03af\u03bf\u03b9, or \u03bd\u03b5\u03ce\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03bf\u03b9 (Luk 15:12, Luk 15:13). The new garment (Luk 5:36) is contrasted as to quality with a worn and threadbare one. Hence \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u1fe6. So a new heaven (Pe2 3:13) is \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u1f78\u03c2, contrasted with that which shows signs of dissolution. The tomb in which the body of Jesus was laid was \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u1f78\u03bd (Mat 27:60); in which no other body had lain, making it ceremonially unclean; not recently hewn. Trench (\"Synonyms\") cites a passage from Polybius, relating a stratagem by which a town was nearly taken, and saying \"we are still new (\u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u03af) and young (\u03bd\u03ad\u03bf\u03b9) in regard of such deceits.\" Here \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bd\u03bf\u03af expresses the inexperience of the men; \u03bd\u03ad\u03bf\u03b9, their youth. Still, the distinction cannot be pressed in all cases. Thus, Co1 5:7, \"Purge out the old leaven that ye may be a new (\u03bd\u03ad\u03bf\u03bd) lump;\" and Col 3:10, \"Put on the new (\u03bd\u03ad\u03bf\u03bd) man,\" plainly carry the sense of quality. In our Lord's expression, \"drink it new,\" the idea of quality is dominant. All the elements of festivity in the heavenly kingdom will be of a new and higher quality. In the New Testament, besides the two cases just cited, \u03bd\u03ad\u03bf\u03c2 is applied to wine, to the young, and once to a covenant.\nSung a hymn\nVery probably the second part of the Jewish Hallel or Hallelujah, embracing Psalms 115, 116, Psa 117:1-2, 118.\nThey went out\nIn the original institution of the Passover it was enjoined that no one should go out of his house until morning (Exo 12:22). Evidently this had ceased to be regarded as obligatory.\nI will go before you\nThe thought links itself with what Christ had just said about the shepherd and the sheep. Compare Joh 10:4. I will go before you, as a shepherd before his flock.\nBefore the cock crow\nA little more graphic if the article is omitted, as in the Greek. Before a single cock shall be heard, early in the night, thou shalt deny me. Dr. Thomson (\"Land and Book\") says that the barn-door fowls \"swarm round every door, share in the food of their possessors, are at home among the children in every room, roost overhead at night, and with their ceaseless crowing are the town-clock and the morning-bell to call up sleepers at early dawn.\"\nThough I should die (\u03ba\u1f02\u03bd \u03b4\u03ad\u1fc3 \u03bc\u03b5 \u1f00\u03c0\u03bf\u03b8\u03b1\u03bd\u03b5\u1fd6\u03bd)\nThe A. V. misses the force of \u03b4\u03ad\u1fc3: \"Though it should be necessary for me to die.\" Wyc., \"If it shall behove me to die.\" Rev., excellently, \"Even if I must die.\"\nGethsemane\nMeaning oil-press. Beyond the brook Kedron, and distant about three-quarters of a mile from the walls of Jerusalem. Dean Stanley says of the olive-trees there: \"In spite of all the doubts that can be raised against their antiquity, the eight aged olive-trees, if only by their manifest difference from all others on the mountain, have always struck the most indifferent observers. They will remain, so long as their already protracted life is spared, the most venerable of their race on the surface of the earth. Their gnarled trunks and scanty foliage will always be regarded as the most affecting of the sacred memorials in or about Jerusalem; the most nearly approaching to the everlasting hills themselves in the force with which they carry us back to the events of the gospel history\" (\"Sinai and Palestine\").\nWhat!\nIt is hardly possible to convey the exact force of the Greek \u03bf\u1f55\u03c4\u03c9\u03c2, thus or so. The idea is, \"are ye thus unable, or so utterly unable to watch?\"\nThe hour is at hand\nHe probably heard the tramp and saw the lanterns of Judas and his band.\nOne of the twelve\nRepeated in all three evangelists, in the narratives both of the betrayal and of the arrest. By the time Matthew's Gospel was written, the phrase had become a stereotyped designation of the traitor, like he that betrayed him.