{"collection":"Buddhism","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/bud/tib/sraltext.htm","path":"bud/tib/sraltext.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/bud/tib/sraltext.htm","text":"The commentary on Mipham's Sherab Raltri entitled\nThe Blazing Lights of the Sun and Moon.\nby Khenchen Palden Sherab Rinpoche\nINTRODUCTION [SPOKEN BY KPSR]\nThis text, the Sherab Raltri, Sword of Prajqa, by Mipham Rinpoche, summarizes many important points from the sutras and tantras. There are two important spontaneously written texts in which Mipham expresses his vision of Buddhist teaching. They are this1 Sword of Prajqa of the Completely True Meaning, and2 The Precious Torch of Certainty. Many great masters say Mipham wrote five \"sword\" texts and five \"lotus\" texts, named for the scepters in the hands of Maqjushri. To reach enlightenment is the main purpose of this text, of course. But in particular, among the three prajqas, hearing, contemplating, and meditating, this text focuses on contemplation. It is an overview that tells how to contemplate thoroughly what we have studied.\nWhen the Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies was established in 1967, this was the first course in the Nyingma department. The root text was written by Mipham Rinpoche at the request of Lhagsam Tenpa Gyaltsen, a famous master in his own right. Mipham wrote a short commentary, which I studied in Tibet; but I couldn't find it or any other commentary that had been brought to India. I did have some notes that Mipham made in the text, and I used them. I started writing every day, on the blackboard, and students would copy it down. By the end of the year the whole thing was done. Every year there would be another ten or twelve students, and the same thing would happen again. Everyone thought we should publish this, but we didn't. Later, when I was in New York, some students wrote and asked if it could be printed, and if anything would need to be changed. When I went back to Nepal, I made some corrections and edited the text with the help of some students there. Then the Tibetan version was printed.\nGuru Rinpoche wrote a famous commentary on the Maqjushri-nama-sa.mgiti, called the3 Blazing Lights of the Sun and Moon. That seemed auspicious, so I adopted the title for this commentary.\nINTRODUCTION BY KHENPO TSEWANG DONGYAL RINPOCHE\nUnsurpassably great and glorious former teacher,\nSupremely kind crown jewel of the learned and accomplished,\nJetsun Maqjushri emanating in human form,\nKnown as Jamgon Mipham Chokle Namgyal Gyamtso,\nSupreme in glory and goodness, producing a hundred and eight Commentaries setting forth the intended meaning\nOf the sutras and tantras of the Victorious One.\nThis treatise teaches without error the vast and profound piths of the mahayana sutras and tantras. The subject expressed is the two truths. It is expressed in terms of the four correct reasonings. The fruition is the great treasure of the eight confidences. That is the way in which this great text was composed. This treatise, the Sword of Prajqa of the Completely True Meaning is one of four very famous commentaries. It is supreme among commentaries that explain without error difficult points of words and their meanings. This commentary on the Sherab Raltri4 is entitled the Blazing Lights of the Sun and Moon. These days the precious teachings of the Buddha in general have been harmed and diminished, particularly in Tibet, the Land of Snow, by the army of the red Chinese. In this situation, replenishing the blaze of the former teachings from the remaining embers was supremely kind.\nBorn in Riwoche in Khams he indisputably went to the heights level of learning, discipline, and nobility.\nBorn and remaining a glorious lord of the teachings and beings, This is Khenchen Palden Sherab, glorious, good, and excellent. It was he who composed this.\nIn 1976, in Varanasi, when the Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies was established, this text was presented to students at the institute as lectures about Khen Rinpoche's own Nyingma tradition. As no commentary on it had reached India, Khen Rinpoche, with supreme compassion for those under his care, newly composed this one. Until now, it remained as an active course, and so it could not be requested that it be published. Now after 13 auspicious presentations of those lectures, Khen Rinpoche has responded to new requests to publish it, from the country of America.\nGreatly moved by these requests and the approach of this supreme occasion, he gave the order to print this, and the pure requests of those sitting at his feet were accomplished.\nAfter thirteen times sending a lamp to beings, in the 2530th year of the teacher's passing in his sthavira-aspect, in the seventh tibetan month, tenth day, by these requests that this be printed, auspiciousness increased.\nThis introduction was written by the chief of the many who were formerly benefitted, the khenpo's brother Tsewang Dongyal Rinpoche. May there be a connection to the vidyadharas. Dge'o Dge'o\nPRAISE TO MaqjuSHRI DORJE NVNPO, VAJRA SHARPNESS.\nNamo shri Vajrapadmatikshnaye.\nPRAISE TO BUDDHA SHAKYAMUNI\nIn the wind-chariot of the two accumulations, excellently leading the four forces5 of the army of the ten powers6,\nYou overcome the warfare of the gods of desire7 and their host is overcome;\nWhile with the sharp fangs and claws of the four fearlessnesses8, you drink from the skulls of vicious feuding elephants9, the eternalists and nihilists.\nKnowing the nature and extent of dharmas10, having removed the darkness of the two obscurations from the place of snow-mountains,11 by your generosity there are the two yogic disciplines.12\nIn the center of the wheel of 11213 spokes you, the supremely exalted lion of men, Siddartha, bestow auspicious fortune.14\nBlazing with the deathless splendor of a thousand radiant marks,15\nLiberated16 from a lotus blossom in the middle of a lake,\nYou are the nirmanakaya who overcomes the phenomenal world,17\nMy beautiful crown-ornament until the heart of enlightenment.\nREQUEST BY MIPHAM TO MAQJUSHRI18\nA hundred devotional petals crown the lotus anthers of teaching.19\nDharma Lord,20 I always offer you reverent homage.21\nYou who are the ever-youthful lion of speech,\nBestow on these beings shining intelligence, filling the sky.\nPRAISE TO SARASVATI OR TARA22\nIn the expansive lotus-garden of speech of all the conquerors,\nWith 100,000 melodious blooms of holy Dharma,\nYou are a singing swan23 that shines as bright as moonlight.\nMay you now enjoy the vast lake of my mind\nSUPPLICATION TO THE VIDYADHARAS OF THE THREE LINEAGES\nThe secret streams of truth of the three collections of tantra24\nBy a gulp of analysis swallowed into the belly of intellect.25\nAre regurgitated as excellent teaching, as with Agastya.26\nI praise a hundred times the former rigdzins and rishis.\nPRAISE TO LONGCHENPA\nAt the council of well-written teachings, the sagely teacher,\nIn a bowing throng of attendant-ministers27 unbiased in learning,\nOn his elephant vehicle,28 which is the great perfection,\nSurveying all like Indra, with a thousand different eyes,29\nConfidently manifesting the hundred pointed vajra30\nWhose prongs are the points of teaching, debate, and composition,\nWearing a crown that is set with gems of many traditions,\nThe incomparable lord of learning who is known as Longchenpa,\nIs renowned as a king of the gods of a kind not seen before\nHis fame surpasses even that of the lord of the world.31\nPRAISE TO MIPHAM\nA thousand elephants of vicious self-serving contention,\nArrogant, with no gentle thoughts of any kind,\nYou overcome and have no thought of enduring them,\nThe lion of speakers, with far-reaching laughter of proper reason,\nIs the victorious one called Mipham Chokle Namgyal.\nMIPHAM'S PRAISE TO HIS GURUS\nBy the sharp vajra-weapon of scripture and proper reason,\nOpponent asuras' arrogant power32 is overcome.\nGracious one who sees the excellent path of truth,\nPrevail among spiritual friends like Indra among the gods.\nAfter these poetic expressions of homage, like beautiful white lotus petals strewn to welcome a teacher, now there is this terma-prophesy by the tamer of beings Sangngag Lingpa:33\nAn emanation named Mipham of the great translator Nub\nAn especially noble master of mind-terma will arise.\nAlso here is a terma-prophesy manifested by the power of the great tertvn Tatung Dudjom Trolv34:\nBy Mipham Gyamtso the host of extremes will be transformed.\nThe conqueror of all the doctrines of wrong view,\nWill make the radiant secret mantra clear as day.\nIn accord with these and 35 the vajra prophesies of Padmasambhava, the second buddha of Uddiyana and others, you the omniscient intrinsic form, the supremely excellent omniscient embodied essence of all the victorious ones of mantrayana, the lion of vajra teachers, appear in the form of a spiritual friend. Mastering the eight great treasures of confidence36 and the four discriminating knowledges,37 you are an authority on ordinary and extraordinary fields of knowledge, beyond the scope of thought. In particular, revealing in an extraordinary way the well-taught word of the Sugata, the profound and vast intentions of the sutras and tantras, uniquely analyzing without depending on others38, you, the jetsun inseparable from Maqjushri, are truly omniscient and great in vision, a learned and accomplished master. You, the jetsun guru who possesses objectless compassion, whose very name is so awesome that we hesitate to utter it39, are famed as Mipham Jamyang Namgyal Gyamtso or Jampel Gyepe Dorje throughout the three worlds.40 The completely certain truth formerly well-taught by you in this Sherab Raltri is what I shall explain.\nThe explanation has three parts.41 These are the name or title, the main part of the teaching so entitled, and the final conclusion.\nFirst overall part.\nThe title of the text is the don rnam par nges pa shes rab ral gri, The Sword of Prajqa, that Ascertains42 All the Details of the True Meaning.\nThe meaning of the subject\nNubchen Sanje Yeshe43 says in the Lamp of Meditation that Illuminates the Pith of Meditation:44\nThe cause of certain knowledge of truth is prajqa contemplating an example, a reason,45 and a conclusion reached by correct reasoning.46 These are evaluated by individually-discriminating prajqa.\nThe profound and vast meaning told in the Buddha's teachings in the sutras and tantras and the commentaries on their intention, accords with the way things are. This is revealed as profound, completely certain prajqa through the process of true and genuine correct reasoning. This prajqa cuts all at once like a sword through the nets of non-realization, wrong understanding, and doubt. That is the contents of this text.\nThe title expresses this by joining the example and the meaning.47 That intended meaning is named by the title in order to clear away stupidity about the conventional. The Lankavatara Sutra says:\nIf no names are given,\nEveryone in the world will be confused.\nTherefore, to clear away confusion,\nThe Protector used names.\nSecond overall part: the main text that teaches what the title denotes.\nWithin that are:\n1. the ancillary parts of the composition that are good in the beginning,\n2. the meaning of the composition that is good in the middle, and\n3. the meaning of the conclusion that is good at the end.\nThe ancillary parts of the composition that are good in the beginning\nHere there are the expression of offering and the promise to compose the text. Each of the two is presented in verse.\nI. The expression of offering:\nThe Doctrine never possesses any kind of confusion.\nIt has completely abandoned any kind of error.\nIt is mind without any doubt about the three meanings.\nLet us bow to the treasure of Maqjushri's knowledge.\nThe Doctrine\n\"The Doctrine\", grub mtha'48 in Tibetan, is the translation of the Sanskrit \"siddhanta.\" The Doctrine is the ultimate goal49 of examination and analysis by scripture and correct reasoning. It is the certain knowledge at the end of establishing. Beyond this there is nothing further to establish.\n\"Confusion\" cannot resolve the way things are. Non-confusion can.50 These arise respectively as worldly doctrine, and The Doctrine beyond the world.51\n1 As for the FIRST, The second Buddha of Uddiyana said in his Oral Instruction on the Mala of Views:\nThe countless wrong views in the worldly realm are summarized under four headings, Phyalwa, gyang phen, mur thug, and mu tek52\nLikewise, the there are two kinds of paths beyond the world. These are the vehicle of philosophical characterization, and the vajrayana. The great translator Kawa Paltsek53 says in his Explanation of the details of Views:\nThere are both the worldly and the world-transcending.\nLike articles of gold, they appear from a single substance.\nThe levels of their appearance are five times three plus two,54\nBeing known, these should be left alone and accepted.\nRegarding the Buddhist view that is beyond the world, FIRST, the Buddhist teachings of The Doctrine are scriptural pramana.55 As such, they have none of the faults of confusion. The reason is that the one who taught them is the Buddha Bhagavat. He has completely abandoned all errors of the two obscurations,56 along with the habitual patterns which are the seeds of their continuation.57 The doctrine was taught by this great being whose knowledge is the vision of perceptual pramana.58\nThe way of establishing this highest truth as The Doctrine, is to establish it as scriptural pramana, established teaching purified by the three analyses.59 This is done through a process of correct reasoning. This process uses the three kinds of inferential reasoning60 in such a way that the three modes of correct reasoning are all complete.61 From so doing comes certainty without doubt. This certainty is the essence of profound intelligence. It is the great treasure of knowing Maqjushri.62 Again, let us pay homage with the three gates to the great treasure of you, Maqjushri, arising by your blessing.63\nIn regard to this, due to the correct reasoning of productive action,64 homage is expressed chiefly to the pramana of the teachings. If this is established in a syllogism, it is said:\n\"The dharmin \"Buddhist doctrine\" has no confusion; because it was taught by the Buddha, who has completely abandoned all error.\"65\nIf it is established that Buddhist doctrine was taught by the Buddha, then the following are established, showing that the three modes66 are complete:\n1) the presence of the reason, \"non-error,\" in the subject, \"Buddhist doctrine.\"\n2) the forward [universal] entailment:67 \"What is taught by the Buddha is certainly without confusion,\" and\n3) the reverse [universal] entailment:68 \"What is confused was certainly not taught by the Buddha.\"\nFirst it was taught that, since the Buddha has no error, therefore the teaching no error. Now it is taught that, since the teaching is authentic, the Buddha must also be authentic.\nTo prove this, when all the errors of the two obscurations, together with their habitual patterns, have been completely abandoned, ultimate knowledge, wisdom, arises.\nWhoever has this ultimate knowledge can teach the path properly. Doing so depends only on the cause of compassion. The great compassion is the extraordinary cause attained by the Buddha.69\nTherefore, in regard to the Buddha Bhagavat, there are the cause of the benefit for oneself, complete renunciation-realization, and the cause of the benefit for others, the completed power of wisdom and loving-kindness. From these arise all the teachings of the holy Dharma, in accord with the faculties, power of mind, and thoughts of those to be tamed. If any of these is practiced, its own particular fruition will be attained. In that sense they are non-deceptive. Therefore, Buddhist doctrine is established as non-deceptive.70 The Prajqaparamita Sutras say:\nAfter attaining omniscience, the wheel of Dharma is turned.71\nThey also say:\nIf we have not attained omniscience, we cannot turn the wheel of Dharma\nGlorious Dharmakirti says in the tshad ma rnam 'grel:\nThe one who has gone there has the meaning of realization.72\nThe Buddha's regent Maitreya says in the Abhisamayalankara:\nWhoever has the authentic truth, has the omniscience of the sages and can teach all their different kinds of teaching.73\nThe great teacher Naagaarjuna in the bla na med par bstod pa, says:\nWhoever knows clearly the solitary object of knowledge,\nWill resolve completely all of the objects of knowledge.74\nI therefore prostrate to a guru such as that\nWho in such a way is equal and otherless.\nAlso Asanga says in the Suutraala.mkaara:\nTruly liberated from all the obscurations,\nYou possess the knowledge that pervades all objects.\nMighty one, the tamer of everyone in the world,75\nI prostrate to you who are completely liberated.\nAlso the great teacher Ashvagho.sha says In his Hundred and Fifty Praises:\nWhether powers of mind are supreme or not\nWhether they may be the lesser, middle, and greater\nAnd all the limitless divisions of their aspects,\nAre not realized by anyone but you.\nAlso he says:\nYou alone, by wisdom,\nEncompass every object,\nBy everyone but you\nSome objects are left out.\nAlso he says:\nYou do good even without urging.\nYou are kind to others without a reason,\nA good friend, even for those who have not met you;\nA helper and counselor that we do not need to know.76\nAlso he says:\nIf we should try to do this with even our flesh and blood\nWhy even speak of how to view all other things?\nDoer of good deeds you even gave your life\nFor the beings who asked you, by your bodies and lives,\nYou have ransomed a hundred times the bodies and lives\nOf those given over to slayers of embodied beings.\nThe great pandit Vimalamitra says in his commentary on the Uttering the name of Maqjushri, 'jam dpal mtshan brjod, Maqjushri-nama-sa.mgiti:\nIn connection to the wishes of all sentient beings, you liberate them from the fetters of the kleshas. As many dharma-teachings as have been explained are one in being antidotes for taming the kleshas.\nThe great teacher Gekpi Dorje,77 in his commentary on the king of tantras the gsang ba'i snying po, the 'grel pa spar khab78, says:\nThese teachings are so-designated79\nFrom his knowledge and what they accomplish\nBut they appear differently\nBy differences between minds.80\nThe great teacher Dharmakiirti, in his auto-commentary on the first chapter of the tshad ma rnam 'grel the stong phrag phyed dang bshi pa says:\nAgain, to take another approach, the words that exhaust defects are not deceptive. Therefore, this inference should be made:\nIn teaching what is to be accepted and rejected\ntogether with the means by which that should be done,\nWhich is the principal benefit of certainty,\nAs He was non-deceptive, this should be inferred.\nWhat is to be accepted and rejected and what are the means of doing that are non-erroneous teachings. They are non-deceptive. For example, the way in which the four noble truths are explained is non-deceptive. Familiarity with this is a pre-requisite for the benefit of beings. Moreover the non-deceptive object of this should be proclaimed to be non-deceptive,\n1. because to do otherwise would be contradictory\n2. because to say that a teacher who explains it is unnecessary is a wrong and fruitless teaching.81\nAnd also Dharmakiirti says:\nWhen someone's words, by being pramana,\nAre non-deceptive, people follow them.\nTheir words then attain to being scripture.\nPeople will not do what does no good82.\n\"Words whose pramana is not confused\" is the definition of scripture, lung. Therefore, what is the same as what is said in the scriptures is also scripture by the power of its pramana.\nAlso the great teacher Asanga says in the sdud pa83\nWhy is Buddhist doctrine true? Here is what has been said. The teachings do not disagree with actual reality. If this is seen, its meaning becomes the cause of complete purity. That is the meaning of its being true. Moreover, Buddhist doctrine is free from the six faults and has the three virtues. Therefore it is not deceptive. Rather, it is established as scriptural pramana, the teachings of holy Dharma.84\nAs for these six faults and three virtues, the Sadi, Asanga's Five Works on the Bhuumis says:\nno benefit, wrong benefit, possessing benefit;85\nMerely heard, merely contentious, genuinely established;86\nHypocritical, unkind, eliminating suffering:87\nFree from these six faults, the treatises have these three virtues.\n1) \"Without benefit,\" means not having the benefit of truly establishing liberation.\n2) \"Wrong benefit,\" or \"wrong sense\" means falling into the extremes of eternalism and nihilism, saying things injurious to the Dharma and so forth. When these two faults are absent, then Buddhist doctrine is true and possesses benefit.\n3) \"Merely heard,\" means just repeating what has been heard.\n4) \"Merely contentiousness,\" means merely searching out faults in others.\nBuddhist doctrine is free from these faults is sincerely or genuinely established.\n5) \"Hypocritical\" means that attesting to the dharma for motives that are not right.\n6) \"Unkind\" means being without the compassion that wishes to protect sentient beings from suffering. When it is free from these two faults, Buddhist doctrine is the holy Dharma that eliminates the suffering of samsara.\nThe teachings of Buddhist doctrine remedy the cause of samsara, the kleshas, and their fruition, the sufferings of the three lower realms of samsara. Therefore, it is established that the teachings are scriptural pramana and unconfused. Vasubandhu's rnam bshad rigs pa, says:\nThey remedy all the enemies, the kleshas,\nAnd protect us from the lower realms of samsara,\nBecause of these virtues of remedy and protection\nThe teachings88 are never other than these two virtues.89\nThe regent, Lord Maitreya, says:\nWhoever has what is meaningful, fully connected to Dharma,\nIs taught to abandon all the kleshas of the three realms.\nWhoever teaches the beneficial virtues of peace\nIs taught to be a sage and irreversible.90\nAlso he says in the Uttaratantra:\nWhat is spoken only in terms of Conqueror's teachings\nExplained with a mind that is undistracted from that,\nIn accord with the path of attaining liberation,\nLike the words of the Sage himself should be received on the head.91\nAlso:\nThe natural state of all the knowable dharmas of the phenomenal world of samsara and nirvana is taught as the true path of emptiness and interdependent arising, and therefore the Buddhist teachings are established as the unconfused doctrine of scriptural pramana.\nThe great teacher Nagarjuna says:92\nFor whomever emptiness and interdependent arising\nAre of one meaning in the madhyamaka path,\nI prostrate to such a sage, who is a master\nOf the secret that is unequalled and supreme.93\nThus, the Buddha taught the teachings included within the stages of the nine vehicles, as many as there are within the scriptural doctrine of holy Dharma, in accord with the nature, capabilities, and wishes of those to be tamed. If we practice these with devoted aspiration, the particular fruition of each will be gained without deception. Therefore, it is taught that the doctrine is not confused. For that reason, the Second Buddha of Uddiyana said:\nAll the vehicles, on their own level, are true doctrine without contradiction.94\nAs this is extensively taught there and elsewhere, if we have faith in all the doctrine and do not close our eyes to the intelligence of pure perception, that will be the first opening of the great gate of the path of liberation.\nSECOND, the Buddhist teachings of Holy Dharma are The Doctrine or scriptural pramana. By reason of their being established as unconfused, the one who taught them, the Buddha Bhagavat, is established as a great being of pramana. As such, he has eradicated and completely abandoned all the errors of ignorance. He knows and sees all knowables with unobscured perception. The pramana of the teachings depends on the pramana of the teacher. As for the pramana of the teacher, the cause is explained as the intent of perfect benefit. For that reason, from the perfect activity of the teacher arises the perfect fruition. This has the benefit for oneself that one is a sugata, and the benefit for others that one is their protector. The great teacher Dignaga says in the first praise of the tshad ma kun btus 95\nBecoming authentic96 should be regarded as\nFor the benefit of every sentient being.\nI prostrate to the teacher, the Sugata and protector.97\nAlso in his auto-commentary he says:\nThe FIRST topic is a praise to the Buddha Bhagavat. By having a perfect cause and fruition, he has become authentic. That is the reason for my arousing devotion to him.98\nThe perfect cause is his perfect intention and perfect action on it. It is explained that his wish is to benefit beings.99 The action is to teach the teachings to sentient beings.100\nThe fruition is perfection of the two benefits, those for oneself and others.\nThe perfect benefit for oneself is becoming a sugata. This should be understood in three senses. 1) The benefit of supreme beauty is like having excellent personal form. 2) The benefit of irreversibility, is like a plague being well-cured. 3) The benefit without exceptions is like a vase being well-filled. These three benefits are without desire for externals. Therefore this perfection of the benefit for oneself is beyond being learned and unlearned alike.101\nAs for the perfection of the benefit for others, through the benefit of liberating them, we are their protectors.102 Having prostrated to the teacher who has such virtues,...\nThe great teacher Vasubandhu says:\nThe one who has eternally conquered all darkness,\nleading beings out of the mire of samsara,\nI prostrate to this teacher of things as they are.\nAccording to the teacher mtho btsun grub:\nHaving abandoned all the other teachers,\nI go for refuge to you Bhagavan.\nIf someone should asks why, it is because\nYou have no faults, but only excellence.\nTHIRD, given that this teaching, purified by the three analyses, is an unequalled way of entering into complete liberation, what is to be proved is that the teacher who has perfect intention, application, and fruition is a being of unequalled pramana. This can be established beyond doubt by syllogistic proofs, using the three kinds of inferential pramana in which all of the three modes of syllogism are complete. In syllogistic form:\nThe dharmin, \"the teacher, the Buddha,\" is an authentic being; because the teaching is scriptural pramana;\nfor example, like that of the great rishis.\nAs for the teaching being The Doctrine, scriptural pramana:\nIt is established that it the teacher who spoke it was the Buddha. So the FIRST mode is there, presence of the dharma in the subject.\nWhen teaching is scriptural pramana, it is certain that the teacher of it is a buddha, an authentic being. That is the second mode, the forward entailment.\nWhen the teacher is not an authentic being, it is certain that the scriptural teaching is not pramana. That is the third mode, the reversed entailment.\nAfter the process of correct reasoning with the three pramanas, if confidence in the non-deceptive certain knowledge of such a teacher and teaching arises within our being, that is supreme faith. This is also the ultimate essence of refuge and supplication. It is also the root of the path of liberation, and of blessings entering into our being, the single root of a multitude of good things.103 The second buddha of Uddiyana Padmasambhava says that if we have ultimate devotion, we will receive blessing, and if we are free from doubt our wishes will be fulfilled:\nIf our minds are devoted,104 blessings will enter in.%\nBy being free from doubt, our wishes are established%\nAlso the omniscient great pandit Shantarakshita says in his auto-commentary to the Madhyamakala.mkara:\nWhat is spoken by the Tathagata is good in the beginning, good in the middle, and good in the end. Like fine gold being smelted, cut, and polished, it will not be harmed by perception, inference, or his own words in the scriptures. This wisdom unmixed with samsaric things,105 is completely undisturbed by their total clutter. By this wisdom, having seen suchness,106 you Buddha are the leader of the divine and human realms. You are the crown of them all. They offer garlands to adorn your two lotus feet, as master and guru of all the world. Who, having known you, would not generate faith, practicing from the heart with complete detachment?\nThus:107\nWhoever relies on that surmounts degeneracy,\nWith undeceived certainty in the guru and the three jewels,\nGrasping that from now onward to the bone core of the heart,\nI go to refuge until the essence of enlightenment.\nNow there is a kind of analysis\nThis precious certain knowledge is essentially non-deceptive. It is unequalled intelligence free from the murkiness of doubt, possessing a thousand undefiled rays of light.108 Since this is the great treasure of your knowledge, Maqjushri, I bow to you. Or again, since that intelligence without doubt arises from the blessing of the great treasure of your knowledge, Maqjushri, I bow to you.109\nThat comes chiefly from the process of correct reasoning of the cause depending on the fruition.110 I express homage to the chief of all benefits. Moreover, for these words of the root verses that express homage, the first verse refers to the jewel of the holy Dharma, the second to the jewel of the Buddha, and the third to the jewel of the sangha.111 To you I bow as the embodiment of these three excellencies, the great treasure of jetsun Maqjushri's knowledge.\nThe purpose of this expression of homage is to benefit oneself by showing why these people are holy beings,112 and also to gather the two accumulations. The benefit for others, is to inspire their faith in the teachings and teacher. The mdo rgya cher rol pa says:\nThe wishes of a person who possesses merit are established.\nThe great teacher Nagarjuna says:\nIt is not fruitless, when authors of the treatises\nExpress their homage to the teacher and teaching.113\nBy so doing they give us inspiration.114\nThe ched du brjod pa'i tshoms says:115\nFor persons who have accumulated merit,\nThere can be no harm arising from others\nOr obstacles of maras and of gods.\nII. The promise to compose the text\nIts vastness and profundity are hard to realize,\nAs for the amrita of the Sugata teachings,\nFor whomever wishes to experience it,\nMay this light of understanding be completely granted.\nThe absolute is free from all the complexities of existence, non-existence, and so forth. Therefore, it is profound. The relative is the bhumis, paramitas, and so forth. Its vastness is difficult to realize. These are the Sugata's teachings of the mahayana.\nThose teachings are like amrita. May whatever fortunate ones wish to experience their taste or to practice them be granted the light of undefiled understanding of the excellent teachings116 of this Sword of Prajqa. May it be produced within their being. The teacher Nagarjuna says:\nThe holy ones do not make many promises;\nBut if they ever promise something difficult,\nIt is as if their promise had been written in stone.\nEven if they die, they do not relinquish it.\nHow the topic of composition is good in the middle\nthe subject to be analyzed is the two truths. The analyzer is the two correct reasonings. With the teaching of the fruition of what is to be analyzed, that makes three parts. As for the FIRST:\nThe Buddhas taught the Dharma\nIn terms of117 the two truths,\nThe relative truth of the world\nAs well as the absolute truth.\nThe perfect buddha bhagavans taught something like 84,000 gates of Holy Dharma. In as many of these as were taught, briefly, what is spoken about relies completely on the two truths. These\nare the relative truth of the world and the ultimate truth beyond the world. As for the meaning of the worldly one, the Prasannapada of Chandrakirti says:118\nHere the world consists of the well-known skandhas.\nWorldly truth119 is what depends on these.\nSince they arise in dependence on the skandhas, imputed individual beings are the world.120\nSo he and many others have said.121 No better realization is possible than realization of the nature of the two truths as they are. It should be known that, in the progression of the nine vehicles,realization of the nature of the two truths becomes ever more profound.122\nHere, to give a provisional analysis of the details of the system of the two truths,123 there are the essence, semantic analysis,124 definition125, divisions and purpose, five altogether.\n1) the essence of the relative is the objects contemplated by mind and the five sense-powers. All these are objects of thought.126 The essence of the absolute is the sphere of individual and personal wisdom free from mind, free from all the extremes of complexity.\n2) the semantic analysis,127 of truth in the phrase \"relative truth\". Natureless, illusory appearance is the confused viewpoint of transient relative. This viewpoint is \"truth\" insofar as its identifying characteristics128 are not deceptive. It is also \"truth\" in the sense that it leads us to absolute truth, our ultimate aim. Since the dharmas of path and fruition are not deceptive, in that sense, relative truth is called \"truth\".\n3) the definition of relative truth, is the truth of \"dharmas that are not beyond the sphere of mind and that will not bear analysis.\" The definition of the absolute is that of \"nature beyond mind where conceptions are completely pacified.\"\n4) the two divisions are the relative and absolute truths. The yab sras mjal ba'i mdo says:\nThere are two kinds of truth by which the world is known\nNo other distinctions are heard, and they are self-sufficient.\nThese are the absolute truth and the relative truth.\nThere is no such thing as any third kind of truth.\nBecause of the needs of worldly beings, within the relative, the distinction of true and false was made. As appropriate kinds of symbolic knowledge for this purpose, the classifications were created of the true relative and the false relative.\nThe true relative is the appearance of objects to a mind in which the six senses are not defective.\nThe false relative is the appearance of objects to the mind in which the six senses are defective, seeing hairs before the eyes and so forth.129\n5) regarding the purpose, the bden gnyis says:\nThose who know the distinction of the two truths\nAre not to be deceived by the Sage's words.\nHaving collected all the accumulations,\nThey will go to the other shore, perfection.\nThe meaning of the composition that is good in the middle\nWithin this there are two sections\n1. the short teaching of the two correct reasonings\n2. the extensive teaching in terms of the four correct reasonings.\nI. The short teaching of the two correct reasonings:\nWith regard to the natures of these same two truths,\nIf we enter into the non-erroneous mind of certainty,\nThe good eye of the two immaculate pramanas\nIs the excellent view that is to be established.\nThe two objects of analysis130 are the natures of relative truth and absolute truth. If philosophical analysts want to enter properly into these by means of131 certain, unerring awareness, they must establish the excellent/ supreme view like a good eye that ascertains awareness of its two aspects. These two aspects are:\n1) the pramana of conventional analysis without the faults of error\n2) the pramana of absolute analysis.\nThese are pramana and madhyamaka respectively. They support each other, like the well-known emblem of two lions with crossed necks.132\nII. The extensive teaching of analysis by the four correct reasonings.\nThe action133 of these is the four reliances. The fruition is explained as the eight great treasures of confidence. First, the three first correct reasonings are explained together, and then the reasoning of proper establishing is explained.\nFIRST there is the general teaching of appearance as interdependent origination; then the explanation of the particularizations of the correct reasonings of essence, cause, and effect. The meaning is summarized under those three.\nA. FIRST The general teaching of appearance as interdependent origination:\nThus, regarding these appearances\nThe pattern of their arising is interdependence\nTherefore, something that is not dependent\nLike a lotus in the sky will not appear\nHow in the world are there these appearances of samsara and nirvana? Certainly and definitely, they all arise134 interdependently from causes and conditions. What is other than that, with no dependence on causes and conditions, never appears within the scope of mind. For example, a lotus flower in the sky never appears. For that reason, all knowables that can be named should be understood as interdependent-arising-emptiness. To think interdependent arising is only the arising of conditioned things from their causes is a very small vision of that universal necessity.135 If all things that are unconditioned do not also arise interdependently, there will be no equality between them. The great teacher Nagarjuna says:\nWhatever arises interdependently\nIs to be explained as emptiness.\nThe classification which depends on that\nIs itself the path of madhyamaka.\nExcept in terms of interdependent arising\nNo dharmas can be said to be existent.\n\"But what is interdependent arising?\" There are three aspects: the meaning of the word, the essence, and the divisions.\n1) The meaning\nThe Sanskrit word pratitya samutpada means interdependent arising. The two volume grammar, sgra sbyor bam po gnyis pa says:136\nPratityasamutpada means interdependent arising. Pratitya means dependent or conditional. sam is sambandha, which means connected together.\nutpada is a word for arising. Outer and inner dharmas do not arise autonomously. They arise from an assembly of causes and conditions. In dependence on previous causes, other things arise unobstructedly later and later still. Therefore, this is called interdependent arising.\nGlorious Chandrakirti says in the Madhyamakavatara:\nThat which arises interdependently\nIs characterized as meeting and working together.137\n2) The essence\nThese dharmas, summarized under the inner and outer, never arise without a cause. They do not arise from non-causes, such as causeless eternal creators other than themselves, the self, time, or a god138 Their arising is called interdependent because each thing arises in dependence on being connected to the assembly of its own particular causes and conditions.\n3) The divisions\nThe divisions are external and internal interdependent arising.\na) External interdependent arising\nAll external dharmas arise interdependently as the sprout does from the seed.\nb) Inner interdependent arising\nInner dharmas, the skandhas of sentient beings, high, middle, and low, arise interdependently in the style of the twelve links of interdependent origination, as exemplified by the arising of the sprout from the seed.\n4) How these in turn are divided\na) external interdependent arising should be known in terms of the seven causal connections and six conditional connections.\n1) The seven causal connections as they apply to the seed are\n1 the sprout\n2 the leaves\n3 the stalk\n4 the hollow within the stalk\n5 the pith\n6 the flower\n7 the fruit.\nFrom the former stage, the later stage arises, produced by the power of closely related causes.139 So it is taught.\n2) The six conditional connections are:\n1 earth\n2 water\n3 fire\n4 air\n5 space\n6 time.\nAccording to the stages, there are firmness and endurance, gathering, ripening, increasing, expansive openness, and gradual change.140\nThese co-producing conditions produce a six-fold association between sprout and fruit.\nb) In inner interdependent arising, when there is connection of causes, there are the twelve links of interdependent origination. What are those? The sutras say:\nInterdependent arising is like this: since this exists, this arises. Because of this having arisen, this arises.\nIn this case:\n1) Conditioned by ignorance, there are 2) formations.\n3) Conditioned by formations, there is consciousness.\n4) Conditioned by consciousness, there are name and form.141\n5) Conditioned by name and form there are the six ayatanas.\n6) Conditioned by the six ayatanas there is apprehension142 of objects.\n7) Conditioned by apprehension, there is feeling.\n8) Conditioned by feeling, there is craving.\n9) Conditioned by craving, there is clinging.143\n10) Conditioned by clinging, there is transmigration.\n11) Conditioned by transmigration, there is birth.\n12) Conditioned by birth there is old age and death.\nThere also arise pain, lamentation,144 suffering, unhappiness, and disturbance. Thus only this great heap of suffering arises. By the cessation of ignorance old age, death, suffering and so forth, this great heap of nothing but suffering, will cease.\nConventionally speaking, when the previous ones of these twelve links exist, the later ones will subsequently arise. By the arising of the previous ones, the later ones are produced. If the former ones do not exist and have not arisen, neither will the later ones. Since they will not arise, the heap of suffering will cease.\nAs for the associated conditions, suffering arises from the kleshas, including ignorance,145 being objects of attention,146 and having been associated with the inner senses and so forth.147 Karma also arises like that.\nThe seven-fold name and form etc. of suffering,148\n1) The inner earth element is solidity.\n2) Inner water is wetness\n3) Inner fire is heat, digestion of food and such.\n4) Inhalation and exhalation of the breath and so forth are the inner air element.\n(5 Open orifices are the element of space.\n6) Arising of the element of consciousness is produced when there has been the condition of the six elements being brought together.\nThe eye-consciousness arises by bringing it together its support the eye-power or organ, perceived form, light, unobscured space, and mental attention149. Awareness is joined to the appropriate other-entity, and it is known.\nConsciousness arises from its preceding moment of closely associated150 consciousness, and therefore is seen to remain as a continuous stream. Without preceding closely-associated causes, the one who has thoughts cannot arise, any more than a sprout can arise from a stone, or light from darkness. This continuity of the clear insight of consciousness, as it arises in someone well-trained in reading and so forth, is observed arising form earlier to later, in unbroken continuity.\nIf the assembly of causes is entirely complete, then how will the stream be broken at the time of death? This stream is like a viable seed. If it has the conditions of water, manure, heat, moisture and so forth, it will inevitably grow; or it is like the continuous flow of a great river.151 Thus all outer and inner dharmas arise from the necessary associations of just the causes and conditions that each requires. If they are not all there, these dharmas will not arise. If they are all there, these dharmas certainly will arise. That is the nature of interdependent origination.\nFrom beginningless time within the continual movement152 of this stream, there is no ego to be its producer, no owner etc. at all. The causes do not think, \"I will produce these fruitions.\" They arise having the five interdependent connections of cause and effect.\nWhat are these?\n1. While the seed still exists unceasingly, the sprout does not arise. The sprout arises after the seed ceases. Therefore, the seed is impermanent.\n2. After the seed ceases, the sprout does not arise after a gap. The ceasing of the seed and the arising of the sprout occur unbrokenly like the beam of a balance swinging up and down.\n3. The seed and sprout are two, since in terms of essence and action they are not one. Nor does the earlier change into the later.153\n4. Since the diminishing of the seed yields the augmentation of the sprout, by a small cause a big fruition is established.\n5. From a wheat seed a wheat sprout arises. From the goodness of merit, doesn't there come a succession of good causes and fruitions? Outer and inner causes and effects should be known to have these five kinds of causal accord. For example, Lord Nagarjuna said:\nRecitations of texts, lamps, and mirror reflections,\nBurning glasses and insults, reverberating echos,\nAs well as the skandhas that are linked in the chain of rebirth,\nShould be understood by the wise as never transferring.154\nB. The explanation of the particularizations of the correct reasonings of 1) essence, 2) cause, and 3) effect.\nWithin that there are the explanations of:\n1) the correct reasoning of dependence of the fruition on the cause\n2) the correct reasoning of productive action\n3) the correct reasoning of suitable establishing\n4) the correct reasoning of nature.155\n1) The correct reasonings of dependence of the fruition on the cause and productive action,\nThere are the main subject and its purpose.\na. The main subject:\nIf all the assembly of causes is there,\nTheir productive action produces the fruition.\nHowever many individual fruitions there may be,\nEach depends on its own cause.\nThe 'phags pa dgongs pa nges par 'grel ba'i mdo, says:\nCorrect reasoning should be understood to be of four kinds:\n1) the correct reasoning of dependence\n2) the correct reasoning of productive action\n3) the correct reasoning of suitable establishing\n4) the correct reasoning of nature.\nMoreover the bstan bcos chos mngon pa sna tshogs kun las btus pa says:\nAs for the Dharmic effort of analyzing dharmas, if it is asked how many kinds of correct reasoning there are, it is said that there are four kinds of correct reasoning. These are the correct reasoning of dependence, the correct reasoning of productive action, the correct reasoning of establishing reasons, and the correct reasoning of nature.\nFIRST To briefly explain the general meaning of these four correct reasonings,\nFIRST: The meaning of \"correct reasoning.\"\nJamgon Mipham says:\nWhy is it called correct reasoning, rigs pa? Because it is suitable or reasonable, rigs pa nyid, that the nature of dharmas is as it is and, therefore, it is called rigs pa, correct reasoning. Also whatever is analyzed in accord with this is called correct reasoning.156\nAlso the lion of teachers rang zom dharmabhadra says:\n\"Correct reasoning,157\" in Sanskrit is called nyaya. Since nyaya consists of the nature or real state of things, the nature of things as they are, it is called correct reasoning.\nYukti or samyukti, since it is proper, is also called correct reasoning. Thus, correct reasoning should be known to consist both of both the way each thing is and the mind in accord with that.\nIn terms of to verbal etymology, nyaya means \"to attain.\" Since what is attained is indestructible158, it is called correct reasoning.\nYukti is good connection. It consists of good connection of words. Nyaya consists of irrefutability. Pratipada also means irrefutability. A proposition that cannot be refuted by being contradicted by any words and thoughts at all, but can be well-established is called correct reasoning. Whatever characteristics and reasons produce such knowledge also are also are included in \"correct reasoning.\" These should be known as correct reasoning in the overall or general sense.\nSECOND, The definition of the four correct reasonings in general\n\"From the power of the things themselves all dharmas, having the nature of interdependent arising, are established in a way free from exaggeration and denigration.\" That is the definition of correct reasoning. The theg chen tshul 'jug, says:\nIn regard to this, as for the manner of the four correct reasonings, in general the definition is that \"all dharmas are established to arise by interdependent origination.\"\nThird, individual definitions of the four correct reasonings.\n1 \"Establishment by the collective power of the causes in terms of the fruition\" is the definition of the correct reasoning of the producing cause.159\n2 \"Establishment of the collective power of the fruition in terms of the cause\" is the definition of the correct reasoning depending of the fruition.160\n3 \"Establishment by that which is the nature of each dharma\" is the definition of the correct reasoning of nature.161\n4 \"Establishing the way of knowables in regard to cause, fruition, and essence through correct reasoning from the power of the things themselves\" is the definition of the correct reasoning of suitable establishing.162\nThe former text says:\nEstablishment in terms of the fruition is the correct reasoning of productive action. Establishment in terms of the cause is the correct reasoning of dependency. Establishment in terms of the essence is the correct reasoning of nature. Correct\nreasoning itself, produced without defilements, is establishing. This is the correct reasoning of proper establishing.\nFourth, that which is removed by the four correct reasonings, or their action.\n1 The correct reasoning of productive action removes doubts about causal production. If the assembly of causes is not complete, the fruition will not arise.\n2 The correct reasoning of dependence removes doubts about the fruition being completely dependent on the cause. An effect that does not depend on its cause is not possible.\n3 The correct reasoning of nature removes doubts about essences, since it establishes the essences of the relative and the absolute.\n4 The correct reasoning of suitable establishing removes doubt about correct reasoning itself. This is because the nature of the two truths is truly established by the pramanas of perception and inference.\nThe former text says:\nAs for the four things removed by these correct reasonings, respectively they clear away doubts about production, the established163, the essence, and correct reasoning.\nFifth The objects and validity164 of the four correct reasonings.\nBefore debating both debaters must establish a dharmin that is established by shared perception or appears the same to both of them165 and is indisputably established for them both. Otherwise the objects to be examined and analyzed by means of the four correct reasonings cannot be established. For example, If the particular object166 someone calls \"fire\" is not hot and burning, it is the wrong object for fire. The former text says:\nAs for the objects and validity of these, if the object of the nature is undefiled, and if the object is not wrong, reasoning is properly classified as correct reasoning of nature. Similarly, if the objects of production, establishment, and correct reasoning are undefiled and if their objects are not wrong, these are properly classified as correct reasoning.\nThe object of nature being undefiled is like its being expected that a burning glass will heat.\nThe wrong object is like saying that fire, rather than water, means what a deer bathes in. That is the wrong object for a hot fire. The others too are joined to what is proper for them.\nSixth The fault of excess,167 over-application, fault of the four correct reasonings.\nWhen didactic conceptual reasoning in the scope of consciousness alone produces great obstinate rigidity, and this becomes extreme, there will be the fault of reification or materialism. Here the theg chen tshul 'jug says:\nHere are the excesses of the four correct reasonings: if by the correct reasoning of nature there is exaggerated extreme establishment,168 all things will not be eliminated. In the end, we will become exponents of self-existing causes.\nAs for excess169 of the correct reasoning of productive action, all action and effort will not be eliminated. In the end we become exponents of doers of acts.170\nIf the correct reasoning of dependency is excessive, all powers will not be eliminated. In the end we become exponents of causation by creator deities.\nIf the correct reasoning of proper establishing is excessive, all occasions of correct reasoning will be faultless. Then in the end pride will manifest.\nWhen exponents of materialism and reification establish things, they are established mostly by excess in the correct reasonings of nature and of direct171 perception.172 Therefore, the right measure/ scope and excess of these should be told.\nWhat the great teacher Chandragomin says in the rigs pa sgrub pa'i gron me is mostly in accord with the above. The tshad ma'i mdo says:\nWhoever instructs in nature from the path of conceptual fixation harms the long continuation of the Sage's teachings. When those with the authentic Dharma of the Tathagata depart into something else, this should be refuted.\nAs the profound nature of that\nis not within the scope of conceptual arguers, if we search for dharmata through conceptual argument alone, we are far from the Sage's teachings, and they will have been damaged. Rather than that, wrong expositions and bad expositions of the profound nature, the intended meaning of the teacher, the Sage, should be refuted.\nFor that reason, the great teacher Nagarjuna said:\nWhatever arises interdependently\nHas no cessation and it has no birth;\nIt is neither nothingness nor eternal;\nIt is without coming and without going;\nIt is neither different things nor one.