{"collection":"bos","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bos/bos277.htm","path":"bos/bos277.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bos/bos277.htm","text":"Internet Book of Shadows, (Various Authors), [1999]\n \n \n IDEOLOGY \n 0\n The human mind seeks to create order out of Chaos\n \n It is in the nature of humanity to attempt to formulate laws from ex-\n perience as a guide to future action. Acting as a feedback-response\n mechanism, the mind considers the results of previous behaviour and\n creates laws of action in an attempt to repeat past good results and\n avoid bad results. In the individual this is known as personality, in\n the communal world it is known as science.\n \n 1\n All scientific laws are false\n \n Science attempts to map the universe as a result of previous collec-\n tive experience. Since this is limited to what has actually been\n experienced so far, it is always inadequate, and since it is not what\n has been experienced it is always human-centred. It cannot be objec-\n tive because the object does not experience, only the subject, human-\n ity, experiences. Two approaches have been used to tackle this prob-\n lem. The philosophy of the western world posits that an external,\n objective world interacts with us through scientific experiment, thus\n science creates objectively true laws. Other European philosophy\n holds, correctly in my view, that talk of an objective reality is\n beyond experience and is thus meaningless babble. Moreover, scientific\n experiment is no more objective than a childs attempt to walk. To Know\n is not a high ideal, it is an instinct born of our particular way of\n survival, and is thus survival-centred. Science is our Elephant Trunk,\n our Giraffe Neck, and since it is inherently inadequate, it is a\n belief system, a set of interconnected ideas-about-things. In terms of\n European, Post-Hegelian philosophy, it is an ideology.\n \n 2\n All idealogies are subject to chaotic dissolution\n \n Every idealogy, whether science, Christianity or whatever, seeks to\n and succeeds in creating a coherent view of reality that satisfies its\n believers. The problem is that there is inevitably a gulf between the\n idealogy and reality. Ideologies are fixed; reality is fluid. Thus all\n ideologies are subject to readjustment when a new discovery challenges\n the existing view. The rediscovery of the Greek text of the New\n Testament and the discovery of the non-existence of the Ether each\n corroded the existing ideologies of their day.\n \n The Christian world responded with Reformation and Counter-Reformat-\n ion. (Historical note: Counter-Reformation was the Reformation of the\n Catholic Church rather than an attack on the Protestant Reformation.)\n Science responded with Einsteinian relativity. These new elements are\n Chaotic. The extent to which the ideology can reform depends on how\n deep the Chaotic element bites into the ideological structure. Every\n ideology has central tenets upon which the rest depend: so the dis-\n covery that Jesus was actually stoned to death rather than crucified\n would cause major rumblings; the discovery that he was a woman would\n cause deeper rumblings; but the discovery that he was a spaceman\n carrying out a standard sociological experiment would bring down the\n ideology entire. Several ideologies have completely collapsed in the\n past, such as Ptolomaic astronomy, and it can happen again. Moreover,\n the spread of a unified ideology over the whole globe, Western Democ-\n racy, leaves the way open to a bigger collapse than ever before.\n \n \n 1253\n \n 3\n There is no such thing as innate value\n \n All present Western ideologies depend upon a concept of innate\n worth, whereby certain things are automatically \"better\" than\n others. The White Race, Men, Adults, all have had their \"innate\"\n value knocked for six. Even the Animal Kingdom is no longer seen as\n of higher worth than the Vegetable as the spread of the Gaia\n hypothesis shows. This is the Chaotic element that can bring down a\n whole pack of cards. There is no ethical reference point, no\n beginning from which to derive an end to aim for, to praise, to work\n towards. As it says in Liber Al: \"let there be no difference made\n between one thing and another\". The result is a confusion of belief\n as people scramble to find a new ideology. Fundamentalists choose\n deliberate blindness and perverse stupidity. Thelemites choose \"pure\n will, unassuaged of purpose\". Chaoists worship the confusion itself\n as the only \"true thing\" left. Pagans begin to construct a new\n ideology based on the absence of heirarchy and turn to cyclical and\n egalitarian beliefs. That a new ideology, or many, will arise is\n inevitable; even the truth of Chaos is only true to us, in our\n experience. But so what. All things considered, I think that things\n are going pretty well.\n \n Further readings:\n Knowledge and Human Interest, J.Habermas, 1967\n Differance, translated as Language and Difference, Derrida, 1959\n Anything by Sir Karl Popper for the view from the opposition\n \n With fractalic greetings and laughter * Fra.: Apfelmann *\n \n \n 1254","title":"Internet Book of Shadows: Ideology (I.O.T.)","type":"page"}