\nA great multitude\nThe Sanhedrin had neither soldiery nor a regularly-armed band at command. In Joh 18:3, Judas receives a cohort of soldiers and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees. Part of the band would consist of this regularly-armed cohort, and the rest of a crowd armed with cudgels, and embracing some of the servants of conspicuous men in the Sanhedrin.\nKissed him (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b5\u03c6\u03af\u03bb\u03b7\u03c3\u03b5\u03bd)\nThe compound verb has the force of an emphatic, ostentatious salute. Meyer says embraced and kissed. The same word is used of the tender caressing of the Lord's feet by the woman in the Pharisee's house (Luk 7:38), of the father's embrace of the returned prodigal (Luk 15:20), and of the farewell of the Ephesian elders to Paul (Act 20:37).\nWherefore art thou come ? (\u1f10\u03c6' o pa/rei)\nThe interrogation of the A. V. is wrong. The expression is elliptical and condensed. Literally it is, that for which thou art here; and the mind is to supply do or be about. The Lord spurns the traitor's embrace, and says, in effect, \"Enough of this hypocritical fawning. Do what you are here to do.\" So Rev., Do that for which thou art come.\nThe servant (\u03c4\u1f78\u03bd \u03b4\u03bf\u1fe6\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd)\nThe article marks the special servant; the body-servant.\nEar (\u1f60\u03c4\u03af\u03bf\u03bd)\nA diminutive in form but not in sense; according to a Greek popular usage which expressed parts of the body by diminutives; as \u1fe5\u03af\u03bd\u03b9\u03b1, the nostrils; \u1f40\u03bc\u03bc\u03ac\u03c4\u03b9\u03bf\u03bd, the eye; \u03c3\u03b1\u03c1\u03ba\u03af\u03bf\u03bd, the body. Peter aimed his blow at the servant's head, but missed.\nPut up again\nPeter was still brandishing his sword.\nTwelve legions of angels\nCompare the story of Elisha at Dothan (Kg2 6:17).\nA thief (\u03bb\u1fc3\u03c3\u03c4\u1f74\u03bd)\nBetter Rev., a robber. See Joh 10:1, Joh 10:8; and Luk 23:39-43. It is more than a petty stealer; rather one with associates, who would require an armed band to apprehend him. Hence the propriety of the reference to swords and staves.\nI sat (\u1f10\u03ba\u03b1\u03b8\u03b5\u03b6\u03cc\u03bc\u03b7\u03bd)\nThe imperfect tense, denoting something habitual. I was accustomed to sit.\nI adjure thee\nI call upon thee to swear. The high-priest put Christ upon oath.\nThat (\u1f35\u03bd\u03b1)\nIn order that; signifying the design with which he adjured the Lord.\nThou hast said\nAn affirmation. You have spoken the truth. What thou hast asked me is the fact. Compare Mat 26:25.\nNevertheless (\u03c0\u03bb\u1f74\u03bd)\nHowever. Apart from my affirmation, you shall see for yourself.\nGuilty of death (\u1f14\u03bd\u03bf\u03c7\u03bf\u03c2 \u03b8\u03b1\u03bd\u03ac\u03c4\u03bf\u03c5)\nRev., worthy of death. See on Mat 23:18. \u1f10\u03bd, in, \u1f14\u03c7\u03c9, to hold. The idea is, literally, holden of death; in bonds to death.\nBuffet (\u1f10\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03ac\u03c6\u03b9\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd)\nWith the fist.\nSmote with the palms of their hands\nAll expressed by one word, \u1f10\u03c1\u03ac\u03c0\u03b9\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd, from \u1fe5\u03b1\u03c0\u03af\u03c2, a rod, and meaning to smite with rods, not with the palms. The same word is employed in Mat 5:39. It came to mean generally to strike.\nA damsel (\u03bc\u03af\u03b1 \u03c0\u03b1\u03b9\u03b4\u03af\u03c3\u03ba\u03b7)\nLit., one damsel, because the writer has in mind a second one (Mat 26:71).\nGone out\nThrough fear of being further questioned.\nThe man\nAs if he did not know Jesus' name.\nTo curse (\u03ba\u03b1\u03c4\u03b1\u03b8\u03b5\u03bc\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b6\u03b5\u03b9\u03bd)\nA new development of profanity. Hitherto he had merely sworn. Now he adds imprecation; invoking curses on himself if the case be not as he says.","title":"Vincent's Word Studies: Matthew: Matthew Chapter 26","type":"page"}