\nIt completely pacifies complexity.\nTo those who are the teachers of that peace,\nThe speakers who are perfect buddhas,\nIn homage to those holy ones I prostrate.\nAccording to these special praises, the immaculate essence of the excellent teaching of the excellent teacher Shakyamuni, the supreme King of Exponents of the path of correct reasoning within these three realms of samsara, is the subject, the two truths.\nOne of these two truths is not refuted and the other established. Appearance is interdependent arising. Interdependent arising is emptiness. These two are inseparable in essence, like fire and heat. Existence and non-existence, both and neither, the four extremes; birth and cessation; eternalism and nihilism; going and coming; these eight complexities and so forth, in the union of appearance and emptiness, are like the eight examples of illusion. Ground, path, and fruition are on an equal footing, and become all-pervading.\nIf we realize this excellent profound certainty, having established the view of buddhism, we have reached its life-source, the profound pith. If we do not know this, having fallen into the places of excess of the four correct reasonings, as explained above, we will be far from establishing the view of the buddha. Knowing how to do this is very important.\nThat is how the way of existence of things is to be evaluated.\nThe evaluating mind in accord with that is called pramana or correct reasoning. When the knowable objects of correct reasoning have been analyzed in terms of the three aspects of cause, fruition, and essence, these are said to be the correct reasonings of productive action, dependence, and nature respectively. When within these objects of analysis exaggeration has been cut through, producing a proper style of affirmation and negation, that is the correct reasoning of proper establishing. So it is taught.\nFor objects that are directly perceived, the evaluator is the pramana of direct perception and for hidden or indirect objects173 the evaluator is the pramana of inference. There are these two. Though inference has a hidden object, through the power of inference, the dharmin is grasped as pramana, so that, in the end, it becomes directly perceived. However, that direct perception can reach only its nature.\nThough some production and dependence are also part of the nature of things, they are gathered together within the correct reasoning of nature alone. What resolves the style of all correct reasonings, and makes them praiseworthy174 is the correct reasoning of nature. Having reached this, there is a suitable benefit with no need to establish anything else, just as the reason why fire is hot needs no further explanation. Thus rang zom mahaapandita says:\nThe aspects of nature, production, dependence, and proper establishing, the so-called four correct reasonings, are indeed establishable; but so that those of little learning and small mind may have easy realization, reasons conforming to the correct reasoning of nature alone should be told them.\nSuch mental analysis in accord with the nature of things is known as the correct reasoning abiding in the power of things themselves.175\nSince the way things are is unerringly evaluated, the meaning of this kind of correct reasoning cannot be appropriated by the others. Both conventional and ultimate pramana are said to dwell in the power of the things themselves. Thus, that fire is naturally hot is, relatively speaking, its nature, or the way it is. That fire is natureless is its nature, or the way it is absolutely speaking. By combining these two pramanas, the way things are is unerroneously resolved, but this is not to say it will be so for every single verse.\nTWO Thus, having briefly explained the general meaning of that, now there is the main topic of the text, the correct reasoning of productive action.\nFor external causes, eg the seed, water, and manure and for inner causes, eg mental object, the senses, and so forth, when the assembly of causes is all present, there is the power of producing the fruition, eg the sprout, consciousness etc. From that being so, this is called the correct reasoning of productive action. The dgongs pa nges par 'grel pa'i mdo, says this about it:\nThe correct reasoning of production is like this. By whatever causes and whatever conditions dharmas occur176 or are established, saying what actions produce the arising of these is called the correct reasoning of causal production.177\nThe great teacher Asanga says in the Shravaka Bhumi from the Yogacara-bhumis:\nAs for the skandhas, which are produced by their own causes and their own conditions, their own action produces the joining of those causes and those conditions. Thus, for example, the eye produces looking at forms. The ear produces the hearing of sounds,... and so on up to the mind produces knowledge of dharmas. Form is made to appear within the sphere of apprehension of the eye,... and so on up to dharmas are made to appear within the sphere of apprehension of the mind. Moreover the kind of productive action of these on one another with the configurations and means by which this comes about is called the correct reasoning of productive action.\nThe Dharma manifesting king Trisong Detsen in his summary of the bka' yang dag pa'i tshad ma mdo says:\nWhat is called the correct reasoning of productive action is described in terms of actions and causes. By the action of what and what else this and that are produced, ascertaining that such and such producers178 are the causes and conditions, it is taught that what is produced179, such and such fruitions, are produced.\nAs for the correct reasoning of dependence, whatever fruitions there are, sprouts, consciousness, etc., all those objects have their own individual causes that produce them. They must certainly depend on the seed, the sense powers, and so forth. This is called the correct reasoning of the dependency of the fruition on the cause. The dgongs pa nges par 'grel ba'i mdo, says:\nThe correct reasoning of dependence is like this: By such and such causes and such and such conditions composite things arise, and whatever conventionally imputed things arise, these are called the correct reasoning of dependency.\nThe Yogacara-Shravaka-Bhumi says:\nThe correct reasoning of dependence is like this: In brief, dependence has two aspects, the dependence of arising and the dependence of imputation.180 The dependence of arising is like this: By whatever causes and whatever conditions the skandhas arise, those skandhas depend on those causes and conditions.\nThe dependence of imputation is like this: By whatever assembly of names, of words, and of letters the skandhas are imputed, those skandhas are dependent on those assemblies of names, words, and letters.\nThese are called the dependency of arising and dependency of imputation of the skandhas.\nthe bka' yang dag pa'i tshad ma'i mdo btus pa says:\nThe correct reasoning of dependence is said to be the correct reasoning of dharmas and their effects. Compounded things, whatever is imputed to those things conventionally, and whatever fruitions arise, these and their causes and conditions are taught to be in a relationship of dependence.\nClassification of causes and fruitions\nIt may be asked, \"Well what kinds of cause and fruitions are there?\" As for the classification of the causes, conditions, and fruitions of arising, there are six causes, five fruitions, and four conditions.\nA Regarding the six causes, the Abhidharmakosha says:\nProducing cause and co-emergent arising\nEqual situation, equality possessing,\nAll pervading and ripening;\nCauses are said to be of these six kinds.\nAs for these six,\n1 The producing cause\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nThe producing cause produces another from itself.\nWith regard to the producing cause the vaibhashika school says that it is all dharmas other than the fruition itself. If so, all causes and non-causes are included within this.\nThe FIRST division, the producing cause with power, is like attributing to the sprout dependency on the seed.\nThe SECOND, the producing cause without power, is like saying that the sprout is uncompounded and arises within formless mind, like the skandhas of hell. Classifying these181 producing causes without power as causes is done simply on the basis that arising was not hindered. Though it is said that some of these182 may also have an indirect power, only producing causes with power need to be considered.183 This is the general classification for all causes.\nSo that the producing cause will not be obscured, among the kinds of causes in a situation, a certain number of causes are taught. Within the classification of the producing cause, the direct cause184 and co-producing condition185 are taught.\na. The direct cause is like the sprout arising from the seed and so forth, or the arising of a later consciousness from an earlier one.186\nb. The co-producing condition is like water and manure for the seed or the perceived condition and the sense-power within awareness.\nMoreover, there are the producing causes like that of the seed producing a sprout and like a lamp shining inside a vase in a dark house. Also ten kinds of producing cause are taught. The dbus mtha' rnam 'byed:\nAs for the ten producing causes there are arising\nDuration, support and supported, becoming and separation.\nOther, and belief, understanding, and attainment;\nThe eye, food, a lamp, and fire and so forth\nAre the examples that are presented of them;\nAs are a sickle, and also knowing how to make things,\nAs well as smoke, and inner causes, the path, and so forth.\n1) The producing cause of arising is like the arising of the eye-consciousness from the eye organ.\n2) The producing cause of duration is like the four kinds of food producing the duration of the body.\n3) The producing cause of support is like the dependence of the essence, sentient beings, being supported by the vessel, the earth.187\n4) The showing or clarifying cause is like a lamp illuminating forms within a dark house.\n5) The change-producing cause is like fire producing burning.\n6) The producing cause of separation is like reaping grass with a sickle.\n7) The cause of transformation into something else is like knowing how to make something or the a goldsmith's knowledge of how to make gold nuggets into jewelry.\n8) The belief-producing cause is like the sign of smoke producing certainty of fire.\n9) The understanding-producing producing cause is like certainty about the object arising from the cause and such and such reasons.\n10) The cause of attainment is like attaining nirvana from the path.\n2. Co-emergently arising cause.\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nThings that co-arise are each others' mutual fruition;\nLike the four elements and subsequent cognitive acts188\nOr like characteristics and the characterized.189\nThe co-emergently arising cause is like things being each others' mutual fruition, depending on each other like the poles of a tripod. This is like a single assembly of the four elements; mind and its subsequent states,190 and characteristics and the characterized.\nWhat are subsequent cognitive acts?191 These are like the linkage192 of mental events and spotless meditation. Mind and those subsequent events are one without earlier and later time. The fruition arises simultaneously or as one with it;193 as since the nature of virtue and so forth are one with the mind, they are called subsequent events or continuations of mind.\nGenerally, as for causes, there are the sorts of cause that produce the produced effect and the kind of cause without which it does not arise. From these two ways of classifying cause and effect, the FIRST is like the seed and water and so forth producing the sprout. The SECOND is like classification as \"short\" being dependent on \"long,\" or \"there\" being dependent on \"here,\" and so forth. In this case, the classification of latter resembles classification as cause and effect.\nReally the one does not produce the other. The \"effect\" arises at one and the same time with the cause, so that if one is not there, that is a sufficient reason why the other also will not arise. In that sense it is classified as a cause.\n3. the cause of equal situation\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nThe cause of equal situation is similar.\nIn the cause of equal situation, skal mnyam rgyu, the cause and the fruition are the same kind of thing, as virtue comes from a virtuous mind etc., barley grows from barley, and so forth. Here the cause does arise before the fruition, and is chiefly classified through being of the same kind of thing and in the same place.\n4. The equality-possessing cause.\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nIn the equality-possessing cause, minds and mental events have equal dependence on each other.\nAccording to what is said there, the equality possessing cause of minds is their being produced only because there are mental events. However, this is distinguished from co-emergent causation in that mind and mental events are equal in five ways:\n1. Both mind and mental events equally depend on the support of ego and the condition, the senses.\n2. With one sphere and one object, they have the same perception.\n3. Neither earlier or later than each other, they are at one and the same time.\n4. In the ways they take account of phenomena and so forth194 they are one and the same.\n5. Each has the same essence and substance.\nIn this cause, mind and mental events arise possessing mutual equality. This is taught for the sake of knowledge, and the way of classification is as before.\n5. The all-pervading cause, kun a'gro'i rgyu.\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nWhat is called the all-pervading cause is the intrinsic 5 all-pervading ones of those who possess the kleshas\nAs for the all-pervading cause, kun a'gro rnams, \"all-pervading\" refers to the kleshas. It is merely a separate explanation of production of dharmas possessing the kleshas, which is also otherwise explained, so that this is merely additional. It says that all dharmas having the kleshas is what produces them. Those having the kleshas are born from those having the kleshas. Accordingly, that from having the kleshas they arise with the kleshas is distinguished from equal situation. In this regard, the dharmas that arise intrinsically with the kleshas arise before those that have them as produced fruitions.\n6. The ripening cause\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nThe ripening cause is only the possession\nOf the defilements of vice and virtue.\nThe ripening cause is otherwise explained as the aspect of samsaric fruition that produces the pleasurable and unpleasurable. This is merely defiled virtue and non-virtue. Those were the six causes.\nB The five kinds of fruition\nThe sdom byang says:\nThere are ripening fruition and the ego fruition\nAccording with the cause, and that produced by the person.\nAlso that which is called the fruition of separation.\nThese comprise the list of the five kinds of fruition.\n1. the ripening fruition\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nThe ripening fruition is of the inferior.\nRipening fruitions are fruitions produced in dependence on the defiled joy and sorrow of samsara. The essence, being obscured, is not what can be expected to occur.195 What is to be expected is self-caused virtue or non-virtue. They arise from ripening causes. They are included within the continuua of sentient beings or designated as dharmas associated with them.\n2. The ego fruition\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nThe ego fruition is first\nAs for the ego fruition, the first fully-produced fruition of the six causes is the ego, it is said.\n3. The fruition according with the cause\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nAs for the one according with the cause\nIt is equal fortune and also all-pervading.\nThat which arises here is both of these.\nThe fruition according with the cause is both a fruition of equal fortune and a fruition of the all-pervading. This designation is used because these fruitions accord with their own causes.\n4. The person-produced fruition\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nWhen by someone's power anything arises,\nThat fruition is a person-produced fruition.\nThe person-produced fruition is a fruition of both the co-emergent and equally-possessing causes.\nWhen a person produces a vase, the maker and the object made both individually exist. The name is conferred on what is like that example.\n5. The fruition of separation\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nSeparation is exclusively involved with mind.\nIn the fruition of separation, the prajqa of mind, by its power of individual-discrimination,196 eliminates the separable aspect to be abandoned. Our own uncompounded essence is classified as the fruition. Our own essence is not produced by a cause, but hindrances to it need to be abandoned. From their being abandoned the essence arises in experience. If they are not abandoned, this is the cause of its not so arising.\nC. The four conditions\nThe sdom byang says:\nThe causal condition, and the preceding condition;\nThe perceptual-object condition, and the preponderant.\nThese are what are known as the four conditions.\n1. the causal condition, the Abhidharmakosha says:\nThe so-called cause is five causes.\nAll the other five causes but the producing cause, are classified as casual conditions.\n2. The immediately preceding condition\nThe Abhidharmakosha says:\nMind and whatever contents of mind may have arisen\nIf they are not last they are equally preceding.\nAs for mind and mental contents equally being preceding conditions, previous to any incorrect mind and mental events their own respective preceding incorrect mind and mental events have arisen.197 Until the last moment before an arhat enters the mind without outflows, all mind and mental events are immediately preceding conditions.\n3. The perceptual object condition the Abhidharmakosha says:\nThis is all the dharmas that are perceived.\nThe perceived condition,198 is all dharmas. When they have been perceived, awareness of them arises.\n4. The preponderant condition, the Abhidharmakosha says:\nThe producing cause, so-called, is explained as the controller.\nThe first of the six causes, the producing cause, is also called the preponderant or master-condition.\nOf these four conditions the perceived condition and preceding condition are mental causes alone. The other two are conditions producing all compounded things.\nSECOND\nTherefore in regard to these causes and fruitions\nKnowing the way in which they exist and do not exist,\nSince by that they can be made to start and stop,199\nThe arts and such200 and doctrines all have this as their root.\nTherefore these arts and doctrines have been gathered together,\nAs helpful advice201 within the world and beyond the world.\nFor these formerly explained reasons, as for the cause of productive action and dependence of the fruition on the cause, by such causes such fruitions are produced. By knowing as they are the ways that those fruitions exist dependently on these causes, and how they are not produced by them and do not exist dependently on them, we engage in and refrain from actions in the world.\nThus there will be the creative arts and crafts202 and so forth, medicine, grammar, pramana, the study of Buddhism the 5 major sciences dealing with worldly objects. there are also rhetoric, drama and dance, astrology, composition, and poetics, the lesser five sciences.203 There are these ten sciences of knowables. There are not only those but also the productive function of all the doctrines of Buddhists and outsiders204 without remainder, and so by means of the style of these two dependencies205 we have the root of practical discrimination.206\nFor this reason, it should be known that within these two correct reasonings of production and dependency, all worldly helpful instructions and all helpful doctrines that are beyond the world are collected.\nSECOND, the correct reasoning of nature is explained in two ways by means of the relative, appearance, and by means of the absolute, emptiness.\nFIRST, The explanation by relative appearance\nWithin this there are two parts, the main topic and its classifications.\nFIRST, The main topic:\nHaving arisen interdependently\nAll dharmas, by their own natures,\nEach have their individually existing characteristics.\nSolidity, moisture, heat, and so forth\nThese conventional natures have no falsity.\nInterdependently arising through causes and conditions, whatever has arisen gathered under samsara, nirvana, and the three paths,207 all these dharmas, none of which are produced by anything else, each by their own natures exist with characteristics which are not those of others. They have their own individual natures which are not shared. Earth is solid, water is moist, fire is hot, air is motile, space is unobstructed, and so forth. If anyone says these conventional natures are not like that, it is false. These indispensable conclusions are known as the correct reasoning of essential nature.208 The dgongs pa nges par 'grel pa'i mdo says:\nThe correct reasoning of nature is like this. It was proper even before the Tathagata arose in the world. Even if he had not arisen, it would be proper. The existence of natures209 and the existence of dharmadhatu are the correct reasoning of nature.\nthe Shravaka-bhumi says:\nThe correct reasoning of nature is like this, why the skandhas are like that, and why worldly existences are like that. Why solidity is the defining characteristic of earth, that of water moisture, that of fire heat, and that of air motility. Similarly, why the defining characteristic of form is properly being visible/ sensible.210 That of feeling is being emotionally felt211. That of perception is knowing all characteristics. The defining characteristic of formations is forming212 The defining characteristic of consciousness is producing consciousness of the factual.213 Why? Because that is their nature. That is the nature of those dharmas. Since their essences are like that, these natures which they have are said to be properly theirs. The bka' yang dag pa'i tshad ma'i mdo btus pa says:\n\"the correct reasoning of natures\"214 is expressed by means of the natures215 of dharmas. Whatever natures dharmas have in relative truth and absolute truth are taught.\nSECOND, The classifications\nWithin a single dharma are also various dharmas.\nConventional terms that establish and eliminate\nDistinguish limitless classifications of different objects.\nEach of these exists with216 its own particular nature.\nBy perception these objects are completely grasped.\nBy means of what characteristics pertain to each of these\nDharmas have their different characterizations.\nJoined and distinguished by conceptual mind.\nKnowables are to be understood.217 from these two kinds:\nReal substantial things218 and imputed characteristics219\nFrom that come the classifications of many complexities.\nFor example, this is like there being various dharmas within the single dharma a vase. A vase has impermanence, is a material thing and so forth, By such statements of what it \"is\" and \"has\" what is established about it is asserted. Also it is not permanent, is without consciousness, and so forth. By means of these \"nots\" and \"withouts\" there are limitless distinctions of classifications negating or excluding conventional terms, excluded meanings220 which are other than it and which it is said not to have at all. Thus by its own nature it exists as what it is.\nAs for what happens by such dharmas perceived, they are grasped as objects221, substantial entities with their intrinsic individual characteristics,222 like a vase. What has been produced has impermanence, arising, and so forth. Using such characteristics223 it is constructed224 as apparently different dharmas. Conceptions of it are grasped as a mixture of the verbal and the real.225 They are grasped with a mixture of sound and meaning. By these characteristics,226 conceptual mind distinguishes these as individuals and joins them together.\nThus dharmas that are things exist substantially and have characteristics attributed to them. By means of these two aspects in relation to knowables, without error we assert and deny, accept and reject. We become involved with or avoid them.227 The way things are228 is rightly realized.\nFrom that come numerous extensive classifications of complexities such as things and non-things, object and perceiver, general and particular, compounded and uncompounded, permanent and impermanent, materiality and awareness, cause and fruition, substantial existence and imputed existence, conceptual and non-conceptual, contradiction and logical entailment, characteristic and characterized, the thing which is distinguished and the dharma that distinguishes it, the expression and expressed, clarifying and eliminating,229 negation and assertion, general characteristics and individual characteristics and so forth. Having produced these various conventional classifications of common meanings, in reliance on them the limitless topics of knowables are clarified.\nSECOND explanation by means of the absolute:\nThus the dharmas whose essence is cause and its fruition\nIf they are rightly apprehended and analyzed,\nThey are not conceived as having been produced,\nAnd so they also do not arise dependently.\nEven though each appears according to its own essence,\nThe essence of all of these alike is emptiness,230\nDharmadhatu possessing the three marks of liberation,\nThey are dharmata, the absolute nature of things.\nAs explained before, the producer, the cause, and the fruition, the thing dependent upon the cause, and dharmas that essentially have the nature of cause and fruition, if they are completely examined and analyzed by the correct reasoning that examines for the absolute, not even a particle of nature exists for them.231 They are characterized by the three marks of liberation.232\nIf we examine the cause, by the reasons of the vajra slivers,233 if knowable dharmas are well analyzed and examined, no producer, or \"cause,\" is observed to arise in terms of any of the four extremes, cause by self other, both, or no cause. Therefore cause is markless.234\nIf we analyze the fruition, by the reasons of existence and non-existence or arising and cessation, through dependence on causes and conditions there may be arisings of fruitions. However, since those alleged fruitions will not be existent, non-existent, both, or neither, and so forth, these fruitions are unborn, and they cannot be wished for.235\nIf we examine the essence, by the reason of being free from one and many, though conventionally there is that which is other, appearing with a nature of its own that is essentially not in common, that which is other has not been produced. Therefore, by its own nature it is emptiness free from being either truly one or truly many. It is essentially empty of nature.236\nIf so, in the absolute, conventional cause, effect, and essence, are dharmadhatu having the three marks of liberation. It is properly said that their essence is that of the absolute.\nTHIRD, The summary of the essence:\nProduction and dependence\nSince they are the nature of things themselves,\nAs for the end of correct reasoning,\nWhen the nature237 is reached, no reason is sought.\nAs explained above, conventionally the action of the cause produces the fruition. Each fruition is produced in dependence on its own producing cause. As this is the intrinsic nature of things, when there is such a reason, that is the end of correct reasoning. If we reach the proper intrinsic nature of things, we need seek no further for other reasons. This is the nature of things, like fire being hot.\nSECOND, The reasoning of suitable establishing\nWithin suitable establishment there are the brief teaching, and the extensive explanation. As for the FIRST, the brief teaching:\nWhen something has been evaluated\nAccording to the nature of the two truths,\nSince it is established by the power of the thing itself,\nThis is the correct reasoning of suitable establishing.\nAs it appears and as it exists\nIts own essence is directly perceived.\nOr depending on perceived appearances,\nWithout deception, other things are inferred.\nAs explained above, an object to be evaluated has both the apparent nature of relative truth and the empty nature of absolute truth. In accord with these what is evaluated or the perceiver arising from it, the evaluating mind is established from the power of the way things intrinsically are in themselves. Therefore it is also called the correct reasoning or pramana of suitable establishment. The dgongs pa nges par 'grel ba'i mdo says:\nThe correct reasoning of proper establishing is like this. When we say by what cause and conditions something is entailed238 to occur and explained, and the sense we want to establish established; that which was fully and truly comprehended239 is called the correct reasoning of proper establishing.\nThe rnal 'byor spyod pa'i nyan thos kyi sa says:\nProperly established correct reasoning is like this. The skandhas are impermanent, or interdependently arising, or miserable,240 or empty, or egoless.\nThe three pramanas are accepted scripture, perception, and inference. They produce realization. So, as for correct reasoning of proper establishing, these are the three pramanas that appropriate241 the essence of the holy ones. They are like this: The skandhas are presented and established as impermanent, or interdependently arising, or miserable, or empty, or egoless. That is called the correct reasoning of proper establishing. The bka' yang dag pa'i mdo kun las btus pa says:\nReason-establishing correct reasoning is universal. It shows such and such established characteristics.242\nTo explain briefly the supplementary points243 of pramana taught here, the definition of pramana is \"non-deceptive knowledge.\" The tshad ma rnam 'grel says:\nPramana is non-deceptive knowledge.\nWithin this definition of pramana, as non-deceptive, there are three distinctions.\n1) The non-deceptive object of action consists of individual characteristics.\n2) The non-deceptive agent is a mind with the two pramanas.244\n3) The non-deceptive mode245 is such that when there is a distinction of existence, that existence is non-deceptive. When there is a distinction of non-existence, that non-existence is non-deceptive. When there is a distinction that something is or is not characterized as this or that, it is really so.\nSomeone may say, \"but isn't pramana also defined as \"the producer of cognizance246 of an unknown object?\"\nYes, it is. These two are dissimilar only their style of verbal expression. The realities have no dissimilarity. How so? In knowledge that cognizes247 unknown objects, there is first a mind deceived about that object. This is because that which is non-deceptive knowledge is the producer of cognizance about that unknown object.\nTherefore these two definitions both join the individual definitions applying to conventional and absolute pramana. Since they join both of these, they are said to be definitions of pramana as a whole. Though what is said to have one meaning arises in three parts, in our own tradition only the latter should be grasped. So the Jamyang guru Mipham has said.\nIn general, the definition of mind, blo, is \"that which understands,\" rig pa. The definition of awareness, shes pa, is \"apprehension248 and experience.\"\nAs for the fortune of supreme knowledge,249 if all thoughts of non-pramana are gathered into correct reasoning, intellectualizations, uncertain appearances, subsequent cognition,250 wrong knowledge, and doubts are said to be gathered into it too.251 The mind of pramana has two kinds of pramana. These are the two divisions. The tshad ma'i mdo, the Pramana Sutra says:\nDirect perception and inference alike are pramana.\nThe definition of pramana is apprehended as double.\nAlso the tshad ma rnam 'grel says:\nThere are two objects to apprehend.252\nTherefore there are two pramanas.\nAs is taught there, there are necessarily two kinds objects to be evaluated:\n1. individual characteristics and\n2. universal characteristics.253\nIn terms of fruition, there are dharmas with a real productive power and those with no such power.\nIn terms of intrinsic nature254 for different things the same dharma may be in common or not in common.255\nIn terms of word and object, there are cases where the expressing word expresses a real thing and those where it does not.\nIn terms of the knowledge of the perceiver, there are conceptually known apparent objects and non-conceptually known apparent objects.\nIn terms of the way the object appears, there are evident and hidden, which are necessarily two in number, and so forth. The mind apprehending these has both perception and inference, which are likewise necessarily two in number.\nThe definition of an evident object of evaluation256 is \"that which is realized by the pramana of direct perception.\" The definition of hidden object of evaluation257 is \"that which is realized by inference.\"\nThe definition of perception is \"unconfused awareness that is free from conception.\" There are four divisions of perception:\n1. sense-perception\n2. mental perception\n3. self-awareness\n4. yogic direct perception.\nTheir definitions are below.\nThe definition of inference is \"mind that realizes what is to be established, its own hidden object, in dependence on a reason in which all the three modes are complete.\"\nThe divisions of inference are:\n1. inference for one's own benefit\n2. inference for the benefit of others.\nThere are also these divisions:\n1. Inference from the power of the thing itself\n2. Inference from reports\n3. Inference from belief.\nCorrect reasoning with reasons for inference is extensively explained below.\nInference from the power of the thing itself is like realizing \"impermanent\" in dependence on the reason \"having been produced.\"\nInference from reports is like realizing, using one's own knowledge of conceptual objects as the reason, that \"the one with the rabbit's image\" = \"the moon.\"\nInference of belief\nDepending on scripture purified by the three analyses is like realizing that what we have been taught is non-deceptive. For example:\nGenerosity is activity, discipline is merit,\nPatience is a good form258 and exertion splendor.\nBy meditation peaceful mind is liberated.\nFollowing the presentation of these remaining subsidiary topics of pramana, now there is the main subject.\nThe two truths:\nRelative truth259 is the way things appear.\nAbsolute truth is the way things really are.\nFor each of these two distinct truths there is perception and inference.\nPerception realizes individual natures.260\nInference uses apparent signs or reasons to infer another object non-deceptively through analysis.\nIn that way each of the two pramanas is itself divided into two, making four altogether. Presenting in order the bases of distinguishing these:\n1) Perception of essence within the relative, is like perception by a non-confused eye-consciousness of a blue utpala lotus\n2) Perception of the absolute essence is like the wisdom of meditation of the noble ones.261\n3) Inference in conventional analysis is like inferring fire from smoke or from something's having been produced that it is impermanent.\n4) inference in absolute analysis is like inferring emptiness by reason of the absence of unity and so forth.\nTherefore, glorious Dharmakirti says:\nThe meanings of things, seen and unseen\nBy the two aspects, perception and inference,\nAre irrefutable and non-deceptive.\nSECOND Suitable establishing of perception and inference\nA. Suitable establishing of perception\nWithin this are the general teaching, the explanation of the particulars, and the summary.\n1) the general teaching:\nThe classification of perception is four-fold:\nThere are the perceptions of non-confused sense and mind,\nThose of self-awareness, and the perception of yoga.\nTheir objects appear as individual characteristics.\nTherefore they are always non-conceptual.\nIf there is no perception, then there are no signs\nBecause there are no signs, there is no inference.\nThings arising from cause, and cessation of such things,\nAll these appearances would be impossible.\nIf it is like that, their emptiness and such,\nDepending on what could they be possibly known?\nTherefore, without depending on the conventional,\nThe absolute as well will never be realized.\nFIRST there is the explanation of proper establishing of perception. The rigs pa thigs pa, the Drop of Correct reasoning, says:\nAs perception is free from conception, it is unconfused. Conception is expressible knowledge and appearance appropriate to be mixed with that. Perception is free from that mixing, for example not confused by dimness, turning quickly, being in a boat, shaking about, and so forth. Such knowledge is perception.\nThere are four kinds of perception:\n1. The knowledge of the senses\n2 Mind consciousness\nThis is directly262 subsequently produced to or by the knowledge of the senses, having sense knowledge as its own preceding object, and its immediately preceding condition. It is similar263 to that sense knowledge.\n3. Self-awareness of mind and all mental events\n4. The limitlessly arising knowledge of yoga\nThis is excellent meditation on true reality.\nThe objects of these are individual characteristics. Whatever different objects far and near appear in awareness are individual characteristics. These same characteristics exist absolutely. This is because the characteristics of things exist only as productive powers.264\nThere are also universal or general characteristics.265 These are the objects of inference. However, the fruition of such inferential pramana is perceptual knowledge. This is because its essence is only to realize objects. That pramana is concerned with objects and their similarity, since by its power, realizations of objects are established.266\nThe great pandit Shantarakshita, pad ma'i ngang tshul and 'dul ba'i lha all say that freedom from conception eliminates inference. Non-confusion eliminates obscured knowledge and so forth. Both are explained as having the characteristic of eliminating what does not accord with correct reasoning. Dharmottara says:\nAs for non-confusion, since the meaning/ object grasped is not confused, it has the power to eliminate conceptualization. To clear away the wrong conceptions of the nyaiyaaikas, samkhyas, mimamsakas, and so forth who say that perception is conceptual,267 it is said to be free from conception.\nThe mdo'i rang 'grel, says:\nThis is distinguished from dependence on what is said by others.\nIn the case of sensory and mental perception, the essence of sensory and mental perception in general, or as a whole, is recognition or identification.268 There is not recognition or identification in perceptual pramana alone.\nPramana is \"non-confused.\" By being joined to that it should be known to be revealed in its particulars.269\nThe supremely learned phya ba says:\nWhen perception and perceptual pramana have been distinguished, the definition of the FIRST is \"unconfused knowledge free from conceptualization.\" The definition of the SECOND is that \"by experiencing something we have not realized before,270 exaggeration is cut through.\"\nSo it is explained here, but the approach of our own tradition will be explained below.\nThe object characterized by perceptual pramana is exclusively non-confused knowledge.\nThe definition of perceptual pramana is \"unconfused knowledge free from conceptualization.\"\nThere are four divisions of perceptual pramana:\n1. Sense perception271\n2. Mental perception\n3. Perception of self-awareness\n4. Yogic direct perception.\nHere are their respective definitions:\n1. The definition of the pramana of sense perception is\n\"unconfused knowledge free from conception that arises in dependence on the dominant condition of the bodily272 senses.\"\nThe divisions of the pramana of sense perception are the unconfused five sense consciousnesses, the eye consciousness and so forth.\nSeeming sense perception corrupted by illusion273, appearance of the one moon as two and so forth is not perceptual pramana.\n2. The definition of the pramana of mental perception is\n\"unconfused knowledge free from conceptualization arising in dependence on the dominant condition of the mental sense.\"\nNon-conceptual mind subsequently associated with confused sense experiences, such as knowledge within a dream, is not pramana.\n3. The definition of the pramana of yogic perception is\n\"unconfused knowledge free from conceptualization arising in dependence on the dominant condition of the yogas of shamatha and vipashyana.\"\nPhenomena like the appearance of skeletons in the meditation on repulsiveness are not unconfused. Therefore, they are not pramana.\n4. The definition of the perceptual pramana of self-awareness is\n\"unconfused self awareness free from conception apprehending itself as the essence of mind and all mental events.\"\nConfused or unconfused, whatever awareness arises is unconfused and free from conception, as mere self-apprehending experience in itself.\nIn regard to their objects, those four kinds of perception do not mix up objects, times, and aspects. This is because actual individual characteristics appear in perception, with no conceptions that could confusedly grasp words and meanings.274\nIn that case, what is the conceptualization that is to be separated from direct perception? In general regarding the divisions of conceptualization, the dbus mtha' says:\nMind and mental events, and the three worlds as well\nAlways have the aspect of exaggeration.\nThus the essence is understood.275\nThe mdzod says:\nConception and analysis are like fine and coarse.276\nAs it says there, conceptual analysis is conceptual\nThe rnam 'grel says:\nWhatever is known, the meaning of the word for it is grasped. That is the conception of that.\nAs it says there, conceptualization has a mixed grasp of word and meaning. From those three quotations, direct perception is free from conceptualization. The tshad ma mdo says:\nJoining names and kinds277 etc. in freedom from conception is direct perception.278\nHere there are four styles.\n1. Saying that the proliferation279 of direct perception of sense and mind does not arise.\n2. Saying that after an instant of sense knowledge there is only mental perception\n3. Saying that at the end of a succession of sense perceptions,280 mental perception arises.\n4. Saying that after the first moment of sense perception mental perceptions arise in a series accompanying another series of sense perceptions, and that finally at the end of the last moment of sense perception there arises the last moment of mental perception.\nOf these four, the Jamyang guru says that just this last should be maintained.\nThese four perceptions, have two divisions in terms of individuals who have them\n1) The perception of ordinary beings\n2) The perception of the noble ones.\nIn terms of support:\nThe objects and understanding of sense and mental perception depend on the senses.\nSelf-awareness depends only on paratantra.\nYogic perception depends on meditation.\nIn terms of their objects:\nMental and sensory direct perception are aware of some object other than themselves.\nSelf-awareness coarsely perceives itself.\nYogic self perception is aware of both itself and others.\nThese four direct perceptions are not related by the difference that refutes one, since all four are real things.\nNor are they merely related by the difference of different manifestations of a single essence. This is because the three other perceptions are different substances, while also they are not different in essence from perception of self-awareness. The other three perceptions have one essence with perception of self-awareness, but they are different objects.\nThe purpose of the four perceptions is to clear away four wrong conceptions:\n1. The Hindu rig pa can pa school do not accept the pramana of sense perception.\n2. The rna ma phug pas do not accept the pramana of mental perception.\n3. The vaibhashikas do not accept the pramana of self-awareness.\n4. The rgya 'phen pa school do not accept yogic direct perception.\nThe great teacher 'dul ba'i lha says:\nBecause they clear any four wrong conceptions these excellent divisions are taught.\nSome say that the sense-power itself is the seer of pramana. To eliminate this view, the FIRST is taught. The knowledge arising from the sense-powers is not the power of perception.\nSome attribute faults to mental perception. The SECOND division is taught for the sake of completely abandoning this fault.\nSome do not accept the self-awareness of mind and mental contents. The THIRD is taught to eliminate this.\nSome do not accept the direct perception of yogins, and so this is called the FOURTH kind of perceptual pramana.\nAlso the great teacher dgra las rgyal pas says:\nSaying that there are four kinds of perception is to eliminate particular wrong conceptions:\n1. the thought that perceptual pramana is seen by the senses themselves, rather than by the knowledge that depends on them.\n2. The thought that the phenomena of perception of the mental sense, whose essence has already been explained, exist as other.281\n3. The thought that self-awareness is impossible.\n4. the thought that yogic knowledge is impossible.\nIf these four direct perceptions were absent, since smoke and so forth would not appear, there would be no signs or reasons. Therefore, inference would be non-existent. If that were non-existent, that from the cause, the seed, the sprout arises, and that it ceases in destruction and so forth, all that appears and is heard in the world, all these conventional dharmas, would be unknown. If that is said, there would be no occurrence of the reasons by which the natural state of such relative entities, emptiness and so forth, is known.\nTherefore it is taught that without dependence on the means of the worldly appearance of conventional truth, the absolute truth, emptiness, that arises from that would not be realized. Glorious Chandrakirti's commentary, the Prasannapada, says:\nSince this is the means of attaining nirvana, as those who want water first get a vessel, it should first be told how the relative exists.\nAlso the 'jug pa rang 'grel says:\nConventional truth alone is the teacher of the absolute. From fully comprehending282 the teaching of the absolute, the absolute is attained. A treatise says:\nWithout depending on the conventional,\nThe absolute truth will not be realized.\nWithout relying on the absolute truth,\nNirvana likewise will not be attained.\nSECOND, regarding sense perception, mental perception, the perception of self-awareness and yogic perception,\nFIRST, Sense perception:\nBy whatever mind-events283 have arisen from the five senses\nApprehension284 of their objects is experienced.\nWithout this sense perception, objects would not be seen, As they are not in the case of those who are blind, and so forth.\nDepending on the dominant condition the eye-power and similarly the ear, nose, tongue, and body-sense, the five consciousnesses of a person experience the apprehension of their objects, form, sound, smell, taste, and touchables. This is sense perception. without it, like those who are blind, deaf, and so forth, we could never perceive external objects.\nSECOND, Mental perception:\nOf outer and inner objects that rise from the mental sense\nMental perception is the drawer of clear distinctions.\nWithout this mental perception all the dharmas would be\nWithout the knowledge of ordinary understanding.\nArising in dependence on the mental sense as dominant condition, knowledge that understands objects285 clearly distinguishes286 experiences of outer objects, form and so on, and by knowledge of self-awareness, distinguishes the objects of inner awareness and dreams.287 This is mental direct perception. A sutra says:\nO monks, there are two kinds of knowledge of form. They depend on the eye and on the mind.\nAlso the tshad ma mdo says:\n...and mental objects....\nIts auto-commentary says:\nMind,288 yid, engages with phenomena that are apprehended and experienced, such as form etc. This is exclusively non-conceptual.\nThe author of the rnam 'grel rgyan sher byung sbas ba says:\nExisting familiarly before one\nThat which is known as \"this\" and so forth\nSince it produces such perception,\nThis is said to be mental perception.\nRngog pa says:\nCo-emergently bound up with sense perception, there is the pramana of mental direct perception.\nWithout this, all external and internal dharmas would lack the understanding of ordinary knowledge.\nTHIRD, yogic direct perception:\nMeditating well according to the instructions\nOne apprehends experience of the ultimate as our object.\nIf there is not this kind of yogic direct perception,\nWe will not see the real beyond the everyday.\nBy the yogin's meditating well in accord with the precepts taught by the guru, the ultimate meaning of egolessness, the two emptinesses, and three and countless kinds are seen.\nMoreover, in a single atom as many buddha fields as there are atoms, and limitless pure\nphenomenal worlds, the mandalas of countless289 buddhas, are seen and so forth. Clearly experiencing its own sphere, this is yogic direct perception.\nThe great teacher Dignaga says:\nAs shown by the experiences290\nOnly unmixed objects are seen.\nThe teacher Dharmakirti says:\nThe knowledge of yogins was explained before.\nIt arises within their meditation.\nTo analyze in outline this clear realization of egolessness in yogic perception, there are the meaning of the word, the essence, the definition and the divisions. Regarding the FIRST, as for \"yoga,\" the sgra sbyor bam gnyis, The Two Volume Grammar, says:\n\"Yo\" is yoga. This is the name of the meditation which unites shamatha and vipashyana. In Tibetan this is rnal 'byor. Here the meaning is rnal ma, the natural state of the mind, or the state in which it is 'byor joined to mastery.\nPratyaksha, in Tibetan is mgnon sum, direct perception. Prati means near or direct. It has many meanings such as \"individual.\" Yaksha is the equivalent of dbang po, the sense powers, so the overall meaning is \"depending on the individual senses\" or \"depending on the senses.\"\nOf the four extremes of the words \"description\" and \"denotation,291\" Pratyaksha depends on the senses, but does not explain.292 All knowledge grasping individual characteristics has a denotum.\nMoreover, for both sense perception and mental perception there is the verbal description and the denotum.\nFor the perceptions of self-awareness and yoga there is only the denoted, and there is no description293 For confused sensory knowledge, there is description but no denotum.\nIn general as to the four extremes of description and denotation, if we take for example the epithet, \"the lake-born,\" where the literal words mean \"born in a lake\" but the phrase refers to or denotes a lotus, there are the extremes of:\n1. the description existing and the denotation not existing\n2. the description not existing and the denotation existing\n3. both description and denotation existing\n4. neither description or denotation existing.\nThe FIRST is like living beings born in a lake.\nThe SECOND is like a lotus in a dry place.\nThe THIRD is like a lotus born in a lake.\nThe FOURTH is like a vase.\nSECOND, the essence of yogic perception is the mind to which the egolessness of objects clearly appears.\nTHIRD, the definition of yogic perception in general is \"non-confused knowledge depending on meditation, free from the conceptualizations of sentient beings.\"\nFOURTH, the divisions of yogic perception. Generally, to divide it into different kinds, there are the three kinds of yogic perceptions of:\n1. shravaka noble ones\n2. pratyekabuddha noble ones\n3. bodhisattvas.\nAs for the pratyekabuddhas, the mdzod says:\nThey are one in that they all depend exclusively294 on meditation.\nAs it says there, pratyekabuddhas do not study, and have no learning. Shravaka and bodhisattva noble ones may be either learned or unlearned. That makes five kinds altogether. Dividing these five in two by yogic perception of post-meditation with appearance, and yogic perception of meditation without appearance makes ten kinds in all.\nIf these individuals had no such yogic perception, it would therefore follow that they saw nothing especially noble beyond the scope of the minds of ordinary beings.\nFOURTH, self-awareness:\nJust as perceived experience of form cuts through distortion.\nIf such experience exists regarding our own mind,\nKnowing that, we will not meet the existence of other.\nTherefore by the essence, gsal rig, luminous insight,\nAware of objects295 is of the nature of oneself,\nSelf-apprehension, rang gsal, is without dependence.\nThis is what is meant by terms like self-awareness.296\nThat which is experienced by the other perceptions,\nBeing ascertained to be perception itself\nIs the work of self-awareness. If that dod not exist,\nNo other modes of perceiving could establish anything.