{"collection":"Buddhism","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bud/sbe36/sbe3616.htm","path":"bud/sbe36/sbe3616.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bud/sbe36/sbe3616.htm","text":"P. xxv. For 'Mah\u00e2y\u00e2na' read 1 Madhyamika.' There is a N\u00e2gasena mentioned in the Bharhut Tope.\n6, l. 1. Read 'to Tissa the Elder, the son of the Moggal\u00ee.' The whole sentence had better perhaps have been rendered: 'And these two also were foreseen by our Buddha (just as he foresaw Tissa the Elder, the son of the Moggal\u00ee), in that he foretold, saying, &c.'\n30, n. 1. The phrase isi-v\u00e2tam pariv\u00e2tam nagaram akamsu recurs at G\u00e2taka III, 142; Samanta P\u00e2sadik\u00e2 316; Saddhamma Samgaha 41.\n32, n. 1. Compare Saddhamma Samgaha, p. 42.\n60, \u00a7 13. On the first simile, compare the Samyutta Nik\u00e2ya XXII, 102, 7.\n76, last line. For 'yoke' read 'yolk.'\n78. It would have been better perhaps to have avoided the use of the words 'where' and 'there,' and to have rendered: 'In the case of beings who, having died, have been reborn elsewhere, time is. In the case of beings who, having died, have not been reborn elsewhere, time is not. And in the case of beings, &c.' The three cases are those of the Puthuggana, the Arahat when dead, and the Arahat alive. My note refers to the third case, not to the second; and should, I think, be modified accordingly. See Samyutta Nik\u00e2ya III, 12, 35; Mah\u00e2 Parinibb\u00e2na Sutta IV, 3; Dhammapada, verse 89; Sutta Nip\u00e2ta II, 13, 1, 12; Magghima Nik\u00e2ya I, 235; G\u00e2taka IV, 453; and compare Ud\u00e2na, p. 80.\nH\u00eenati-kumbur\u00ea gives only a literal translation. A similar question is discussed in the Kath\u00e2 Vatthu XV, 3.\n99, n. 1. For 'chapter' read 'book, p. 39.'\n107, l. 16. After 'brought about' insert a comma.\n118, 5. I now prefer 'initiation' instead of 'ordination' as the translation of Upasampad\u00e2.\n119, n. 1. This interpretation is confirmed by part ii, p. 197.\n129, l. 7. The phrase, 'though his hands and feet were cut off,' seems, at first sight, out of place. But compare part ii, p. 147.\n150, l. 2. Read I and not accepting them.'\nP. 153, \u00a7 18. Read 'Ki\u00f1k\u00e2:' and compare G\u00e2taka IV, 189.\n164 (six lines from the bottom of the page). Read 'and then a subsequent ease to the pain he has given.'\n176, \u00a7 39. In accordance with the note at part ii, pp. 86, 87, we must read 'a huge and mighty cauldron, full of water and crowded with grains of rice, is placed over a fireplace.'\n179. On the problem of king Sivi and his new eyes, compare the question discussed in Kath\u00e2 Vatthu III, 7.\n229, n. 1, l. 6. For 'these' read 'those.'\n239, n. 2. For 'But I never think' read 'But I now think.'\n241, \u00a7 20. For 'The Master said, N\u00e2gasena,' read 'The Master said, O king.'\n244, n. 2. For 'Gatharaggi' read 'Gatharaggi.'\n278, n. 1. For 'adika' read '\u00e2dika.'\n288, n. 3. For 'purdhita' read 'purohita.'\n190, n. 2. This story, which I could not trace, is no doubt the one referred to in Kariy\u00e2 Pitaka I, 7.\n291, l. 22. Read 'Uposatha.'\nP. 27, last line but two. Read 'k\u00e2ma-loka.'\n29, n. 2, l. 7. Read 'sams\u00e2ra.'\n139, l, 4. For 'sun and moon' read 'moon and sun.'\n748, two lines from the bottom. For 'O king' read 'Sir.'\n150, four lines from the bottom. For 'destructions' read 'distinctions.'\n166, n. 1. Read 'sam\u00e2hato.'\n219, n. 2. Read 'bhavan\u00e2.'\n252, l. 4. For 'pulling' read 'putting.'\n271, n. 1. Compare the 'Journal of the P\u00e2li Text Society,' 1887, p. 155.","title":"The Questions of King Milinda, Part II: Book VII: The Similes: Additions and Corrections","type":"page"}