\nFor the perception of the eye consciousness, experience of the form of a white conch shell is the cause of cutting through the distortion of thinking it is yellow. In regard to our own mind, self-awareness is exists the cause of cutting through a similar distortion. For a knower who does not know self-awareness, other must exist. If we have self-awareness, the knower for who the other must exist and so forth will ultimately become non-existent. We will not meet with knowledge that something exists as other at the same time, or not at the same time, and so forth as self-awareness.\nFor that reason, in knowledge, a chariot, a building, and so forth, which have a material nature separate from awareness are eliminated. By their becoming of the essence of awareness,297 while we have knowledge of external objects in consciousness, they are oneself and do not depend on any other. This self-apprehension is self-awareness. The great teacher Shantarakshita says in the Madhyamakala.mkara\nThen there is full development298 of elimination\nFrom consciousness of the nature of material things\nThat which is of a nature that is not material\nIs known as \"this,\" oneself.\nAscertaining whatever objects are experienced by the other three perceptions as perception itself is the function of self-awareness. This is because our own mind is not be hidden from one, as for example we have the power to decide whether we are happy or unhappy.\nIf there were no self-awareness, experience of other kinds of perception too could not be established as such by any other means. The reason is that self-awareness of them would not exist.\nWe may think that for example that blue would be established by being seen by the eye consciousness; but we should analyze how by perception or inference the eye consciousness is established. If first it is established by perception, then the perception would have to be both at the same time and not at the same time. That is unsuitable.\nIf the eye consciousness is supposed to be established through inference, there will be none, because the perception this presupposes will be non-existent. That is unsuitable.\nFor that reason, if objects such as a vase were material things, they could not be apprehended and perceived.299 Therefore, their essence is produced within or as awareness.300\nThough a mind that is illuminated by and apprehends others must be dependent on them in some sense, this knowledge is not like knowledge of material things. As our own essence that is being intuited, this need not depend on other conditions.\nThe conventional classification \"self-awareness\" is totally suitable. This is because it has arisen from oneself alone, has the nature of awareness and is essentially free from action, actor, and karma. For example, it is like a lamp that illuminates itself. The tshad ma mdo says:\nEven conceptualization is said to be self-awareness.\nSince that is realized, conception is not real\nAlso the Madhyamakala.mkara says:\nFor that whose nature is being single and partless\nThree natures are therefore unsuitable.\nAs for this being aware of itself\nAct and actor are unreal.\nTherefore, since this is the nature of knowledge,\nIt is properly called self-knowledge.\nThird, the summary of the meaning:\nInference has perception existing as its root.\nPerception in turn is ascertained by self-awareness.\nOnce experience by unconfused mind is reached,\nThere is no other establisher than that alone.\nTherefore, for whomever relies on pure perception,\nUnconfused and free from all conceptualization,\nFrom whatever dharmas may be manifested\nExaggeration will be completely cleared away.\nSince inference arises from having relied on the power of perceived signs as reasons, it has perception as its root. Since perception has been ascertained301 by self-awareness itself, perception must be classified as self-awareness. If all experience of a mind that is not confused by the causes of confusion are the ultimate, self-awareness,302 no other external establisher need be sought. That is the experience of unconfused mind. It is like finding the elephant.303\nThus at the limits of inference, perception is what is reached. Apprehension of objects of perception304 ultimately arrives at apprehension-experiencing self-awareness. Therefore, if we want to make a presentation of pramana of the seeing of this side, samsara,305 it will be unsuitable without self-awareness. Therefore, the partiality of not accepting self-awareness has been refuted.\nThe ways of establishing that this is true are extensively taught in the texts of the two lords of correct reasoning Dignaga and Dharmakirti. Whoever is free from conception with its mixed grasping of word and meaning relies on the unconfused purity of the four perceptions. For such a person exaggeration will be completely cleared away from perceived306 dharmas that seem to be a vase etc.. This occurs by the power of the experience that there is no vase, and so forth,. This is the suitable establishing of perception.\nIn brief, the pramana of inference is ultimately the pramana of perception. The pramana of perception is ultimately the pramana of self-awareness, the clear experience of our own mind apprehending itself as object. Therefore, if within the relative there is no self-awareness, all the world's classifications of truth and falsity will be unsuitable.\nAs for the refutation of self-awareness in the texts of madhyamaka, it should be known that, by correct reasoning about the absolute, only the true existence of self-awareness is negated and not self-awareness itself.307\nSECOND Inference\nIn regard to inference there are the essence, divisions and abandoning contentiousness. Within the FIRST, the essence, there are the mind that infers, the signs from which inferences are made, and how inferences are made.\nFIRST, the mind that infers\nAfter the universal marks308 of things are fully grasped,\nBy being mixed with names, they are understood.309\nThis is called conceptual mind, and by its concepts\nVarious conventions are proliferated.\nEven for persons who do not know linguistic symbols\nUniversal characteristics appear within their minds.\nMixable with names, conceptions such as these\nProduce engagement and disengagement310 with their objects.\nIf there were no such thing as this conceptual mind,\nThere would be no conventional statements and denials.\nAny kind of teaching would be impossible.\nOf inference or of any subjects of learning and study.\nBy concepts we can deal with the future and so forth.\nWe evaluate and establish what is not evident.\nIf there were conceptions, but no inference,\nWe would be like children who are newly born.\nSECOND, within the explanation of the suitable establishment of inference, the definition of the pramana of inference was briefly explained above in the brief explanation of proper establishment. The mind that infers is conceptual mind. What is the essence of conceptuality? Having mentally grasped only the universal aspects311 of the individual characteristics of objects, such as a vase, by confusing appearance and conceptualization as one thing, it mixes them. for example the word \"vase\" is mixed with its meaning. The producer of conceptions312 about a vase and so forth is called conceptual mind.\nAs for the action of this,313 in the world conceptual mind produces the proliferation of various conventionalities of assertion, denial and so forth. Within the minds even of persons who do not understand symbols, small children and those who are like animals, the universal characteristics of food and drink, at least, appear. Even if they do not know their own names, these conceptualizations which mix names and objects produce engaging and disengaging with objects or accepting and rejecting them.314 If there were no conceptual mind, with its mixed grasping of word and meaning, then within the world there would also be no conventional classifications that refute others and establish our own view. There would be the fault that we could not infer hidden meanings, nor teach any subjects of study.\nFor that reason, through concepts, we think in terms of taking care of the future; we understand the past in terms of memory; and for present objects joining names and kinds, depending on relative concepts or signs, we analyze and establish concepts and so forth315 that are not manifest. For this reason if there were no conceptual inference, there could be no reliance on reasons for accepting good and rejecting evil. All the people in the world would be like children before action is engendered within them. They could simply have no purposes at all.\nSECOND, the signs from which inferences are made:\nThat relying on which something can be understood\nIs that which is known as the reason or the sign of inference.\nThere are also the presence of the dharma in the subject\nAnd the forward entailment and reversed entailment.\nThe three modes are complete, there is no confusion.\nFrom reasons or signs that are resolved by perception\nThat which is hidden can thereby be inferred.\nBy the power of relations what is to be established,\nIn fruition will be established, and its nature, the reason,\nWill be a reason such that by non-observation\nOr that whose conception is contradictory with that,\nThat which is to be refuted, has been refuted.\nThus the three reasons will be purified.\nBut how does this conceptual mind infer other hidden dharmas? There are two divisions, inference for our own benefit and for that of others. Inference for our own benefit and inferential pramana have the same meaning.\nFIRST, the essence of the first, inferential pramana for one's own benefit, is a mind that realizes what is to be established from a reason for which all the three modes of syllogism are present.\nThe tshad ma mdo says:\nOf the two kinds of inference, as for that for one's own benefit\nFrom the three modes of the sign, the meaning will be seen.\nThe rigs pa'i thigs pa says:\nThere are two kinds of inference, that for one's own benefit and that for others.\nInference for oneself is known from a reason with the three modes. Here establishing the conclusion of correct reasoning is like perceiving. The three modes of the reason,316 are these:\n1. Its existence in what is to be inferred.\n2. Its presence in similar cases.\n3. Its absence in dissimilar cases.\nWhat is to be inferred is the particular characteristic of the subject that we want to know about. Similar cases317 also have the dharma to be established. Dissimilar cases318 do not. There can be no cases other than these or contradictory to them.\nThe three modes are only possession of the three reasons regarding the unperceived, the nature, and the fruition.\nAs it says there, a reason or sign is a dharma depending on which there is the power of inferring another dharma. The sign establishing that the dharma to be proved is in the subject of the proposition to be proved is called the phyogs chos, the presence of the reason in the subject.319 That is the first mode.\nIf a sign is not established in a subject and its presence is debatable, analysis of the entailments will be useless. First, we must analyze whether the designated sign exists or does not exist in the subject in question, eg a vase. That in which the sign is known to exist has the presence of the dharma in the subject. That is the first mode of syllogism.\nWhen the reason has been established, the dharma to be established with this reason follows as a consequence, since these two have been analyzed and apprehended as connected. That is the forward entailment, the second mode. For example, \"What is produced is impermanent,\" is certain pramana because \"impermanent\" follows from \"produced.\"320\nIf the dharma to be established is wrongly identified or non-existent, then the reason will be wrong and cannot apply. For example, \"what is not impermanent cannot be produced.\" That is the reversed entailment, the third mode of the three.\nWith these last two modes, by pramana, necessarily true statements of entailment and exclusion can be expressed. These are taught using an example such that:\n1) all the according features are present\n2) all the discordant ones are absent.321\nIf all the three modes are present, there is a true reason that establishes the conclusion without confusion.\nWhat are the definitions of the three modes?\nAs for the definition of the phyogs chos, presence of the dharma to which the reason applies in the subject, \"the reason, itself said to be known to be established, is established to apply to the dharmin with necessity, according to pramana.\"322\nThe definition of forward entailment, 323is that \"the reason is established in such a way that things for which it is established certainly exist only in accord with its similar cases.\"\nThe definition of reversed entailment324 is that \"according to the way the reason is established, what does not accord with the reason will certainly be without the dharma to which the reason applies.325\"\nThe definition of a genuine example is that \"it is an object certainly pervaded by the certainty of what is to be established.\"\nThe divisions of genuine examples, are two:\n1) examples according with the reason\n2) examples not according with the reason\nThe definition of an example truly according with the reason is that it is \"truly a ground of the forward entailment of the reason to be proved.\" For example, an according example of what is \"produced\" being \"impermanent\" is a vase.\nThe definition of a non-according example, is that it is \"a true example of the reversed entailment of the true thing that is to be established.\" Space is a non-according example of what is \"produced\" being \"impermanent.\"326\nThe definition of a merely apparent example,327 is that it \"is taken to be a true basis of entailment by the real thing to be proved, but this cannot be so.\"\nRelying on a reason resolved as valid by the experiential power of any of the four perceptual pramanas, some hidden dharma whose presence is to be evaluated is established inference by the power of logical relationships. Anything that is not logically related cannot be logically established. The tshad ma rnam nges says:\nA reason having a logical relationship other than \"if the phyogs is not there that which is to be established will not occur\" is a merely apparent reason.\nThere are many other logical relationships such as having a characteristic, and inclusion in a class328\nGlorious Chandrakirti says:\nAll dharmas whatever have329 either the nature of unity or that of difference. In the first case they are essentially one with the possessor or subject, while for things related by difference they can certainly be numbered as a second.\nFor the first, the relationship of unity with the subject, in unity with a single basis such as a vase, due to the characteristic330 \"impermanence\" being dichotomous \"permanent\" is eliminated. If \"unproduced\" is eliminated for some object, \"produced is established. From eliminating \"non-thing,\" there is its opposite the exaggeration-eliminating quality of individual existence. These can be understood from the individual names of each object, and cannot be understood in terms of any other.\nTherefore, this very individual object that is presented as the object of the verbal concept is one with the essence of a vase alone.\nAs for its being produced, impermanent, and so forth, those qualities are related to it as further aspects of its single discrete selfhood. Over and above a vase they are connected to it by its single selfhood.\nSo it is presented. From the viewpoint of the conception that eliminates what is other than the characteristic in question, though there are supposed to be relationships of inclusion and discrimination, since it is said that in reality there is only a single discrete subject, it cannot connect itself to itself, any more than a sword cannot cut itself.331\nSECOND, as for the relationships arising from that, there are the modes of cause and fruition. These are the direct cause332 and co-emergently producing conditions.333 Though in other texts six causes and four conditions, or five causes etc, have been presented, in reality, all causes are included under arising-producing producing causes334 and logical causes of definitional dependency.335\nThough actually336 such connected arising is impossible, having connected things together by conceptualizing them as an earlier cause and later fruition, when that cause does not exist, that fruition will not arise. That is conventionally called connected arising, 'byung 'brel.\nAs for the definition of relationship, 'brel ba, from the viewpoint of a mind that has correctly excluded what is other than some quality, the other dharmas are not rejected.\nThere are two divisions. FIRST the definition of connection in a single possessor337 is that from the viewpoint of rejection338 of a dharma because of the subject's single nature, the dharma that is other is not rejected. As for the definition, of that relationship, \"by the power of that rejection the dharma that is other is not cleared away.\"\nThe definition of subsequent contradiction339, is that it occurs when two things are mutually contradicting and contradicted.\nAs for the FIRST of the two divisions, the definition of the contradiction of non-co-existence is that whatever dharmas things have, those with the contradiction of non-co-existence cannot be associated by the same causal power. The two divisions are\n1) contradictory objects/ states of affairs340 [eg hot and cold]\n2) contradictory states of mind [eg ego grasping and egolessness.\nSECOND, the definition of being mutually abandoned is that whatever dharma allegedly has a contradictory pair of characteristics341 is unreal, eliminated by being contradictory. The two divisions are like:\n1) permanence and impermanence being contradictory within the same thing342\n2) being produced and being permanent being contradictory.\nBy having such a relationship, some reason in which the three modes are complete has the characteristic of proving what is to be established in a syllogism.\nIf this is divided, there are three kinds of reasons, gtan tshigs.\n1) the reason of the fruition\n2) the reason of the nature\n3) the reason of non-observation, that which by non-observation or by being conceived as contradictory to the object, is refuted as what is to be denied.\nWithin these three reasons all the reasons that evaluate hidden things that are to be established are included. The tshad ma rnam 'grel says:\nThere are three kinds of reasons establishing the entailment\nOf the presence of the dharma in the subject of the thesis.\nIf they are absent, that dharma's non-arising is certain.\nMerely apparent reasons are those that are other than this.\nIf the classification in correct reasoning of these strictly necessary343 reasons is extensively explained, in general, as for the definition of a sign presented as a suitable sign or reason,344 \"if the basis is established, it is always a suitable reason.\"\nIf reasons are divided, there are genuine reasons and apparent ones.\nIn the FIRST, genuine reasons, there are the definition and divisions. As for the FIRST, definitions, the definition of a genuine reason is that it is one in which the three modes are all present. Here dividing them to show the connections, there are three kinds:\n1) the reason of fruition\n2) the reason of nature\n3) the reason of what is not conceived.\nIn the FIRST, the reason of fruition, there are the definition of the reason of fruition and the divisions. The definition of the reason of fruition is: \"that which is connected to the arising of the fruition and has been presented as a reason of fruition, establishing the inference that is asserted, in which the three modes are complete.\"\nAs for the divisions, in terms of the means of presenting the relationship, there are five kinds:\n1. \"The dharmin \"actual345 smoke\" has fire, since it is smoke.\" Such syllogisms establish a cause from an actually existing sign of the fruition.\n2. Similarly, \"The dharmin \"the appearance of smoke\" has not occurred before its preceding cause, fire, since it is smoke.\" These establish a preceding cause from its effect.\n3. \"The dharmin \"the proliferating346 skandhas\" occur with their respective causes, since they are things existing only some of the time.\"347 That establishes causes in general for temporary things.\n4. \"The dharmin \"appearance of sense consciousness of green\" is accompanied by its own object-condition,348 because it is sense consciousness.\" That establishes that there is a particular cause.\n5. \"The dharmin \"a lump of molasses in the mouth\" has form, because it has taste.\" Here the dharma which is the cause is the reason for an inferred fruition. In reality from the present taste of molasses, both the former and present taste and form of the molasses, as a single association produced by a preceding cause can be inferred.\nThus, there are many ways of establishing the cause by the fruition, and by this splitting of hairs or making fine distinctions349 that water is unmoving is attributed to its being supported by a support. From spoonbills, water, croaking frogs, and ants being carried away there is attributed the cause that rain has fallen, and so forth. All350 such correct reasonings attributing causes to fruitions should be gathered under the heading of reasons of fruition.\nSECOND, under the reason of nature there are the definition and divisions. FIRST, the definition of the reason of nature is when \"a reason is presented that is of the same essential nature351 as the thing to be proved itself, establishing what we want to say, in which all the three modes are present.\" That is the definition of the reason of nature.\nIn the SECOND, the divisions of the reason of nature\nThere are divisions in terms of reasons and in terms of what is to be established. The FIRST, division in terms of reasons, is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is produced or \"...because it arises.\" Here there is dependence on a distinction or qualification.352\nThe other is like \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it exists as a thing.\" What is presented here is a syllogism with a sign of the nature that is pure of distinctions.353\nOf these two ways of expressing the reason, the former shows another thing as fruition. This is like dependence on another.354 The later, merely describes the essence autonomously. This is called pure of dependency or without dependency.355 Aside from their mere classification these have no real difference.\nSECOND there are real establishment and conventional establishment.\nThe FIRST, real establishment356, is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is produced.\"\nThe SECOND, establishment by conventional terms357 is like, \"the dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is instantaneous.\"\nThird, a syllogism with a reason of non-observation,358\nWithin this there are the definition and the distinctions. As for the FIRST, the definition of an syllogism with a reason of non-observation is \"that which is presented as a reason for refuting what is to be refuted.\" This is the definition of an reason of non-observation in which the three reasons are not observed to be complete.\nIf we divide, there are a true unobserved sign which is incapable of appearing, and a true unobserved sign which is capable of appearing.\nWithin the first are the characteristic and the subject with the characteristic.359 In the FIRST we are unable to prove that a dharma to be refuted is necessarily absent in the basis of dispute, but are able to refute its existence. That is the definition of a non-apparent unobserved reason in which the three modes are complete.\nIn the way of establishing such a syllogism, for a continuum encountering that invisible object no pramana could produce the perception of such an object, for example, an invisible rakshasa. This non-apparent unperceived object, which we cannot evaluate360 and so forth, in brief, is an unfathomable or uninferable361 object that should neither be exaggerated or deprecated.362\nSECOND Perceivable but unobserved true reasons\nWithin this there are the definition and the divisions.\nFIRST, the definition of a perceivable but unobserved reason is, \"a basis of establishment363 in which the dharmas to be refuted can be certainly established to be non-existent, by a reason having all of the three modes.\" For example if an ordinary person were here we could see that person, so if we do not see anyone, no one is here. In the divisions of a perceivable but unobserved reason there are perceivable but unobserved reasons with a necessarily related pair and with a necessarily excluded pair.364\nFIRST, as for perceivable but unobserved reasons with necessarily related pairs,\nWithin this there are the definition and the divisions.\nFIRST, the definition of necessarily related pair is: \"a perceivable but unobserved true reason always paired with the thing to be refuted.\" That is the definition of an apparent unperceived true reason joined to the reason for negation by non-affirming negation.\nThere are four divisions of necessarily related pairs.\nFIRST, an unperceived nature is like: \"In the dharmin \"this house\" there is no vase, since it is perceivable but not perceived by pramana.\"\nSECOND, there is an unperceived cause, because what is paired with it is not perceived. This is like: \"The dharmin \"the ocean at night\" has no smoke, since it has no fire.\"\nTHIRD, an unperceived class,365 is like: \"The dharmin \"that rock fortress over there\" has no shimshapa trees, since it has no trees at all.\"\nFOURTH, an unperceived actual fruition, is like, \"The dharmin \"a constructed circle without smoke\" does not have the actual fruition of smoke, since there is no smoke there.\"\nSECOND, the reason where the opposite is perceived to be contradicted\nWithin this there are the definition and the divisions.\nFIRST, the definition of a reason where the opposite is perceived to be contradicted,366 is \"a perceivable but unperceived true reason for a dharmin said to be known, for which the dharmas to be refuted are non-existent, making it into a sign that is certainly established.\"\nSecond the divisions of a reason where the opposite is perceived to be contradicted\nWithin these, there are true reasons where the opposite is perceived to be contradicted depending on the contradiction of simultaneous non-existence, and on the contradiction of abandoned mutuality.\nFIRST true reasons where the opposite is perceived to be contradicted depending on the contradiction of simultaneous non-existence\nWithin this there are the definition and divisions.\nFIRST, the definition of a true reason whose simultaneous non-existence is contradictory is: \"a reason where the opposite is perceived to be contradicted that depends on the contradictoriness of not existing simultaneously, and whose own necessary connection is certain.\"\nSECOND, there are three divisions of true reasons where the opposite is perceived to be contradicted depending on the contradiction of simultaneous non-existence:\n1) The four perceptions of contradictory nature\n2) The four perceptions of contradictory fruition\n3) The four perceptions of objects of entailment.367\nThese are twelve in all.\n1) the four perceptions of contradictory nature are these:\n1. Perceiving a nature contradicting the nature.\n2. Perceiving a nature contradicting the cause.\n3. Perceiving a nature contradicting the fruition\n4. Perceiving a nature contradicting the class/ khyab byed\nThese respectively are like the following examples:\nThe dharmin \"a thing on fire all over\"368\n1. ...is continuously cool to the touch;\n2. ...produces the fruition of cold, rising hairs;\n3. ...is a real cause of cool touch;\n4. ...is continuously without the feel of snow\nbecause it is a thing on fire all over.\n2) The four perceptions of contradictory fruition are these:\n1. Perception of fruition contradicting the nature.\n2. Perception of a fruition contradicting the cause.\n3. Perception of a fruition contradicting the fruition.\n4. Perception of a fruition contradicting the genus.\nRespectively these are like the following examples:\nthe dharmin \"a thing is pervaded by being compelled to give rise to strong smoke\"\n1. ...is continuously cold to the touch;\n2. ...has the fruition of cold, rising hairs;\n3. ...is a real cause of cool touch;\n4. ...is continuously without the feel of snow\nbecause it is thing that is pervaded by being compelled to give rise to strong smoke.\n3) perception of a contradictory object of entailment.369 There are perception of a object of entailment contradicting nature, cause, fruition, and genus. Examples are: the dharmin \"a thing pervaded by a sandalwood fire,\"\n1. ...is continuously cold to the touch;\n2. ...has the fruition of cold, rising hairs;\n3. ...is the real cause of cool touch;\n4. ...is continuously without the touch of snow\nbecause it is a thing pervaded by a sandalwood fire.\nSECOND, for the true reason depending on perception of contradiction through the contradiction of370 abandoning what is mutual, there are the definition and the divisions.\nFIRST, the definition, \"a true reason of conceptual contradiction371 depending on a contradiction of abandoning what is mutual whose universal connection is necessarily certain,\" is the definition of this reason of perceived contradiction. There are two divisions,\nthe FIRST is true reason of conceptual contradiction with the genus.\nThis is like \"the dharmin \"sound\" is empty of being an eternal real thing372 because it is produced.\"\nThe SECOND is the true reason of conceptual contradiction with a necessary entailment.\nThis is like \"The dharmin \"a vase\" is not dependent on another object for a cause of destruction, because merely from its own existence,373 its destruction is certain.\"\nThe number of things to which these two apply is not certain, since there are no known limits to what is not included within them. Therefore, it is a certainly true reason whose practical scope depends on the number established.\nSECOND, merely apparent reasons\nWithin this there are the definition and the divisions.\nFIRST, the definition of a merely apparent reason is \"whatever is presented as a reason in which the three modes are not complete.\"\nSECOND, the divisions of a merely apparent reason are\n1) the unestablished reason\n2) the uncertain reason\n3) the contradictory reason.\nFIRST The unestablished reason\nWithin that are the definition and the divisions.\nThe definition of the unestablished reason is that what we say is known is not established as it is supposed to be.\nthe divisions of the unestablished reason\nWithin this are the reason unestablished in reality and the reason unestablished from the viewpoint of mind.\nFIRST, the reason unestablished in reality\nWithin this there are four kinds, non-establishment because:\n1. ...the subject374 does not exist\n2. ...the reason does not exist\n3. ...both do not exist\n4. ...both do exist, but are without connection.\nFIRST, non-establishment because the subject does not exist, is like the subject \"absolute sound.\" Though a reason may be presented, the subject375 does not exist. Therefore, the presence in the subject of the dharma to which the reason is applied cannot be established.376\nSECOND, non-establishment because the reason does not exist, is like: \"because it is the horn of a rabbit.\"\nTHIRD, non-establishment because both do not exist, is like \"the dharmin \"absolute sound\" is permanent, since it is the horn of a rabbit.\" Neither subject nor dharma are established.\nFOURTH, non-establishment because both do exist but are without connection, within this are three kinds the reason said to be known is not established because\n1. it is impossible\n2. it is not universally so\n3. it has both aspects that are universally so and aspects that are not.\nThe FIRST because it is impossible is like \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is unhearable.\" or \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is apprehended by the eye.\"\nThe SECOND because it is not universally so is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" always precedes the mind.\"\nThe third, because it has both aspects that are universally so and aspects that are not is like \"The dharmin \"sense-consciousness of the appearance of two moons\" is perceptual pramana, since it is free from conception and unconfused. The subject is established as universally free from conception, but it is not established as unconfused. So it follows that this is not established as a reason. Such over-entailment,377 is uncertain, has an unestablished reason, does not follow...six things like that\nSECOND, not being established from the viewpoint of mind.\nThere are four kinds altogether, non-establishment from the viewpoint of mind of:\n1)...the subject\n2)...reason\n3)...both being established but their connection not being established.\nThe FIRST is like a jewel being presented as the subject if we are not sure whether it is a jewel, rakshasa vase, or lamp.\nThe SECOND, it is like, \"Since there is freedom from desire, it has been produced, if we are not sure whether there is freedom from desire. Or it is like, \"Because there is smoke,\" if we are in doubt whether what is there is smoke or mist.\nThe THIRD is like, \"The dharmin \"a rakshasa vase\" is here, since an invisible rakshasa is here.\"378\nIn the FOURTH there are non-establishment through belief379 in impossibility, non-entailment, and both.\nThe FIRST is like \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is produced,\" for a mind that thinks sound is unproduced.\nThe SECOND is like, \"the dharmin \"words\" is not self arising, because it is produced by a person,\" for someone who thinks that some verbal sound is produced and some not.\nThe THIRD is like, \"The dharmin \"Indra\" is permanent, because Indra both a thing and impermanent,\" from the viewpoint of someone who thinks that, though things for the most part do not endure, gods like Indra may really be permanent.\"\n\"Since there is virtue now, there was virtue before,\" and \"By a peacock's cry in the midst of a mountain ravine, a peacock is established,\" may be uncertain, even though the reason is established.\" Gathering together here the others that are depended on in disputation and so forth, there are those like \"sound is impermanent, because it arises by effort.\" If someone thinks sound always arises from effort, this would be a true reason, and the inference would be established. Rally, if we think of certain naturally occurring sounds like the sound of water, it is not established for those. This entails that it is also not established for all sounds, and this should be explained. The six such kinds have twelve kinds of non-establishment.\nSECOND, Uncertain reasons.\nWithin this there are:\n1. The definition\n2. The divisions.\nFIRST, the definition of uncertain reasons is \"a reason that produces doubt as to whether what is to be established has been established.\"\nSECOND, the divisions of uncertain reasons\nWithin this there are uncertain reasons with no common basis and with a common basis.\nWithin this are two divisions:\n1. Uncertain reasons with no common basis where the characteristics are not different380\n2. Uncertain reasons with no common basis where a common basis exists does exist, but both the corresponding and non-corresponding classes are instantiated.381\nThe two classes are the corresponding class, and the non-corresponding class,382:\nFIRST, Uncertain reasons with no common basis where the characteristics are not different\nWithin the FIRST there are these four sub-divisions:\n1. The uncertain reason where subject and reason have no common basis because they are identical.383 This is like, \"the dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is sound.\"384\n2. The uncertain reason where dharma and reason have no common basis because they are identical. This is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is impermanent.\"\n3. The uncertain reason where basis, reason, and dharma have no common basis because they are identical. This is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is sound, because it is sound.\"\n4. The uncertain reason with no common basis because the assembled meaning of the basis and dharma and the reason are identical. This is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is impermanent sound.\"\n77. 16 SECOND, Uncertain reasons with no common basis where a common basis does exist, but both the corresponding and non-corresponding classes are instantiated. There are four divisions:\n1. The uncertain reason where no common basis is seen because both classes are non-existent. Neither the corresponding nor the non-corresponding class is seen. This is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is unheard.\"385 Since both classes are non-existent, they are not seen.\n2. The uncertain reason with no common basis where there is doubt because we cannot observe which of the two classes apply to the subject. This is because, although both the corresponding and non-corresponding classes exist, neither can be observed. This is like \"The dharmin \"this being\" has transmigrated from the life of a god, because he has eyes. We are unable to observe either those with eyes who have transmigrated from the life of a god or those who have not; From not seeing either, we are in doubt.\n3. The uncertain reason with no common basis where the corresponding class exists but is not seen. This is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is permanent, because it is produced,\" for a disputant who says that vedic sound is permanent and produced from the ultimate nature but not observed. The corresponding class is permanent sound, the non-corresponding class is impermanent sound From that viewpoint, the corresponding class exists, but is not seen.386 However, really what is permanent cannot be produced and there is no permanent sound.\n4 The uncertain reason with no common basis where the non-corresponding class exists but is not seen. This is like, \"the dharmin \"the Vedas\" is impermanent, because it is produced from the vedic viewpoint which holds the opposite. The vedic view is that the Vedas have an unproduced eternal existence that cannot be observed by ordinary human beings. The corresponding class is permanent Vedas. The non-corresponding class is impermanent Vedas. From the vedic viewpoint the non-corresponding class exists, but is not observed.\nWithin the SECOND, reasons where a common basis is uncertain, there are\n1) reasons uncertain about a common basis which is a real thing\n2) reasons uncertain about a common basis depending on mind that has is uncertain about a remainder.387\nWithin the FIRST, reasons uncertain about a common basis which is a real thing, there are four kinds.\n1. The FIRST is like \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is evaluable. The reason, \"being evaluable\" is universally true for both classes, the according class \"permanent things\" and the non-according class \"impermanent things\".\n2. The SECOND is like \"The dharmin \"sound\" arises from effort, because it is impermanent.\" The reason, \"being impermanent\" is universally true for the corresponding class, \"things that arise from effort,\" such as \"a vase.\" The reason applies to some aspects of the non-corresponding class, \"things that do not arise from effort\" such as \"a vase\" and does not apply to some aspects, such as \"space.\"\n3. The THIRD is like, \"the dharmin \"sound\" does not arise from effort, because it is impermanent. The corresponding class has both pervaded and non-pervaded aspects. The reason applies to some aspects of the corresponding class, \"things that do not arise from effort\" such as \"a vase\" and does not apply to some aspects, such as \"space. The reason, \"being impermanent\" is universally true for the non-corresponding class, \"things that arise from effort,\" such as \"a vase.\"\n4 The FOURTH is like \"The dharmin \"the sound of a conch\" is hearable, because it arises from effort.\" The according class is hearable things. Some hearable things like the sound of a conch or trumpet arise from effort, but some like the sound of a waterfall do not. Some non hearable things like the visual appearances of a painting arise by effort, but others like the visual appearances of a waterfall do not. For both classes the reason applies to some aspects and does not apply to some aspects.388\nAnother example is \"The dharmin \"sound\" is permanent because it is not touchable for the bye brag pas, a school which says that the atoms of the four elements are permanent and touchable, so that there is a basis of both of these, however that there are impermanent sounds and that some untouchable things are permanent.\nWithin the SECOND, reasons uncertain about a common basis depending on mind that has a remainder, there are\n1) the true uncertain reason having a remainder\n2) the contradictory uncertain reason having a remainder.389\nFIRST, the reason with uncertainty about there being a true remainder\nThis is like, \"The dharmin \"this being\" is an omniscient being, because of speaking.390\" The reason is seen (eg. by a non-Buddhist opponent) to apply to the non-corresponding class, ordinary people, but the corresponding class, omniscient beings or buddhas, is not seen. Mostly beings are not omniscient, but whether there might not be a truly existing remainder of buddhas existing as the corresponding class exists is uncertain to the opponent.\nSECOND, the uncertain reason having a contradictory remainder.\nThis is like \"The dharmin \"this being\" is not an omniscient being, because of speaking.\" the corresponding class of non-omniscient beings is seen and the reason, speaking, is seen to apply to it. The non-corresponding class, omniscient buddhas, is not seen and (the opponent) suspects that it does not exist. However (the opponent) is uncertain whether there may not be a remainder of omniscient buddhas who speak that would contradict the reason, \"All speakers are non-omniscient.\"\nThird, the definition and divisions of the apparent contradictory reason.\nFIRST, the definition of the apparent contradictory reason\nit is certain that what is to be established by such a reason is erroneously established.\nSECOND, the divisions of the apparent contradictory reason\nWithin this there are the contradictory reason of real dependence, and the contradictory reason of dependence from the viewpoint of mind.\nFIRST, the contradictory reason of real dependence\nWithin this there are the contradictory reason of erroneous negation and the contradictory reason of erroneous assertion.\nThe FIRST, the contradictory reason of erroneous negation, is like \"the dharmin \"a lump of clay devoid of the shape of a bulging belly\" is a vase, because it does not appear.\" The reason of non-perception eliminates everything.\nThe SECOND, the contradictory reason of erroneous assertion, is like, \"The dharmin sound is permanent, because it is produced.\" The natures are contradictory. Or it is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is permanent because it arises from effort.\" A permanent fruition is contradictory. In brief, the fruition's own reason and that which is to be proved are all wrong.\nSECOND,\ncontradiction depending on viewpoint of mind, it is like, \"The dharmin the sound of a conch is impermanent, because it is sound,\" for someone who says that sound is permanent. If that were true, what is established would be contradictory.\nOr it is like, \"The dharmin a vase is not newly arisen, because it exists,\" for someone who says that all existence is momentary and hence newly arisen. The denial is contradictory. In accepting it we accept a contradiction. When a mind depends on that, it is really an apparent reason. It is not a true reason and will never be one. In reality391 it is not a proof. A reason that only seems true to the mind is not properly a true reason. In reality an apparent reason and a true one should be distinguished. Again it is said.\nAs said, mere seeming appearance of a genuine reason\nUnquestioning, if we mount it quickly as valid reason392\nThe very profound great level of conceptual understanding,\nWill it not readily in an instant be destroyed?\nTHIRD how to make inferences\nThere are three parts. There are three classifications in terms of what is to be analyzed, four in terms of the manner of establishing, and two in terms of the manner of application.393\nFIRST, classifications of how to make inferences in terms of what is to be analyzed:\nAll that truly appears\nIs therefore primordial equality, and\nBy continua that are pure, since purity is seen,\nOne abides in possession of the nature in purity.\nIn dependence on things there is sure to be arising.\nIn dependence on non-things there is sure to be imputation.\nTherefore things and non-things, are by nature emptiness.\nThe actual natural state is the basis of emptiness;\nAnd since it is not something different from emptiness,\nInseparable appearance/ emptiness is inexpressible.\nIt has to be apprehended by personal experience.394\nBy the ultimate madhyamaka that examines the absolute, if we examine by the correct reasoning of speech, in the genuine reality of the natural state, all this that appears as samsara, nirvana, and so forth has always been primordial equality without distinctions of good and evil and so forth.\nTherefore, if we analyze with the ultimate correct reasoning that examines the conventional, as taught in vajrayana, since within our own pure continuum, only the pure environment and inhabitants of the mandala are seen. All that exists has the pure nature of the natural state.\nThings arise in dependence on some kind of cause and conditions. Non-things do not arise from cause and conditions, but are imputed depending on that which is to be refuted being completely eliminated.\nTherefore neither things like a vase and non-things like emptiness that hinders a vase are established in the natural state. They are empty by and of their own nature.395\nIn reality, the ultimate, natural state of suchness, neither a thing that is empty, such as a vase, nor the emptiness that eliminates it, have separate individual characteristics.396 Apparent objects such as a vase and the emptiness of their not being established are both inseparably empty from the time they appear, and apparent from the time they are empty.\nThis is not within the sphere of words or conceptions. It is inexpressible by any nouns, adjectives, and so forth at all.397 Someone may think, \"Well then who realizes it? it is realized by individual, personal wisdom.\nSECOND, how to make inferences in terms of the manner of establishing:\nAs many aspects of assertion as there may be\nMay all be summarized under \"has\" and \"is.\"\nAs many aspects of negation as there may be\nMay all be summarized under \"has not\" and \"is not.\"\nFIRST establishment\nAs many aspects as there may be that are included and established in the world are summed up under establishment as existing, and establishment as having such and such characteristics.\nSECOND negation\nAs many aspects as there may be that are excluded and denied can be summarized under the two kinds of negation. These are the following:\n1. Non-affirming negation is complete absence that does not bring in any other dharma.\n2. Affirming negation that is not complete absence and does bring in other dharmas.\nIf so, the characteristic of establishment should be realized by the mind with complete definiteness and certainty,398\nThe divisions of establishment\nin the divisions of establishment there are the establishment of appearance and the establishment of elimination.\nFIRST establishment of appearance\nThe definition of establishment of appearance is that it \"is realized with complete definiteness by non-conceptual knowledge.\"\nThe basis of characterization of establishment of objects of appearance 399 is individual characteristics of objects of appearance.400\nSECOND, the establishment of elimination\nThe definition of the establishment of elimination is \"conceptual mind realizes exaggeration with complete definiteness and certainty.\" Other existences that are so characterized are eliminated.\nSECOND, negation/ refutation401\nthe definition of negation/ refutation is that what is refuted is \"understood by the mind to be completely cut off.\"\nThe divisions of negation/ refutation are:\n1. affirming negation\n2. non-affirming negation.\nFIRST, affirming negation\nThe definition of affirming negation. \"What is to be negated or refuted by conceptual mind, after its negation or refutation has become completely certain, should be realized as completely cut off.\" This and eliminative assertion or establishment have the same meaning.\nSECOND, non-affirming negation\nThe definition of non-affirming negation, \"when existence or establishment has been completely cut off for that which is to be negated by conceptual mind, it should be realized as exclusively cut off without remainder.\" This has the same meaning as absolute negation.402\nThird, how to make inferences in terms of the manner of engagement:\nDepending on pramana, after classification\nOf assertions and denials has been properly ascertained,\nThen moreover, in accord with correct reasoning,\nEstablishments and refutations are expounded.\nAs for refutation, there are three classifications,\nThese are reasons established by asserting one's own thesis,403\nThose depending on proclamations of another,\nAnd refutation that states the consequence of a position.\nIn general, first the object to be evaluated by oneself is made unobscured. The object to be established is established using valid pramana of undeceived perception and inference. One produces certainty for oneself by refuting what is wrong and establishing what is right.\nInference for others depends on such a previous presentation of valid inference for one's own benefit. For other disputants,404 since what the topic to be evaluated is like405 is not realized and wrongly conceived by them, the same sense formerly seen by oneself is shown to accord with correct reasoning. It is made very clear. We establish our own tradition as suitable and present refutations of the unsuitable positions of others. The tshad ma mdo says:\nAs for inference for the benefit of others,\nThe meaning seen by oneself is completely clarified.\nThe rigs pa'i thigs pa says:\nInference for the benefit of others is said to be a reason with the three modes, because the cause is imputed as the fruition. There are two divisions,406 proper and improper.407\nAccording to what is said there, establishment and refutation are divided into four kinds:\n1 genuine establishment\n2. merely apparent establishment\n3. genuine refutation\n4. merely apparent refutation.\nFIRST, genuine establishment\nTruly establishing speech and valid inference for the benefit of others have the same meaning.\nThe definition of truly establishing speech is\n\"speech possessing the two limbs of teaching, which show the three modes of syllogism to the opponent.\" This is done:\n1. without anything omitted or spurious\n2. by the reasoning established by a disputant's own pramana.\nThe divisions of truly establishing speech are:\n1) truly establishing speech in which the forward entailment and the presence of the dharma in the subject accord408\n2) proper non-connection establishing speech.\nThis is truly establishing speech in which the reversed entailment and presence of the dharma in the subject do not accord\nFIRST,truly establishing speech in which the forward entailment and the presence of the dharma in the subject accord\nThis is like, \"whatever is produced is impermanent, for example a vase, and sound too is produced, isn't it? Then it must also be permanent.\nThe presence of the dharma in the subject and forward entailment are shown to an opposing disputant.\nSECOND properly-disconnected establishing speech\nThis is like, \"What is permanent is not produced, for example, like space. But sound is produced, isn't it? So how can it be permanent?\"\nThe presence of the dharma in the subject and the reversed entailment, are shown to the opposing disputant.\nSECOND, apparently establishing speech\nthe definition of apparently establishing speech is what is presented as establishing speech, but has some sort of fault.\nThe divisions of apparently establishing speech are:\n(1 faults of mind409\n(2 faults of meaning410\n(3 faults of words.411\nThe FIRST, faults of mind, is like, \"The dharmin \"mental ease\"412 is without mind413, since it is has birth and destruction.\nThe SECOND, faults of meaning, is like, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is permanent, since it is any thesis and corresponding class at all.414\nThe third, faults of words, is like \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, since it is produced. For example like a vase. Sound too is produced. Therefore, it too is impermanent.\"\nHere there is the fault that the thesis415, the reason, the example, and the conclusion entailed are run together.\nThe definition of true refutation is \"speech that tells why a fault is a fault, so that we can understand it.\"\nThe divisions of true refutation are:\n(1 refutation of a reason for one's own benefit, having the three modes according to inference, after the reasons have been established within one's own continuum.\n(2 refutations depending on the assertions of another, if the three modes of those assertions are not complete, by telling the consequences.\nAs for the respective objects characterized, here is what is said in order to refute an opposing disputant who says that sound is permanent, but produced.\nFor ourselves we establish, \"The dharmin \"sound\" is impermanent, because it is produced.\" Then for the opponent we say: \"From what you say it follows that the dharmin \"sound\" is unproduced, because it is permanent.\"\nSetting out a proof using that reason, we draw the undesired consequence. If that is properly done, we reveal and bring out various necessary consequences of the reason established by pramana416 or asserted by the opponent.\nSECOND, apparent refutation.\nThe definition of apparent refutation417 is \"a refutation presented in speech that has a fault,418 but where the one who presents it does not understand that it is faulty.\"\nTruly drawing out the consequences of what has been said\nThe definition of truly drawing out the consequences of what has been said, is \"speech drawing consequences that are irrefutable419 by one who receives them.\"\nApparent drawing of consequences of what has been said\nThe definition of merely apparent drawing of consequences is that it is \"speech such that the one who receives it can refute these consequences.\"420\nSECOND, within the divisions of apparent refutation,\nthere are the actual presentation and the summary of the meaning.\nFIRST, The actual presentation of apparent refutation\nWithin that there are conventional pramana and the pramana that examines the absolute.\nFIRST, Conventional pramana:\nThe way that things appear within the conventional\nDoes not coincide, with the way things really are.\nThere are two pramanas of all the conventional.\nThese depend on the impure seeing of this side\nAnd pure vision, as with the human and deva eye.\nThese two are distinguished in essence, cause, fruition, and action.\nThe mind that is not deceived about temporary objects\nArises from having properly grasped its appropriate object.\nClearing exaggeration from objects perceived on this side,\nIt will completely grasp the meaning of situations.\nVast wisdom arises from having perception of the nature.\nClearing exaggeration from inconceivable objects,\nIt has as its fruition the knowledge of extent.\nWithin the conventional, relative truth, individual appearances which accord and do not are distinguished. These are appearances in which the way things appear coincide with the way things are, and those in which they do not. As either according with the way things are or the lack of it applies truly and universally without qualification,421 There are two pramanas that evaluate these two situations. These are:\n1. The impure, worldly pramana of all the conventional which sees from this side.\n2. The pramana of all the conventional depending on the pure seeing of the noble ones.\nAn example of the first is the human eye, which sees only its own object. An example of the second is the divine eye, which sees former situations as well as its own object.\nDistinction of impure and pure pramana\nThese two pramanas are distinguished in four ways in terms of essence, cause, fruition, and action.\nFIRST, for the impure, worldly pramana of all the conventional which sees from this side\nIts essence is mind that is not deceived about the situation of its appropriate object, a temporary knowable.\nIts cause arises from having truly and properly grasped things as they are in terms of the appropriate objects of situational pramana.\nIts action is clearing away the exaggerated errors of the seeing of this side.\nIts fruition is completely grasping situations that occur without error422\nSECOND, the pramana of all the conventional depending on the pure seeing of the noble ones\nIts essence is wisdom that is not deceived about the vast sphere of the extent of knowables.\nits cause is having truly perceived the nature, the simplicity of how things are, in meditation.\nits action clears away exaggerated conceptions about objects that are inconceivable to the mind that sees from this side.\nits fruition is the wisdom that knows the extent of knowables.\nWith that we reach the buddhas' vision of trikaya. This is the profound instruction of the vidyadhara gurus of the three lineages, the instructions of the three dharmas by the learned and accomplished lords of the three families. These depths of mind-samaya revealed by former learned and accomplished vidyadharas was again revealed in the valleys of the Land of Snow by the jamyang guru Mipham Rinpoche. He had the three-fold eye that sees the three realms of things to be evaluated in the sutras, tantras, and treatises.\nNow this is said:\nIn the pramana that analyzes conventional truth\nAre conventional pramana of impure seeing of this side\nAnd conventional pramana of the pure seeing of the aryas.\nThe only proper thing is to make this distinction early.\nSECOND:\nWithin the absolute there are also two divisions,\nThe accountable and the unaccountable absolute.\nThe pramana that analyzes for absolute truth\nThat evaluates these two is also of two kinds.\nWithin absolute truth,\nFIRST there is the accountable absolute, emptiness as a mere non-affirming negation. It refutes the arising, enduring, and so forth of the objects of consciousness of the situations of post meditation. They are shown to be non-arising, non-enduring and so forth.\nSECOND there is the unaccountable absolute. Here the objects of the ultimate wisdom of meditation are free from all complexities of the extremes of arising or not arising, existing or not existing and so forth.\nThere are also two kinds of pramana that evaluate these two kinds of absolute truth:\n1) The pramana that examines the accountable absolute.\n2) The pramana that examines the unaccountable absolute.\nAs ways to resolve absolute truth both in stages and as a unity, according to the essences of post-meditation and meditation, and in terms of the accountable and unaccountable absolute two schools called svatantrika and prasangika madhyamaka arose. These schools are defined by respectively\n1 accepting and not accepting individual characteristics conventionally\n2 establishing reasons as their own theses, or merely as consequences of the views of others;\n3 joining or not joining what is to be refuted to the absolute;\n3 proclaiming or not proclaiming that the dharmin has a common appearance with the absolute.\nHowever, presenting such distinctions as these is merely making distinctions about their limbs. Here is the real distinction between the two:\nSvatantrika first brings out the two truths of post-meditation by the power of distinguishing prajqa, and then resolves it with the proclamation of the situational accountable absolute. Having done so, it then enters the stage of the ultimate, unaccountable absolute that is free from all proclamations.\nPrasangika from the first having taught meditation as the inseparability of the two truths, the unity of appearance and emptiness, the unaccountable absolute truth, as thought-transcending ineffable sudden wisdom.\nHere are the bases of distinguishing svatantrika madhyamaka and prasangika: For Svatantrika, in accord with evaluating the two truths by individual pramanas, one's own assertions of them as separate exist, and from that for others, reasons established by pramana as their own theses, are presented chiefly as syllogisms to overcome the confidence of opponents. For that reason they are called svatantrikas = those who present their own theses.\nThe prasangikas remain free from all assertions about the complexities of the four extremes, but in disputing the assertions of others by presenting the consequences of the reasons presented by their opponents, they eliminate wrong conceptions. For that reason they are called prasangikas.\nRespectively, as for the characteristics of the svatantrika and prasangika madhyamaka, the definition of svatantrika is \"madhyamaka exponents who explain emphasizing assertions and teaching of the accountable absolute.\" Those who teach with explanations emphasizing the unaccountable absolute free from all assertions are the prasangikas = those who draw out consequences.\nIn brief, from the teaching of the masters of svatantrika and prasangika having styles of explanation emphasizing the accountable and unaccountable absolute there arise the two streams of doctrine of svatantrika and prasangika. However, as for the ultimate great ocean of realization, without divisions or mixing up of higher or lower views they should be known to be of one taste. That is very important.\nThe way things are conventionally is the ultimate great purity and the way things are is the absolute great equality.\nThose who teach that view of the inseparable truth of purity and equality as liberation use whatever means they have of trying to see it that way. So the kind ones teach.\nTHIRD, as for abandoning contention\nWithin this are the general teaching and the particulars.\nFIRST, the general teaching of abandoning contention\nWithin this are abandoning contention about what is:\nimpossible,423\nunestablished, and\nunnecessary.\nAs for the FIRST, abandoning contention about what is impossible:\nMind with thoughts or mind that is without any thoughts,\nAs with two moons,424 or dreaming, or taking a rope for a snake,\nHas confused aspects and aspects that are unconfused.\nThere is the classification of pramana and non-pramana.\nIf there is no pramana and no non-pramana,\nSince it will never be possible to make the valid distinction\nThat the confused is false and the non-confused is true,\nEstablished doctrine will not be able to exist.\nSome may think that even if there is pramana it cannot possibly be unconfused;425 but there is unconfused sense and mental consciousness, with no conceptualizations grasped in a way that mixes word and meaning. There is also mind consciousness with conceptual thought that has an unconfused grasp of mixing of word and meaning.\nAlso there is confused non-conceptual sense consciousness, such as one moon appearing to be two. There is confused non-conceptual mind consciousness, such as in a dream. there is confused conceptual mind consciousness, such as in a mind that grasps a multi-colored rope as a snake.\nWithin both conceptual and non-conceptual consciousnesses these confused and unconfused aspects are distinguished. Because unconfused awareness is not deceived, it is pramana; and because confused awareness is deceived, it is not pramana. These individual classifications are established by correct reasoning from the power of the thing itself.\nIf we could not distinguish pramana and non-pramana, we would not be able to distinguish what is false because it is confused, and what is true because it is unconfused. It would follow that we could not establish that the heretical doctrines of outsiders are false, and that Buddhist doctrine is true.\nSECOND, abandoning contention about what is unestablished:\nIf we have genuinely examined and analyzed\nPramana and non-pramana of perception and inference,\nWhatever sorts of classifications there may be,\nAnd whatever sorts of complexities may occur in those,\nThese are all established as emptiness of essence.426\nThere is freedom from all complexities like the heat of fire,\nYet all that exists as conventional complexity,\nis inseparable with this as appearance/ emptiness.\nWithin all dharmas, upaya is found mixed with its source.\nWe cannot refute the one and still establish the other.\nIf someone thinks, \"such emptiness therefore cannot established as absolute,\"427 if true reality, or the natural state of suchness, is examined and analyzed by the correct reasoning that examines for the absolute, the pramanas of sense and inference, as well as that which is non-pramana of sense and inference, objects and perceivers that are verbally established as well as those that are refuted, each and every one of these classifications of complexities is established as emptiness, free from all the extremes of complexity.\nTherefore the nature free from all the complexities of existence, non-existence, both, and neither, exists universally within all conventional complexities, as heat does in fire. For that reason, appearances like a vase and the emptiness of their not truly existing are never separate.\nSince this exists within all conventionalities, appearance, which is upaya, and emptiness, which is the source of upaya, are mixed. That after refuting one, such as the conventional, the other, such as the absolute, is established, or that after refuting the absolute, the relative is established, is impossible. This is because the natural state of things is the inseparable truth of appearance/ emptiness. Therefore, the Heart Sutra says:\nForm is emptiness. Emptiness itself is form. Form is no other than emptiness. Emptiness is no other than form.\nSo the teachings were bestowed, after the arisen complexities of the four extremes of existence, non-existence, both, and neither had been refuted.\nTHIRD, abandoning contention about what is unnecessary:\nNot examining pramana and non-pramana,\nOnly by worldly seeing, might we enter the absolute?\nIndeed, the possibility cannot be refuted.\nBut as for those who see that \"This arises from that,\"\nBy this very dependence on the world's perception\nThere is inference that penetrates to the truth,\nThey do not use its name, but have not abandoned truth.\nAs it says here, pramana and non-pramana are not individually examined, according to prasangika tradition. Someone may ask whether having proclaimed relatively merely whatever conventionalities are seen within the world, since we are able to enter directly into the absolute, it might not be unnecessary to classify things in terms of pramana and non-pramana.\nIt is indeed true that we can never refute that someone without the classifications of pramana and non-pramana might still enter into the absolute.\nNevertheless the worldly perception that sees that from this cause, the seed, this fruition, the sprout, arises, and sees that this fruition, the sprout, arises from its cause, the seed, and so forth, is also pramana. Depending on these perceptual reasons, there is penetration to whether hidden objects exist or not. This is inference, as well as the reasoning that establishes the absolute.\nTherefore worldly people too, though they do not clearly distinguish the names of pramana and non-pramana and designate things by them, do not really abandon the classifications of pramana and non-pramana. Since worldly people produce negation and assertion, acceptance and rejection, entering and relinquishing, they very much need the classification of pramana.\nWithin the SECOND there are abandoning contention in conventional analysis, abandoning contention in absolute analysis, and a common summary.\nFIRST, abandoning contention in conventional analysis:\nIf there were not the two conventional pramanas,\nThe noble ones' pure seeing would have to be called false.\nImpure seeing of a white conch as yellow\nWould then not properly be either true or false.\nSomeone may think that conventional is single, and that one pramana analyzing it is enough and two unsuitable.\nWell what if, within the pramana that analyzes the conventional, no distinction were made between the pramana of all the conventional depending on pure vision and the pramana of all the conventional of the impure seeing of this side. Then there would be only the pramana of the seeing of this side. No pure pramana other than this would exist. That within a single atom there are as many buddha fields as there are atoms, that there is sugatagarbha, that the pure phenomenal world is a universal, divine mandala--such pure visions would be false.\nMoreover,428 it would never be acceptable to say that a conch shell is truly classified as white and falsely as yellow. This is because there would be nothing else but a single pramana of whatever is seen on this side.\nSECOND, abandoning contention in absolute analysis:\nIf absolute analysis were not two-fold in nature,\nThe union of the two truths could never come about.\nThe absolute would fall into extremes of concepts,\nAnd it would destroy itself by doing so.\nSomeone may ask, \"Well isn't there just a single absolute truth? So why isn't one pramana enough to analyze for it? What need is there for two?\"\nWhat if no distinction were made between the pramana that examines for the accountable absolute and the pramana that examines for the unaccountable absolute? Then we would be saying that the accountable absolute alone, the conceptually realized path of emptiness as non-affirming negation is the ultimate. This path has neither an ultimate natural state or exaggerations of it. Within it inseparable appearance emptiness, the meaning of the unity of the two truths, can never be realized, and is, in fact, impossible.\nSince there would be only the complexities of non-affirming negation and so forth, even the absolute would fall into the extremes of complexity. In that case the absolute too would be a complexity. The absolute truth, the way things are, as well as the correct reasoning that examines the absolute and the pramana that examines the absolute, could not be innately or autonomously established429 and so would be destroyed.\nThird, the common summary:\nIf the relative, what is analyzed, is unestablished,\nThe analyzing mind, and self awareness too,\nWhen analyzed, are not established, like the moon in water.\nThe ultimate truth, which is inseparable, single truth\nExists as nirvana, unqualified reality.430\nSince all dharmas whatever are that ultimate,\nIt is the inseparable kaya of knowledge and knowables,\nAppearance for wisdom free from any center or limit.\nIn terms of the way things are, ultimate suchness, the object to be analyzed, the relative, is not established as real. The natures of the mind that analyzes are its seven collections of consciousness and self-awareness. If these too are examined and analyzed with the correct reasoning that examines for the absolute, they are not established either. They are no more established than, for example, the moon in water.\nIf such a natural state is the ultimate, these conventional appearances primordially appearing as empty are the single, unified truth of nature in which the two truths are not individually distinguished, is the primordial field of nirvana. This naturally established nirvana is unreservedly true. Within it, all dharmas are equal to that, and so there are no dharmas except for dharmadhatu. Within this supreme emptiness possessing all the supreme aspects, knowable dharmas never fall away from that. They too are the ultimate. This is the appearance of the kayas and wisdoms, in which knower and known are inseparable, naturally without center and limit.431\nSECOND, the action of the kayas and wisdoms, the four reliances\nWithin this there are the general teaching, and the explanation of the particulars. As for the FIRST, the general teaching:\nThose in whom this vast profound good eye of prajqa\nHas opened are the children of the Sugata.\nFrom these beings who are of great intelligence432\nThe path on which they go ought to be well discerned.\nThis is the way of the sutra and the mantra vehicles,\nWhich is so hard to attain within the diversions of time,\nTherefore let us not make it into something fruitless.\nThose of brilliant intelligence who have the four reasonings,\nNever abandon433 others. By this discrimination,\nThe four reliances will certainly be produced.\nIf we do not have an attitude like this,\nIt is like a blind man leaning on his staff.\nDue to opinion and words, and easy understanding,\nWe will misunderstand the four reliances.\nAs explained above, after the good eye of spotless prajqa has opened, with the correct reasoning of the profound absolute and vast relative, we are sugatas, buddha bhagavats. The path of a sugata's heart sons of supremely great intelligence, the bodhisattvas, is the good path that dwells neither in samsara or peace, but has gone into nirvana. Let us work hard with the means of seeing this. Now within this world realm of forbearance, among the thousand and two guides of the good kalpa, like a mind-produced white lotus, the praiseworthy supreme leader, the son of king Zetsang, the Buddha, has taught in the extensive style the precious vehicles of the teachings of the sutras and tantras. this is very hard to obtain. However, from the power of collecting hundreds of our former merits, when the time for the auspicious connection of aspiration and karma has come, it is obtained. The taste of this is not now\nexperienced within our continuum. Do not enter into the free and well favored situation without the fruition of listening. So those who wish for liberation are instructed by the kindly ones.\nIt may be asked, \"Is such a good path to be seen?\" The four correct reasonings are the correct reasoning of productive action, the correct reasoning of dependency, the correct reasoning of nature, and the correct reasoning of suitable establishing. The intellect having the spotless appearance of the four correct reasonings not following the speech of others, not making itself dependent on others, having the power of undefiled examination of its own correct reasoning from the power of things themselves, depends on these four correct reasonings. By so doing, the four reliances that are being explained, must certainly be produced within our continuum.\nBy our own power, as explained above, if we do not also have analyzing intellect, it is like being without eyes and having to rely on a staff. If we do not examine the world, we will therefore only follow opinion, and grasp things only verbally. If we produce only the easy reasons of the external provisional meaning and the sphere of consciousness, the four reliances will gradually be abandoned.\nThe four reliances are as follows:\n1. Not relying on the individual, but relying on the dharma;\n2. Not relying on the words of the dharma, but on their meaning;\n3. Not relying on the provisional meaning, but the true meaning;\n4. Not relying on the true meaning within consciousness, but within wisdom.\nThe great commentary on Kalachakra dri med 'od says:\nThe four reliances are like this:\n1) Rely on the Dharma, not on the individual\n2) Rely on the meaning, not on the words\n3) Rely on the true meaning, not the provisional meaning\n4) Rely on wisdom, not on consciousness.\nSECOND, the four reliances,\nThe FIRST is RELYING ON THE DHARMA, NOT THE INDIVIDUAL:\nTherefore, do not rely on individuals.\nIt is the holy Dharma that we should rely upon.\nOne is liberated by the speaking, not the speaker,\nOf the true path established by proper reasoning.\nIf it has been properly taught by anyone,\nIt will do its job whoever the speaker may be.\nThe Sugata himself by his power of taming\nEmanated as butchers and similar kinds of people.\nIf the teachings contradict the meaning of mahayana,\nThe seeming teacher, however good, will not succeed.\nIf we do not have the kind of intellect described above that examines by its own power, it is taught that the four reliances will be reversed.434 For this reason, not relying on individuals as individuals, the mind should rely on the dharma they teach. The true means of liberation is the path established by the power of correct reasoning from the things themselves. We are liberated by this being spoken without confusion, but not by the speaker alone. Therefore do not rely on the individual but on the Dharma.\nFor this reason, when any being speaks about the true path established by correct reasoning, it is appropriate; this is so whether that particular speaker is good, bad, or whatever. Even the Sugata, the Buddha himself, by his power that necessarily tames beings, emanated as explained above and in other ways.\nIf the expressible essential meaning of the mahayana is just emptiness free from the complexities of the four extremes, which is what is known as the view of the Chinese Hwa Shang; and if it accords just with the absolute as examined by correct reasoning; and if this is said to be the ultimate, absolute truth and so forth; and if this is what is taught, That contradicts the tradition of mahayana. the teacher is behaving in a style of mere imitation and so forth. However \"good\" such person may be, it will be of no help. Even evil-doer maras may emanate as seeming to be buddhas with the major and minor marks, perfect in action, but teaching a dharma that reverses the mahayana and so forth.\nSECOND:\nEven when we have heard and contemplated the Dharma,\nDo not rely on the words, rely instead on the meaning.\nIf we realize the meaning, whatever words we say,\nThere will be no contradiction in what is said.\nDesiring verbal expressions to realize their meaning.\nUnderstand them in terms of the meaning of their message.\nBusying oneself with verbal complexities\nIs like searching for an elephant we have already found.\nIf wanting words, we go our way with merely words,\nDiscursive thoughts are not exhausted, but increase.\nBecoming farther and farther removed from the actual meaning,\nIs the cause of silly fools' completely exhausting themselves.\nYet even a single word, a little \"and\" or \"but,\"\nIf it reveals that the object, is inexhaustible,\nBy this alone and nothing more there will be suchness.\nThis is the exhaustion of any need for words.\nIf a finger points to the moon, a fool looks at the finger.\nIf fools depend on words alone and think they know,\nThe time of really knowing is difficult to find.\nEven when we cut through the exaggerations of hearing and contemplating the Dharma, the mind should not rely on the expressing words, but on the expressed meaning. If the expressed meaning is realized as it is, the435 expressing words, whether expressed in good verses or bad and so on, will be suitable and without contradiction. As for the need of words, for the sake of realizing the meaning, the expression of human beings is wished for, and therefore symbols are joined together as a message.436\nThese should be understood to be words spoken for the purposes of a particular situation.437 If that is understood, and later we devote ourselves to438 complexities of words, it is like, for example, someone who has lost439 an elephant and, even when it is found, still keeps on looking for it. This is like that.440\nHaving given credence441 and been attached only to words, if only words are extensively and genuinely being dealt with,442 not only discursive thoughts, but verbal complexities as well, increase inexhaustibly. We wander farther and farther from the meaning to be understood. Since the meaning is not realized, we are childish fools. Such mere words are only a cause of exhaustion.\nTake, for example the utterance, \"Bring wood!\"443 If the places, times, and details and so forth are fully revealed, that may indeed yield inexhaustible extremes of the meaning, but even so, one will not necessarily understand what was really meant.\nIf the meaning on that occasion of use, \"You Bring that wood over here\" is understood, the intention of the expressing words is that alone.\nIf a person points his finger to show the moon to fools, the fools do not know they are supposed to look at the moon, but look at the finger instead. Just so, fools are attached only to the expressing words, and if they do not discriminate the expressed meaning, but only the expressing words, and think they understand the expressed meaning, it will be very hard for them to reach a time when they really do understand. The Great Commentary on Kalachakra says:\nEven in barbarous dialects and in broken words,\nThose in yogic union convey a grasp of the meaning\nAs there is truly milk mixed into the water,\nWhen it naturally comes to the top,444 then they will drink it down.\nThe absolute itself is the sort of object\nWhere the great ones never will rely on words.\nThose who know what is actually meant by the names of objects,\nWhat use will they have then for wordy of treatises?\nAlso the great gnubs sangs rgyas ye shes445 said in his Lamp of the Eye of Meditation:\nAnd so, in brief, knowing the meaning is much better than learning.\nThe Mirror of Dharma says:\nAn ocean of collected verbiage is not learning.\nBut understanding a single word is the very best kind.\nThe Lankavatara Sutra says:\nWhat is called \"having heard much,\" is being competent with the meaning, rather than just the words.\nIt should be understood by what is taught there.\nTHIRD:\nIf we enter fully into the meaning of this,\nHaving come to know the true and provisional meanings,\nNot putting our reliance on the provisional meaning,\nInstead we should rely on the meaning that is true.\nThe omniscient one himself by using his omniscience,\nConsiders the powers and abilities of those to be tamed.\nAs for the stages and vehicles being in accord with those,\nThey are taught to be like the rungs of a ladder.\nWhoever has realized what is their basic intention446\nThen goes by the eight concealed intentions and intentions.\nGoing literally by pramana Is something to be destroyed.\nThe teachings exist for that reason. In the four schools of doctrine\nAnd in the vehicles up to the ultimate vajra vehicle,\nParts that are not understood by the lower ones\nHave been explained by the higher ones.\nThen what accords with scripture is made even greater by reason.\nWhen it has been seen, the true meaning will be grasped.\nLike milk rising out of water, is the play of supreme intelligence\nWithin the ocean of speech of all the victorious ones.\nThe profundity of vajrayana is also sealed\nWith six extremes and four ways of interpreting,447\nWith the accompaniment the lineage instructions,\nBy undefiled correct reasoning they must be resolved.\nAll dharmas, eternally pure, are one in the great equality.\nThat is the meaning resolved by the two authentic pramanas\nIn the style of the paramitas, and of the developing stage,\nThe perfecting stage and also that of the great perfection;\nIn these manners the general designation of words\nEnters into the ultimate pith without contradiction.\nWe gain the deepest certainty about their meaning.\nThat limitless Dharma treasure of supreme intelligence,\nIs the victory banner of teachings of scripture and realization\nThat waves in the hands of the children of the Victorious One.\nIf we enter completely into the expressed meaning of the excellent speech of the teachings by hearing and contemplating, we will have come to know how to distinguish the provisional meaning and true meaning taught by the Victorious One. Our mind will not rely on the provisional meaning; but on the true meaning. The knowledge that perceives the nature and extent of knowables, and all dharmas without obscuration, is buddhahood.\nBy that, through omniscience about the place where there are those to be tamed, the means of taming them, and so forth,in accord with the perceptual constituents, powers of mind, and thoughts of those to be tamed, for the sake of leading them gradually to the level of omniscience, there are the stages of vehicles for entering the gate. These go from that of the shravaka Vaibhashikas all the way up to ati yoga, the highest unsurpassable secret of vajrayana. They have been taught to be, for example, like the rungs of a ladder. The Shrimahanirvana Sutra says:\nLike the gradual stages of a ladder's rungs\nMy profound teachings should be earnestly studied stage by state\nNot skipping anything,448 going through the whole succession.\nThis is also found in the tantras of Anuyoga. The sangs rgyas thams cad kyi dgongs pa 'dus pa'i spyi mdo chen po says:\nAs for the vehicle of the true absolute,\nThe appearance of truth is in a three-fold way:\nAs the vehicles of the guide who shows the origin,449\nHeroic practice,450 and means that transform our powers.\nAs is said there, the types of minds of those who are to be tamed are summarized under superior, intermediate, and lesser. If each of these again is divided into three, there are the stages of the nine vehicles. The second buddha of Uddiyana in his great commentary on Properly Pronouncing the Name of Maqjushri called the Blazing Lights of the Sun and Moon said:\nThe minds of sentient beings who are to be tamed are higher, intermediate, and lesser. By each of these three being again divided into three, there are nine. They are not said to be easy to understand.\nThe lowest three teach the three collections of characteristics.\nThe middle three teach the three collections of yoga.\nThe highest three teach the three aspects of developing and perfection.\nIn regard to the distinctions in the powers of beings, the rin po che snang byed says:\nBy distinctions of minds there are nine stages of the vehicles.\nExplaining view and action in their own discordant ways.\nOf the Dharmas of the nine vehicles, the various lower ones are the provisional meaning, and the various higher ones are the true meaning.\nWhat are the provisional and true meanings? The omniscient dharmaraja Longchen Rabjam explains the precious key to evaluating them like this:\nAs for the classifications of the provisional meaning and true meaning, the nature of all dharmas is the space of suchness, naturally pure, seeing the luminous nature of mind. Because it is naturally pure, it is the unchanging essence of space, beyond birth, enduring, and cessation. This is the true epitome of all the words of the teacher and of all the treatises. The dharmin, all that appears, arising and ceasing, coming and going, pure and impure, skandhas, dhatus, and ayatanas, and such various details are appearances like a dream. All teachings that analyze451 and exaggerate the details of speech, thought, and expression are known as the provisional meaning. In the words of the teacher and all the treatises, this is included within the relative. For example. \"The nature of mind like the sky.\" If in speech, expression, or thought there is pride452 about this, it too is relative. The nature of the absolute is the true meaning which is really so.\nThe dbu ma bsam gyis mi khyab par bstod pa says:\nThe emptiness of all dharmas\nIs the true meaning as is taught.\nWhat is born, ceases, and so forth\nThe lives of beings and so forth\nIs taught as provisional meaning,\nAnd as the relative.\nThe Shri Samadhiraja Sutra says:\nAs the teacher, the Sugata, has taught them,\nKnow the particulars of the true meaning sutras.\nWherever individual sentient beings are taught\nKnow that all those dharmas are the provisional meaning.\nThe 'phags pa lo gros mi zad pa bstan pa'i mdo says:\nWhat are the sutras of the true meaning? What are the sutras of the provisional meaning? Sutras taught for the purpose of entering the path are those of the provisional meaning. Sutras taught for the purpose of entering into the fruition are those of the true meaning.\nSutras that explain ego, sentient being, life, persons, and individuals, those born of Manu, self, the doer, the experiencer, and various words, and those that teach egolessness along with ego are of the provisional meaning.\nSutras that teach emptiness, no characteristics, non-aspiration, not collecting anything, the unborn, the non-arising, no things, and no ego, no sentient beings, no life, no individuals, and no interval until egolessness and liberation, these are those of the true meaning. As for these, it is said that we should rely on the sutras of the true meaning and not on the sutras of the provisional meaning.\nIn brief, the nature of the natural state and the sutras that teach it are the true meaning. The many means of entering into its nature, the impure, confused Dharmas that guide the minds of sentient beings there and all teachings about their divisions and so forth are the provisional meaning and Dharmas of the provisional meaning.\nIn this way a mirror for looking at Dharmas and a first key to distinguishing them is taught. In order that these may be clarified and the nature of the intended meaning realized, the presentation of the distinction between the intentions and concealed intentions must be explained. These are understandings explained with a little453 exaggeration, having a purpose to which we are not explicitly guided.454\nFirst to instruct in the meaning of the Sanskrit word \"tsaa twa ro a bhi pra ya,\" it refers to the four intentions.455\nRegarding those the Sutrala.mkara says:\nEquality,456 other purposes457\nLikewise other times458\nAnd thoughts of individuals459\nAre the four intentionalities.\nAs is taught there, because of the purpose, as for having other intentions460\nwith the intention of equality, the Buddha taught, \"I at that time became the Buddha rnam par gzigs.\"461\nThe intention of other objects is like saying \"all dharmas are essenceless, there is not form, feeling and such, with the intention that they are not non-existent as mere conventionalities, but in the absolute.\nThe intention of other times, is like teaching that just by apprehending462 the name of a buddha we will be born in his463 buddha field. It is not certain that this will occur as soon as this life is over, but the intention is that it will certainly happen at some point.\nthe intention of the thoughts of individuals, is like discipline being praised, and generosity being said to be lower to someone having the thought that just generosity is enough. Here in truth discipline is nobler than generosity. Here each case has its own purpose.\nSECOND \"tsaa twa aa bhi sa ndi,\" to instruct in the meaning of that word, there is also concealed intention. The Sutrala.mkara says:\nThere are the concealed intention of entering464\nThe concealed intention of definitions/ characteristics,\nThe concealed intention of antidotes,\nAnd the concealed intention of transformation.\nThese concealed intentions are mostly not to be grasped verbally, but are brought to apprehension465 by other phenomena.\nThe concealed intention of entering is called that because the shravaka teachings enter gradually. When here it is taught that there is individual egolessness, but that dharmas such as form exist, the hidden intention is that they exist merely in relative truth.\nAs for concealed intention of characteristics, from the intention of the mtshan nyid gsum, the 3 natures of yogachara, having intended the absolute, it is like teaching essencelessness and primordial nirvana and so forth.\nThe concealed intention of antidotes gnyen po ldem por dgongs pa, is called that because it eliminates that which is to be abandoned from the continuua of those who are to be tamed. Having grasped that buddhahood is in both the excellent and the inferior, beings may therefore abandon trying to attain it, and there will be the vision of buddhahood explained above. If like that they think that the Dharma is easy to obtain, if it is said, \"the antidotes attained are like those gained by worshipping as many buddhas as the sands of the river Ganges, then a wish for the mahayana Dharma will arise. The concealed intention is that that is what is taught to happen after realization is attained.\nFor a lazy person who thinks, \"I cannot learn the path,\" because of laziness, it is said, \"If you aspire to the pure realm of Sukhavati you will be born there. For such sayings the intention is that it will occur at another time.\nHaving disparaged those who grasp merely small virtuous roots as enough, praising other virtuous roots has an intention for individuals with thoughts like the above. That is what expressed by means of those four intentions\nMoreover, though it is not the real intention, having regarded or intended it in that way only for the thought of those individuals, for those who have pride in family, their bodies, or wealth, by praising other fields and individuals, they will have a lessened perception of themselves, they will perceive their own situation as inferior.\nAs an antidote to those who desire defiled objects, world-transcending wealth is highly praised.\nIt is taught that those who because they have done evil deeds of harming holy objects and so forth, repented, their minds are filled with great longing, and that when they harmed the buddhas and bodhisattvas they made a connection with virtue. The intention is that having confessed or exhausted their faults, that eventually they will act virtuously.\nFor those whose bodhicitta is uncertain and who have a desire to turn away from the mahayana it is taught that there is no vehicle but that one. The intention is that the individual fruitions of the three incidental vehicles466 will not be attained, but the ultimate realization will be. If so, by teaching the Dharma of the supreme vehicle, all these obstructing faults will be abandoned.\nWhoever grasps the words in mind or considering their meaning, puts them into practice does as is as taught in the above two verse dharani.\nAs for the concealed intention of interpretation/ transformation, by some of the heretics and so forth, it is said,\"the Buddha's teachings are easy to realize,\" to reverse such grasping of them as inferior and so forth they have transformed them into other symbols, with a concealed or indirect intention that they should be known to have another meaning than the words explained by them. For example,\nKnowing what is essenceless as an essence,\nThe kleshas will be extreme kleshas\nIf we dwell well on what is wrong,\nWe will attain true enlightenment.\nAs is taught there, if we explain the intended meaning of that, By engaging with both \"Saa ra\", the essence, and the motion of agitation, for the mind training in trying hard to make them completely motionless,467 even having known the essence, performing the training of effort and discipline, the one who has the kleshas produces even more kleshas.\nIf those who wrongly grasp purity and virtue as an eternal ego, properly remain in training the prajqa, by that they will attain true enlightenment. That is the concealed intention.\nSimilarly, that we should kill our fathers and mothers refers to the father and mother of the world of samsaric formations and the one who clings to them. It has the intention that we should abandoning them and so forth. All sayings of that kind should be known as concealed intention of interpretation.\nHere, as for the distinction between intention and concealed intention,468 the great translator rngog pa blo ldan shes rab says:\nNot understanding another meaning than what speaker is thinking of from the speakers words by the listener is the intention. The same meaning the speaker is thinking of being understood by the listener is the concealed or indirect intention. The theg bsdud kyi 'grel pa bshad sbyar says:\nThe intention is simply what is presented to the mind, It is not proclaimed to depend on grasping anything else. The concealed intention does depend on grasping something else.\nThus, whoever has realized the basic intention469 of the skandhas and so forth, according to what was just explained, the four concealed intentions and four intentions according to those eight, in those in having grasped the words literally, as for that, by true pramana is also taught for the purpose of being something that has the existence of harm and the teachings also have that purpose\nThe Shravaka vaibhashikas and sautrantikas, and the mahayana exponents of mind-only and madhyamaka are the exponents of the four schools. The ultimate level of fruition of all of these is the secret mantra or vajrayana, including the three outer and three inner tantras, going up to the highest, ati yoga. When the lower doctrines are examined and analyzed by lower intellects, the mind does not enter into the true object. That very thing has been done with the highest clarity by the higher ones of the higher doctrines, and the meaning of the scriptures that exhausts faults should be realized or experienced as it is.\nHaving seen greater and greater things established by this great correct reasoning, not putting together a position out of the provisional meaning alone, we grasp the true meaning with naked directness, for example, like water that has naturally separated from milk. Those whose intelligence has become supreme, conquer the warfare of the four maras. They can play like swans or perform activity in the situation of the Buddha's teachings as if it were a great ocean. This is very profound and hard to realize.\nThe vajrayana also says this, as in the gal po:\nBy extensive explanations of the six extremes,\nRealization of the sense of provisional meaning\nAnd realization of the true meaning are explained.\nWhen words are not realized, their suchness is non-suchness.\nThe six extremes taught there are:\nThose who have only the provisional meaning and those who do not.\nThose who have realization and those do not.\nThose who know how the words are meant and those who do not.\nSince the six tantra vehicles of the vajrayana do not go beyond these six extremes of words and meaning, they are also called the six extremes.\nAlso the gal po says:\nThere are verbal, general, concealed, and ultimate.\nThere are four ways of interpreting the texts, verbal, general, secret, and the ultimate.\nThe verbal meaning works with explaining the literal meaning of the configurations of words and letters in accord with the texts of grammar and pramana.\nAs for the general meaning,470 if we do not enter quickly into the blissful mantra path, if we regret dwelling on the slow sutra path and ascetic path, these are explained as bridging paths.471 Also to live in sexual practices of union and liberation, not even dreaming of the pure mantra path, like a dog or a pig, is thought by the exponents of Dharma to be the dharma of the heretics.\nIf we repent of this, but do not also abandon grasping and attachment to the dream of purity of the sutra path, we will not see the meaning of equality. If we abide in virtuous mind, whatever accumulation of merit there may be, it is explained as in the mi nag mdung thung can bsad pa and so forth:\nThe secret meaning, is the extensive actions of the developing stage and the secret bindings and so forth produced by nadi, prana, and bindu.\nThe ultimate meaning is realization of the absolute, luminosity. This is the ultimate natural state in which the two truths are unified.\nMoreover, in the verbal style the four kayas are taught as OM AAH HUUM, HRIH, or EVAM, A and so forth, or as the four chakras.\nIn the general style, the paths and bhumis of the paramitas and so forth are expressed by mantra as well.\nIn the secret style, the objects of the higher vehicles are not the objects of the lower ones.\nThe ultimate style is the wisdom of buddhahood for which views and vehicles are of no benefit.\nBy means of these six extremes and four styles, those without the good fortune of the vajrayana, who have wrong views, who are separated from buddhahood so that it does not appear to them, must realize the meaning of secret mind from the path of the instructions of vajrayana.\nFrom the instructions of the lineage from dharmakaya Samantabhadra to one's own root guru, we should correctly resolve the meaning of the realization of the profound, secret vajrayana, through pramana and analysis undefiled by accompanying faults. We should reason correctly by the reasons of the four correct reasonings, the extraordinary realizations of the four correct reasonings, and so forth.\nThat is the king of all tantras, the peak of all vehicles, the source of all teachings, the general commentary on all scriptures, and the great, direct path of all the buddhas.\nThe holy penetrating mind of all the sugatas, the glorious, miraculous, great net of miraculously arisen qualities, the guhya garba, or secret essence, the certain continuity of suchness, is taught by the great king whose correct reasoning is not in common with those of the lower vehicles.\nHere there are three extraordinary correct reasonings:\n1. The reason of the revelation of pramana\n2. The reason of the meaning that is in accord with words, as taught by the noble ones472\n3. The correct reasoning where words and meaning are not in accord.\nFIRST, the reasons of the teachings of pramana,473\nWithin this there are four topics. These are the following:\n1. The reasons of the four realizations.\n2. The reasons of the three purities.\n3, The reasons of the four equalities.\n4. The reason of the mahatma474, or great self.\nFIRST, the reasons of the four realizations,\nWithin this there are the following:\n1. The reason of the single cause.\n2. The reason of the style of the syllables.\n3. The reason of the blessing.\n4. The reason of manifestation.\nFIRST, the reason of the single cause\nThe dharmin, \"the dharmas of the phenomenal world,\" is eternally united with the space of the absolute as naturally existing wisdom. This is the single cause. No dharmas go beyond it.\nSECOND, the reason of the style of the syllables\nThe dharmin, \"appearances that arise from the space of the dhatu by way of the example-letters,\" the relative, appears as the kayas and wisdoms. Therefore, it does not go beyond the nature of space.\nTHIRD, the reason of the blessing\nThe dharmins \"the relative\" and \"the absolute\" mutually bless each other and are inseparable. They are united and do not exist with separate natures.\nFOURTH, the reason of manifestation\nThe dharmin \"the inseparable natural state\" is free from everything within the scope of mind. Therefore, it is the realm of individual, personal wisdom, the perception of yoga, which is incomprehensible to conventional mind.\nSECOND, the reason of the three purities\nThe king of tantras, the Guhya garba says:\nThe continuities475 of the vessel and essence are purely realized.\nAs it says there, the dharmins \"the five elements, the five skandhas, and the eight consciousnesses\" dwell within the nature of the three purities. Therefore, they exist primordially with the nature of the five consorts, the five families, and the five wisdoms.\nThird, the correct reasoning of the four equalities\nThe king of tantras, the Guhyagharba says:\nTwo equalities, with a further two equalities,\nAre the mandala which is the buddha field of Samantabhadra.\nThe dharmins \"the two absolutes,\" the accountable absolute which cuts through every partial complexity and the unaccountable absolute which cuts through complexities altogether, are equal as the mere absolute. It manifests completely, simply because the natures of complexity are not established.\nThe dharmin's appearance with causal efficacy is the true relative. Its appearance without causal efficacy is the false relative. These two are equal as the mere relative. Things appear to have self-nature, but if examined they have none.\nThe dharmins \"the accountable absolute and the non-accountable absolute,\" are equal in having a self-existing essence and having the seven exceptional riches of the absolute.476 That is because the absolute is the space of the dhatu, the natural state non-dual with primordial wisdom.\nThe dharmins \"the two kinds of the false relative\" are also equal in being within the mandala of the kayas and wisdoms. This is because the nature of the way things really are is primordially pure.\nFOURTH, the reason of the mahatma, the gsang snying says:\nNaturally present wisdom appears without existing.\nThe dharmins \"the many ways things appear,\" the apparent dharmas of samsara and nirvana, in terms of the way things really are, are the mahatma, the great self, naturally present wisdom. That is because this is established as the wisdom that discerns477 the ultimate natural state.\nSECOND, the reason of being taught with similar words but exalted meaning\nThe tantras teach that the dharmin \"the five poisons\" should not be abandoned. Though the word \"poisons\" is the same, the meaning is exalted. The five poisons are not abandoned by antidotes, because in realization, they arise as the five wisdoms.\nTHIRD, the reason of non-according with a particular sense\nThe dharmin \"the nature of dharmas\" is definitely established not to have the nature of any complexity at all, because it arises as all the various appearances of samsara and nirvana. The dharmin \"these appearances of the relative\" is definitely not of a fixed nature and may arise as anything. This is because no nature of its own is established for it. What is said there and so forth is realized in the lower vehicles only with extraordinary correct reasoning.\nTo briefly summarize the profound main point of the views of both sutra and tantra, there is the correct reasoning that establishes the relative as the great purity, establishing all the dharmas of the phenomenal world, from their primordial beginning, as divine appearances, and the correctly established truth existing abiding with that as the essence of the perceiver wisdom.\nThere is also the reasoning that establishes the absolute as the great equality. All the dharmas of samsara and nirvana, free from their primordial beginning from all extremes of complexity, are within the state of the great emptiness beyond mind, inexpressible by speech or thought, the equality of all good and bad, and accepting or rejecting.\nThus, as purity is established from the viewpoint of appearance, and equality from the viewpoint of emptiness; these two are inseparable from all dharmas, equal with them in the sense of being of one taste with them. This is the utter, total purity of the great net of miracles, the uncompounded unity of insight-emptiness. It is dharmakaya, the single dot or drop of bindu, realized by the holy ones through their individual, personal wisdom. It is the unity of the great perfection.\nWhen this has been truly resolved by the true pramana that analyzes the conventional and also by the pramana that examines for the absolute, the same meaning is found by both these analyses. If it is explained in terms of the two stages of the vajrayana path of the secret mantra, this meaning is as follows:\nThe developing stage, utpattikrama, with the symbolism of the relative body, teaches that all dharmas are like illusions and so forth. The teachings of the paramitas and the illusion-like bodies of the deities etc. are visualized. The divine body of prana and mind, taught to be like illusion etc., is perfected. Spontaneous presence, taught to be like the natural radiance of insight, is gradually brought into the way of being of the great perfection. When the verbal, general, secret, and ultimate meanings are resolved, we enter into this.\nThe perfecting stage, sampannakrama, denotes the luminosity of the absolute.\nThe mere luminosity also taught by the paramita-path is the verbal meaning.\nAbiding in the luminosity of the developing stage is the general meaning.\nThe luminosity evoked by the four emptinesses of the perfecting stage is the secret meaning.\nIn both these two stages, all dharmas are realized as the primordial, natural state of eternal emptiness. The ultimate meaning, ultimate realization of the primordially-pure wisdom of the four abhishekas, has the style of luminosity of the great perfection.\nBy the power of entering into the profound meaning of the pith of these four styles, among which there is no contradiction, there is the profound sense of the teachings of the sutras and tantras, true knowledge that does not need to depend on anything else. Whoever has confidence in such intelligence, has the supreme mind of which no one can be deprived. We are great heart-children of the Buddha, participants in the kayas of the victorious one. Holders of this great, undiminishing treasury of holy Dharma, as taught in any of the teachings of the three vehicles or the nine, are bodhisattva-mahasattvas, the protectors of all those remaining within samsara to be tamed. These bodhisattvas have realized the twelve limbs of the buddha's teaching,478 the Dharmas of the scriptures included in the six tantra-vehicle-collections, the three excellent trainings479 and the teaching of realization that includes both of the two stages. They are completely victorious over all partialities that do not accord with these precious teachings of scripture and realization.\nFourth:\nIf we practice the true meaning, we do not rely on consciousness,\nThe mind of grasper and grasped that follows verbal concepts,\nInstead we put our reliance in non-dual wisdom itself.\nAs for the ego that has an object--that is mind.\nIts nature is the grasper and the object grasped.\nWhatever object it has, it is always false.\nThe reality of nature has nothing to do with things.\nConceiving things or non-things, with duality or without,\nAll conceptual objects, however they are conceived,\nWhatever may be grasped, belongs to the realm of Mara.\nSo it has been taught by the Buddha in the sutras.\nDenials or assertions can never destroy conceptions;\nBut if it is seen that there is no adding or taking away,\nThere is liberation, free from subject and object.\nThere is the natural radiance of luminosity.\nEliminating complexities of the four extremes,\nThis is taught to be the excellence of wisdom.\nTo the fool who has never seen it, it is like the sun to the blind,\nThey do not know it, but even from trying to think about it\nPanic arises in the minds of fools like these.\nNevertheless by the power of authentic scriptural teachings,\nBy valid reasoning that eliminates all extremes,\nAnd by the oral instructions given by the guru\nIt seems to us as if just now we first had eyes.\nThen by the faith of experience of the Sugata's Dharma-amrita,\nWhich is just a name for limitless expanding joy,\nThe wisdom of the Sugata is bestowed on us.\nSince dharmas without remainder have reached the goal, equality,\nOne attains inexpressible depths of certainty.\nThe wise call this the inexhaustible Dharma treasure.\nHaving developed skill in the way of the two truths,\nWhen the two truths are seen to be a unity\nIt is like threshing the husk for the sake of having the essence.\nKnow that all skillful means lead only to this end480\nTherefore, the Sugata, knowing these skillful means,\nReferred to this as the genuine path of all skillful means.\nLet irreversible faith arise for Teacher and teaching.\nHaving attained the supreme, non-dwelling state of wisdom,\nWe are free from all the extremes of samsara and nirvana.\nThe spontaneous flow of the stream of effortless compassion\nPervades to the farthest limits of time as well as space.\nWe should cultivate realization of the true meaning as it is in itself, not relying on the mind of consciousness, whose nature is grasped objects and the grasping mind which follows after words and concepts. Instead, rely on the mind of non-dual wisdom without grasper and grasped.\nThe ego has conceptions of empty, non-empty, both, and neither and so forth. Since that mind has the nature of the grasper and external objects that are grasped, it is confused. So conceived, it is false. Since it will not bear analysis, we cannot make contact and join with its real nature beyond all complexities of things.\nWhat is the reason? The conception of things, and the opposite conception of non-things, the conception of neither and so forth, however they are conceived, are motions of the mind. They are concepts. Since they are concepts, whatever conceptions may grasp at things and non-things, these are the realm of Mara. So it has been taught in the 'jam dpal rnam par rol pa'i mdo:\nWhatever is conceived and whatever is compounded, that is the work of Mara\nTherefore refuting things, establishing non-things, and so forth, whatever conceptual negation and establishment there may be cannot destroy the grasping of conceptual mind. The nature eliminates any dharmas whatever. When we do not establish or postulate any dharmas at all, all complexities of grasper and grasped subside. Therefore, we are liberated from conceptions and complexities. The regent Maitreya and lord Nagarjuna both have a single intention, and there is a song that says:\nNothing should be postulated at all\nTruth will then be truly seen as it is.\nHaving seen it, we will be liberated.\nIn that case, since we are entirely free from conceptualized grasped objects and the conceptualizing subject that fixates them, there are no grasper and grasped. Materiality is empty, non-existence like space. This has the nature of intrinsic wisdom where knowledge arises by itself. This is luminosity in which all the complexities of the four extremes are naturally absent. The Victorious One has said that this is supreme wisdom. The rgyal yum sdud pa rin po che says:\nIn the pure worlds, whatever names of dharmas are named\nThey all arise transcended, abandoned in the truth.\nThere is no other deathless, holy wisdom than this.\nTherefore, this is known as prajqaparamita.\nAs the blind never see the form of the sun, fools who see only this side have never seen nature free from all the extremes of concepts. By thinking, \"It is simply empty,\" and so forth, not knowing the mind of faith, these fools cannot enter into the nature free from all complexities, and terror arises in them.\nHowever, if this has been well-resolved by the extraordinary three true pramanas, meditators realize the natural state as it is. The rgyud rdo rje me long says:\nThose who evaluate using pure pramana,\nOf scripture, proper reasoning, and the oral instructions,\nWill enter into that which they are trying to know.\nThe word taught by the Buddha is genuine scriptural pramana of the true meaning. The pramana of correct reasoning, free from all proclamations and eliminating all extremes is the teaching of the mahatmas. The pramana of the oral instructions of the authentic guru with the lineage instructions practiced by the wise have the power to liberate. When world-transcending wisdom arises in our being by the power of unfeigned devotion for this, it is like a blind person obtaining eyes.\nHere there is a style of patience or example wisdom in accord with the situation of individual beings. Since true perception of situations appears within one, the person having the distinctions of true knowledge then experiences the taste of the amrita of the Sugata's holy Dharma. By confident faith in that, joy, the eye that sees the essence, develops. This is not the ordinary physical eye481 but the supreme eye of wisdom. It always one-pointedly views dharmakaya, the wisdom of the Sugata.\nIn this case, all the different dharmas of samsara and nirvana, virtue and vice, good and bad, and so forth are realized as inseparable equality. By that there is a deep true knowledge inexpressible by names, words, and so forth. This cannot be refuted by anyone in the world, including the gods.\nThat is the subject of this work. It is what is expressed by the teachings and all the inexhaustible Dharma treasury of the three vehicles. As is said:\nIf we attain the depths of the true meaning, hundreds of thousands of Dharma treasures issue from our hearts.\nTherefore, by having come to know the true way of the two truths by hearing, contemplating, and meditating; when the unity of the two truths is seen in a way where it is not seen by oneself, the essence of the fruition is attained. Like gradually removing the husk from the subtle inner truth, we should try to enter into and remain482 in the unity of the two truths, the ultimate means of liberation of all those taught by the Tathagata.\nBy these the singularity of dharmadhatu is realized. Except for this one ultimate realization, there is nothing else.\nThe Sugata, the Buddha Bhagavat knows means of taming that accord with the faculties, powers, and so forth of those to be tamed. The final goal of all the means he taught is omniscience. Therefore, that is the true path. Irreversible faith arises that these teachings cannot be ravished from the mind by the host of billions of maras. This is because the way things fundamentally are has the essential nature of the unity of emptiness and compassion. If this is truly realized, we attain the manifestation of supreme self-arising wisdom, the genuine prajqaparamita, the fruition that dwells neither in samsara or in nirvana, as the benefit for oneself. We are liberated from the one sided extremes of samsara and nirvana, without having to refute them.\nAs the benefit for others, for sentient beings who do not realize this, there naturally arises the stream of the great compassion will naturally flow, pervading the ten directions and the three times to their limits. By the spontaneous, eternally-pervasive presence of buddha activity, the supports of the path,\nthe actual path, and the ultimate path are established.\nThird, the explanation of the eight great treasures of confidence in the fruition:\nThus contemplating the way of the dharma of the two truths,\nUsing the skillful means of the four reliances,\nThe action of which is taught as the four correct reasonings;\nFrom this undefiled483 cause, by the deep wisdom of fruition,\nIf the phenomena of experience blossom forth;\nOne is set free by the eight great treasures of confidence.\nThat bring about this expansion into the space of insight.\nTraditions that were formerly heard and contemplated,\nNot forgotten, then become the treasure of memory.\nThe meaning of these, as profound as it is extensive,\nIs then completely revealed as the treasure of intellect.\nAll the meanings of the sutras and the tantras\nAre entered into as the treasure of realization.\nAll the details of the teachings we have heard\nNever forgotten become the treasure of retention.\nExplaining things properly to all sentient beings\nIs the satisfaction-producing treasure of confidence.\nAs for the precious treasury of holy Dharma,\nCompletely guarded, this becomes the Dharma treasure.\nThe continuous families comprising the three jewels\nNot cut off, are the treasury of bodhicitta.\nIn the unborn equality of the nature itself,\nAttaining patience manifests as the treasure of practice.\nThese are inseparable and inexhaustible.\nThose who attain the eight-fold power of the treasures of confidence,\nAs praised by the victorious ones and all their sons,\nOver the three worlds they are empowered as lords.\nAs explained above, the way of the dharma of the two truths is analyzed and resolved by the non-erroneous analyzer, the four correct reasonings, whose well-contemplated action is the four reliances. By having this supreme cause that is undefiled by faults, when the fruition blossoms whose uttermost depths are very hard to penetrate, there is profound appearance of wisdom, as limitless as space. this is the fundamental space of primordial insight that is not realized by ordinary people. It is will be liberated by the eight great treasures of confidence, as if that was what made it blossom. What are these eight? The rgya cher rol pa says: will not be broken. This is the treasure of relative bodhicitta.\n8. By practicing the Dharmas that have been resolved by hearing and contemplating, we attain patience within the unborn equality of nature. This is the treasure of practice.\nThese eight great treasures are attained. How is this done? These treasures of memory, intellect, realization, and grasping are the cause of confidence. The treasure of Dharma and so forth are the fruition of confidence. That is why these eight have the common name of treasures of confidence: From having the treasure of memory and so forth, irreversible confidence arises. From confidence the treasures of protecting the Dharma and so forth arise. Thus confidence is the chief of them, and they are known as the great treasures of confidence.\nHaving joined these eight great treasures of confidence to our own powers, every word and meaning become the wealth and power of the inseparable, inexhaustible, limitless eight great treasures. Holy persons who do this are supreme children of the victorious ones. They are praised as such by the victorious ones together with their sons. They will be lords of the three worlds of the nagas below the earth, human beings on the earth, and gods above the earth.\nThird, the teaching of the fruition of analyzing in this way:\nTo gain pramana is the teaching of the Buddha.\nIf true authentic pramana has fully been established,\nThrough the certainty produced by the path of pramana,\nBy the teaching of pramana, we see the truth of fruition.\nHere the benefit for those who become beings of pramana is explained. What is always taught in the teaching of the Victorious One, the perfect Buddha Bhagavat, is the conventional pramana that is not in contradiction with the path of correct reasoning, and the pramana that analyzes for the absolute. These are established as much higher than the doctrines of outsiders and so forth.\nTherefore, glorious Chandrakirti, glorious lord Nagarjuna, and so forth taught the path of correct reasoning in their texts, teaching the analysis of the two truths and so forth. The path that they taught, the teachings of pramana, has produced the certainty of supreme faith. Therefore, those who are famed for learning in the world together with its gods, as well as the noble ones of the shravakas,\npratyekabuddhas, bodhisattvas, and so forth, who do not know things as they are, by this pure Dharma amrita, will see the highest true fruition.\nHaving the renunciation/ realization that completely perfects the five paths and ten bhumis, they will therefore produce mastery over the four bodies of a buddha and the five wisdoms.\nFinally, there are the two sections of the meaning of entering into the merit of this,\n1) the manner of composition\n2) the dedication of merit.\nAs for the FIRST, the manner of composition:\nAs a result of vision that is completely pure\nOne will reach the ultimate goal, the great compassion.\nThe Sugata said, after this path had been taught by him,\n\"As for the taste of amrita of that which I attained\nThose who are possessors of these four proper reasonings\nExperienced by the means of the four reliances,\nProduce by that the fortune of sharing that amrita.\"\nCorrupted nowadays, by the power of the dark age,\nDue to its way of reversing the four reliances,\nThe excellent taste of the teachings is hard to experience.\nHaving seen it, have an attitude of devotion\nTo this the finest of thoughts, the most excellent of teachings.\nIn itself, the vision that sees the way all dharmas are as it is is very pure. Because of that, we reach the final goal, the great compassion, which in its kindness protects all other sentient beings as limitless as space, with their causes of suffering. The supreme being of the shakyas, the Sugata, the son of king Zetsangpa, for those to be tamed established the three or the nine vehicles, appropriate for the respective powers of each being. Because he has taught those paths, the tastes of holy Dharma amrita which the teacher, the perfect Buddha himself attained, is also genuinely experienced by those who have the four correct reasonings, by means of the four reliances. So both the sutras and tantras truly teach.\nWhen the portion of amrita attained by oneself has been produced within this world, many beings of the good kalpa will experience this taste of holy Dharma. But by the 5 denigrating corruptions, and in particular in this present time by the power of defilements of the view, understanding of what is explained above is reversed. The certainty of the path of the four correct reasonings is not produced.\nThe non-erroneous way of the four reliances is the supreme taste of the supreme leader Gautama's teachings of scripture and realization. After its perfect abundance, so difficult to experience, was genuinely seen,484 there were only excellent wishes to benefit others. Having realized this precious teaching that is difficult to meet with, the great reason of certainty unequalled by others, was realized, by supreme devotion to the faith that desires the radiant essence, this treatise was composed.\nSECOND, the dedication of merit:\nProducing undefiled prajqa from contemplating this,\nBy the merit embodied within this brief expression\nMy all beings come to abide in the state of Maqjushri\nThe above mentioned intention is a special ultimate or quintessential purpose. For such a reason, the manner or means of producing within the continuua of sentient beings the prajqa without the faults of defilement that arises from contemplating the three prajqas is discussed just a little in a few texts. Since the subject is naturally vast, by the limitless merit of composing this, reaching to the limits of space, may all these beings not be kept far away from inseparable space and wisdom, the jnanasattva level of Maqjushri, but quickly attain it.\nThird, the completely perfect, ultimate meaning:\nIn the direction manifesting the sun of Maqjushri,\nIf the lotus of the essence blooms because of faith,\nBy the red honey droplets of good explanation having arisen\nMay celebration increase for the bees of the excellent kalpa.\nAccording to previous advice to write this, and recently exhorted by the victory banner of the excellent thoughts of learned ones, in the Sakyong year, third month, twenty-ninth day, this was written by Jampel gyes pa, Mipham]. Mangalam. There are a hundred and four verses. Dge'o.\nHere is the identifying scepter485 of the colophon\nWhen these, my good explanations, have been contemplated,\nMay various great and subtle doubts unwind themselves.\nMay total certainty rise by supremely clear intellect,\nBestowing the treasures of inexhaustible confidence.\nfire horse year, fourth month, fourth day.\nJetsun Mipham, the sun of exponents of Maqjushri, made his mind one-pointed by the great force of longing. Drawn by the three faiths in the direction he was looking, the lotus of the essence, drawn upward by the three faiths, was opened by the penetrating solar rays of blessing. When anything was explained, the good explanation rose from the hundred petals of intellect, like tiny red droplets of honey. For the host of bees of the good kalpa who want to taste the supreme flavor of this sage's speech, together with the commentary on its intention, may the celebration of realizing the intention as it is not only put an end to samsara, but increase ever more and more.\nAgain this is said:\nBy the excellent teacher, the chief of two legged beings,\nAs for the natural state of knowing things without mixing,\nThe great knowledge mandala of the nature and extent\nSeemingly emanating a hundred thousand rays,\nThe all-pervading light of the objectless compassion,\nAccording with the powers and thoughts of those to be tamed,\nProclaiming the eighty-four thousands heaps of dharmas as one.\nFrom the thick darkness of ignorance that makes them fall asleep\nMay the beings of the three worlds instantly be exalted.\nGood in beginning, middle, and end, this excellent teaching,\nHas the two-fold goodness and the four pure actions.\nIn the great ocean of amrita of this auspicious teaching,\nThere is seen the play of 10 million naga lords,\nThe learned accomplished ones of India and Tibet,\nA country of valleys wreathed by surrounding snowy mountains.\nLed by the three ancestral leaders, and khenpo, loppvn, and Dharma\nThe golden chariot of arousing bodhicitta\nIs full of ten million rigdzins of the two accomplishments.\nFrom now on possessors of the special six Dharmas\nAs the legacy of the ten million former rigdzins\nLearned and accomplished, who have now passed on,\nThe difficult pith of the sutras, tantras, and oral instructions,486\nThe vajra vidya mantra tradition of joyful teachers\nIs the play of the dance of the saffron lion of all teachers.\nThe three realms' Dharma lord, jamgon guru Mipham,\nFrom a meadow by the lake of play of supreme learning487\nFrom the welcome single circle the wheel488 of the deepest sense,\nWith its day-producing power like the sun,\nOn the non-deceptive path of freedom and omniscience\nMay there gleam white parasol of pramana.489\nWithin the circle of the two truths of the nine-fold vehicles,\nMay the retinue, the eighty-four thousand teachings,\nFree from stain, amidst the great thousand petalled lotus\nThe explanation of teachings of the Victorious One,\nSatisfy with the anthers of the four proper reasonings.\nBy interdependent arising, the essence of knowables,\nHaving the great vase of well-described analysis\nOf the two pramanas, in the ocean of excellent teaching,\nWith the analysis of the two conventional pramanas,\nTheir insight flashing490 auspiciously like the golden fish,\nThe nine-fold lineage precepts, coiled to the right,\nMay the dharma conch of the four reliances pleasantly sound.\nFrom the pure and equal wisdom of the net of miracles,\nEight treasures of confidence gather into a knot of eternity,\nThe completely certain meaning of the sutras and tantras\nMay this victory banner the Sword of Prajqa fly in samsara.\nWithin the vast and extensive ocean of all dharmas,\nMay those who want to sever at once the hundred nets,\nThe snares of non-realization, wrong realization, and doubt,\nGrasp this thought-arisen razor-sharp sword of prajqa.\nThus while staying in the great place of Varanasi,\nIn the Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies,\nBeing well-supplied with the needed Tibetan texts,\nSince this is my own tradition, to benefit some new minds\nBy the kind teacher Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche\nQuickly written, by the guru's oral dictation,\nWith ornamentation by learned treatises of pramana,\nHe followed the early translation, a knower of ancient haughtiness\nThe supreme instructions of prajqa, he arranged in the boldest style491\nI, by intellect, as narrow as the eye of a needle,\nFor the sake of good explanation as extensive as the sky\nBy the supreme and spotless merit of doing this\nHaving illuminated the thick darkness within all beings,\nMay they attain the ultimate level of omniscience,\nGreat prajqa whose vision is the suchness of knowables.\nHere within the extent of the limits of Jambudvipa,\nThe rain-clouds of the true view are gathering.\nMay rains of the benefits of loving-kindness fall,\nMay there be the perfect auspiciousness of the new young sun.\nHere for the sake of gathering the glorious gift of blessings, are the great Rishi Ajita's true and pleasant words of auspicious aspiration, the loosely rel;axed grace of a gandharva maiden\nBy this well-performed appearance of the sun\nWhen the darkness of the dark age has finally been expelled,\nThe grove of young utpala lotuses of the truth of mind\nBlossoms to the very limits of the directions.\nMay beings taste the joy of the celebration of this\nI and all beings who open the treasure, the Sugata's teachings,\nAre rendered wealthy by the appearance of his mind.\nWithout all pride, but with the highest aspirations,\nMay the realm of benefits for those to be taught increase.\nMay the prophesied dharmaraja, the coming Dharma lord,\nVictorious in all directions, just like Dharmakirti,\nDiscover the highest dharma, attaining the dharma-eye.\nEliminating adharma, may the way of Dharma flourish.\nMay the shining sun of Maqjushri with its blazing heart,\nScatter huge petals of explanation everywhere.492\nMay red honey droplets of benefit for other beings\nExpand to the limits of space throughout the ten directions.\nSo may they be grasped by every sentient being.\nThe eye of prajqa the seer of knowables in themselves,\nClears away the darkness of the mist of views.\nBy its producing that brilliant daylight in this world,\nMay all beings thereafter always glow with beauty.\nThe lotus feet of the Jamgon guru, lion of teachers,\nHaving touched my head, may the vase examining eye\nThe path of proper reason, limitless as space,\nBeautify all this world with the sound of the lion's roar.\nThis commentary was written in 1986 In the great Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, to explain my own Nyingma tradition. It was delivered orally and was not originally intended to be published. Having consideration for my students, strongly urged by their pure requests again and again, very moved, after the direct rain of the auspicious benefits of Nyingma was assembled on thirteen occasions, the chief Khenpo rigdzin dorje, the great leader, urged very strongly, further requests were made at the Nepali stupa, and the teachers Ugyen Tendzin and Tsering tendzin having written an important/ kind auspicious letter hardly needed to do so again.\nThis occurred in the year of the teachers passing 2530 in the eighth month on the tenth day, when I the holder of the name of Nyingma khenpo Palden Sherab was in Varanasi, in the place where the rishis had been in the Deer Park, and this was the cause of the good fortune of the place and time of composition being so perfectly auspicious. Sarva mangalam.\nThus in Varanasi at the Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies after thirteen presentations of the glorious happy sense of the former Nyingma, in the fire tiger year on the seventh month, tenth day (BE 2530) this was printed. ge'o ge'o.\nTranslator's note\nTranslating this text had the general purpose of presenting Buddhist logic in English. In particular it is a rare presentation of a uniquely Nyingma approach to reasoning, and the particular views of the subject of the great Mipham Rinpoche. There is no greater authority on Mipham than Khenchen Palden Sherab Rinpoche, who is also one of the most learned Nyingma Khenpos in his own right.\nThis project was begun by members of the Nalanda translation committee. Later the committee members in Boulder, Colorado continued working on it with commentary by Khenpo Palden Sherab. Khenpo Tsewang Dongyal gave a running translation. The members most active in this were myself, Ann Helm, Gary Wiener, Nelson Dudley, and Tony Duff. This process covered only about 1/5 of the text. Ann especially did some further work, but for the most part I was on my own after that. I was able to ask some questions due to the kindness of Khen Rinpoche's colleague Khenpo Tsewang Gyamtso, which made it possible to finish the text. rime lodrv Waldo, Guy Fawkes Day 1997. May it be auspicious.\nEnglish Glossary: For meanings see the Tibetan listing or search the Tibetan term\nabhi.sheka: dbang\nabhidharma: mngon chos\nabsolute truth\nabsolute: don dam\naccept and reject: blang 'dor\nact and effort: bya rtsol\naction: spyod\nadding and taking away: 'du bral\naffirmation and negation: dgag sgrub\naffirmation: sgrub\nnegation: dgag\nAkanishta: 'og min\nalaya: kun gzhi\nalayavijqana: kun gzhi rnam par shes pa\nall at once: cig char\nall-pervading, all-encompassing: phyam gdal\nall-sufficient: gcig chod\nalpha-pure: ka dag\namrita: bdud rtsi\nanalysis: dpyod pa\nantidotes: gnyen po\nanu: a nu\nappearance: snang ba\nartificial: bcos\nAryan riches, 7,: 'phags pa nor bdun\nas it is: rang babs, rang sar, rang mal\nasura: lha min\nati: a ti: rdzogs pa chen po\nauthentic: yang dag\nAvalokiteshvara: spyan ras gzigs\nAvici Hell: mnyal ba mnar med pa\nawakened: sangs\nawareness: shes pa\nayatanas, 12: skye mched bcu gnyis\nbardo: bar do\nbhagava[-t][-an]: bcom ldan 'das\nBhrama: tshangs pa: Hindu creator god\nbhramin bram ze\nbhuta: byung po\nbhuumi: sa\nbias: ris\nbindu: thig le\nbodhicitta: byang chub sems\nbodhisattva vehicle/yana\nbodhisattva: byang chub sems dpa'\nbuddha activity: phrin las\nbuddha qualities: yon tan\nBuddha qualities: sangs rgyas kyi yon tan\nbuddhadharmakaya: sangs rgyas chos kyi sku: = dharmakaya.\nbuddha[hood]: sangs rgyas\nreasoning: rigs pa: see text\ncause and condition: rgyu rkyen\nceaseless: ma 'gags, 'gag med.\ncertain: nges\ncharacteristics: mtshan\ncharya yana: see theg pa dgu\nco-emergent: lhan cig skyes pa\ncoarse: rags\ncollection of oral instructions: man ngag sde\ncompassion: thugs rje\ncomplexity: spros pa\nconcept: rtog pa\nconceptions: dmigs pa\nconfusion: 'khrul pa\nConquerer: rgyal ba.\nconsciousness 5/6: rnam shes lnga/drug\nconsider: ltos\ncontrived: bcos\nconventional: tha snyad\ncoronation vase: spyi blugs\ncreated: bcos\ncrystal: shel [gong]\ncutting through: khregs gcod\ndakini: mkha' 'gro\ndedicating the merit: bsod nams bsngo\ndefilements: dri ma\ndeity: lha\ndetail: rim pa\ndeveloping [stage]: bskyed [rim]\ndharmakaya: chos sku\ndharmata: chos nyid\ndharma[s]: chos\nDharmdhatu: chos dbyings\ndharmin: chos can\ndhatu: dbyings, khams\ndhatus, 18: khams bco brgyad\ndhyana[s, 4]: bsam gtan bzhi\ndifference of different manifestations of a single essence: ngo bo gcig la ldog pa tha dad\ndifference that refutes one: gcig pa bkag pa tha dad\ndirect liberation: cer grol\ndiscontinuity: rgyun chad\ndiscriminating awareness wisdom: so so rtags pa'i ye shes\ndiscriminating awareness: so so rang rig; so sor rtag pa\ndiscursive thought: rnam rtog\ndisplay: bstan, bkod\ndisturbed: rnyog\ndoer of all: kun byed\ndvn: gdon\ndrowsiness and discursiveness [wildness]: bying rgod\nego: bdag\neight consciousnesses: tshogs brgyad\neight examples of illusion: sgyu ma dpe brgyad\neight extremes: mtha' brgyad\neight kinds of suffering: sdug bsngal brgyad\neight ordinary siddhis: dngos grub thun mong brgyad\neighteen dhatus: khams bco brgyad\nelement: khams, rigs\neliminate or establish: dgag sgrub\neliminate: log\nemanation: sprul pa\nembodiment: 'du ba\nempowerment: lung, dbang\nemptiness with all the supreme aspects: rnam mchog kun ldan stong nyid\nemptiness: stong nyid\nempty: stong pa\nenlightenment: byang chub\nennailment: gzer [bu]\nenvironment and inhabitants: snod bcud, rten dang brten pa\nequality: mnyam nyid\nequanimity: mnyam nyid\nessence: ngo bo [snying po]\nestablish: sgrub\neternal: ye\neternalism: rtag [lta]\netherial: sang seng\neven: phyal ba\nexamination: brtags pa\nexamine: brtags pa\nexamin[e][ation]: dpyod pa\nexhaustion: zad pa, rdzogs pa\nexist: yod pa\nexperience: rang snang\nexperiences: nyams\nextremes: [mu] mtha'\nfabrication: bcos\nfalse conception: kun btags\nfamily: rigs\nfather tantra: pha rgyud\nfine and coarse: rags phra\nfive aspects of sadhana: cho ga rnam pa lnga\nfive buddha activities: phrin las lnga\nfive buddhas: bcom ldan 'das lnga:\nfive certainties: nges pa lnga\nfive colors: kha dog lnga\nfive desirables: a'dod pa lnga\nfive elements: 'byung ba lnga\nfive enlightenments [manifestations of...]: byang chub lnga\nfive eyes: spyan lnga\nfive families: rigs lnga\nfive kayas: sku lnga\nfive paths: lam lnga\nfive perfections: phun sum tshogs pa lnga\nfive qualities: yon tan lnga\nfive root kleshas/ poisons: rtsa ba'i nyon mongs lnga\nfive skandhas: phung po lnga\nfive wisdoms: ye shes lnga\nFive buddha families: see five buddhas, five families.\nfixation and grasping: gzung 'dzin\nfixation, fixated object: gzung ba.\nfixator, fixating subject: 'dzin\nfixed: nges\nflickering [emanation etc]: 'gyu ba\nfour extremes: mtha' bzhi\nfour fearlessnesses: see text\nfour individual true apprehensions: meanings, words dharmas, powers.\nfour kayas: sku bzhi\nfour kinds of birth: skye ba bzhi\nfour legs of miracle: cho 'phrul rkang pa bzhi\nfour manners of birth: skye tshul bzhi\nfour maras: bdud bzhi\nfour mudras: phyag rgya bzhi\nfour noble truths: 'phags pa bden bzhi\nfour purities: see ch. 6\nfour reliances: see text\nfour seals: phyag rgya bzhi\nfour, the, propitiation and so on: bsnyen sgrub bzhi.\nfour times: dus bzhi\nfour ultimate realizations: rtogs pa bzhi\nFour elements: khams/ 'byung ba bzhi\nFour immesurables: tshad med bzhi\nfreedom: grol ba\nfreedoms and favors, 18: dal 'byor bcu brgyad: Ch. 1.\nfresh and relaxed: lhang nge lhan ne\nfrom all eternity: ye\nfruition: 'bras bu\nfundamental luminosity = gting gsal\nfundamental state: gzhi gnas [not = shamatha]\ngandavyuuha: stugs po bkod pa\nGandha :Gandha: goddess of perfume.\ngandharva: dri za\ngarbha: snying po\ngaruda: khyung\ngather: 'du ba.\ngelong: dge slong\ngenuine: yang dag\nexaggeration: sgro 'dogs\ngood and evil: bzang ngan\ngotra: rigs\ngrasper & grasped: gzung 'dzin\ngrasper/grasping [subject]: 'dzin pa\ngreat full ocean: gang chen mtsho\ngreat perfection: rdzogs pa chen po\nground: gzhi\ngroundless: gzhi med\nguard samaya: dam tshig srung ba\nGuru Rinpoche: Second Buddha of Uddiyana = Padmasambhava\nguru: bla ma\nheart-[essence]: snying po\nhigher perceptions: mngon shes\nhigher realms: mtho ris\nhighest yoga: shin tu rnal 'byor\nhinayana: theg dman\nhungry ghosts: yi dwags\nignorance: ma rig pa\nImmense ocean: gang chen tsho: AKA rnam snang\nincidental: glo bur\nincluded: 'du ba, 'dril ba, 'ub chub\nindividual insight: so so rang rig\nindividuating characteristics: rang mtshan\nIndra: brgya byin\ninsight: rig pa\ninstantly: skad gcig par, cig car\nintellect: yid [special cases]\nintellect-consciousness: yid kyi rnam shes\nintention: dgongs pa\ninterdependent arising: rten 'brel 'byung ba\nintrinsic-: rang-, rang bzhin gyis-\nIshvara: \"the Lord,\"a Hindu creator god.\njets|n: rje btsun\njewel: in context of three jewels dkon mchog\njqana: ye shes\njqanasattva: ye shes sems dpa'\nkagy|: bka' brgyud\nkalpa: bskal pa\nkama: desire\nkarma: las\nkaya: sku\nkhen[po]: Buddhist scholar\nkinnara: mi'am ci\nklesha: nyon mongs\nknowledge: shes pa\nkriya: kri ya, bya rgyud\nliberation: grol ba\nlimit: rgya chad\nlimitless as the sky: mkha' mnyam\nloka: sems can rigs drug\nlokayata: rgyang phan\nLongchenpa: klong chen [rab 'byams] pa\nLongdi: klong sde\nLord of death: shin rje\nlord: mgon pa, bdag po, mnga dbang, rje\nlower realms: ngan 'gro\nluminosity: ['od] gsal\nluminous appearances of what does not exist: med pa gsal snang.\nluminous: ['od] gsal\nmadhamaka: dbu ma\nmadhyamaka\nmadhyamaka: dbu ma\nmagic wand: sgrib shing\nmahamudra: phyag rgya chen po\nmahasandhi: rdzogs pa chen po\nmahasattva: sems dpa' chen po\nmahasukha: bde ba chen\nmahasukhakaya: bde ba chen po'i sku\nmahatma: bdag pa chen po\nmahayana: theg chen\nMaheshvara: dbang po chen po\nmaintain: skyong\nMaitreya: byams pa\nmajor and minor marks: mtshan dpe\nMajor and minor marks of a buddha: mtshan dang dpe byad\nmandala: dkyil 'khor\nmanifest: mngon gsum\nManjushri: a'jam dpal\nmantra: sngags\nmantrayana: sngags kyi theg pa\nMaqjushri\nmara: bdud\nmarks: mtshan\nmeasure: tshad\nmeditation: bsgom pa, mnyam bshag, bsam gtan\nmemory: dran pa\nprasangika: thal a'gyur: see text\nmental contents: sems las 'byung ba\nmiddle: bar\nmind: sems, yid\nMind: [itself][-nature of] sems nyid\nmind-only: sems tsam\nmindfulness dran pa\nMipham: mi pham\nmiracle: cho 'phrul\nMount Meru: ri rgyal rab\nmudra: phyag rgya\nMuni: thub pa\nnada: na da\nnadi: rtsa\nnadis, three: rtsa gsum\nnaga: klu\nnatural state: gnas lugs, rnal ma\nnatural: rang byung, rang bzhin gyis etc.\nnature: rang bzhin, gzhis\nnegation: dgag\nneither established nor cleared away: sgrub bsal med\nnet: rgya, dra ba\nneutral: lung ma bstan\nnihilism: chad [lta]\nnine yanas: theg pa dgu\nnirmanakaya: sprul sku\nNirvana: mya ngan las 'das pa, zhi\nnoble ones: 'phags pa\nnon-dual: gnyis med\nnon-men: mi ma yin\nnon-obstruction: 'gags med: zang ka\nnon-thought: mi rtog pa\nnot adding and subtracting (taking away): 'du bral med\nNyingma: rnying ma\nKagyu: bka'a brgyud\nGelugpa: dge lugs pa\nnyingthig: snying thig\nobject, kaya: yul sku: the object of enlightened perception is the kayas, having the essence emptiness and the nature of luminosity.\nobject: yul\nobscuration: sgrib\noffering substance: rdzas\nomniscience: kun mkhyen, thams cad mkhyen pa['i ye shes]\none taste: ro gcig\none's own insight: rang gi rig pa\none's own seat: rang mal\nopposite: ltos\noral instructions: man ngag:\nornament: rgyan\noverturned: ru log\npandit: scholar\nparamita: pha rol tu phyin pa\nparatantra: gzhan dbang\nparikalpita: kun btags\nparinishpanna: yongs grub\npartiality: phyogs\nparticularizing characteristics: rang mtshan\npass the pass: la bzla ba\npath of splendor of vivid rainbow colors: khra lam lam\npath: lam\nperceiver, wisdom: yul can ye shes\nperception: dmigs pa\nperfect: rdzogs\nperfecting stage: rdzogs rim\nperfect[ing] yoga: yongs su rnal 'byor\npervasion, backward pervasion.\nphenomena: rnam pa\nphenomenal world: snang srid\npith: gnad\nplay: rol\npost-meditation: rjes thob\npower: rtsal\npowers [of mind]: dbang po\nprajqa: shes rab\nprajqaparamita: shes rab pha rol tu phyin pa\npramana: tshad ma\nprana: rlung\nprasangika: thal 'gyur pa\npratyekabuddha: rang rgyal\npreta: yi dwags\nprimordial purity of wakefulness: ye sangs\nprimordial space: gdod ma'i dbyings\nprimordial: gdod nas, thog nas, ye\nprojection: [rang] snang, kun btags, rang gzugs\nprovisional meaning: drang don\npuja: mchod pa, cho ga\npure appearance: dag snang\npure bhuumis: dag pa sa\npurified: dag, sangs, sbyangs\nqualities: mtshan, mtshon\nrakshasas: srin po\nreal: don du, dgnos\nrealization: rtogs pa, dgongs pa\nrecognize: ngos bzung\nreference point: gtad [so]\nrelative truth: kun rdzob bden pa\nrelative: kun rdzob\nrenunciation and realization: spangs rtogs.\nresolve: gtan la 'bebs pa\nrich display: 'byor ba'i bkod\nrigdzin: (enlightened)awareness holder\nroyal treasures, 7: rin chen sna bdun\nrupakaya: gzugs sku\npure appearance: dag snang\nsadhana: sgrub thabs, cho ga\nSage: thub pa, the Buddha\nSaha: This world called the realm of endurance.\nSakyong: sa skyong: earth preotecting (king)\nsamadhi: ting nge 'dzin,\nSamantabhadra [i]: kun tu bzang po [mo]\nsamapatti: snyoms 'jug\nsamaya: dam tshig\nsamayasattva: dam tshig sems dpa'\nsambhogakaya: longs [spyod rdzogs pa'i] sku\nsampannakrama: rdzogs rim\nSamsara: 'khor ba: srid pa\nSangha: dge 'dun\nSaraha: Sa ra ha\nSarasvati: consort of Shiva\nsattva: sems dp'a\nsautrantika school: mdo sde pa\nsautrantika: mdo sde pa\nsealing: rgyas thebs: phyag rgya\nSecond Buddha of Uddiyana: Padmasambhava = Guru Rinpoche\nSelf existing equanimity: lhun [grub] mnyam [pa nyid]\nself-existing: lhun grub, rang gnas\nself-insight: rang rig\nself-liberation: rang grol\nself-luminosity: rang gsal:\nself-nature: rang ngo\nself-subsiding: rang yal\nSemdi: sems sde\nseparation of clearing away: dbye bsal\nseven fold service: prostration, offering, confession, rejoicing, requesting to teach, asking the teacher to remain, dedicating the merit.\nseventeen tantras: man ngag sde rgyud bcu bdun.\nShakyamuni: sha kya'i thub pa\nShamatha: gzhi gnas\nShastra: bstan bcos\nshentong: gzhan stong\nShiva: drag po, dbang po\nshloka: sho lo ka\nshravaka: nyan thos\nshunyata: stong nyid\nsiddhi: dgnos grub\nsign: rtags: tshad\nsimple: spros bral\nsimplicity: spros bral\nsingle dot: nyag gcig\nsix ayatanas: ske mched drug\nsix higher perceptions: see mngon shes\nsix lokas: rigs drug\nsix perfections/ paramitas: pha rol tu phyin pa drug\nsix realms of beings: rigs drug\nsix senses: tshogs drug, dbang drug\nskandhas: phung po\nsky: nam mkha'\nsolid: dgnos\nspace of the dhatu: dbyings\nspace: dbyings, go, [nam] mkha', bar snang\nSpace: [Spaciousness] klong\nspheres of activity: spyod yul\nspheres of apprehension: spyod yul\nspontaneous: lhun grub\nstage: rim pa\nsthavira: = elders. The original hinayana Buddhist monastic style Sugata\nstraying: gol [sa]\nSubhuti: rab 'byor\nsubject: yul can\nsubstance: rdzas\nsubtle: phra ba\nsubtlest: shin tu phra ba\nsuchness: [de][ji] bzhin nyid\nsugata: bde gshegs pa\nsugatagarbha: bde [bar] gshegs [pa'i] snying po\nsuitable establishing, and nature\nsupport and supported: rten dang brten pa\nSurya: the Hindu sun god.\nsutra: A discourse of the Buddha in the mahayana\nsutra: mdo\nsvatantrika: rang rgyud\nsvatantrika: rang rgyud: see text\ntaking and leaving: btang bshag\ntaming: 'dul ba\ntantra: A discourse of the Buddha in the vajrayana\ntantra: rgyud\nTara: taa ra, sgrol ma\ntathagata: de bzhin shegs pa\nten bhuumis: sa bcu\nten dharmic activities: chos spyod bcu\nten directions: phyogs bcu\nthe 5 pranas: rlung lnga\nthe dhatu: khams: = dharmadhatu\nthe four abhishekas/ empowerments: dbang bzhi\nthe four reasonings: those of dependence, productive action, three jewels\nthe Nature: ngo bo\nthing: dgnos po\nthings as they are: gnas lugs [tshul]\nthree gates: sgo gsum\nthree jewels: dkon mchog gsum\nthree kinds of suffering: sdug bsngal gsum\nthree mandalas: dkyil 'khor gsum\nthree modes: presence of the reason in the subject, forward three natures\nthree natures: rang bzhin gsum\nthree poisons/kleshas: dug gsum\nthree pramanas: scripture, perception, and inference\nthree purities: dag pa gsum\nthree samadhis: ting nge 'dzin gsum\nthree times: dus gsum\nthree worlds [realms]: srid gsum, khams gsum\nThree levels: sa gsum\ntirthika: mu stegs: Hindu, extremist.\ntonglen: gtong len\ntraining on the bhuumis: sa sbyang\ntransmission: ngo sprod\ntransparent: zang thal\ntrikaya: sku gsum\ntrue meaning: nges don\ntummo: gtum mo\nturning the wheel of dharma: chos kyi 'khor lo 'khor.\ntwelve ayatanas: skye mched bcu gnyis\ntwelve divisions of the Buddha's sutra teachings: bstan pa'i dbye ba bcu gnyis\ntwelve links of interdependent origination: see ch. 8 rten a'brel\ntwo acumulations: tshogs gnyis: accumulation of merit and wisdom.\ntwo benefits: don gnyis\ntwo bodhicittas: byang chub sems gnyi\ntwo cessations: 'gogs pa gnyis\ntwo kayas: sku gnyis: dharmakaya and rupakaya, chos sku and gzugs sku.\ntwo obscurations: kleshas and knowables.\ntwofold purity: dag pa gnyis\nultimate point: 'gag bsdam\nunborn: skye ba med\nuncompounded: 'du ma byas\nuniversal: [rab] 'byams\nunmixed: ma 'dres\nunobstructed: 'gag med, thogs med, zang ka\nupa/ charya: u pa, spyod rgyud\nupaya: thabs\nupayayoga: = upa\nutpattikrama: bskyed rim\nvaibhashika: bye brag pa\nvajra holder: rdo rje 'dzin pa\nvajra master: rdo rje slob dpon\nvajra: rdo rje\nVajradhara: rdo rje chang\nvajradhatu: rdo rje dbyings\nvajrakaya: rdo rje sku\nVajrapani: lag na rdo rje\nVajrasattva: rdo rje sems dpa'\nvajrayana: rdo rje theg pa\nvasana: bag chags\nvase of coronation: spyi blugs\nvast: yangs\nvessel and essence: snod bcud\nVictorious One: rgyal ba\nvidya mantra: rigs snang\nvidyadhara: knowledge holder\nvidyadhara: rig 'dzin\nvinaya: 'dul ba\nvipashyana: lhag mthong\nvirtues: yon tan\nVishnu: khyab 'jug\nvision: dgongs pa\nvisualize: bskyed\nvividness: sal le ba\nwisdom of equality: mnyam nyid ye shes\nwisdom of extent: ji snyed pa'i ye shes\nwisdom of nature: ji lta ba'i ye shes\nwisdom: ye shes\nwish-fulfilling gem: yid bzhin nor bu\nwithout support: rten med\nwithout transition and change: pho 'gyur med.\ntwo truths: bden gnyis\nyana: theg pa\nyanas of cause and characteristics: rgyu mtshan theg pa\nye: primordial There is no creation or creator in Buddhism. The nature is beginningless and eternal, much as God is described.\nyidam: yi dam\nyoga tantra: yo ga: rnal 'byor [rgyud]\nyogachara: sems tsam, rnal 'byor spyod\nTibetan glossary\n'phags pa nor bdun, faith discipline, generosity, learning, decency, modesty, prajna.\n'bras bu: Effect, result, fruition (the kayas and wisdoms etc.) -lam du byed pa: Making the fruition one's path. -theg: The last three of the nine yanas in which the fruition itself becomes the working basis. Vs. rgyu mtshan theg pa in which the result is produced causally by purification, practice, etc.\n'bud: See bud.\n'byed pa med pa: Without distinction, of dualistic conceptions etc. -thugs rje, impartial, distinctionless compassion. It is there for all beings equally, regardless of their state of virtue, understanding etc, as rain falls on the just and unjust alike.\n'byor ba'i bkod: Rich display.\n'byung ba lnga: sa, chu, rlung, me, nam mkha'; earth, water, air, fire, and space. In their coarse form as substantial existents, they are obstacles to enlightenment. In their subtle form, they are phenomenal principles that respond to the will of the yogin. Thus they are known as the consorts of the five bhagavans. In their subtlest form, they are not different from insight-bodhicitta itself.\n'dre ba: mix. Eg. things are seen clearly without being mixed up in ji snyed ye shes, qv.\n'du ba: 1 Gather, assemble, accumulate, collect, join, meet. (active sense). 2 Be united or included (of changeless entities). 3 To embody (of deities etc).\n'du bral med: Without gathering or separation, without adding or taking away.\n'du byed: the fourth skandha, formations, habitual tendencies, karmic formations.\n'du ma byas: Uncompounded, unconditioned. Not produced by combining dharmas through cause and effect.\n'du shes: Perception, [conception] discernment, ideation, inclination, the third skandha.\n'dul ba: the teachings of monastic discipline, such as the 250 rules for monks and 350 for nuns. One of the 3 pitakas or baskets of the teachings, sde gsum. Vinaya, [monastic] discipline, conversion, cultivation, taming. 'dul byed, is the tamer or teacher and 'dul bya, the tamed or disciple.\n'dus pa: See 'du ba.\n'dzin: See gzung 'dzin.\n'gag med: 1 Unobstructed, unlimited by or free from..., able to manifest. 2 Unceasing.\n'gag: 1 Pith, crucial or principle point. Cf. gnad. 2 To cease.\n'gogs pa gnyis of discriminating awareness 1 without complexity resting in natureless meaning in which defilements are like the sky.\n'gro ba: 1 Sentient being = sems can. 2 Animal. 3 To go.\n'gro ba'i lam: Path of one's travels, path of beings.\n'gyu ba: movement, moving thoughts, discursive [vibration], thinking. Has the connotation of unsteady flickering like lightning, tongues of flame, or reflections on water. All distracting mental activities including perceptions, feelings, and the undercurrent of subconscious gossip are included. 'phro: Flickering emanations of the moving, more or less equal to, rnam rtog, discursive thoughts; erratic, mental activity.\n'jam dpal: Maqjushri bodhisattva of knowledge.\n'jog pa: 1 Put, place. 2 Leave, abandon. 3 Postulate, assert. 4 Classify, pigeonhole. 5 Rest the mind in meditation.\n'khor ba: Sa.msara; confused, cyclic, transmigratory existence; to whirl or spin; rotate.\n'khrul pa: Confusion, deception, mistake, frenzy, madness, bewilderment.\n'od gsal: Luminosity, luminous clarity. The glory of the vision of the pure bhuumis from the eighth upward, in which the two obscurations are removed. non-objectivized manifestation within the great emptiness. Its full blown form is the buddhas' vision of things as they are, corresponding to ji snyed ye shes or kun mkhyen ye shes. All schools of the mahayana accept its existence. Therefore, it is a mistake to understand emptiness in a way that excludes such vision.\n'od: Light, radiance.\n'og min: Akanishtha, = gandavyuha, the highest realm, pure land, or buddha field, that of the vision of enlightenment. It is on the level of sambhogakaya, and said to be inhabited by mahasattvas, (who alone can apprehend it.) It was at first the name for the highest of the realms of the gods.\n'phags pa bden bzhi: Four noble truths. 1 All is suffering, sdug bsngal. 2 The origin, kun 'byung, of suffering, ego grasping etc. 3 'gag pa, Cessation of suffering. 4 The path, lam, leading to the end of suffering.\n'phags pa nor bdun, faith discipline, generosity, learning, decency, modesty, prajna.\n'phags pa: Arya: Changeless, without transition or change. Cf. pho ba, the yoga of transference of consciousness.\na nu: Anu yoga, the eighth yana. See theg pa dgu.\na ti: Ati yoga, the great perfection, the ninth yana. See theg pa dgu.\na'dod pa lnga: desirable qualities of the 5 senses.\na'jigs chen bzhi: old age, illness, death, deterioration.\na'khor lo bsgyur ba'i rgyal po. Universal monarch, especially Dharma kings.\nbag chags: vasanas Habitual tendency or pattern, karmic propensity or seed. In yogacara philosophy karma is stored as bag chags, in kun gzhi, alaya, a formless and neutral basic consciousness. These mature into such manifestations as being born in a physical body, having particular mental propensities or character, seeing the world in terms of sa.msaric confusion, experiencing the karmic result of previous good and evil deeds, etc.\nbar do: Intermediate state in cyclical existence, especially those experienced between death and rebirth, according to texts like the bar do thos grol, the Tibetan Book of the Dead. These are the 'chi ka'i bardo, the bardo of the moment of death, where the radiance of dharmata is experienced; the chos nyid bar do, bardo of dharmata, where visions of peaceful and wrathful wisdom-deities etc. are experienced; and the srid pa bar do, the bardo of becoming or rebirth.\nbar snang: Space. (The literal words could mean appearance in the middle but seldom do.)\nbar: The middle, middle way between opposites, eg. inner mind and external appearance. It may become an object of fixation, and it is said that the wise do not dwell in the middle either.\nbcom ldan 'das lnga: the five bhagavans, peaceful deities or sambhogakaya buddhas, Ak.shobhya, Ratnasambhava, Amitabha, Amoghasiddhi, Vairochana. They are said to appear in the visions of the chos nyid bardo, and also figure in many tantric visualization practices. They represent the enlightened forms of the five skandhas, form, feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness and five kleshas anger, pride, desire, jealousy, and ignoring. They manifest as the five wisdoms, mirror-like, equality, discriminating, all-accomplishing, and dharmadhatu wisdoms. Locana, Mamaki, Pandaravasini, Tara, and Akashadhatvishvari are their consorts, representing the pure form of water, earth, fire, air, and space.\nbcom ldan 'das: bhagava[n][t], blessed one, the Buddha.\nbcos ma (n) pa (v): Fabricated, artificial, created, cranked up, created purposely, fake, unnatural, pretended.\nbdag pa chen po: great being\nbdag: Self, ego, atman (false and delusive) master, sovereign. -nyid = bdag or sometimes = essence, ngo bo or similar words. - pa chen po : great being, mahatma, universal mind of enlightenment or buddhahood, as symbolized by Samantabhadra etc. By becoming enlightened one attains this. There is no conflict with emptiness. This self is empty in essence like any other.\nbde ba chen [po'i sku]: Mahasukha[kaya], the body of great bliss, referring to the intrinsic and inseparable bliss of enlightenment, bde ba, which is closer to well-being and equanimity than physical pleasure.\nbde bar gshegs pa: Sugata, epithet of buddha, the blissfully gone one, due to experience of mahasukha.\nbde gshegs snying po: Sugatagarbha, sugata essence, buddha nature, the ultimate, changeless reality from which temporary phenomena arise and to which they return. v. Uttaratantra etc. Because of its existence as our real nature we are of the \"enlightened family\" and can attain enlightenment. Sometimes sugatagarrbha refers to that potential or Buddha nature.\nbden gnyis: the relative and absolute, kun rdzob and don dam: The two truths are usually said to be emptiness and appearance, in the third turning they are also presented as appearances being or not being like things as they are.\nbdud rtsi: amrita. The intoxicating nectar of the gods, which conveys long life, bliss, and spiritual accomplishment. The literal words mean \"devil juice.\"\nbkod pa, (n or v): Arrange[ment], display, order, setup, array.\nbdud: Mara, demonic or obstructing forces, either personified or seen as psychological or karmic propensities. Mara is the king of such demons or forces, as the Devil is in the west. There are many divisions (see text), especially the four maras: The klesha and skandha maras (personifications of those); mrityu mara, personifying death, rigidity, darkness, depression and such life-destroying forces; and the deva putra (son of deity) mara concerned with the seductions of pleasure, power, and various ego-building experiences.\nbla ma: guru. Teacher who embodies, displays, and transmits the sacred reality of enlightenment, also teaching the path by which it may be obtained and so forth. In tantric teachings like ati it is generally held that even though enlightenment is our true nature, it would be extremely difficult to realize this without the guru. Therefore great respect is in order for those rare persons who can properly perform this function. At the same time one must transcend devotional conceptions about the guru as separate to attain realization. Over-conceptualized devotion can actually be a hinderance.\nblang 'dor: Accepting and rejecting, receiving and abandoning, taking and discarding.\nblo: (Conceptual) mind, intellect, cognition, awareness, plan; -zangs, good intelligence -'das, beyond conceptual or sa.msaric mind, beyond thought or intellect.\nbram ze: brahman, hindu priestly caste.\nbrgya byin: king of the 33 gods in Hinduism\nbrtag pa: Vitarka. Investigate, inquire, examine; -s: Pf. of rtog: Think conceptualize. Applied and focused thought approaching and determining the nature of its object. Cf. dpyod pa.\nbrtags pa gnyis pa: Condensed text from the cycle of the Hevajra Tantra.\nbsam gtan bzhi: the dhyana \"trances\" have five factors concets, analysis/scruitiny, joy, well-being and equanimity [rtog pa, dpyod pa, dga'a ba, bde ba, btang snyoms). Accounts vary. In each successive dhyana one drops out until the 4th has equanimity alone. These states also correspond to heaven realms where the gods have correspondiong realizations. See Ch. 4.\nbsam gtan: Dhyana, state of meditation. In particular, the nine dhyanas, four with form and five formless concentrations. See snyom 'jug.\nbsgom pa: Meditate, action of meditation. See text for divisions. V. shamatha, vipashyana.\nbshugs: That which has been entered into and within which one dwells. What presents itself. To consist of, constitute.\nbskal pa: In Hindu-Buddhist cosmology a great kalpa consists of 4 to 80 (depending on the source) small kalpas of about eight million years. During this period the world evolves, develops, deteriorates and finally is completely destroyed in fire. It is said we live in a sub-period called the good kalpa because many buddhas appear in it.\nbskyang: p. of skyong: Protect, guard, maintain, preserve, care for, nurture, govern, enjoy. Dharma protector deities are chos skyong.\nbskyed rim: Developing stage. One performs various liturgies involving visualization of deities, making praises and offerings to them, reciting their essence mantras, and so forth. The deities are more aspects of enlightened mind than disembodied, personal entities external to and more powerful than oneself. But they are sometimes experienced as personlike beings. Eventually one hopes to see the phenomenal world as embodying various aspects of the pure environment and inhabitants of the mandalas of deities.\nbskyed: Generate, cultivate, create, produce, visualize, develop.\nbsod nams bsngo: all good deeds including practice accumulate merit or good karma. When ego thinks it owns good karma it is easily defiled, so it is best to give or deicate it to beings and the path.\nbstan pa'i dbye ba bcu gnyis: General/sutras, verse summaries, prophecies, verse teachings, exhortations, biographical tales, narratives of former examples, conditional eclarations, extensive teachings, narrativges of former births, resolutions, narratives of miracles.\nbtang bshag med: Without taking or leaving: Intransitive or participle of 'bud, revealed, occurred. It just happens. bud pa, dispense with. 'bud, transitive: strip, lay bare, reveal, set free, expel, slander, blow (conch, on fire etc.), endeavor.\nbya ba grub pa'i ye shes: All-accomplishing wisdom, the karma family wisdom. The speed, struggle, and poverty mentality of jealousy is transmuted by realization that real achievement is effortless and self-existing. As with Vajrakilaya (indestructible dagger) practice, the power of realization cuts through the confusion of obstacles.\nbya rgyud: Kriya tantra. See theg pa dgu.\nbyams pa: the next buddha, Maitreya, now residing in the Tushita Heaven.\nbyang chub lnga: The five manifestations of enlightenment are 1 Sitting on a sun and moon seat. 2 One's body completely manifests the body of the deity. 3 One's speech manifests the seed syllables. 4 Mind manifests the attributes of the deity's scepter, eg. Vajrayogini's trident and skull cup. 5 Jqanasattvas descend.\nbyang chub sems dpa': Bodhisattva. One who has reached at least the path of seeing of the five paths, but not yet attained complete buddhahood. With the buddhas they are called noble ones or aryas, 'phags pa. There are usually said to be ten levels or bhuumis of the bodhisattva path, on each of which a certain perfection or paramita is emphasized, though up to fifteen are sometimes mentioned. -theg pa: The bodhisattvayana practices the paramitas in the context of the understanding, and later the vision, of emptiness. see theg pa dgu.\nbyang chub sems gnyis: aspiring and entering smon 'jug.\nbyang chub sems: Bodhicitta, enlightened mind. In the mahayana there are the bodhicitta of aspiring to enlightenment, and that of actually entering into it. There are relative bodhicitta, concerned with compassion and the details of practicing the paramitas etc. and absolute bodhicitta, the ultimate nature of things. Bodhicitta is presented in ati as the absolute mind of enlightenment. It is more or less equivalent to rig pa, insight, and sugatagarbha, when they are used to refer to the fruition.\nbyang chub: Bodhi, enlightenment. byang: purified of obscurations and chub = perfected in enlightenment.\nbye brag pa: Either the vaishe.shikas among the six hindu schools, or the vaibha.shikas among the shravaka schools. The eighteen schools more or less followed these tenets. Stcherbatsky's The Central Conception of Buddhism is one of many sources. They define the relative as the composite, and hold that the absolute is physical atoms and the momentary dharmas of mind. They also hold that these absolutes are linked by various truly existing causes and conditions. They hold that the three times, space, etc. are established as substances. They hold that partless atoms aggregate into gross objects, and that partless moments of consciousness directly perceive their objects. They hold that effects in some sense pre-exist in their causes\nbying rgod: Drowsiness and wildness, sinking into dullness and the arising of uncontrollable discursiveness, as obstacles experienced in meditation. They are said to be defenses of ego against fundamental space in which it does not exist.\nbyis pa: 1 Immature persons, children. 2 Disparaging: childish fools.\nbyung po: Ghost, generic name for 'dre, gdon (dvns) and bgegs (geks) etc. Demon, evil spirit, esp. of the preta realm of the six lokas.\ncha med: Nothing whatsoever, partless, without aspects.\ncha phra: Infinitesimal, subtle [parts].\nchad lta: Nihilistic view. Those who hold that nothing truly exists or who are skeptics holding that we cannot know what exists are nihilists. But this fault is most often ascribed to those who hold that there is no moral order of karmic cause and effect, so that the various good and bad events in the world arise only by chance. Thus many scientists would be nihilists from the buddhist viewpoint.\ncho 'phrul: Magical display, apparition, illusion, trick, creation, power, miracle, magical attack.\ncho ga rnam pa lnga: The five aspects of sadhana: Visualization, recitation, offering, praise, and blessing.\nchos can: That which possesses the various qualities of individual dharmas as opposed to the single nature of dharmas, emptiness, dharmata. The subject of a logical reasoning. Sometimes the phenomenal in general.\nchos dbyings: Dharmadhatu. Space, source, or realm of phenomena. Absolute reality, the Dharma = enlightened mind, bodhicitta etc.. In the eighteen dhatus of hinayana, as presented by the Abhidharmakosha, dharmadhatu is the object, vi.shaya, yul, of the mental sense. In this sense there are as many dharmadhatus as there are sentient beings.\nchos kyi 'khor lo 'khor: The three turnings of the wheel of Dharma. The first was at the deer park in Varanasi with hinayana teachings of truly existing dharmas, the four noble truths, and eightfold path; the second at the vulture peak taught emptiness of true existence; the third in the indefinite realms taught the changeless, eternal, ultimate nature, absolute bodhicitta or sugatagarbha.\nchos nyid: Used in the Abhidharmakosha etc to mean absolute reality or realities, the real nature of something. It is sometimes used in this text in such a sense. The Tibetan schools all accept emptiness as the absolute reality, so the terms are more or less synonymous. In ati this is the great emptiness beyond emptiness and non-emptiness, things as they are beyond concept, their ultimate being or nature.\nchos sku: Dharmakaya. See sku gsum.\nchos skyongs: Dharma protector, dharmapalas, various generally wrathful deities, who protect the teachings, attack those who pervert them for reasons of ego etc. In general when basic sanity begins to slip, the phenomenal world gives gentle messages, like you can't find your car keys. If that fails, you might drive your car into a tree. That is called a manifestation of the protectors. Mahakala, Vaitali, Ekajati etc, are examples.\nchos: 1 dharma, phenomenon, thing, existent, ultimate constituent of existence, that which is suitable to be known by the mind, mental object. 2 Dharma (capitalized): The Buddhadharma, the teachings of buddhism. 3 Religion in general. 4 quality, property. 5 Right, duty, moral law. 6 Scripture or doctrine. 7 Truth, order, law. 8 Principle, topic. 9 Meaning, value. 10 In ati the vision of realization is the end of the buddhadharma, and this is called \"the Dharma.\" If the guru transmits this vision to someone, it is called \"giving the Dharma.\"\ndag pa gnyis: rang bzhin dag, glo bur dag. Purity of nature and purity of pure experience from the incidental. The two purities result from removing the veils of conflicting emotions, the kleshas, and of primitive beliefs about reality that obscure omniscient wisdom.\ndag pa gsum: There are various lists of three purities. In the bodhisattva path there is threefold purity (=emptiness) of actor, action, and object. In mahayoga there are purity of the outer world, inner contents, and the continuity of the mind stream snod, bcud, rgyud. The list referred to in the text, during a discussion of kriya is probably this: 1 lha dag dkyil 'khor, the mandala of the pure deity 2 rdzas dang longs spyod dag, pure substance = longs spyod, enjoyment or abundance 3 sangs rgyas don dag ting nge 'dzin the samadhi of the pure meaning of buddhahood. [ES lists sngags dang ting nge 'dzin, purity of mantra and samadhi for 3] It is worth noting that ES's source specifically refers to kriya and ours is more a mahayoga feast commentary.\ndag pa'i sa: The three pure bodhisattva bhuumis, the eighth, ninth, and tenth. They are so called because only on these levels do luminosity, pure appearance, wisdom, the ornament, gandavyuuha, Akani.shtha, etc. manifest. Bodhisattvas of these levels are to some extent like the buddhas in seeing things as they are. Those on a lower level have direct cognition of emptiness in meditation. But they have not yet removed the obscurations of primitive beliefs about reality that veil pure appearance.\ndag snang: Pure appearance, sacred outlook (VCTR, who wanted to that here everything appears has a sense of overwhelming sacred value). Enlightened vision of the relative = luminosity possessing the two purities etc. Ultimately = the kayas and wisdoms.\ndam bca': Thesis, promise, oath, claim, idea. \"Dam\" here = firm, stable.\ndam tshig srung ba: To keep, guard, or maintain samaya. It is sometimes said that this is almost impossible for someone who is not enlightened. For buddhas it is self-existing and effortless.\ndbang bzhi vase (5 buddha families, water, crown, vajra, bell, and name), secret (inner feelings and phenomena are the mandala), prajnajnana (bliss of union), suchness (the nature).\ndbang drug: The six indriyas, or sense organs, the six senses, the five usual senses plus the mental sense; ES: six tantric empowerments of yoga, but he does not list them.\ndbang lgna: 1 The five senses. 2 The five powers: faith, perserverence, mindfulness, samadhi, and prajqa.\ndbang po chen po\"the great Lord,\"a Hindu creator god.\ndbang po: Hindu god, of the three Bhrama, Vishnu, and Shiva he is associated with destruction and ascetic yoga, and with the dance of existence. He is also much associated with Hindu tantra.\ndbang: 1 Empowerment (= dbang bskur, abhi.sheka) Typically a ceremony introducing students the ritual and mandala of a particular deity. One can also be empowered as a teacher or with a certain state of being. 2 Power. 3 Senses or their faculties (= dbang po, usually as conditioned experiences to be transcended. 4 Mental acuity or capacity. 5 Ruler.\ndbu ma: 1 The middle way. 2 The central channel visualized in tantric yoga. 3 The madhyamaka philosophy of emptiness established by Nagarjuna. Nagarjuna claimed to establish logically the teachings of the prajqaparamita suutras that absolute reality is empty of true existence of what conventional concepts impute to it, of any real nature and so forth. Interdependent arising of all conventional things is one way of establishing this. The prasangika school dbu ma thal 'gyur, emphasizes that reality transcends concepts, even that of emptiness. Therefore, insofar as possible, it makes no attempt to establish doctrines of its own, but limits itself to showing the inadequacies in the doctrines of others. Ati is highly influenced by the prasangika viewpoint, which it presupposes. Reasoned arguments do not appear in this text, because they have been resolved previously. Therefore, one who wishes to study ati should first have personally resolved the meaning of emptiness as presented by madhyamaka. Then it is possible to go on to realize how emptiness manifests in experience as non-dual emptiness/luminosity.\nAti to some degree also accepts the notion of svatantrika madhyamaka: without distinction, division, classification, or exclusion.\ndbyings kyi snying po: Garbha of space = sugatagarbha. Sometimes = dharmadhatu, sometimes the seed, potentiality, or \"genes\" of dharmadhatu, which makes it possible for sentient beings to attain it, as in the Uttaratantra.\ndbyings las mi g.yo: Not departing from space, going beyond it in the sense of becoming something with a truly existent different nature, not of one taste with it, non-empty, something dual in relation to insight.\ndbyings: Field, dhatu, realms, [basic] space, expanse, totality continuum, source. dbyings su, can mean spontaneously. dbyings su dag, can mean spontaneous or fundamental purity. Basic nature, eg. wetness can be called the dbyings of water.\nde bzhin gshegs pa['i snying po]: Tathagata [garbha] [womb of the] thus-gone. tathagata = buddha qua one who courses in suchness = emptiness = things as they are. Tathagatagarbha: the buddha nature or essence. It is like sugatagarbha except the emphasis is on the emptiness rather than the bliss aspect. Sometimes it refers to the buddha nature as potential for enlightenment in all beings, as opposed to full blown enlightenment. Sometimes it means realization of absolute truth = absolute bodhicitta etc.\nde bzhin nyid: Suchness, emptiness, things as they are = chos nyid.\nded dpon: Guide. Literally it means a ship captain, as a metaphor of one who can guide people safely on a long journey.\ndgag sgrub: Assert or deny; prove or refute in the verbal sphere; hinder or establish in the experiential sphere.\ndge a'dun: followers of the Buddha's teachings.\ndgnos grub: The relative thun mong or kun rdzob, siddhis are accomplishments such as the six higher perceptions, mgnon shes. Absolute siddhi, thun mong ma yin or don dam) = enlightenment.\ndgnos po: Thing, conceptualized as something solid and real with a fixed, independent essence. That which has the power to produce an effect, don byed nus pa, is a thing. What does not, like space, is a non-thing. cf. dgnos su, in reality.\ndgnos [por] 'dzin: To recognize, either things as they are or in terms of some conceptual reference point falsely fixated as invariant and objective; to grasp as solid or as things having fixated characteristics of essence and effect-producing power. The experiential quality of the world so grasped.\ndgongs pa: Literally intended meaning, and thence by extension vision or realization. KPSR.\ndkon mchog bzhi: Buddha Dharma, Sangha, and guru.\ndkyil 'khor gsum: body, speech, and mind.\ndkyil 'khor: Mandala. Literally, center and border. The mandala of a deity has that deity with customary accoutrements at the center. Around the central deity are the retinue and attendants of the four families other than that of the deity. Around that are the palace, vajra fence, charnel grounds, and other environmental symbols. Altogether they symbolize in detail the particular modes of being, action, and awareness symbolized by the particular deity. Mandala is also used to mean the experience of body, speech, and mind of primordial buddhahood. Such a mandala is not an artificial creation, but a self-existing display for whoever reaches this level. This display of the mandala of the king of dharmata is not chaotic, but is experientially as organized as the experience of a real king's court. By extension almost any perspective or arrangement can be called a mandala.\ndmigs pa: Conception, image, object-focus, perceived object, visualization. -med: without any of the above, inconceivable, inexperiencable, unimaginable. -rkyen object condition of perception. -med pa'i snying rje: objectless (impartial, egoless) compassion.\ndngos grub thun mong brgyad: magic pills, eye medicine, sword, going in space, invisibility, deathlessness, conquersing sickness.\ndon byed nus pa: Ability to perform a function or produce a result. The defining characteristic of things.\ndon dam: True, real, absolute, ultimate. rnam grangs- the conceptually describable absolute vs. rnam grangs min pa'i -, which cannot be described but only experienced.\ndon gnyis: rang don and gzhan don, benefit for self and other.\ndon grub: Attainment, accomplishment, success. = Siddhartha. KSTR.\ndon: 1 Meaning, sense, significance. 2 Object, thing. 3 Fact. 4 True, real, ultimate. 5 Topic, subject. 6 Purpose, benefit. 7 Result. 8 Nature. 9 Message.\ndpyod pa: Vichara. Sustained analytical thought on objects determined by vitarka, usually with the intent of resolving them in terms of practical judgement. Subconscious gossip on sense impressions, an ongoing indistinct murmur of conceptuality (manojalpa) underlying our experience. Vitarka searches to match sense experiences to conceptual reference points. Vicara attempts to fix them there definitively. Thus, one might use them to decide respectively that sa.msaric objects are impermanent and empty, and should not be relied on by one who hopes for liberation. In hinayana brtags pa and dpyod pa, are considered desirable in building concentration that leads one to a more direct cognition of reality in dhyana, meditation. But they drop out in the second dhyana leading to clear lucidity (samprasada.) PPA, appropriate sanskrit index headings. In the Tibetan schools also examination and analysis are considered as preludes to the clarity of direct comprehension. In CYD and LT analysis is almost invariably madhyamaka analysis for the absolute: Memory and understanding, wakefulness.\ndrag po, Hindu god, of the three Bhrama, Vishnu, and Shiva he is associated with destruction and ascetic yoga, and with the dance of existence. He is also much associated with Hindu tantra.\ndran pa: Memory, mindfulness, a term for conditioned sa.msaric consciousness altogether, as used eg. by Saraha.\ndri ma gnyis: The two obscurations of kleshas and knowables. KSTR.\ndri med: Stainless, spotless, immaculate, undefiled.\ndri za: celestial musician spirits said to susbust on smells.\ndril ba: Include, essentialize, wrap up, sum up.\ndug gsum: The three poisons; chags pa, zhe sdang, gti mug; passion, aggression, and ignorance.\ndug lnga: The five poisons = the five kleshas, anger, pride lust, jealousy, and ignoring.\ndus med: Timeless, constant.\ndus bzhi: The four times: Past, present, future, and the all-inclusive fourth.\ndus gsum: The three times, past present and future.\ndus: age krita, treta, dvepara and kali are four ages of the universe after which the world is destroyed. The first is like a golden age dominated by bhramins (priests). The following ages deteriorate, and are controlled by kshatriyas (rulers/warirs) vaishyas (merchants) and shudras (servants/ laborers\ngdod ma'i dbyings: gdod= Primordial. dbyings= chos kyi dbyings= Space of dharmadhatu, [= The dhatu], as sphere, source, and element of all there is.\ngdod nas: Primordially. Sim. thog nas, ye nas.\ngdon: Malevolent or demonic spirit, especially of the preta realm, said to bring about disease and accidents for those who lack mindfulness.\nglo bur: Temporary, incidental, transient, adventitious, not innate or intrinsic, sudden, abrupt.\nglod: Relax, rest, be natural, free, loose, release, let go, set free.\ngnad: Main, essential, vital or key point; pith, essence, secret. -kyis: due to. -'gag, put into a single point. lus kyi gnad: teachings of physical practice, hatha yoga etc.\ngnas lugs [tshul]: Natural: Antidote, remedy. Eg., the contemplation of disgusting aspects of the body is a hinayana antidote for carnal lust. The path as a whole is the antidote for sa.msara. Emptiness is the antidote for belief in self-nature. Tibetans often think of the bodhisattvayana as the one that principally employs antidotes. Whereas the first two yanas are said to find nothing good in negative thoughts and emotions and to recommend suppressing them, the bodhisattvayana compares them to an unpleasant tasting medicine. They may be useful in building resolve for enlightenment, non-attachment, compassion, and other wholesome attitudes. From the viewpoint of ati, since buddhahood is self-existing, there is no need for antidotes.\ngnas: Place, basis, ground = gzhi, abide, exist, to live, lifetime, remain, endure, be stable, establish oneself, domain, realm. -skabs: Occasion. -'gyur: Transformation. -cha: Stability, section of a text, point, topic. -snang: The way things appear and the way things are.\ngnyis med: Non-duality, non-existence of either or both. Eg. gzung 'dzin gnyis med, may mean that grasping subject and grasped object are non-dual, not separate states, co-emergent, in union etc; or it may mean that neither of them exists. The former approach is characteristic of the mind-only school, where enlightenment is defined as realization of ultimate mind as one without subject/object duality. The latter is characteristic of madhyamaka, which says that neither mind nor its objects truly exist as independent entities with a nature of their own and so forth. But the same arguments that refute them also refute any truly existing ground such as dharmadhatu that would be beyond mind. So they cannot be said to exist non-dually as that or anything else.\nAti ultimately accepts the madhyamaka viewpoint: Straying, deviation, misunderstanding; place where these can occur -gsum: clinging to bliss, clarity, and non-thought. -bzhi: Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche in LM: Misunderstanding the great primordial emptiness, one labels mind with conceptual negation. This is known as straying into the realm of conceptual shuunyata (emptiness). Not having faith in the ground and fruition of ordinary mind within oneself, one hopes for a new acquisition of the fruition of dharmakaya elsewhere. This is known as straying in regard to the path. Misunderstanding the way of self-liberation, one seeks antidotes elsewhere than in the kleshas themselves. This is known as straying in regard to the antidote. Thinking that all dharmas of apparent existence, sa.msara and nirvana, are merely shuunyata, one is stuck in a fixation of nihilism. This is known as straying into labeling.\"\ngoms: 1 Proficient, habituated, trained, skillful, adept, having mastered, accustomed, developed. 2 Paces, footsteps.\ngrol ba: Liberation, freedom, to liberate oneself or another, untying, releasing escaping from, recovering from illness, to end [a meeting]. to become non-existent [of things] = cease. -bzhi, the four kinds of liberation: shar grol, liberation on arising; gcer [cer] grol direct liberation; rang grol, self-liberation, and ye grol eternal liberation.\ngrub thob: Siddhi, accomplishment; siddha, the one who has such accomplishment. Absolute siddhi is enlightenment. The relative siddhis involve miraculous displays of power over phenomena, the higher perceptions, mngon shes qv., and the like.\ngsal ba: Clear, clearly appearing, clearly explained, luminous. See 'od gsal.\ngtad med: Not solid, shifty, offering no fixed or steady reference point. KPSR. VCTR.\ngtan la 'bebs pa: Establish, resolve with certainty, determine, settle, clarify, put in order, usually of doctrines.\ngzhan stong: Empty of other. In shentong philosophy it is said: Foundation, ground, basis, object [-ive support] basic nature, = buddha nature (sugatagarbha, the Space of insight) , source, subject. - gzhi: the thing which is . (eg. stong gzhi, the thing which is empty.) -grub, established foundation. -rten ground and support, foundation = gzhi. -lam 'bras: ground, path, and fruition: Eg. the ground, one's nature, sugatagarbha, emptiness possessing all the supreme characteristics, is the nature as cause and ground. Therefore, one can practice the path of the buddhadharma in the ways described in this text, and attain the fruition, enlightenment, the manifestation of the kayas and wisdoms and so forth. This text is presented in that order.\ngzhi gnas: 1 Intrinsically present, abiding in the ground, gzhi gnas ye shes gsum qv. 2 Shamatha meditation: One-pointed meditation on an object, most often the breath. It is a means of cutting through conceptualizations and attachments so that one can experience the basic self-existing nature.\ngzhi med: Groundless. Things are mere appearance of what does not exist. Cf. med pa gsal snang, stong gzugs, rten med. KPSR.\ngzugs brnyan: Reflection. Ordinarily we think of reflections as reflections of something that is not itself a reflection, such as the moon in water, or \"reflected\" in visual experience. But here all phenomena are \"reflections\" in that they arise interdependently. The external moon is a considered to be a projected, false conception, with even less reality than the experienced one, and so forth. Whatever arises is experienced as empty, in something like the way we experience the moon in water now, or like the way we experience a dream, when we know we are dreaming.\ngzugs sku: Ruupakaya. The two form kayas sambhogakaya and nirmanakaya, constituting the benefit for others. See trikaya.\ngzung 'dzin: Usu. Abbr. gzung ba'i yul dang 'dzin pa'i sems: Fixated or grasped object , gzung ba and fixating or grasping mind, 'dzin pa; illusory, sa.msaric fixations of independent, truly existing subjects and objects. VCTR translated this \"grasping and fixation,\" rather than the more common \"subject and object.\" One reason is that enlightenment in ati is not envisioned, as sometimes in hinayana, as nihilistic cessation of experience of subject and object; nor, as in mind-only, as their becoming one thing. The enlightened object is the kayas, emptiness possessing all the supreme aspects. Theenlightened subject is insight-wisdom. They can be said to be inseparable and non-dual, so that this perception is self-insight of itself. But for ati this state is also the great emptiness beyond existence and non-existence, beyond mind and no-mind etc. Ati accepts the madhyamaka claim that no predicates can adequately describe absolute reality. So it is beyond the absolute mind of mind-only. Thus, VCTR used \"grasping and fixation\" to indicate that enlightenment transcended confused conceptualizations of the perceiver and the perceived. Those who translate gzung 'dzin gnyis med, as [with neither][without the duality of] subject and object are in general aware of these considerations, so that in the end there need be no fundamental disagreement. VCTR sometimes used these terms so that they seemed to refer to a simultaneous co-dependence of subject and object, and sometimes spoke of a successive occurrence of the subject-object split, gzung ba, followed by mental grasping, 'dzin pa. Obviously one should not mix the two usages.\nIt is traditionally said that the shravakas realize the non-existence of gzung 'dzin, of the individual ego, and that pratyekabuddhas also realize half-egolessness of dharmas by realizing the non-existence of gzung but not of 'dzin. KPSR explains that this means that there is no individual ego ('dzin) and therefore no objects (gzung) that have a substantial, causal, or any other kind of dependence to it. Pratyekabuddhas are said to realize interdependent arising, according to the twelve links of interdependent arising and so forth. Therefore, they realize that dharmas of the external world do not exist with an independent nature of their own. They view them as aspects of the experience of a perceiver. However such a perceiver is not an individual ego. Such a view is very like mind-only, or perhaps some versions of Sautrantika Abhidharma that anticipate mind-only. cf. BPTP. Bodhisattvas have full realization of emptiness, and therefore do not accept the grasper of dharmas as truly existing any more than those dharmas themselves.\ngzung: V. gzung 'dzin.\ntheg pa dgu: the nine vehicles\nI. Hinayana:\n1 shravaka yana nyan thos, the hearers or disciples. This is the monastic buddhism taught by the nirmanakaya. It emphasizes the four noble truths: Life is full of suffering, this arises from the causal setup of dharmas, skandhas etc, which are transient without any enduring self. But given this situation, suffering too depends on a transient setup and cessation is possible. This is achieved by means of the eightfold path, right view, speech, thought, action, livelihood, exertion, mindfulness and samadhi. By learning to be there, doing everything properly and mindfully, one cuts off the suffering arising from the speed, clinging, and desire for self-aggrandizement of ego, and attains enlightenment. One relearns like a baby to sit, eat, and walk like a buddha. Practicing shamatha and vipashyana, zhi gnas and lhag mthong, one learns to have the buddha mind. And yet it is said, the fathers dwell in complete humility.\n2 Pratyekabuddha yana, rang rgyal: The basic physical setup has already been determined. Here solitary yogins traditionally unlock the development of mind in sa.msara and nirvana, seeing how the skandhas, phung po, develop. Contemplating a corpse, one reasons backward through birth and craving etc to ignorance, the ultimate cause of life's sufferings. Cutting craving and attachment to externals, the yogin realizes the self sufficiency of one's ultimate nature. Letting this be as buddhahood is maitri, the ultimate kindness to oneself. In ati tradition the account given sounds very like the view of mind-only. It is said that the yogin realizes the emptiness of individual ego and of objects other than mind, but not of mind itself. Pratyekabuddha solitariness betrays a subtle remainder of belief in the independence and separability of self and other, which is basic to ego.\nI. Mahayana, theg pa chen po:\n3 Bodhisattvayana, byang chub sems dpa'i theg pa: Here madhyamaka emptiness is realized. In ati tradition the emphasis is not nihilistic. Rather the nature of enlightened mind glimpsed in mind-only is seen to have always been universal and unobstructed. The skandhas and so forth which cause suffering are seen to be like mere temporary clouds on the face of the basic nature, sugatagarbha. Therefore, with great joy one enters the path of the bhuumis that goes beyond sa.msara. As self and other do not exist, there is no boundary between maitri and compassion for all sentient beings. Yet this path is not trod by turning away from the phenomenal world, but rather relating to all situations fully as expressions of the ultimate nature. This is like the mindfulness of the eightfold path, but now it is unleashed in emptiness. It manifests as the practice of the ten paramitas, by which finally the proper manifestation of the body, speech, and mind, buddhahood, trikaya, is attained. However there can be a problem here. For example, the elder Vimalakirti was totally devoted to virtue and saving others. He goes among sewer-like dens of thieves and whores and was not corrupted. But the whole human world still looked like a sewer inhabited by perverts and criminals. One may see the absolute and the natural world as pure, and still have no pure vision of the relative altogether and of human society. So even with the vision of sugatagarbha and the paramitas, relative existence is something of a crude joke, a pot of night-soil. Hence the need for vajrayana.\nII. Vajrayana, rdo rje theg pa:\nA. the outer tantras, phyi rgyud:\n4 kriya yoga, kri ya, bya rgyud, the tantra of action): Here we find that within us there is also the sacredness of the vajra world, the sambhogakaya world of pure perception inhabited by deities, who are like kings and queens with their palaces and retinues. Because they have become totally egoless, everything they do is pure, sacred, and immensely powerful. In fact we encounter this world by relating to the guru's world, which invokes this pure aspect of ourselves. At first we may feel rather like stupid, filthy monkeys in relation to this world. We cannot participate as equals, but only as spectators. However, if we surrender ourselves to this as devoted servants, there is a possibility of becoming part of the vajra world. That is the logic of kriya. Meanwhile one can purify oneself and one's basic energies in hopes of becoming a decent vajra-citizen. In kriya this is very literal, with many baths and changes of clothes, white food, etc.\n5 Upa, The most basic difference as we progress to upa through the outer tantras is that one begins the relate to the deity as a friend. Oneself is samayasattva, the deity is jqanasattva, the real thing, who is sending his wisdom down on us, and the pretence of being of that nature seems less and less preposterous.\n6 yoga: Finally we truly realize that the deity, who represents the nature of the guru's vajra world, also is our own true nature as well. So we can actually become mahasukha princes and princesses of the five families. That is the fruition of the yoga yana. The five skandhas etc. have been transmuted into the perfection of the five wisdoms.\nB. The inner tantras:\nBut even here there is a subtle reference point of perfection, wisdom-message, divinity and so forth, vs. something imperfect, unwise and so forth that is co-emergently ignored. Hence the further journey of the inner tantras that transcend reference point altogether.\n7 Maha: Here there is much more confidence in situations as embodying the continuity of the self-existing fruition mandala. For example, in the eight heruka mandala, bka'.brgyad, the herukas are less embodiments of ideas, than means of cutting through such conceptualizations. Yangdag yang dag, the vajra heruka punctures concepts with a scepter like a pin, revealing naked space The ratna heruka is the King of Death , shi rje, with an owl. Hayagriva and Vajrakilaya, rta mgrin/ rdo rje phur ba, the padma and karma herukas, reveal naked passion and aggression. etc. This yana emphasizes the visualizations of the developing stage, bsked rim.\n8 In comparison to this complex network of divine forces:, a sort of tibetan cabala, anu, is relatively simplified, in essence one sees everything as the union of primordial space and wisdom, eg. the bliss of union of Samantabhadra and Samantabhadri in their cosmic dance. The complexities of the lower yanas are largely removed. The means for doing this is the practice of the fulfillment stage, and in particular, the yoga of nadi, prana and bindu.\n9 Ati is like the punch line, and doesn't make proper sense without the other yanas. All remaining conceptualizations are stripped away so that the fruition becomes completely naked and self existing. As the text says, this is how it is for one who has done all the work. One can say to a superbly trained musician etc,\"Just let go and do it,\" and hope to hear beautiful music. If one gives the same advice to a person without musical training, this result is unlikely. Thus ati traditionally functions as the framework and culmination of the nine yana training, as a means for removing nirvanic neurosis and so on. It is not generally meant as a complete program in its own right. Most distortions of ati come from ignoring this.\nji lta ba'i ye shes: Wisdom of the absolute nature of everything as it is, ie. as the great emptiness.\nji snyed pa'i ye shes: Wisdom of extent; ji snyed = as much as there is, whatever kinds, as suitable; omniscient qualitative wisdom of all phenomena as they are, discriminating all details without confusion.\nka dag: Primordial purity, purity from the start.\nkha ldog lnga: Blue, white, yellow, red, and green, the colors of the five families and elements.\nkhams/ 'byung ba bzhi: these are the 5 minus space.\nkhams bco brgyad: The eighteen khams, dhatus, (classes of dharmas) are the six sense powers, dbang po, indriyas, including the mano-dhatu or, yid kyi dbang po, the faculty of intellect; the six sense-objects, yul, vishaya, including the dharmadhatu, here in its original sense = the realm of non-sensuous, intellectual objects; and the six consciousnesses including the manovijqana or intellectual sense. The consciousness of touch is called the kaya consciousness, meaning here \"of solid bodies.\" the six senses, their six objects, and the six consciousnesses of those objects. Here \"dharma,\" in a special sense, means intellectual object, and dharmadhatu is the realm of such objects, analogous to the realm of colors, sounds, etc.\nkhams gsum: Three worlds. 1 The desire realm, the realm of material form. 2 Pure non-material form, the realm of the impure visions of dreams, and those of the god realms; and the pure ones of meditation, such as visions of the sambhogakaya deities. 3 The formless realm [objectless space, time, consciousness, neither perception nor non-perception.]\nkhams: 1 Element, dhatu, realm. 2 Disposition of individual personality; the nature of something, sim. rang bzhin; the elements. Eg. the khams of fire is heat. Such natures are partial vs. 3 the basic nature = rigs (gotra) = sugatagarbha, buddha nature. potential or seed; semen.\nkhong yangs pa: [Innerly] vast or wide open, open minded, to perceive or understand.\nkhra lam: Vivid, clear, bright, splendid.\nkhrol khrol: Bright, sparkling (cf. khrol po) (loud or rumbling of musical instruments); insubstantial, unobstructed (cf. khral khrol); LUS: Continuously liberated (cf. bkrol ba).\nkhyab 'jug: Hindu god. Of the threw Bhrama, Vishnu and Shiva, responsible for maintaining the universe. He has a number of incaranations such as Krishna, and according to the Hindus, the Buddha.\nklong: Space (capitalized in text) expanse, sphere, realm of..., mass, immensity vastness, scope or boundaries. -gyur: attaining perfection or mastery. -chen, immense space or knowledge = dharmadhatu -chen rab 'byams: realization of vast universal Space or knowledge = Longchenpa. -zer, : nail of space. See gzer.\nLongchenpa says in LT that klong can be differentiated from dbyings as the space of ultimate mind vs. that of the universal ground. VCTR differentiated them by comparing dbyings to the vastness of contemplating the horizon from the seashore. Klong is more like skydiving in the middle of the night. He was referring in particular to the black klong experience of the forty-nine day bardo retreat in darkness. Here Space is beyond reference points of vastness and constraint.\nklu: Naga, water spirit, serpent [deity]. Living in low watery places and caverns, they are often associated with the lower aspects of the human situation, either those which are necessary, but not exalted, or those which are dark, evil and poisonous. Thus they are associated with skin diseases such as leprosy. In this aspect, they are the enemy of garuda. However, they are said to have great wealth, and to have received the wisdom of the prajqaparamita from the Buddha, guarding it until Nagarjuna, klu grub, could receive them. Also the nagas protected Buddha from attacks of the maras on the night before his enlightenment.\nkri ya [rgyud]: Kriya tantra, = bya rgyud, the fourth yana. see theg pa dgu.\nkun btags: False conception, parikalpita, the merely imputed or illlusory nature of external reality projected onto mind-only, which has no true existence at all, like space.\nkun byed rgyal po: The all-creating (doing, accomplishing) King, title of the main scripture of the Semdi. The King = bodhicitta, personified as Samantabhadra qv. His attributes are explained at length in the text. The King also is one's true enlightened nature.\nkun gzhi rnam gsum: the neutral alaya, alaya of various habitaul patterns, alaya of reality.\nkun gzhi rnam par shes pa: Alayavijqana: Universal ground- consciousness. See rnam shes brgyad.\nkun gzhi: Alaya: Universal ground. See rnam shes brgyad.\nkun mkhyen ye shes: The omniscient wisdom of enlightenment, which sees all phenomena without mixing them up. cf. ji snyed ye shes.\nkun rdzob: Relative, conventional, obscured (in the sense of disguised or costumed) truth, as opposed to don dam, absolute truth. Various systems have different views of what constitutes the relative. See bden gnyis. -gnyis, the two aspects of the relative are, [yang] dag pa'i kun rdzob and log pa'i kun rdzob. Sometimes these refer to ordinary right and wrong judgements within the everyday sphere. In this text they differentiate the confused perception of sa.msara and the perception of enlightenment which sees things as they are. yang dag is sometimes called absolute truth, but the sense is different from, though not in conflict with the absolute truth of emptiness, which it presupposes.\nkun tu bzang po [mo]: Samantabhadra [-i] literally means total or universal goodness. In mahayana Samantabhadra is one of the eight main bodhisattvas, an emanation of Vajrasattva. In sadhanas the environment is purified as pure appearance by the Samantabhadra offerings, in which offerings of desirable things of the five sense objects are visualized like clouds filling the whole of space. In ati Samantabhadra is the first, primordial buddha, who spontaneously achieved understanding of his own nature as universal enlightenment. His consort is Samantabhadri. Usually he is blue, she is white, and they are naked. The text presents this in detail. When Samantabhadra is united with his consort Samantabhadri, she symbolizes the primordial space of the empty essence, dharmadhatu and prajqaparamita. He symbolizes pure arising in that space of entities that do not go beyond its nature. Samantabhadra does not exist as an ego or individual being, but = buddhahood, one's own true nature. Therefore, all who are enlightened are said to be equal to him. The \"I\" of the K|nji, who is the all-creating King, is Samantabhadra. He may be considered the essence of all that is sacred. Ati might say that this is the real concern of all religions and their deities. Some have wondered whether Samantabhadra as lha and bdag chen, big mind, the great self, was not like God in the western sense. I think this is true in a sense. Bdag pa chen po is the great mind beyond ego and non-ego, or self and other, and even God and atheism. In theory the via negativa of Dionysius and \"God is not a what\" of Aquinas are compatible with this. If there are theists who have no problem with God being emptiness and not something removed by a gap from what we really are, so be it.\nlag na rdo rje: bodhiattva who is the lord of secret vajra teachings.\nlam bgrod: Treading, traversing the path.\nlam lnga: The five paths. These will vary somewhat with different systems. 1) Accumulation, tshogs lam: One accumulates merit and wisdom and avoids confusion and evil deeds so that one will escape the lower realms and enlightenment will eventually manifest. The four foundations of mindfulness are practiced and developed in shamatha. This leads to the clear seeing of vipashyana. 2) Preparation (unification), sbyor lam, Developing vipashyana, one develops a deep understanding of the four noble truths, cutting the root of the desire realm. 3) Seeing, mthong.lam: The practitioner comes to understand the unsatisfactoriness of all the realms of form, including the god realm. Direct vision of emptiness is seen. This conveys the essence of liberation, and one enters the first bhuumi, supremely joyful. 4) Meditation, sgom lam: Practicing meditation and relating to the phenomenal world through the paramitas, pha rol tu phyin pa, one attains the second through tenth bhuumis. This culminates in the vision of luminosity and wisdom. 5) Fulfillment or no more learning, mthar phyin or mi slob, Attaining the vajra-like samadhi the practitioner enters the eleventh bhuumi, prabhasvara, kun tu 'od, the complete luminosity of buddhahood. See JOL.\nlam: The practitioner's way to enlightenment as taught by the Buddha, the method of practice, \"the path\" = the buddhadharma altogether. -khyer, make something into the path, practice, bring something to the path. eg. one can use kleshas as a means of practice in various ways.\nlas rlung: Karmic energy, karma prana, as opposed to ye shes rlung, the energy of wisdom.\nlas: 1 From, as, which is, instead of, rather than. 2) Karma.\nlha min: jealous gods who are enemies of the gods, one of the six realms of existence, rigs drug\nlha: Deities, the divine, the level of things that are exalted. Sometimes buddhist scriptures accept the existence of the entire hindu pantheon on deities as the highest sort of temporarily existing beings. The deities of sadhana, yidams, protectors, buddhas and bodhisattvas (such as Samantabhadra in this text) sometimes seem to be approached as beings having a personal existence, and sometimes as principles of the energies of one's mind and the phenomena of the world. In any case they are ultimately empty of essence. Buddhahood is eternal, but a certain being Samantabhadra was first to realize it. Doing so, he ceased to be merely personal. We too can become what he became. It is not the existence and nonexistence of deities that differentiates Buddhism from \"theistic\" religions. It is that the whole issue shifts elusively, leaving one nothing to rely on, so that one is just left hanging. The \"theism\" that Buddhism eschews has less to do with accepting and worshipping deities than trying to fix the reference points of one's universe through conceptual idolatry. This the great theistic religions also decry. Fixating emptiness and nihilism about any divine nature in any sense is part of that \"theism.\"\nIt has sometimes been noted that Buddhism sometimes makes statements, eg. about Chakrasa.mvara or Samantabhadra, that are indistinguishable from those theistic dogmatists make. But since these perspectives are not fixated, but seen in the context of the great emptiness, they become a commentary on the phenomenological possibilities of religion. Such openness is the very reverse of cultish dogmatism (or should be). Here one can compare what Longchenpa says about the difference between the use of sems tsam terminology to establish metaphysical and spiritual dogmas and the use in ati to go beyond them.\nlhag mthong: Vipashyana, clear seeing. Having calmed the mind through shamatha, and in that stillness gained some sense of the self-existing basic nature, the meditator continues with mindfulness on the breath etc., but lets the boundary dissolve into all-inclusive, panoramic awareness in which all phenomena, not just those of mind, are included without accepting and rejecting. This occurs by seeing there is no real step between the two. The sense of boundary is an illusory fabrication that requires maintenance. As one explores the phenomenal world in this way, the connections of interdependence that lead to sa.msara and nirvana become self-evident. This deepens into direct experience of emptiness as one enters the bodhisattva bhuumis.\nlhan [cig] skyes pa'i [ye shes]: Sa.msara and nirvana arise in one's situation simultaneously. Therefore, the solidity of each is annihilated, and the wisdom beyond both spontaneously appears. Very intense suffering naturally tends to self-liberate into co-emergence, and the attempt to stabilize a nirvana free of sa.msara tends naturally to evoke co-emergent, conceptualization, fixation, ignorance and so forth. -kun btags, co-emergent false conceptions, ; -ma rig pa, co-emergent ignorance.\nlhun grub: Self-existing, of the changeless essence. In particular, the self-existing, spontaneously present nature of dharmadhatu, which, from the path viewpoint, arises effortlessly when pure perception is achieved. One of four states of meditation in Semdi according to NN.\nlhun: 1 = lhun grub. 2 Monolithic, massive. 3 Dignity.\nlike thunder you can hear but not see: having no real identity, cf. nges med, ngos 'dzin med. It is like a cloud of no fixed shape or a mutter in stadium that seems to be saying something, but it isn't quite clear what. Really it is not anything in particular. The situation is like a dream where one feels that something crucial is happening, and yet nothing really justifies such a feeling.\nlog: Eliminate, wrong, perverted: lta log, wrong view.\nlongs spyod rdzogs pa'i sku: sambhogakaya. KPSR presents longs spyod literally being activity = bya ba, which includes in particular the realization of extent ji snyed. longs spyod also means enjoyment and in fact, since nothing needs to be accomplished the realization of sambhogakaya is appreciation, and the activity celebration. It is often so glossed. see sku gsum.\nlung bstan: Give instruction, teach, prophesy.\nlung ma bstan: 1) It is not taught. (occurs frequently in the K|nji. 2) it comes to nothing. It is also used this way in the \"Song of Lodrv Thaye\" in The Rain of Wisdom. 3) Neutral, neither wholesome nor harmful, bad or good. Eg. kun gzhi lung ma bstan, the neutral alaya.\nlung: 1 Scripture. 2 Passage or quotation from scripture (as in lung gi gter mdzod, The Scriptural Treasury, the name of Longchenpa's commentary on The Precious Treasury of Dharmadhatu. 3 Reading transmission of a text or practice. 4 Precept. 5 Teaching.\nlus ngag sems: Body, speech, and mind (non-honorific), vs. sku gsung thugs. These sets of terms can be used to differentiate the body, speech, and mind of the enlightened and unenlightened states.\nma 'dres: Unmixed, unconfused. Eg. in ji snyed ye shes all the different, individual things are clear and distinct. They do not get mixed up with each other or confused. Unadulterated: Wisdom is not mixed = adulterated with sa.msaric fixation and grasping.\nma 'gags: See 'gag med.\nma bskyed: Not purposely produced, developed, or cranked up. Hence, self-existing, natural. Cf. ma bcos.\nma btsal: Literally, \"not sought.\" But things could be unsought for reasons of ignorance. Also, they are often missed just because they are sought too greedily. So the sense is more like not needing to be sought, because they are self-existing.\nma rig pa: Ignorance, as opposed to rig pa, understanding, insight. ma rig pa occurs when rig pa is covered over by incidental defilements.\nmchod rten: stupa. Originally a memorial structure containing relics of the Buddha. Later other holy objects and texts were also put in.\nmdo sde pa: Sautrantikas, an abhidharma school of the hinayana. The Abhidharmakosha of Vasubandhu, dbyig gnyen, propounds this viewpoint. The logicians, such as Dignaga and Dharmakirti, hold that what has the power to produce an effect, is absolute truth, and that what does not is relative. They deny the, bye brag pa, vaibha.shika, assertions that space and cessation substantially exist, and that there are simultaneous cause and effect. They hold that consciousnesses do not nakedly see their objects but are themselves generated in the image [rang rig]. They deny the self of persons, but accept that there are other truly existing entities. Thus they accept the self of dharmas.\nmdo: Confluence, juncture, main point, suutra (a discourse of the Buddha) mdor na: In summary.\nmed pa gsal snang: This could mean that the appearances themselves do not exist at all, which is the case from the madhyamaka viewpoint. But all informants concur that the idea is that they are there but are empty of any truly existing object of which they are appearances. They do not exist with a nature of their own.\nmgnon chos: Abhidharma, schools of philosophy such as the hinayana, bye brag pas and mdo sde pas and the mahayana sems tsam pas who believe in various truly existing dharmas (as madhyamaka and ati do not). These dharmas are grouped into classifications such as the 5 skandhas, 18 dhatus, and 12 ayatanas. They are held to arise interdependently through various causes and conditions. To accept such doctrines is to deny the doctrine of emptiness, a key feature of madhyamaka and tantric systems such as ati.\nVCTR said that abhidharma still has a place in tantric systems like ati in charting the geography and evolution of sa.msara and enlightenment. When a kind of free floating panic causes the freezing of basic space and we divide it to try and check what went wrong, the seemingly solid, dualistic phenomena of abhidharma appear and proliferate. In enlightenment the same phenomena become manifestations of the five wisdoms and so forth. In ati dharmas are not thought of as truly existing as in hinayana. They are not even truly existing dharmas of mind as in mind-only. For example, this account is given of the evolution of the illusory experience of the five skandhas. The dualistic split and solidification manifest as form gzugs. Levels of basic accepting and rejecting, feeling , tshor ba, and instinctual patterns of meaning/response = perception 'du shes) appear. A whole repertory of conditioned attitudes and responses builds up to define the emotional and motivational fabric of the world = samskaras, formations, 'du byed). The discursive thoughts and intellectualizations of consciousness, rnam shes) fill in every gap to create a seemingly solid situation of full blown egohood in an external world of fixed entities. Meditation reverses this evolution, returning phenomena to the state of basic space of dharmadhatu, as described at length in the present text.\nmi ma yin: Literally non-men; pretas, such as graveyard ghosts, often malevolent.\nmi pham Rinpoche: Mipham, a nineteenth century Nyingma master and member of the nonsectarian ris med, rimj, school. He formulated Nyingma doctrines in such a way that it became possible to consider them in a detailed way in relation to the views of other schools.. Eg. SSN argues that there is no ultimate incompatibility between Nyingma and shentong doctrines and those of the Gelug school, or between the intentions of Nagarjuna explaining the scriptures of the second turning and those of Asaga in explaining the scriptures of the third turning. Cf. chos kyi 'khor lo 'khor.\nmi rtog pa: Non-thought, non-conceptuality, non-discursiveness. Longchenpa distinguishes the following: 1 The artificial non-thought of one-pointed meditation which does not go beyond sa.msara. 2 The nyams, nyam, of mi rtog which is a sign of some accomplishment, but is not ultimate realization and is a possible object of attachment and straying. 3 Non-thought = self-existing samadhi or wisdom which is an aspect of realization. The essence of the latter is absence of grasping and fixation rather than a mind clear of phenomena. Thus it is possible for a teacher who has stabilized the mind of non-thought to give teachings etc. nondual mind, sugatagarbha, dharmata. It is beyond all complexities and opposites.\nmi'am ci class of spirits included with the deva realm. Some are oddly shaped with a horse's head etc.\nmkha' 'gro: One who goes in the sky. Usually = dakini. In one instance in this text = bird. Sometimes general for gods or those who have attained godlike powers. Usually female tantric deities of the five families who guard, serve, present, and embody the tantric teachings, and are the consorts of the Herukas, the male tantric deities. They seem to have evolved from a mischievous and sometimes malevolent class of forest spirits. On the whole they are wrathful or semi-wrathful, symbolizing compassion, emptiness, prajqa, the basic fertile space from which everything arises, the unity of desire and space, and the tricky and playful aspect of phenomena. The higher ones give basic inspiration to seek enlightenment or cut through perversions of the teachings. Some of the lower ones are said to be on the level of local deities or spirits, ghosts, and demons.\nmkha' mnyam: The equality of space, as limitless as space.\nmnga' bdag: Master, sovereign, lord.\nmngon par dga' ba: Abhirati, the eastern buddha field of Ak.shobhya.\nmngon shes: abhijqa. Relative siddhis. The five -, : 1 seeing at a distance. 2 Hearing at a distance. 3 Reading others' minds. 4 Remembering past lives. 5 Manifesting miracles. the six-, : Includes the ability to destroy defilements. This last is said to occur on attaining the state of an arhat.\nmnyam bzhag: Meditation. (vs. rjes thob, post-meditation) In particular it often refers to the direct intuition of emptiness in the formless meditation of the noble ones, vs. their illusion-like apprehension of appearances in post-meditation.\nmnyam nyid: 1 Equality, (especially in terms of the essence, emptiness). 2 Equanimity, as the state of mind of someone realizing 1\nmnyam pa chen po: The great equality.\nmtha' brgyad: The Muulamadhyamakakarika says:\nThat which arises interdependently\nIs without cessation and has no birth.\nIt is neither eternal or nothingness.\nIt is without any coming and any going.\nIt is not different, nor is it a unity.\nPacifying complexity, it is taught as peace.\nTo the perfected buddhas who have said this,\nTo those holy ones I make prostration.\nmtha' bzhi med: Without the four extremes. A predicate does not apply, not apply, both, or neither. Eg. to say that for all dharmas true existence is empty is to say that in absolute truth all dharmas do not truly exist, not truly exist, both, or neither. According to madhyamaka, if any of these assertions is maintained, a contradictory consequence can be derived.\nmtha' la = mtha gcig tu: Completely, without qualification [by its opposite].\nmtha': Extreme. A one-sided, rigidly conceptualized viewpoint that confuses features of concepts with those of reality. Concepts are useful in various kinds of practical situations, but to think they have an absolute validity independent of the situations in which they are used, invariably leads to mistakes, according to madhyamaka. The four and eight extremes are kinds of extremes that should be avoided. Thus, if one understands the conventions and limits of words, one can use them to talk about the world and the teachings without falling into extremes. Mipham says SSN. \"Not every assertion of existence asserts the extreme of existence. Not every assertion of non-existence asserts the extreme of non-existence.. etc.\"\nmtshan dang dpe [byad]: The thirty-two major and 80 minor marks of a buddha. They are (sometimes fantastical) physical characteristics, wheels on the hands and feet, arms descending to the knees etc.\nmtshan ma'i yul (chos): Objects having fixated characteristics (dharmas).\nmtshan/mtshon med: Things like dharmadhatu without fixed characteristics. Such things can be talked about of course, but elude being successfully pigeonholed or exhaustively described by any particular description.\nmu stegs: Non-buddhists, tirthikas, especially hindus, the variety most typically encountered within buddhist tradition. The term has a sense of infidel or heretic.\nmya ngan las 'das pa: Nirvana, enlightenment. It is said enlightenment in ati is beyond sa.msara and nirvana to differentiate it from partial notions of the lower yanas which, from the viewpoint of ati, are not free from conceptualization and attachment. Such notions would be cessation, emptiness, knowledge, power, bliss, purity, morality, compassion, and social improvement, or their negations. Superficial imitation of the good qualities of former enlightened ones by turning them into preconceived programs is good at the beginning of the path. But in the end it is only creating more sa.msaric obscuration of the naked, boundless relation with our situation that Longchenpa presents as true enlightenment.\nna da: iconographically the tip of the bindu, the first and las existence before nothingness. cosmic sound.\nngag 'khyal: Discipline of functional talking, restraining frivolous and unnecessary speech.\nngang du [las]: Within that [state], as that [state]\nnges med: 1 Uncertain. 2 Not ascertained as anything in particular. 3 Unfixed, unfixated, unpredictable. 4 Untrue, unreal.\nngo bo: as opposed to manifestation and variety, emptiness possessing all the supreme aspects, nothing whatever but everything arises from it, Essence. Being, principle, substance, identity. In general like rang bzhin, but when they are distinguished, of sugatagarbha, etc. ngo bo refers to the essence, emptiness, and rang bzhin to the nature, the spontaneous presence of luminosity. (The terminology of the kun byed reverses these two.) ngo bo rang bzhin thugs rje: see sku gsum. Cf. snying po, bdag nyid. me long gi : Surface of a mirror. It can be said the essence of water is cohesion, the nature wetness, and the function cleansing or thirst- quenching. ngo bo should be distinguished from ngo = Face, viewpoint, side.\nngo sprod: Transmission, pointing out [instruction], showing, introduction, bring face to face with something.\nngos bzung: Recognizable or identifiable, fixated in terms of reference points.\nnyams: Temporary experiences of meditation, which, however, are signs of a certain development in practice. (vs. sgyu ma, nying 'khrul, illusory and hallucinatory experiences.) The three usually mentioned are bliss, luminosity, and non-thought.\nnyan thos: shravakas, the hearers or disciples of the hinayana, the first of the nine yanas. See theg pa dgu.\nnye bar [nyer] len gyi phung po lnga: ES: Perpetuating, substantializing, bringing about, grasping, solidifying the skandhas; nye bar len lnga = phung po lnga.\nnyon mongs gsum: = The three poisons, passion, aggression, and ignorance, chags, zhe sdang, gti mug.\nnyon mongs lgna; rtsa ba'i-: The five root kleshas are hatred, envy, desire, jealousy, and ignorance.\npha rgyud: Father tantras of the anuttara tantras, emphasize form, upaya, and working with aggression, vs. mother tantras emphasizing space, prajqa, illusion, desire, and compassion. Maha is considered father tantra and anu mother tantra.\npha rol tu phyin pa drug: generosity, discipline, patience, exertion, meditation, prajna/knowledge.\npha rol tu phyin pa: Paramitas or perfection practices of the bodhisattva path. All are practiced on every bhuumi, but on each of the ten bhuumis one is emphasized. 1 rab tu dga' ba, supreme joy: Generosity, sbyin pa. 2 dri ma med pa, stainless: Discipline, tshul khrims. 3 'od byed pa, illuminator: Patience, bzod pa. 4 'od phro ba, blazing light: Diligence, brtson 'grus. 5 shin tu sbyang dka', difficult to conquer: Meditation, bsam gtam. 6 mngon tu 'gyur ba, presence: Knowledge, prajqa. 7 ring du song ba, far going: Skillful means, upaya. 8 mi g.yo ba, motionless: Aspiration, smon lam. 9 legs pa'i blo gros, good intellect: Power, stobs. 10 chos kyi sprin, clouds of dharma: Wisdom, ye shes. They are perfect or transcendent in being practiced from the perspective of emptiness. For example, generosity is perfect when there is no thought of giver, gift, and receiver, any action of giving. Then the action is pure and spontaneous. See JOL\nphra: Subtle. Probably similar to description of Kagy| divisions in SKK 3,323: When the eighty kinds of innate thoughts of coarse mind, possessing the three appearances [of body, grasping subject, and grasped object are eliminated and cease, and everything abides merely in emptiness, that is subtle mind. Free from grasping the characteristic of the experience of emptiness, luminosity, absolute bodhicitta, which is called the manifestation of enlightenment, is the subtlest mind. Thus mind that is said to have defiled continuity is called subtle, and undefiled continuity is the subtlest. Similarly as for body, ...all the skandhas, dhatus, and ayatanas, having the nature of the environment and its inhabitants, are resolved as the coarse circle of the deities. Nadi, prana, and pure bodhicitta are resolved as the subtle essence. The well established singularity of support and supported is taught as the very subtle, co-emergence. Thus in meditating in the developing stage, first all the skandhas, dhatus, and ayatanas of the impure body which are to be purified as emptiness are the coarse body. Prana, nadi, and bindu, which are to be established as the body, speech, and mind mandalas of the deities are the subtle. At the time of fruition, the co-emergent three vajras, trikaya, the inseparable body of the realities of the natural state, are the subtlest...Thus, the coarse is the designated ground of purification, the subtle the object of purification in process, and the subtlest the ultimate state of the object of purification.\nphrin las: Enlightened activity, buddha activity, which is egoless, beyond conception, spontaneously arising, and spontaneously perfect and appropriate. In particular, the buddha activities of the five families, pacifying (suffering etc), enriching (accumulations of good qualities), magnetizing (students), destroying (whatever needs to be destroyed or those who cling to that), and self-existing, effortless accomplishment\nphrin las: the spontaneous activity of enlightened beings. For ecample, without thionking about it buddhas emmanate limitless emanations in limitless times and places to tame liitless sentient beings. However the ordinary teaching activities etc. of an enlightened person are also called buddha activity.\nphun sum tshogs pa lnga: The five perfections, most often attributes of sambhogakaya, but in this text applied to the three kayas: excellent teacher, teaching, retinue, place, and time.\nphung po: Expanse [eg. of wisdom] phung po lnga: the five skandhas or \"heaps,\" one of the systems of categories under which the dharmas are organized in the abhidharma: 1 Form, gzugs, including physical objects. 2 Feelings, tshor ba, positive, negative, or neutral. 3 Perception, 'du shes. 4 Formations, 'du byed. 5 Consciousness, rnam shes. In ati consciousness is understood in terms of the eight consciousnesses of yogacara. In hinayana abhidharma, eg. Abhidharmakosha, the skandhas are classes of truly existing dharmas. In ati they can also be thought of as an evolving series of non-existent confusions. Cf. mngon chos. In enlightenment these vanish and the skandhas manifest as the five wisdoms. Cf. mngon chos.\nphyag rgya bzhi [of mahayoga]: In particular: 1 thugs dam tshig gi phyag rgya (mind as samayamudra). 2 gsung chos kyi phyag rgya (speech is dharmamudra). 3 sku phyag rgya chen po (body is mahamudra). 4 phrin las las kyi phyag rgya (Buddha activity is karmamudra).\nphyag rgya chen po: Mahamudra, great seal. 1 Consort of empty form. 2 One of the four mudras of mahayoga. 3 Fruition teachings associated especially with the kagy| lineage as Dzogchen is primarily associated with the nyingma lineage.\nphyag rgya: Mudra, symbolic [hand gesture], seal, symbolic encounter, consort.\nphyi nang gsang: Outer concerns the external world, inner the body, secret the inner life of feelings etc.\nphyi rgyud: The outer tantras which understand luminosity/emptiness beyond conception, but still believe that the fruition is established through stages and effort.\nphyogs bcu: The ten directions, the four cardinal directions, four intermediate, up and down.\nphyogs med: Impartial, without conceptual partialities. When one is impartial =without accepting or rejecting, one is not attached to partialities of concept. Thus, the impartiality = non-bias, inseparability, of the two truths is transparently seen.\nphyogs: Direction, part, aspect, bias, partiality, side.\nrab 'byams: Infinite, vast, encompassing, universal, immense, boundless, the whole of..., widely and deeply learned.\nrab 'byor: Subhuti, a prominent and analytically inclined disciple of the Buddha.\nrags: 1 Coarse. 2 Dependent.\nrang bshag: Let be as it is, rest as it is = cog gshag; self-absorbed, self-rested, self-established, established as merely one's own experience.\nrang byung: Natural; naturally occurring or arising; self-arising, spontaneous. Eg. hunger is rang byung when one does not eat. A shape like a face found on a rock is a rang byung sculpture. Impromptu verse is rang byung.\nrang bzhin gsum: kun btags, gzhan dbang, yong grub; parikalpita, paratantra, parinishpanna; false conceptions, other-caused relativity, the completely perfect. See Ch 3.\nrang bzhin: Nature, actuality, natural expression, natural, intrinsic, inherent. In relation to sugatagarbha etc it means the luminous manifestation, vs. the ngo bo emptiness. ngo bo/ rang bzhin/ thugs rje. See sku gsum\nrang dbang: Freedom, independence, mastery vs. gzhan dbang, arising interdependently from others. The second of the three natures of mind-only.\nrang ga [ma]: Spontaneous, ordinary.\nrang gsal: Natural, clearly as it is; intrinsic clarity, radiance, brilliance, luminosity; naturally awake; self-cognizing. [esp in mind-only] See rang rig rang gsal.\nrang mtshan: Own-, specific, or individuating characteristics that things would have if they were independent, individual entities existing in their own right. Ati accepts Madhyamaka claims to establish the impossibility of rang mtshan. The real thing, intrinsically identifiable, independently existing.\nrang ngo: [One's] own nature, original face, true nature, self-nature.\nrang rgyal: Pratyekabuddha, the second of the nine yanas. See theg pa dgu.\nrang rgyud: 1 One's own being or stream of consciousness. 2 Svatantrika school of madhyamaka. 3 Independent vs. gzhan rgyud.\nrang rig: 1 Intrinsic insight or awareness, = rang byung rig pa. 2 one's own insight or awareness, = rang gi rig pa. 3 self-cognizance, self-insight, self-knowledge, rang gis rang rig. KPSR seems to favor 2), as 1) seems prima facie to involve claims of a fixed nature or entity that would conflict with madhyamaka, and 3 is specifically rejected in madhyamaka critiques of mind only. 1) Self-arising = natural = intrinsic insight is favored by TT and LUS; rang gyis rang rig self-insight in the sense of non-duality, and non-other of insight and its objects. [KSTR, KTHR]. They all agree that all these interpretations are relevant if understood in the right way. They also agree that any acceptable interpretation must be distinguished from the rang rig rang gsal of the mind only school, conceived to be a truly-existing, self-intuiting substance. Ati accepts the madhyamaka refutation of such a substance. Part of the apparent disagreement is because Tibetan does not require choosing among these various uses of rang. The demand to do so is somewhat artificial. Cf. rang shar. See the passage in the text where Longchenpa specifically addresses the difference between mind-only and ati use of mind-only terminology. The main point is that ati does not accept these terms as describing dharmas that truly or absolutely exist, and so does not fixate these conceptions.\nrang rig was introduced by the sautrantikas: The two terms are pretty well equivalent here. rang gsal in mind-only means more or less self-apprehended, ie. self-illuminating or clarifying, appearing clearly to itself. In mind-only, sa.msara has perception of duality of subject and object, and enlightenment involves seeing that in reality there are no external objects distinct from mind, but only various states of mind, which alone truly exists. All experience has to be the mind's experience of itself, because there is nothing else to be experienced. When one understands that this mind is changeless, eternal, and naturally blissful, letting go of attachments to the incidental waves on the great ocean of mind, one loses hope and fear about sa.msara and becomes enlightened. In ati too, insight is rang rig rang gsal, self-apprehending insight, and the luminous manifestations of the nature are actually of the essence of insight and do not go beyond it. But where sems tsam presents this as absolute truth, ati presents it as having only provisional, conventional validity. It is more valid than ordinary perception for the same kinds of reason that, in the venerable example, seeing the rope is more valid than seeing the snake. From the absolute viewpoint, insight has no more true existence than external objects. If it did, it would be contradictory in madhyamaka terms to say that insight, which does not appear with distinct qualities etc., is the same thing as appearances that have these qualities etc. Mind-only, in claiming absolute validity for its formulations, falls into such faults as this. Ati tries to avoid them by claiming that the true state of affairs transcends conceptualization.\nrang sar: Naturally, spontaneously, its own condition, in itself, as it is.\nrang shar: 1) = rang 'byung: Self-arising, naturally occurring. Mere spontaneous arising is not peculiar to enlightenment, since the kleshas and obscurations are also notorious for arising by themselves in the superficial sense that they are not willed or produced by a specific effort. 2) Longchenpa glosses at least one occurrence as = rang snang shar. In that passage rang shar is taken to entail rdzogs, exhausted of defilements and therefore perfected. Thus, by appearing as mere experience, an aspect of insight, and thus appearing as they really are, they are perfected/exhausted.\nrang snang: Personal experience. One's own experience. When delusive, it has a sense of snang = false appearance, one's own projection. When good, it can mean natural or self-appearance of things as they are, in particular of objects appearing merely as one's own experience, and not as solid external entities. Self appearing, [of sambhogakaya deities etc]. Intrinsically appearing [as the rays of the sun]. Of the same nature with oneself.\nrang stong: Emptiness of its own nature or of itself. The typical sort of madhyamaka system, vs. gzhan stong which claims the absolute nature exists, but is empty of any truly existing other. See SSN. for Mipam's view on this distinction.\nrang: Self, prefixing compounds: self-, one's own, spontaneously, intrinsically, natural, [only] as it is, merely within one's own experience (and hence unreal), acting on itself. This multiplicity cam make rang- compounds very difficult to evaluate. Often more than one sense is relevant. In such cases LUS was inclined to think that all the different aspects were part of the meaning.\nrbad chod la chod: rbad = entirely. chod, cf. chig chod = sufficient.\nrdo rje 'dzin: Level of a vajra holder, sometimes the thirteenth bhuumi.\nrdo rje chang: Vajradhara personifies the state of primordial buddhahood. His function in the kagy| teachings is rather like that of Samantabhadra in nyingma.\nrdo rje dbyings: Vajradhatu, indestructible space, the vajra-like aspect of ultimate space.\nrdo rje sems dpa': Vajrasattva, a buddha of the vajra family, white and associated with purity.\nrdo rje theg pa: the tantra or mantra path, one of the three vehicles, theg pa gsum. It is characterized by features like visualization practice, yoga, and strong samaya vows to the teacher and lineage.\nrdo rje: 1 Prince of stones, diamond. 2 Indestructible, adamantine. 3 The weapon of indra, the thunderbolt.\nrdol thabs su smra: One just puts forward one's own ideas without due attention to traditional knowledge in a situation where it is not appropriate, as eg. in arguing points of law or scientific theory.\nrdzogs pa: Perfection, exhaustion, completion, fulfillment. Sa.msaric, impure aspects are exhausted, revealing things as the eternal perfection of the kayas and wisdoms. VCTR once suggested using perfection for this, but changing one's understanding of what perfection is-neither an eternalistic fixation on an impossible standard, or a nihilistic rejection of everything there is in its name. In this tradition emptiness/luminosity IS perfection.\nrdzogs rim: Tantric stage of completion or perfection, sampannakrama, as opposed to visualization practice of sadhana. Both formless meditation and yogic practices such as the six yogas of Naropa are included.\nrdzogs [pa] chen [po]: Ati, great perfection, mahasandhi, the ninth yana.\nrgyal ba: capitalized the Buddha, otherwise buddhas.\nrgyu mtshan theg pa: Vehicles of cause and characteristics. In particular the first three yanas which present enlightenment as a causal process. Sometimes = hinayana, since it does not postulate emptiness. However all vehicles but ati have certain characteristics that are to be abandoned and attained by causal means.\nrgyud: Continuity, tantra. In the latter case the continuity is that of the basic nature, sugatagarbha etc. See rang rgyud.\nri rgyal rab: Mount Meru, which in Indian cosmology is at the center of the world surrounded by four continents. Of these we inhabit the southern continent, Jambudvipa (Jambuling).\nrig 'dzin: awareness holder\nrig pa: 1 Insight, [intrinsic] awareness of the absolute, pretty much equivalent to wisdom. [KSTR] 2) Mind, knowledge, intelligence, understanding in the ordinary sense. -lnga: philosophy, reasoning, grammar, medicine, mechanical arts and crafts. However 1 is also the essence of 2, and in realization 2 does not go beyond 1 It was to bring out this dual aspect that VCTR preferred the translation \"insight.\" cf. rang rig.\nrigs drug: gods, asuras, humans, animals, pretas, hell beings.\nrigs drug: gods, asuras, humans, animals, pretas, hell beings.\nrigs drug: The six realms or lokas of sa.msara in which beings take rebirth. They are those of gods, asuras (demigod enemies of the gods), humans, animals, hungry ghosts (pretas), and hell beings.\nrigs lnga: The five divisions of the families of the mandala: Vajra, rdo rje; ratna, rin chen, jewel padma; lotus; karma; and sangs rgyas, buddha. They are associated respectively with sa.msaric and enlightened forms of intellect and aggression; feeling, richness and territoriality; passion; artistic sense, discrimination; energy of activity and accomplishment; and spaciousness, the overall viewpoint, or neurotically just ignoring things. There are extensive descriptions in VCTR's Cutting through Spiritual Materialism and The Myth of Freedom. The five families are associated with the five colors, kleshas, skandhas, elements, bhagavans and their consorts, and wisdoms, qv. They are also associated with the seasons, time of day etc.\nrigs sngags: Vidya mantra. rigs = esoteric knowledge. Knowledge of magic and magical formulas. By means of these the magician is said to create illusions, destroy enemies, change the weather, and demonstrate power over phenomena in other ways.\nrigs: 1 Kinds, varieties, aspects 2 Family, lineage 3 Caste 4 Nature = snying po 5 Buddha nature 6 Realm = khams 7 Reasoning, logic, philosophy, ....rigs: It is logical, certain that ....\nrigs: being of the family of beings who can attain enlightenment. The eternal gotra is dharmadhatu. The incidental gotra is our intrinsic potential of achieving this combined with the process of the path of purification.\nrim pa: Stage, detail, aspect.\nrin chen sna bdun: wheel, jewel, queen, minister, elephant, horse, general. Or ruby, sapphire, lapis, gold, silver, spug mu tig dmar po ???, emerald\nris med: Without limits, borders, bias, partiality, as between phenomena and dharmata, sa.msara and nirvana etc. Non-sectarian school founded in the nineteenth century by Khyentse the great, Jamgvn Kongtrul the great, and others.\nrje btsun: jets|n, [exalted] lord.\nrjes thob: Post-meditation as opposed to the meditative state, mnyam bshag. In particular the noble ones who have not attained the pure bhuumis are said to cognize emptiness directly in meditation. In post-meditation false appearance still appears to them, but they know it to be empty, so it has the aspect of a dream or illusion. In general, all Tibetan schools agree that buddhas have transcended this distinction. They know the appearances of all sentient beings, but directly perceive their emptiness at the same time. Controversial points are just how accurate the perception of the bodhisattvas of the pure bhuumis is, and the extent to which lesser beings are capable of flashes of pure perception that can be used on the path. Ati tradition holds that sa.msara is self-liberating and enlightenment self-existing and self-actualizing. The guru points out that the nature of enlightenment is already within us, and that even ordinary persons can have brief flashes of experience of this. From that perspective, the path consists of acknowledging this and learning to let it be as it is.\nrlung lnga: life, equalizing, upward moving downward moving, fire. See ch 9.\nrlung: Prana. Part of the trio of prana, nadi, and bindu, rtsa, lung, thig le. rtsa: Nadi, root, vein, artery, psychic channel as visualized in yoga (such as gtum mo, tummo, (heat yoga)), any tubular organ. They are said in tibetan medicine to occur throughout the body, and to cluster together like wheels, chakras, in various energy centers of the body, such as the heart, brain etc. rlung: Wind (vayu), breathing, vital energy. In tibetan medicine the various vital energies move along the nadis. las - Karma prana, karmic energy. thig le: Bindu, 1 Dot, circle, ring, in particular colored dot on the forehead between the eyes, dot on letter or mantric syllable representing the anusvara, eg. \"M\" in HAM. It is typically presented as a small flame. 2 The red and white thig les, the male and female vital essences as represented and embodied in semen and menstrual blood. When acted on by the pranas, these are refined, melting into a more subtle form that produces bliss etc. 3 = thig le nyag gcig: The single universal essence, the sole seed = byang chub sems, chos dbyings, ngo bo stong pa, etc.\nrnal 'byor bzhi: In this text this refers usually to the four yogas of mahayoga as presented eg. in the K|nji: 1 sems dpa': The yoga of the two sattvas, samayasattva and jqanasattva, as practiced in the three lower tantras. 2 ma ha: Mahayoga, which works especially with the developing stage. 3 yongs su: Perfecting yoga, anu, which works especially with the perfecting stage. 4 shin tu: supreme yoga or ati.\nrnal 'byor rgyud: Yoga tantra, the sixth yana. See theg pa dgu.\nrnal 'byor [pa]: Yoga, yogin, literally meaning inseparable union with the absolute.\nrnal a'byor spyod: yogachara philosophy. See sems tsam\nrnal ma: The fundamental state before the various projections of subject and object occur. Cf. gnas lugs [tshul]\nrnam kun mchog ldan stong nyid: Emptiness possessing all the supreme aspects, as described in the Uttaratantra. Emptiness as realized by the buddhas is not nihilistic nothingness. It is the great emptiness, the union of appearance and emptiness, possessing the kayas, wisdoms, buddha qualities and activities, etc. The details are an important part of resolving the view of emptiness.\nrnam pa: Aspect, phenomena, always.\nrnam rtog: Discursive thought, conceptualization, the conceptualized phenomena of sa.msara.\nrnam shes lnga/drug eye, ear, nose, tongue/ taste, body\nrten 'brel: 1 Interdependent arising, eg. as a rainbow appears from interconnection of sunlight, rain, air, the eyes, and mind, as reflections appear in a mirror, or as appearances appear in the mind. The rainbow is not the appearance of any of these, or all of these, Yet it is not the appearance of something completely independent of the above either. In madhyamaka rten 'brel is equated to emptiness. 2 Auspicious coincidence.\nrten dang brten pa: Environment and inhabitants. OR support and supported. For example it will be said in general that the physical environment is he support and mind the supported, cf. snod bcud. In particular, the environment of the mandala, the palace and surrounding features, and the deities inhabiting it are called rten dang brten pa.\nrtog pa: Concept, or perceiving things in terms of concepts.\nrtogs su ma chod: Not cut off by concepts.\nrtsa gsum: the 3 main channels of prana, wind or vital energy in the body. These are the central channel, and the right and left channels ro ma and rkyang ma. They are visualized in breath control yoga.\nrtsa rlung thig le: Nadi, prana, and bindu. These are aspects of hatha yoga practices such as gtum mo that lead to awareness of insight. See for example Chang and others. See rlung. The direct insight of tregchv is not directly concerned with these practices.\nsa bcu: The ten bhuumis or levels of the bodhisattva path, entered on attaining the path of seeing from the five paths, lam lnga, and perfected on the path of meditation. See pha rol tu phyin pa.\nsa bon: 1 = bag chags. The seeds of good and bad karma. From the path viewpoint, transmission and practice are like planting and cultivating seeds that will ripen as the fruition. 2) But from the absolute viewpoint this is only uncovering the ultimate sugatagarbha that was there all along. So relative reality is itself a seed of buddhahood in that sense.\nsa gsumabove the earth (god realms) on the earth (human realm etc. and below the earth (nagas and hells)\nsa sbyang: Training on the bhuumis. See JOL.\nSa ra ha: Saraha, a mahasiddha, grub thob chen po, who worked as an arrow-maker and had a consort of the same trade. He composed many songs or dohas describing the enlightened state.\nsal le ba: Vividness. Ego fixation draws on the energy of the natural state to produce blockage and obscuration. So, by comparison, experience of things as they are is one of vivid splendor and immensity.\nsang nge [ba]: Pristine etherial; the spacious clarity and primordial purity of emptiness, like fresh mountain air.\nsangs rgyas kyi yon tan the pure qualities of enlightened perception of things as they are.\nsangs rgyas: Buddha[hood], enlightenment.\nsangs: Purified, awakened.\nsangs rgyas: buddha, enlightened\nsbubs: 1) Covering, cocoon, shell, confinement, hollow, narrow space, sheath. 2) TT essence (cf. bcud), nature. 3) Field of....\nsdug bsngal brgyad: birth old age, sickness, death, meeting enemies, separation frm intimates, not getting what we want, sufferings of the skandhas.\nsdug bsngal gsum: the sufferings of suffering, the composite, and change.\nsems can: Sentient being = 'gro ba, unenlightened inhabitant of the six lokas having dualism of body and mind, vessel and essence, snod bcud, etc.\nsems dang yid dang chos: TT sems = Basic mind of duality, alayavijqana and klesha consciousness. yid = Intellectual consciousness, yid kyis rnam shes. chos = Perceptions of the sense consciousnesses.\nsems dp'a: = bodhisattva, byang chub sems dp'a\nsems dpa' chen po: mahasattva, a bodhisattva of the pure bhuumis from the eighth upward, who experiences the pure vision of luminosity.\nsems dpa'i rnal 'byor: Sattva yoga: See rnal 'byor bzhi.\nsems las 'byung ba: Mental contents, inner feelings and so forth, not counting external perceptions of the five senses.\nsems tsam: With madhyamaka one of the two great philosophical systems of the mahayana. It is associated with Asaga and his brother Vasubandhu. It is also propounded in such sutras of the third turning (chos kyi 'khor lo 'khor) such as the Lakavatara and Sandhinirmocana. It is said to record the realization experience of those who emphasized yoga more than the logical dialectics of madhyamaka, and hence is also known as rnal 'byor spyod. It holds that luminous mind is the absolute reality, yongs grub, parinispanna. Experiences of mind, like waves in water, are relative, dependently arising reality, gzhan dbang, paratantra. Our beliefs concerning a world of external objects that are other than mind are confused, merely imputed, and false, kun btags, parikalpita. Therefore, the duality of perceiver and object is a feature of sa.msaric confusion, and does not occur for enlightened mind. As there is nothing other than enlightened mind for it to perceive, it can be said to be intrinsically self-perceiving, rang rig rang gsal. Ati too accepts non-duality, the absolute nature of mind itself, rang rig rang gsal etc. But as Longchenpa notes in the text it sees this in the light of madhyamaka emptiness. Therefore it is not accepted that any of this terminology describes anything that is truly existing or non-empty of the level of the absolute. The use is for practical benefit in the relative sphere, in the same way exponents of madhyamaka speak practically of chairs and tables in everyday life, without believing that they have absolute existence. This kind of use all schools of madhyamaka sanction.\nsems: 1 Dualistic mind. 2 = sems nyid or byang chub sems: The nature of mind, mind itself, bodhicitta (occurs in the titles of tantras 3) = Semdi in compounds like sems smad: The lesser texts of the Semdi.\nsgo gsum: The three gates, body, speech, and mind. grol ba'i sgo gsum: The three gates of liberation: the signless, markless, and wishless.\nsgrib ma gnyis: nyon mongs and shes bya: Kleshas, knowables or primitive beliefs about reality. They are the obstacles to omniscience, and the pure vision of luminosity.\nsgrol ma: one of the five consorts of the five lords of the sambhogakaya buddha families, of the karma, buddha activity family, symbolizing compassionate activity for beings.\nsgrub: Affirm, establish\nsgyu ma dpe brgyad: The eight examples of illusion: 1 Dream. 2 Echo. 3 City of the gandharvas (celestial musicians etc. who live on smells). 4 mig thor: A growth on the eyes, cataracts? 5 Mirage. 6 Illusion. 7 Reflection. 8 A magically emanated city. Sometimes the moon in water, lightning, a rainbow, and a bubble are added, making twelve].\nshang shang: half human mythical bird, something like a garuda.\nshes pa: Awareness, knowledge.\nshes rab: Literally, supreme knowledge, prajqa. Intelligence, discriminating knowledge in general, and in particular knowledge of emptiness as presented in the prajqaparamita scriptures, the reasoning of madhyamaka etc. shes rab pha rol tu phyin pa: Perfection of prajqa, the sixth of the ten paramitas. Emptiness is directly realized in a way transcending concepts. In a strict sense this refers to realization in formless meditation. Shes rab and ye shes can be loosely used so that they are equivalent, referring to the transcendent knowledge of realization. ye shes involves the further realization of luminosity, pure appearance, omniscience, and the various other aspects of wisdom. It is the final paramita, the culmination of their development. Prajqa clearly sees the essence of things, but does not yet see things as they are as the buddhas do.\nshin rje: He and his retinue preside over Hell.\nshin tu rnal 'byor: Supreme yoga = ati. See rnal 'byor bzhi.\nshugs 'byung: Spontaneous, self-arising, suddenly-arising.\nskra shad: Seeing hairs or spots in the eyes, due to solidification and opacity of the vitreous humor.\nsku bzhi: the three kayas + svabhavikakaya, de kho na nyid kyi sku.\nsku gdung: The bodily remains of a teacher after death or the reliquary in which they are placed -'bar ba: A text, The Blazing Relics of the Buddha Body.\nsku gsum: Dharmakaya, chos sku; sambhogakaya, longs spyod rdzogs pa'i sku; and nirmanakaya, sprul sku. the first is the essence of buddhahood, the benefit for oneself, unborn primordial insight, awareness devoid of content, like space. It is called [buddha]dharmakaya, because it embodies the essence and fruition of the teachings. Dharmakaya is sometimes used in the sense of non-dual dharmakaya. In that case it includes all the phenomena of trikaya, in the aspect of inclusion within dharmakaya and not going beyond its essence. In this sense it is similar to dharmadhatu. Among the three kayas dharmakaya is associated particularly with the essence, emptiness. Sambhogakaya, and nirmanakaya are the two ruupakayas or form bodies, which are the benefit for others.\nSambhogakaya is the realm of enjoyment/realization of pure form, contemplated aside from existence as external objects. This includes visions of the pure lands and teachers (eg. of Samantabhadra, akani.shtha etc.) and form altogether as seen from that perspective. It is associated with the vision of luminosity, the nature.\nNirmanakaya is associated with the play of appearance of this dualistic, material world and so forth, which arise from the power of compassion to ripen beings for enlightenment. Longchenpa makes the remark that, strictly speaking,the two ruupakayas should be regarded as the ground of arising of their respective form phenomena rather than as those phenomena themselves. Otherwise contradictions may arise from regarding dharmakaya, which is essentially non-apparent and various apparent phenomena as having the same essence. This seems a little odd after all he has said about everything being included in the essence of insight-bodhicitta. But it does explain why he frequently uses formulas like thugs rje'i 'char gzhi, the ground of arising of compassion.\nsku gsung thugs: Body, speech, and mind (honorific). When juxtaposed with lus ngag sems (non-honorific) it can mean enlightened vs. unenlightened body, speech, and mind.\nsku lnga: There are various lists of the five kayas. The most common is trikaya (sku gsum) plus the mahasukhakaya, bde ba chen po'i sku, the body of great bliss, representing the inseparable bliss aspect, and the svabhavikakaya, ngo bo nyid kyi sku, which represents the unity of the kayas. Another list that is cited in the text is the changeless vajrakaya, mi 'gyur rdo rje sku; the kaya of full manifestation of enlightenment, mngon par byang chub pa'i sku; Peaceful dharmakaya; sambhogakaya; and the variously manifested nirmanakaya cir yang sprul pa'i sku. Cf. TT88. See appendix 2.\nsku: sometimes = The kaya of emptiness, dharmakaya.\nskye ba bzhi: The four modes of birth: womb, egg, heat and moisture, and spontaneous. See ch. 9.\nskye ba med: From the absolute viewpoint, unborn, non-arising, non-truly-existent, because things and arising are empty. Relatively enlightened reality is unborn because it is eternally self-existing, and never arises as a limited thing. Nevertheless, from unborn dharmakaya, which is born as nothing at all, the pure appearance of ruupakaya rises. Though born in that sense, it too is unborn in the sense of becoming truly existing things other than dharmakaya.\nskye mched bcu gnyis: The twelve ayatanas. The six senses and their objects. Cf. khams bcu brgyad\nskyong: Guard, protect or maintain is the basic meaning. In ati the sense is remembering that we are always resting in the essence. In a negative sense, it means trying to maintain something self-existing that has no need of that and in fact will even be obscured by the attempt.\nsnang ba: 1) Appearance 2) False appearance of truly existent other etc, eg. perceptions of rocks and trees. 3) The objects of 2, the apparent rocks and trees themselves. Eg. med pa gsal snang means that the objects, not the appearances do not exist.\nsngags kyi theg pa: the tantric or vajrayana teachings.\nsngags: Mantra, praise.\nsnod bcud: the vessel is the environment, the world, and the essence the inhabitants, sentient beings. The vessel and essence. (as metaphor). snod = The container as the external world. bcud = The experience of beings within it, here compared to the liquid in a bottle, the essential part of the situation. Sometimes rendered \"the environment and inhabitants (of the phenomenal world).\nsnying po: 1 Heart. 2 Heart-essence or essence. 3 Garbha, = sugatagarbha, bde bshegs snying po.\nsnyom 'jug: Meditative absorption, samapatti. One might use it to obtain bsam gtan, dhyana. Samadhi originally in the abhidharma is an omnipresent faculty of concentration on whatever objects are present. It came to mean absorption in various objects, and thus ting nge 'dzin tends to be differentiated by its objects. Longchenpa too differentiates purposefully attained bsam gtan from naturally existing ting nge 'dzin qua awareness of the absolute.\nso so rang rig [ye shes]: Since it discriminates mind and wisdom, it can be called discriminating-awareness wisdom. since wisdom is also self-awareness in the sense of being insight of otherlessness, it can be called discriminating self-awareness wisdom. Since it is a non-conceptual personal encounter with wisdom, it can be called individual and personal wisdom. So so can be interpreted to mean either the individual entities that are known or the individual knower. rang rig has the various interpretations of that term qv. In any case it should not be confused with the padma family wisdom so sor rtags pa'i ye shes, discriminating wisdom [of individual things].\nspangs rtogs: Simultaneous renunciation/ realization. This is an aspect of enlightenment, not experienced by ordinary beings. Because of realization, confused perceptions and desires naturally do not arise for them. Everything is enlightenment for them. This is very different from nges 'byung, which is a distaste for and rejection [zhen log] of sa.msara in ordinary beings like ourselves who aspire to whatever we think we understand as enlightenment. [KTHR.]\nspros bral: Simplicity; unconditioned; free from conceptualization, complexity, elaboration, constructions. One of the four yogas of mahamudra. spros bral often refers to direct vs. conceptual realization of emptiness by wisdom.\nsprul sku gsum: bzo ba'i sprul sku, skye b'i sprul sku, mchog gi sprul sku. OR skye ba'i sprul sku, mchog gi sprul sku OR sna tshogs sprul sku; 'gro 'dul sprul sku and rang bzhin sprul sku: The working or various t|lkus are gifted individuals, artists, craftsmen, scientists etc who so benefit beings. The born or taming t|lkus are the rinpoches usually called t|lkus, who have taken human birth in order to tame beings by the dharma. The supreme t|lku is the Buddha.\nsprul sku: Nirmanakaya. See sku gsum.\nspyan lnga: The five eyes. 1 The eye of flesh. 2 The divine eye (of relative siddhi). 3 The eye of prajqa (emptiness). 4 The dharma eye of pure vision. 5 The buddha eye of omniscience.\nspyan ras gzigs: bodhisattva of compassion.\nspyi blugs: Literally head-vase, a coronation vase, especially golden, used in crowning kings. Later similar vases were used in empowerments. To say wisdom is the coronation vase means that it confers empowerment as King of dharmata.\nspyod rgyud: Upa yoga, the fifth yana. See theg pa dgu.\nspyod yul: Sphere of behavior, realization, instantiation. -med: It does not exist. skal med spyod yul ma yin: Not realized by those without good fortune.\nspyod: 1 Behavior. 2 Apprehension. 3 Action in the trio view, practice, and action\nsrid gsum: The three realms: The desire realm and its inhabitants, the realm of pure form (visions, the deities of pure form etc), and the formless realm (inhabited by formless deities).\nsrid pa: The phenomenal world, sa.msara.\nsrin po: demonic vampire-like beings. Among other things they can kill with their touch.\nStages can vary for different sadhanas. Examples might be these: 1 Visualizing the deity and palace: shastra, a treatise or discourse on any topic. A discourse delivered by the Buddha is a suutra.\nstobs kyi rigs pa: The power of direct experience of reality, the ultimate source of all reasoning.\nstong pa [nyid]: Emptiness. It is established conceptually by showing that a concept cannot be instantiated, eg. round square. It is directly intuited in the formless meditation of the aryas. At the time of fruition it is realized as a direct vision of naturelessness as the nature of the absolute, \"nothing whatever and so it arises as all there is.\"\nstong pa'i rang gzugs: rang gzugs, self-form, is like rang snang, self-appearance qua one's own appearance. Forms appear to one, but they are empty of any truly existing nature of their own. They are kun btags, dualistic, false conceptions in the sense of yogacara and natureless in the sense of Nagarjuna.\nstugs po bkod pa: Gandavyuuha, the densely ornamented or densely structured realm, as described in the sutra of the same name. This is the form of the vision of the sambhogakaya realm that realizes/enjoys the pure perceptions and energies of omniscient wisdom. This is also aesthetic perception of form etc. as the ornament. The array is dense not only because it is elaborate, but because of its multifarious connections of rten 'brel etc, which are such that everything is said to be contained within everything else. In this closed, endless web of pure vision, everything contains everything else and presupposes everything else, so ultimates of time, space, and meaning are nowhere to be found. Thus, according to the Avata.msaka Suutra, within every atom of the universe the whole universe is contained, and within every instant all of eternity is contained. This interpenetration is not discussed in this text, as it is more an aspect of the vision of mahayoga. (eg. the gsang snying). This aspect never seems to have the emphasis in Tibet it does in certain Hwa Yen and Zen teachings. But it is there, and it is correct to think of ati notions of the form aspect of enlightenment in this way. [KPSR VCTR]\nthabs: Upaya, skillful means, method, expediency. In the mahayana, the paramitas are called the path of means that ripens, and prajqa is called the path that frees. In the tantra a similar distinction is often made between the practices having form as upaya and the formless ones beyond distinction like mahamudra or ati as the path that frees.\nthag gcod: Settle, resolve, decide, have \"got it.\"\nthams cad mkhyen pa['i ye shes]: Omniscient [wisdom] which knows all phenomena without mixing, as the buddhas do. It is associated with the wisdom of extent, pure perception, and the vision of gandavyuuha.\ntheg chen: Mahayana, the bodhisattvayana.\ntheg dman: Hinayana, including the shravaka yana and pratyekabuddha yana.\ntheg pa [dgu]:\nthig le: Bindu. See rlung.\nthog babs chen po: The great suddenness. Sudden realization.\nthree kinds of enlightenment: byang chub rnam gsum: of buddhas and bodhisattvas, pratyekabuddhas, and shravakas.\nthub pa: 1 Capable or mighty one: Reach, arrive, encounter.\nthugs rje: In ati is sometimes equivalent to the power of manifestation [rtsal] and like the latter = manifestation in general = ruupakaya which produces benefit for others, bringing them to dharmakaya, the benefit for oneself. But here there is the idea that all manifestations are either offerings for the enjoyment of enlightened beings, or presentations of the teachings to those who are not enlightened. In this case these sense of rtsal as skillful performance, articulation, etc is relevant. The individual receives teachings exactly suited to his needs and understanding, a personalized mandala as it were. So below compassion is the power and ground of arising. Or, opposed to power, one can say that compassion is the manifested power of the ground. In the context of essence, nature, and compassion, ngo bo rang bzhin thugs rje it refers to the nirmanakaya level of dualistic manifestation in particular.\nting 'dzin gsum: The three samadhis: 1) de bzhin nyid, suchness. 2 kun tu snang ba, the nature appearing as everything. 3 rgyu: The single cause.\nting nge 'dzin: Samadhi. See snyom 'jug.\ntsa nda li: Chandali. gtum mo. Heat yoga practice involving prana, nadi, and bindu, rlung rtsa and thig le.\ntshad ma: valid cognition\ntshad med bzhi: kindness, compassion, joy, equanimity, brtse ba, snying rje, dga'a ba, btang snyoms.\ntshad: Measure, scope, criteria.\ntshangs pa'i gnas bzhi: Lesser versions of the four immeasurables, tshad med gsum.\ntshogs brgyad. The 5 sense consciousnesses plus mind consciousness yid (memory and conception) plus klesha mind consciousness nyon yid, plus alaya or all-ground consciousness, kun gzhi rnam shes. The eight consciousnesses.\ntshogs drug: The six senses (including the mental sense).\ntshogs gnyis: bsod nams dang ye shes. Merit and wisdom, the first having a focus or conceptual object, and the second not.\ntshogs gnyis: The two accumulations, merit and wisdom.\nu pa: Upa yoga, upayayoga, the fifth yana. See theg pa dgu.\nyang dag: Real, true, actual, genuine, authentic, proper, perfect, very, completely. -kun rdzob, vs. log pa'i kun rdzob: True and false relative, in the conventional sense. dag vs. ma dag pa'i kun rdzob: The impure vision of ordinary beings vs. the pure vision of the noble ones, 'phags pa. Embodied as yang dag, the vajra heruka of the bka' brgyad, the mandala of eight heruka-principle of mahayoga.\nye nas: Like gdod nas, back-looking eternity, primordial, from the beginning; hence translated \"from all eternity.\" But it also keeps going limitlessly and hence is eternal.\nye shes lgna: The mirror like wisdom, wisdom of equality, wisdom of individual discrimination, all-accomplishing wisdom, and dharmadhatu wisdom. They are discussed in the text.\nye shes: wisdom, literally primordial awareness or knowledge. Pristine cognition, direct intuition of absolute reality beyond conception. Sometimes the kayas and wisdoms\n: kun mkhyen-, snang ba'i, lhan cig-, so rang rig-.\nye shes sems dpa': One visualizes that jqanasattva, of similar appearance to one's visualization of the deity of sadhana, samayasattva, embodying spontaneously existing wisdom, descends and transmutes one's visualization. Ideally an experience of this actually occurs. Usually the visualization has the same outer form as that of samayasattva.\nyi dam: Short for yid kyi dam tshig, samaya of mind. Deity of tantric practice that one is performing, eg. Chakrasa.mvara, Vajrayogini, especially the deity of one's main practice.\nyi dwags: hungry ghost, one of the 6 realms of beings. Preta. Some have huge bellies and minute throats and suffer great torments of hunger and thirst. Some are rather like our conceptions of ghosts or malignant spirits\nyid bzhin nor bu: Wish-fulfilling gem, a mythical gem that makes things \"as one desires,\" rather like Aladdin's lamp.\nyid dpyod: Intellectualization, conclusion reached merely conceptually. ES.\nyid kyi rnam shes: Intellectual consciousness. See tshogs brgyad.\nyid: Mind, intellect in general; = Yid kyi rnam shes.\nyo ga: Yoga, the sixth yana, see theg pa dgu.\nyod pa: Existence. In conventional truth it is said that there can be no existence without non-existence. They are complimentary. In madhyamaka it is argued that if anything has the characteristic of existence it ought to be intrinsically existent and hence eternal. So existence is equated with eternalism, and nonexistence with nihilism. What exists should be changeless and incapable of interaction with anything else. Relying on this logic, the texts will sometimes draw conclusions about existence that seem less than\nobvious in ordinary english. Readers will have to resolve questions of the ultimate validity of these statements for themselves by studying the appropriate texts.\nyon tan bcu: Various lists will sometimes be so called. 1) The ten paramitas. 2) The stobs yon tan bcu, the ten powers of a buddha. 3) The ten abstentions from unwholesome karmic paths: 1 Not destroying life. 2 Not taking what is not given. 3 Refraining from improper sexual activities [together these are the three good actions of body.] 4 Not speaking falsely. 5 Not using abusive language. 6 Not slandering. 7 Not speaking frivolously or irrelevantly [together these are the four good actions of speech.] 8 Not being covetous. 9 Not being malicious. 10 Not having wrong view [these together are the three good actions of mind.] see CH 4\nyon tan: 1 good quality, virtue, excellence 2 object, property 3 skill, learning, knowledge. 4 Buddha qualities, enlightened qualities, the qualities of the pure perception of enlightenment. They are said to be eternally existing but to manifest when one attains enlightenment, as does wisdom etc. Sometimes these are differentiated from qualities of enlightenment that can be said to be produced. In particular the ten powers, four fearlessnesses, eighteen distinct doctrines of the buddhas, and thirty-two major marks are called the sixty-four qualities of a buddha. They are described eg, in the Uttaratantra.\nyongs su rnal 'byor: Perfect[ing] yoga = anuyoga. See theg pa dgu.\nyul can ye shes: the samsaric perceiver is the grasper, a'dzin pa, but the elnightened perceiver is nondual wisdom.\nyul dag: 1 Pure of [sa.msaric, dualistic] objects. 2 Objects of pure appearance, free of objects of the preceding kind. 3 The pure sphere.\nzab: Profound refers to the emptiness of dharmakaya, =ji lta, Vast, rgyas) often refers to ruupakaya = ji snyed qv.\nzhi gnas: Calm abiding, tranquility, serenity, quiescence [neither = nirvana of the karma of pacifying] A basic meditation practice found in most schools of buddhism. The mind is tamed and sharpened by being brought back again and again to the meditative object. In practice the breath is the most used object. Originally in hinayana shamatha was practiced in order to attain the dhyana states, bsam gtan) yogic trance states in which bliss, equanimity, and various higher perceptions were claimed to be experienced. However even hinayana claims that such states do not constitute enlightenment and can easily lead to various spiritual attachments.\nIn ati:, shamatha is practiced not to attain one-pointed trance-concentration on an object, but to cut off attachment to thoughts and perceptions, which then are left as they are. By doing this one can directly experience one's self-existing,true nature, one and all sufficient, and rest in that. With repeated practice this resting becomes spontaneous, and one realizes the basic nature as unchangeable and self-existing, like a mountain. This is the same buddha nature that is realized as bodhicitta and so forth in ati. However, here it is realizes only as one's own true nature. Many subtle conceptualizations must be eliminated before it becomes known as the universal nature.\nIn the Semdi shamatha is described as part of a fourfold process of realization, zhi gnas, lhag mthong, gnyis med, lhun grub. NN\n-steng po: inert shamatha. -ltengs po, the pool of shamatha = -steng po\nzhi: 1 Peace. 2 Pacifying (one of the phrin las lnga). 3 Nirvana\nzhing or sangs rgyas zhing: Realms of particular buddhas where sentient beings attain enlightenment. Eg. this is jambudvipa which is the buddha field of the buddha Shakyamuni. The infinity of buddha fields is a major theme in such tathagatagarbha suutras as the Gandavyuuha and Avata.msaka. Pure land or realm. Each of the five bhagavans is associated with one. Akani.shtha and gandavyuuha are called buddha fields. Twenty-five [sometimes twenty-one] such fields are said to be on the hands of Vairochana, Yid bzhin mdzod 28ff. [v. ES] corresponding to the permutations of body, speech, mind, quality and action, as body of body, speech of body, etc.\nNOTES\n1. don rnam par nges pa shes rab ral gri.\n2. the nges shes rinpoche sgron me.\n3. nyida barwe dronme.\n4. don rnam par nges pa shes rab ral gri 'i 'grel pa nyi zla 'bar ba'i sgron me\n5. dpung tshogs yan lag bshi: horse, elephant, chariot, foot.\n6. {stobs bcu} - Ten Powers. Those powers developed by bodhisattvas are 1) reflection, {bsam pa'i stobs} or aashayabala 2) superior reflection, {lhag bsam} or adhyaasa 3) acquisition {sbyor ba} or pratipatti 4) discriminative awareness, {shes rab} or prajqaa 5) aspiration {smon lam} or pra.nidhaana 6) vehicle {theg pa}. or yana 7) conduct {spyod pa}. or charyaa 8) transformation {rnam par 'phrul pa} or vikurvana 9) enlightenment {byang chub kyi sems} or bodhicitta, and 10) turning the doctrinal wheel {chos kyi 'khor lo bskor ba} or dharma-chakra-pravartana. wrong understanding causes and conditions and karmic conditions and capabilities of sentient beings. See rgyud bla ma. The ten powers of a tathagata: {gnas dang gnas min mkhyen pa'i stobs} power of knowing what is possible and impossible; {las kyi rnam par smin pa mkhyen pa'i stobs} power of knowing how actions will ripen; {mos pa sna tshogs mkhyen pa'i stobs} power of knowing the different dispositions of human beings; {khams sna tshogs mkhyen pa'i stobs} the power of knowing different elements; {dbang po mchog dang mchog ma yin pa'i stobs} power of knowing the supreme and lesser powers of human beings; {thams cad du 'gro ba'i lam mkhyen pa'i stobs: power of knowing the path that lads everywhere; {bsam gtan rnam par thar pa dang ting nge 'dzin dang snyom par 'jug pa'i kun nas nyon mongs pa rnam par 'byung ba dang dang ldan pa tams cad mkhyen pa'i stobs} omniscience regarding the original of all suffering and which leads to dhyana, liberation, samadhi, and samapatti; {sngon gi gnas rjes su dran pa mkhyen pa'i stobs-power of knowledge that remembers former abodes {shi pho ba dang skye ba mkhyen pa'i stobs} power of knowing death, transmigration, and birth {zag pa zad pa\n7. Grasping, duality and so forth.\n8. {mi 'jigs pa bzhi} - Four Fearlessnesses. Fearlessness in the knowledge of all things {chos thams cad mkhyen pa la mi 'jigs pa}. or sarva-dharma-abhisambodhi vaishaaradya, fearlessness in knowing all the cessations of corruption {zag pa zad pa thams cad mkhyen pa la mi 'jigs pa}. or sarvaashravak.saya jqaana-vaishaaradya, fearlessness according to the definitive prophetic declarations that these things which are intermittently cut off on the path. do not change into something else {bar du gcod pa'i chos rnams gzhan du mi 'gyur bar nges pa'i lung bstan pa la mi 'jigs pa}. or antaraayika-dharmaananyathaatva nishcitavyaakara.navaishaaradya, and the fearlessness that the path through which all excellent attributes are to be obtained, transformed and ascertained, is just what it is {phun sum tshogs pa thams cad thob par 'gyur bar nges par 'byung ba'i lam de bzhin du gyur ba la mi 'jigs pa}. or sarvasampadadhigamaaya naira.nikapratipat tathaatvavaishaaradya.\nThus Buddha is compared to a lion. Of the four fearlessnesses two are related to the buddhas themselves and two to sentient beings. The buddha has no fear, hesitation or doubt in saying he is realized, has removed all obscurations. Those are the two pertaining to himself. He has no fear to show the clear facts to other beings and pacify their mistakes on the path. Those are the two relating to others.\n9. Eternalists and nihilists have the greatest ignorance among human beings, as elephants have the largest bodies among animals.\n10. Having perfected the two accumulations, one attains the two wisdoms of nature and extent.\n11. The Buddha is compared to a snow lion living in glaciers and snowy mountains, and this again, in its brilliance, to the sun.\n12. brtul zhugs gnyis\n13. For bcu yi read bcu gnyis KPSR.\n14. This is adopted from Jigme Lingpa to increase blessings. Most of this praise comes from various great masters, as does the next line, praising Padmasambhava.\n15. He is compared to Amitabha.\n16. This is how he was born.\n17. This is his buddha activity.\n18. At the beginning of his commentary on the tshad ma rnam 'grel.\n19. Compared to Indra's hundred-pointed vajra.\n20. Master not only of the teachings, but all the three jewels.\n21. mchod KTDR said \"praise.\"\n22. Also by Mipham.\n23. Sarasvati is often called \"daughter of the swan.\"\n24. The sems sde, klong sde, and man ngag sde ati text collections of mind, space, and the oral instructins.. Or perhaps also the vehicles of te teachings maha, anu, and ati. It could also denote outer inner and secret trios comprising all the nine yanas.\n25. By {brgyud pa gsum} - Three Lineages. Intentional, or mind-to mind lineage of buddhas, symbolic lineage of awareness-holders, and aural lineage of mundane individuals.\n26. In Hindu mythology he is a rishi who swallows all the rivers and oceans. The gods were very worried. They offered him praises and finally he vomited some up again. Similarly we should praise the vidyadharas. This was written by the first Kongtrul, Shechen, and Petrul, pupils of the first Khyentse. But KPSR also added something.\n27. The learned masters are compared to Indra's 32 ministers.\n28. sa srung steng na: Elephants as the vehicle of indra\n29. Aryadeva once said Indra has 1000 eyes but still didn't realize the true nature. I have one eye of wisdom and realize everything. KPSR.\n30. With its four powers. This represents his buddha activity.\n31. This was written by KPSR's teacher Khenpo Khato. He came from kha to. He also adopted the next two lines from shechen master Dudul Namgyel, another shechen master. the following two lines are praise to Mipham by khato sechur chvkyi gyamtso, Miphams's student.\n32. Representing negative obscurations.\n33. Now there is prediction of Longchenpa by Padmasambhava found quite late by a terton of the late 1900s. Gnubs refers to Nubchen Sangye Yeshe, one of the 25 main students of Padmasambhava. He was a yogi of Manjushri or Yamantaka. He predicts that his emanation of called Mipham will come and that he will have a great ability to reveal mind termas.\nIn many predictions it is said that when the first Khyentse, Kongtrul, and Mipham came that delayed by sixty years, the coming of a bad time in Tibet. Perhaps the fall of Tibet would already have occurred by 1900 without them. In particular Mipham was a predicted to be a special antidote for the armies at the edge of the bad time, the armies of the barbarians. It is said that in his time a Chinese army came to where he was in Chamdo. He stayed in the road, but the army never came. They went another way, and everyone was amazed.\nBefore his parinirvana he said, \"Now I am going to die, and I will not come here again and reincarnate. Tibet will not be as it was any longer. Instead I will go to the kingdom of Shambhala and be the chief minister of the king there. They asked him to teach Kalachakra the day of his passing. Also he asked one of his students to teach Kalachakra at Khato monastery.\nThere are other predictions by Padmasambhava, but I could not find them all. Also pema osel dangalampa said he could write a big book about Mipham's previous lives and prophesies, but that Mipham wouldn't like it. The first Khyentse, Mipham's root guru enthroned him as an emanation of Manjushri, with a sword and lotus. He also wrote this one stanza saying, \"You are like Manjushri and in revering the ultimate meaning of the teachings of Manjushri, Maitreya, Nagarjuna, Asanga, and Dharmakirti, you are incomparable, and therefore I honor you as Manjushri.\n34. Now there is a prediction by the first Dujom Rinpoche, khrag thung bdud 'joms gro lod, predicting Mipham Rinpoche's name and his activities.\n35. There are many others, so many that KPSR could not find them all.\n36. Discussed below. KTDR said spobs here could also be translated \"courage.\"\n37. {so so yang dag par rig pa bzhi} - fourfold correct discriminations/knowledges, the four discriminating/analytical knowledges. Respectively they understand all 1) {don}. = meanings, 2) {chos}. = dharmas, 3) {nges pa'i tshig}. = languages, verbal discrimination 4) {spobs pa}. Confidences, here in the areas of ready speech, accurate penetration, etc.\n38. He is very original, not simply repeating what is said by others.\n39. Through respect.\n40. He was given something like twenty names,\n41. The outline KPSR follows in this commentary was composed by Mipham himself.\n42. nges pa here has a verbal force like nges byed, KPSR.\n43. Gnubs chen sangs rgyas ye shes\n44. gnad gsal bar phye ba bsam gtan mig gi sgron me\n45. gtan tshigs.\n46. On the level of contemplation we cannot just look at things and get the whole truth about them. We have to explore them through reasoning, seek out their characteristics and so forth. Often rigs pa and gtan tshigs are the same, referring to reason in general. Here gtan tshigs is concerned more with the actual process of reasoning and rigs pa is more like the resulting certainty-wisdom, or unmistakable knowledge. Accurate gtan tshigs brings up unmistakable rigs pa in your mind. Then you contemplate and analyze it further. At last you find the wisdom of perfect meaning. Dharmakirti says that we cannot just accept any scripture at face value and expect to get the truth. Reliable understanding develops through the process of examination by reasoning.\n47. Some titles reflect the meaning of a text, particular words that are discussed, the name of the place where the teaching was taught, or of the person who requested it, or a metaphor that is frequently used. Here the name unites the meaning and metaphor. KPSR.\n48. grub mtha', doctrine, is often used elsewhere in a sense where the doctrine is not necessarily true.\n49. don.\n50. By seeing the true nature.\n51. All the Indian schools accept that there is something confused, unclear, or incomplete about the ordinary worldly viewpoint or doctrine. Their various viewpoints are meant to remedy this lack or confusion. They are the various kinds of doctrine beyond the world, which are supposed to be beyond confusion as well. However, the Buddhist view tends to consider all non-buddhist views as confused and worldly. They are opposed to Buddhist views as versions of the view beyond the world. KPSR.\n52. phyal ba, rgyangs 'phen, mur thug, and mu stegs. This text gives a condensed version of some teachings of the Guhyasamaja and Guhyagharba tantras. Here Padmasambhava's summary of confused worldly views is not by names of schools, but kinds of beliefs. In this quotation there are only the names of the various kinds of worldly doctrine. However the text goes on to explain clearly and concisely what these terms mean. phyal ba means literally \"flat ones,\" are those who don't think the perfect state consists of temporary pleasures, eating, drinking, sleeping, and so forth. They think that is enough perfection for us and that there is nothing more.\nThe gyang phen pas have a stronger view of a similar kind. gyang phen literally means \"throwing away.\" They do not worry about past and future lives, but live for the here and now. They have a stronger tendency to ignorance and tend nihilistically to deny and deprecate the past and future. They cling to the present, and \"throw away\" the past and future.\nMur thug pas have a very limited and shrunken idea of what is proper. They are fixated on ritualistic, regimented orthodoxy. They all go in the same direction like sheep. It is like living in a small room with a low ceiling only one window to look out of, so that what can be seen is always the same very limited view. [mur thug literally means reaching the edge, limit, or an extreme state. They go about as far as they can go CIW]\nmu steg pas express extreme views of eternalism and nihilism. They like to live on the edge in that sense, [mu stegs means literally taking extremes as a support, such as a table. CIW] KPSR.\n53. ska ba dpal brtsegs, in his lta ba rim pa bshad pa. He was one of the first seven monks ordained by Shantarakshita. He is one of the three famous translators mentioned in histories and so forth as Ka, Chok, and Shang. {ska cog zhang gsum} - the three young translators. 1) {ska ba dpal brtsegs}. 2) {cog ro klu'i rgyal mtshan}. 3) {zhang ye shes sde}\nKa wa is his family name. He was one of the twenty-five famous students of Padmasambhava. This is a well-known text describing all the various kinds of views. KPSR\n54. These numbers refer to seventeen different levels of view that he describes. The worldly level concerns tarkaya, in Tibetan rtog ge pas, those who are followers of conceptual thought. Those with views beyond the world to varying extents go beyond the realm of concept. One should understand the workings and relationships of the various kinds of views. They might be compared to various objects, that might be made out of gold, with varying levels of craftsmanship and artistry. Finally, one can stop, and leave them all alone, accepting only that which is best, the pure view beyond the world of the ultimate essence. The old masters of all schools learned the whole range of views, Buddhist and otherwise, so they could know what was good in each and what was best and why. KPSR.\n55. Pramana, tshad ma means perfect, reliable, valid, authentic, and non-erroneous. It can be applied to perfect persons, correct perception, valid logical inference, trustworthy scripture, and so forth. Of course we must give reasons why this is so, since no one thinks their own doctrine is invalid. The three pramanas, tshad ma gsum, are perceptual, inferential, and scriptural pramana, mngon sum tshad ma, rjes dpag tshad ma, and lung tshad ma. In vajrayana the tshad ma gsum are a little different: lung, dam ngag, rig pa, scripture, oral instruction, and tig pa in the sense not of conceptual understanding but direct insight. KPSR.\n56. Those arising from obscurations of the kleshas and distorted knowing.\n57. That Buddha abandons all error entails that he has true knowledge, just as when all darkness and murkiness disappears, it follows that it is bright and clear. KPSR.\n58. The buddhas have omniscient, direct knowledge of all natures throughout the three times. Therefore, they have no need to infer hidden characteristics by inference. KPSR\n59. 3 analyses. What is valid knowledge of perception is commonly established by 1) investigating perception. Eg, by looking we can see that there is a glass here. But not all knowledge is perceptual. There is also valid inference using reliable signs. Eg we hear a car outside, and by that we infer that a car is there. This is not just unsupported opinion. 2) Inferential investigation shows that we have a justification for our conclusion. But it is not the highest certainty either. Wisdom could have direct perception of the car, just as when we directly see a car in front of us. It sees the nature of things as they are, eg. emptiness, impermanence etc. Things that are very hidden and hard to discover and cannot even be known by reasons can still be known by 3) investigation of true words. For example the Buddha predicted certain events that later actually occurred. He predicted that various good things would happen if certain practices were followed. Those who believed him eventually verified this. These teachings are beyond our ordinary thought. They cannot be verified at once by ordinary thought, but later can be by wisdom. For example, in the beginning we cannot verify that all beings have Buddha nature. We must take it on trust. But if we become enlightened, we can see the truth of this for ourselves. It becomes direct perception. Therefore, through these three investigations, we can eventually verify for ourselves with certainty that the Buddha's teaching is reliable.\nMoreover, if we simply take all the teachings on one level, without taking into account how they were taught for beings on different levels with different powers of mind and so forth they will seem to be contradictory, But if we understand the intention, they will be seen to be authentic and reliable.\n60. The three kinds of inferential reasoning are 1) grags pa rjes dpag, inference from reports, 2) dgnos stobs rjes dpag, inference from the power of the thing itself, inference from reality itself. This is the one that ultimately shows that the teachings are true. 3) yid ches rjes dpag, the inference of trust of faith. For example, at first we take on trust the teachings that the practice of the six paramitas brings enlightenment. These three kinds of inferential reasoning having all the three modes are necessary when we are analyzing knowledge that at that time is not knowable by us through direct perception. The three analyses and the three pramanas, dpyad gsum and tshad ma gsum, are the same in general. But tshad ma gsum and 3 inferences are somewhat different. KPSR.\n61. The presence of the dharma in the subject, forward entailment, and reversed entailment, phyogs chos, rjes khyab nd ldog khyab. These are discussed below.\n62. To explain the last line of the above root verses, the inner nature of that individual certainty wisdom is Manjushri, so now we pay respect to him.\n63. External knowledge is Manjushri's blessing, which leads to wisdom through a proper attitude of devotion about what is known with the three gates.\n64. One of the four reasonings as discussed below.\n65. The reason in this case is, \"because it is taught by the Buddha, who has completely given up all errors. This, in logical terminology, is a reason of effect. In general, there are three kinds of reason: gtan tshigs or in Sanskrit hetu. These are 1) rang bzhin gyi rtags, the reason of nature, 2) bras bu'i rtags, the reason of effect 3) ma dmigs pa'i rtags, the reason of non-observation. The reasons of effect and nature are quite similar in general. We look at the result, eg. a beautiful flower in the garden, we also see that the cause of that beauty is completely functioning. The cause is the right conditions and so forth. If we see the Buddha's teachings as a result, and we can see its causes too as something wonderful. That is the reason of effect. Logically, the Buddha's doctrine is the dharmin, or subject of inference. Non-confusion, or authenticity is what is to be established about it.\n66. Which are the criteria of a valid syllogism. These are discussed below.\n67. rjes khyab. khyab is literally pervasion, meaning that it applies in all cases.\n68. The contrapositive.\n69. Someone wise might conceivably show others the wrong path; but since buddhas are compassionate, they will not do so, any more than eg, a mother will purposely deceive her child. We know the Buddha has compassion, because compassion is intrinsically part of the seed of enlightenment. Therefore he will not deceive others.\n70. In summary, first Buddha, as the benefit for himself, attained and realized everything through wisdom. Also he has wisdom, compassion, and so forth to help beings according to their inclination, capabilities, and wishes. [khams: element qua. mental state, their interest: eg whether they are inclined to sutra, vinaya, or whatever. dbang po, powers or capabilities, bsam pa is different thoughts and wishes. Each teaching brings its described result, so no one is deceived. So that teaching is without error and deception, khrul med.\n71. Omniscience comes with enlightenment. One who is not enlightened cannot turn the wheel of Dharma completely properly.\n72. gshegs pa has a meaning like de bshin gshegs pa, thus-gone, tathagata, and means \"realized.\" The tathagata is a realized one, or buddha. He understands perfectly, goes with complete understanding, and has developed the wisdom of enlightenment.\n73. The Buddha has omniscience and by that he can turn the wheel of all kinds of teachings of the true and provisional meanings and so forth, as required by all kinds of sentient beings. That kind of thing comes about through dgnos stobs rigs pa, reasoning by the power of the things themselves. These quotes show that the thesis is supported by the teachings. KPSR.\n74. The one knowledge of Buddha clears up all objects of knowledge and knows the measure of all knowledges. KPSR.\n75. You, Buddha, have demolished all the conceptions of worldly beings by going beyond them.\n76. KPSR explained this as meaning about the same as the previous line.\n77. sgeg pa'i rdo rje.\n78. Khab is palace or realm. so this is a blazing realm of the fire of wisdom without ignorance.\n79. As tshad ma/ pramana.\n80. Some teachings are for different sorts of mind. KPSR related this primarily to the idea of differences in capacity for receiving the true meaning teachings, which causes the Buddha to present some teachings in a provisional form.\n81. Whatever Buddha taught, for example the four noble truths, his speech is found to be correct. Therefore we can infer that he is a buddha without obscuration. We know that what he taught was true, because he showed what to accept and reject, and the method for doing that. Everyone would like to get rid of suffering and achieve peace, but Buddha actually showed the perfect method to remove ego-clinging so that we can do this. As regards the principle purpose of his teaching, to remove samsaric obscuration and to obtain nirvana, Buddha was never deceptive. Those who practice as he says will reach the fruition he describes without fail. From this we know he is perfect.\n82. If practitioners see that certain practices are good and suitable for them, they will follow them; but if they are found in practice to be deceitful, unsuitable contradictory, or fruitless they won't. That is obvious. This is the opposite approach to what the Hindus sometimes said in the old debates, \"The Vedas are non-deceptive because they come from the gods.\" If Buddhists do not to go beyond saying, \"the teachings are true because the Buddha taught them, that is no better. KPSR.\n83. {shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa sdud pa tshigs su bcad pa\nSaqchayagaathaa-prajqaapaaramitaa-suutra, condensed perfection of wisdom sutra.\n84. In brief, Buddha's teachings are true, 1) because they correspond to the true nature, and 2nd because if we practice them, we achieve the promised result. KPSR.\n85. Senseless: For example, debating whether a raven has teeth or not is useless for getting enlightened. Wrong sense, means being confused or mixed up about meanings. For example, because of falling into extreme views, one may adopt wrong practices, eg. seeking to stabilize eternal bliss or blank emptiness. The Buddha's teaching doesn't have these two errors so it is meaningful, beneficial, and has the true sense, don ldan. KPSR.\n86. Thos here means study without contemplation and meditation. rtsod pa is fixation on argument and criticizing others. The Buddha does not have these two errors, and therefore his teachings focus on establishing true vision of how things are through genuine practice of the path as a whole.\n87. nyan g.yo deception and hypocrisy. Someone pretends to be very holy and special etc. brtse med means not being caring about others, having no compassion. Because the Buddha's teaching does not have these two faults, it removes all sufferings from oneself and others.\n88. bstan bcos here means the teachings altogether. KPSR\n89. Only Buddhas and their teachings have such qualities, and others don't.\n90. Buddha's teaching is meaningful, and therefore connected to compassion. Its compassionate activity is removing cause of the three realms of samsara. Its result is the ultimate state of peace. The teaching of the great sages [drang srong = .ri.shi] is like that. Without lack of knowledge, they and it have infallible meaning and benefit.\n91. Such teaching will lead to the same enlightenment, and so it should be honored like the teaching of the Buddha.\n92. In one of his praises.\n93. Such a sage has found the middle way between eternalism and nihilism. KPSR.\n94. Without contradiction, kha 'dzin ma byed. This, which is explained below does not mean that they withstand analysis for being absolutely true.\n95. These two lines are very famous. Dignaga had written many teachings on pramana, but in this text he brings them all together. This is part of his first praise to the Buddha. He wrote this on his cape. He wrote it three times. The first time the earth shook seven times. The second chapter of Dharmakirti's tshad ma rnam 'grel is based on these two lines. It establishes that the Buddha is truth and genuineness in a uniquely excellent way. Having seen that the teaching is true, we see that Buddha too is correct and authentic. Buddhas give up all errors from the root. They know all objects without blockage. The perfect teaching has a perfect teacher. He has perfect intention and activities, and so there is a perfect result. Buddha himself attained the realization of a sugata and also his activity helps others.\n96. tshad mar gyur: gaining conviction, attaining pramana. KPSR said that the meaning is not simply that one has true ideas or perceptions, but that one becomes a genuine being as a whole.\n97. Five attributes are mentioned. tshad par 'gyur, becoming means that the Buddha is authentic, true, honest, and non-deceitful. 'gro la phan, for the benefit of sentient beings, means intent to do benefit for all others impartially. ston pa, teacher, means that he has the ability, skill, and methods to teach perfectly. bder gshegs, sugata, means that he has perfectly gone to the enlightened state. This is the source of the ability to be a perfect teacher. So therefore he performs his various activities as skyob pa, protector, of beings All these establish that the Buddha is a perfect teacher.\n98. I praise you with great respect and also invoke respect from others.\n99. Here wish = intention. KPSR\n100. Sbyor ba, the application of his intention, is his showing teachings in accord with the needs and capabilities of beings.\n101. This praise to the Buddha says that Buddha has perfect cause and result, therefore he is perfect = tshad ma. The perfect cause is that his intention and actions are perfect. bsam pa is intention, compassion for all sentient beings without exception. The result is the two benefits for oneself and others. Those people who gain the perfect benefit for oneself become sugatas. This is understand in three ways: They have gone beautifully, without returning, and gone completely. Going beautifully means that they give up all major obscurations that are causes of samsaric birth. Going without returning means giving up any cause of returning to the world. The Buddha is even beyond nirvana. Gone completely means that he has no stains of obscurations, but has gone completely into enlightenment. Those three senses apply in three ways. The first shows that Buddha is very special compared to people, Buddhist or otherwise, with only a little temporary detachment. Second, Buddha is beyond all the arhats and pratyekabuddhas. Third he is beyond those of the mahayana, no matter how learned and accomplished who have not removed all the obscurations.\n102. Perfect beneficial activity for others means the Buddha can give others the teaching, and liberate them. KPSR.\n103. If, through the three pramanas, we have incomparable certainty wisdom within our hearts, that confidence is ultimate devotion, the ultimate refuge and Praise, and the root of enlightenment, and all blessings etc.\n104. yid khyed shes kyi ded pas.\n105. We see that all these are consistent, without the confusion that characterizes samsara.\n106. i.e. reality, things as they are.\n107. This is by KPSR himself. He had a dream in which he was reciting it. At first he thought it was from text, but could not find it. Still he rather liked it and decided to include it.\n108. Like the sun. KPSR.\n109. It can also be known in this way. KPSR. See above this distinction between the essence and blessing of Manjushri.\n110. Or in terms of the three reasons, rtags gsum the 'bras bu rtags, like seeing smoke and by that establishing fire.\n111. The sangha possesses this awareness and liberating qualities of realization. These inner qualities arise from certainty-wisdom. Also it is the sangha who practices the Buddha's teaching, and so establishes this certainty-wisdom.\n112. It shows that people who do this are special, since they respect someone else. KPSR.\n113. bstan bcos, usually shastra, as above. Here KPSR said that the sense was more the teachings in general, and US said that the connotation was the teachings when delivered for certain purposes.\n114. This increases merit so that enlightenment is gained. If reasoning is rightly used it inspires people to appreciate directly the experiential meaning of the teachings and teacher. But often the result is just the opposite, to make it all seem very conceptualized, abstract, and proud of its orthodoxy. It becomes uselessly circular. The teachings are true because the Buddha taught them, and the Buddha is an authentic, true person because the teachings say so. We have to be inspired to see for ourselves what is meant. For example, the Gelugpas often begin more with reasoning and then practice. The Nyingmas and Kagyus tend to start in the middle with some of both. But in the end, if they practice well, they all go to the same place. KPSR.\n115. 1 of the six root texts of the Kadampa school. So merit, as gained from expressions of homage and so forth, is important. KPSR\n116. legs bzhad. Literally it means good/ excellent speech/ explanation/ teaching. It refers to all the true teachings of the sutras, tantras, and commentaries. KPSR\n117. yang dag brten, completely relying on. KPSR\n118. His commentary on Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyaamakakaarikas. First Chandrakirti quotes the Buddha's teaching in the sutras, then he comments on the meaning and says \"that is what it says.\" Then KPSR has a shes do mark the end of the quotation and notes that many others have also said this.\n119. nges pa, certainty.\n120. KPSR Here \"the world\" means \"the individual beings in the world.\" These beings arise in dependence on the five skandhas. \"Beings\" is a name imputed to the skandhas, so ultimately it is they that are the world. KPSR. The usage is something like the french tout le monde. Literally it means \"all the world,\" but the sense is \"Everybody.\" The worldly truth is not the real truth about the world, which would be the absolute truth. It is the erroneous beliefs about the world of people in general.\nThen why not translate a'jig rten as people? That would obscure other meanings. The Chandrakirti passage also says the content of worldly truth = the skandhas, and explains this by saying it depends on the skandhas. How does it depend? Primarily logically, in the sense that entities in the world are imputed on the basis of patterns of dharmas included under the skandhas. Causal and compositional dependence presupposes the existence of these imputed entities. In that sense a'jig rten includes all statements about entities in the world, persons and otherwise that the world's opinion would say are true. To make sense of this in English it helps to remember that while a'jig rten is usually translated \"the world\" that meaning comes from the literal sense \"that which is a support of = is characterized by destruction.\" The point is also being made that entities described in worldly truth = entities dependent on the skandhas = destructible entities.\n121. There are two occurrences of zhes. The first indicates that Chandrakirti is referring to a similar quote from Nagarjuna. The second, zhes sogs, refers to what Chandrakirti has said as a whole, and notes that many others have also sais this. KPSR.\n122. bden gnyis dgnos pa'i gnas tshul. The meaning would be pretty much the same if dgnos pa'i were omitted. The primarily intended meaning is not \"the two truths as the nature of things in general.\" rdzi zab read rdze zab. KPSR. He considered rendering it, \"the nature of these things the two truths.\" Then he decided \"the actual nature of the two truths\" was better.\n123. mtha' dpyad na, literally search out the edge, analyze the details. system: rnam bzhag.\n124. nges tshig refers to the meaning of the individual words of a term, in terms of semantics, etymology and the like. This sort of analysis is very common in Tibetan texts. Thus, for kun rdzob, relative truth, one would discuss what kun means and what rdzob means. In sanskrit it would involve breaking a word into components, eg. sam-v.riti.\n125. mtshan nyid is more general meaning of a term. It can mean essential characteristic, defining characteristic, or definition. Students in monastic colleges learn many formulae defining Dharma terms. Both these formulae and the characteristics they describe are mtshan nyid.\n126. blo dang dbang pos bsam pa'i yul. At first KPSR interpreted this as mind = sems or shes pa, dualistic consciousness and the objects of the five senses. Then he seemed to think the meaning might be clearer if the phrase were broken down as blo yis bsam pa'i yul dang dbang pos bsam pa'i yul. Objects contemplated by mind and objects contemplated by the five senses. The meaning is ultimately the same, but the second makes it clearer that mind insofar as it is beyond dualistic objects is not included. Relative objects are things we perceive \"like Buddhas, dogs, and raccoons.\"\n127. nges tshig.\n128. Svaalak.shana, rang mtshan. Individual characteristics are not deceptive on their own everyday practical level. We are not cheated in our ordinary expectations from knowing that fire is hot and so forth. We would be cheated on that level if we believed fire was cold. This is true even though on another level \"Fire is hot\" and \"fire is cold\" are on the same footing in being unable to bear analysis for being statements of absolute truth.\n129. The names and systems of the two truths were formulated by the madhyamaka and higher schools to bring clearer understanding to the notions of worldly beings. They also made further divisions of true and false within the relative, making appropriate divisions within symbolic knowledge for that purpose or side of things. KPSR.\n130. gshal bya, Literally measure. KPSR. One investigates things, trying to encompass them from every angle, until finally one sees them as they are.\n131. .\n132. If you want to know more about one you should also study the other. The lions look in opposite directions with their necks joined. That is a symbol of strength that will not fall into the two extremes. KPSR\n133. byed las\n134. .\n135. khyab chung. If we think interdependence, tendrel, is concerned only with everyday matter of causal succession, such as the arising from each other of seed, stem, flower, and fruit, our understanding is very small and partial. Everything in the universe is within tendrel, and everything constantly depends on everything else. All the atoms in the whole of space are connected and so forth. This connection is not only within a single moment in time, but extends throughout the three times. That is to say, it transcends everyday notions of space and time.\n136. This is a famous sanskrit grammar. It is in the Tengyur. It contains all the Sanskrit-Tibetan rules of translation that were made at the time of Trisong Detsen's son Mutig Tsenpo. He invited many great masters like Vairochana, Kawa Peltseg and so forth. For example that is why bhagavat is always translated bcom ldan 'das and so forth. sgra is sound, or word, and sbyor is how to apply them. sgra sometimes refers to sanskrit. For instance sgra mkhas doesn't mean someone who knows about sound, but an expert on Sanskrit.\n137. 'du 'phrod 'du is joined or gathered together, and 'phrod mingled, or harmonious meeting. Things meet and cooperate. The universe is a coop, as it were, a condominium. Also there is a sense of things working as they are supposed to: Weapons cut, medicines cure, and whatever. This is a mtshan nyid of tendrel, its definition, what is it really. Mtshan nyid means definition, but also characteristic or principle. For example, like people are essentially characterized by being able to think.\n138. What arises interdependently does not arise without cause. Non-cause, rgyu min, means a completely external cause, unrelated to the nature of what arises. An eternal creator would be such a cause, whose nature is totally unrelated to that of the temporary things that arise. For example, as barley does not come from rice. Some systems say time brings about everything. It makes us sleep, wake, get old, die etc.\n139. nyer len: for example eating food is not like this. The creation of an embryo from the father and mother is. The things in this list are so connected. For example sdug bsngal nyer len phung po eg the skandhas are closely connected to suffering.\n140. go 'byed,\n141. Often name and form is explained as the five skandhas. In that case feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness are the skandhas of name.\n142. rig pa.\n143. len pa.\n144. smra ngags 'den read smre ngags 'don. KPSR.\n145. Literally ignorance etc.\n146. dmigs pa'i yul. This is pretty much equivalent to objects of knowledge here. KPSR.\n147. Emotional patterns, including ignorance, focus our attention or knowledge. Then the sense consciousnesses assist and reflect the emotion. We can also say emotion is projected onto sense-perception. Because of ignorance these are seen as independent external objects. The emotions are like a basic ground. The senses help project them. Then they increase. There is always ignorance, but without the helping conditions the emotions arise as the fully developed suffering of samsara.\n148. The system of karma, the kleshas, and suffering refers to the close association of these elements in terms of the twelve nidanas. Of the 12 nidanas the first is ignorance, the eighth is attachment, srid pa, and the ninth is len pa, accepting. These three are known as kleshas. 'du bshes, the second, and the tenth are called las, karma. The rest are called sdug bsngal. There are seven of those. They arise through the agency of the six inner elements or khams, which are related to the body. Thus the inner earth element makes us solid, the inner water element makes us moist etc. Here the subject is inner tendrel as related to our personal consciousness and skandhas, as opposed to the system of external tendrel as a whole.\n149. bsam pa yid byed. Here both terms have a similar meaning, attention etc. except that bsam pa refers more to the object and yid byed to the subject. Both terms also have other meanings.\n150. nyer len.\n151. The point is that as long as there is dualistic consciousness etc there will be rebirth.\n152. 'jug pa. KPSR.\n153. 'phos. From the viewpoint of absolute analysis.\n154. Generations of students learn to chant the same texts from each other, but recitation involves different word-events. Lamps may be used to light each other, but each has its own individual flame. Things do not actually go into a mirror when their reflections appear there. The power of producing fire is not in a burning glass by itself, but works by its concentrating the rays of the sun. People insulted at work may go home and insult their dogs and cats, but it is not the same insult-event in each case. The continuity of the skandhas in rebirth should be seen as analogous to these examples. KPSR.\n155. 'bras bu ltos pa rigs pa: the effect depends on the cause. That connection of reliance or dependence is reliable and unchanging, and makes systematic sense. One looks from the effect to the cause.\nbya ba byed pa'i rigs pa: the reasoning of causal functioning. One looks from the viewpoint of the cause producing the effect.\n'thad pa grub pa'i rigs pa: suitable establishment. What happens is natural and in order. It is proper for fire to burn. That it is what it usually does, and what it is \"supposed\" to do. It snows in winter and rains in summer. Water washes things. Medicines heal and poisons kill. It can also be used to describe valid proofs, arguments, and so forth. Here the point is that sees things as they are without exaggeration and deprecation. The difference from the reasoning of action or function is that there is an emphasis not just on what something does, but on this being \"suitable\" within the system of relationships of things as they are. What is done fits in the system of things.\nchos nyid rigs pa: Again this is like the nature of fire being hot, and water moist. This is more concerned with the quality of the thing itself and the last with what it might or can be expected to produce. For example fire is hot by nature, and therefore it is capable of burning, cooking, and so forth.\nrigs pa can be applied to objects, e.g. seeing the nature and proper action of fire as it is; but it is also a mental state of seeing these natures and functions etc as they are. So it also has a subjective aspect.\n156. The nature of things is not bizarre, capricious, and utterly unfathomable but reasonable and orderly in the sense of being workable. This well-known order really exists on the phenomenal level. We can discover it properly, and this is rigs pa. Being able to cook dinner and wash the dishes involves knowing things as they are to some extent. If we think fire will cool things off, we don't have rigs pa.\n157. rigs pa.\n158. Ie not falsifiable and irrefutable by anything.\n159. 'bras bu'i sgno nas rgyu'i tshogs nus sgrub par byed pa rgyu bya ba byed pa'i mtshan nyid. producing cause/ function: EG from barley seeds + the other necessary conditions barley grows and nothing else.\n160. rgyu'i sgo nas a'bras bu'i tshogs nus sgrub par byed pa a'bras bu ltos pa'i rigs pa'i mtshan nyid.\n161. chos kun ngo bo gang yin pa sgrub par byed pa ngo bo chos nyid rigs pa'i mtshan nyid. chos kun ngo bo isn't the nature of all dharmas [the absolute, emptiness] here. It refers to the natures of all dharmas, e.g heat for fire, wetness for water, though included among those is the nature of emptiness, the absolute.\n162. rgyu a'bras ngo bo nyid gsum gyi shes bya gnas lugs dngos stobs gyi rigs pas sgrub pa a'thad pa sgrub pa'i rigs pa'i mtshan nyid.\n163. mngon par grub pa: this can mean fully/ actually/ perfectly/ manifestly establishing/ existing; but here the difference between the sense bya ba byed pa in the last phrase and this is best considered in terms of the definitions of the different kinds of reasoning.\n164. yul dang tshad. tshad here the same sense as tshad ma.\n165. mthun snang su grub pa.\n166. dgnos gshi.\n167. thal sa.\n168. bsgrub pa thal drags.\n169. thal drags.\n170. Ego.\n171. In abhidharma perception is often said to be \"direct.\" This makes the most sense when we say we have direct knowledge of our own experiences. It means that the way we usually talk about experiences is such that we do not speak of experiences AS SUCH as obscured, or say that we do not know what they really are. We may say that a certain experience is obscured or illusory perception of an external object. Abhidharma sometimes gets in trouble by talking about direct perception of external objects. Later schools rightly refuted such statements, which entail an absolute knowledge of external objects that could never be wrong or incomplete.\n172. It is said to be proper to establish such things in traditional Buddhist philosophy on the ordinary level, in abhidharma etc. What is not said to be proper is to take this kind of reasoning beyond its proper scope and attempt to use such reasoning to establish such entities as truly existing absolutes. The analysis for the absolute of madhyamaka is said to establish the sense in which this is improper. One also has to explain the seeming paradox of such statements as \"The absolute is beyond words\" of \"The absolute is empty.\"\n173. lkog\n174. zal sar skyel ba.\n175. dngos po['i] stobs kyi rigs pa.\n176. 'thob.\n177. rgyu bya ba byed pa'i rigs pa.\n178. byed pa.\n179. bya ba.\n180. gdags.\n181. 'di dag.\n182. 'ga' zhig.\n183. a'dzin.\n184. nyer len gyi rgyu. This is variously translated substantial cause, perpetuating cause etc. It is opposed to conditions because it is more directly connected or is the thing that would ordinarily be said to turn into the effect as the seed does the sprout.\n185. lhan cig byed pa'i rkyen.\n186. In abhidharma consciousnesses are momentary. Ordinarily we commonly speak of being aware of things over a space of time. This is explained in abhidharma as being due to a causal succession of dharmas like successive frames of a movie. [Let us ignore for now that apprehension is also said to become conceptualized or mentalized].\n187. Not mentioned in the verse above.\n188. sems kyi rjes 'jug.\n189. sems dang mtshan nyid mtshan gshi.\n190. rjes 'jug pa rnams. Sometimes this is translated continued functioning.\n191. sems kyi rjes su a'jug pa.\n192. sdom.\n193. 'bras bu gcig skyes pa.\n194. rnam par sngo sogs kyi 'dzin stangs.\n195. lung ma bstan. The essence = the universal absolute essence, enlightenment, sugatagarbha etc.\n196. so sor rtags pa'i stobs.\n197. This of course raises a question of infinite regress, which has been dealt with in various ways historically.\n198. dmigs pa'i rkyen.\n199. 'jug ldog.\n200. bzo = bzo gnas kyi rig pa, mechanical arts and crafts, one of the five sciences, rig [pa'i] gnas lnga. And such, sogs refers to the rest of these as enumerated below.\n201. bslab bya US.\n202. rig pa'i bzo gnas. ES lists {rig [pa'i] gnas [chen] lnga: the 5 [major] sciences [branches of traditional Buddhist learning] (1) {nang gi rig pa} = spiritual/ buddhist philosophy, 2) {gtan tshigs kyi rig pa} = dialectics/ logic, [here tshad ma, which is equivalent] 3) {sgra'i rig pa} = grammar, 4) {gso ba'i rig pa} = medicine, 5) {bzo gnas kyi rig pa} = mechanical arts and crafts]].\n203. rig gnas chung ba lnga: the 5 minor sciences [[= *{rig pa'i gnas lnga} snyan ngag dang, mngon brjod, sdeb sbyor, zlos gar, skar rtsis te lnga'o]].\n204. In this case, since some of these doctrines conflict, both logically and ion their practical goals, so not all them can be The Doctrine.\n205. The cause of productive action and dependence of the fruition on the cause.\n206. rnam par dpyod. One can investigate the world in such a way that one becomes discriminating about how to deal with it practically.\n207. lam gsum The three realms below, on and above the earth, traditionally this world system of Mount Meru and the four continents plus the celestial [physical, form and formless] realms above and the hells etc. below, hence including all of the six lokas.\n208. nog bo chos nyid kyi rigs pa = chos nyid kyi rigs pa= reasoning of nature.\n209. chos nyid.\n210. gzugs su rung ba.\n211. In terms of pleasure, pain, and indifference.\n212. The Tibetan is tautological: The definition of 'du byed is 'du byed, it produces conditioned composites of dharmas, samskaras. These are basic patterns of emotional-behavioral reactiveness from which fully articulated consciousness is built up.\n213. don: It would be alright to say objects, but what is meant includes awareness of self and whatever aspects of situations, actions, and so forth we may apprehend.\n214. chos nyid.\n215. rang bzhin.\n216. kyis OR by.\n217. rtogs, not realization of enlightenment here.\n218. dngos po'i rdzas.\n219. ldog pa'i btags.\n220. don gzhan in logic often has the sense of what is opposite to a certain characteristic, like not blue for blue.\n221. yongs su gzung ba'i don nam yul: they become objects in the sense of dualistic samsaric objects truly existing from their own side and so forth.\n222. rang mtshan rdzas yod.\n223. ldog pa. This word can also mean opposites. The two usages are related in that the kind of characteristics meant divide things dualistically into eg permanent and impermanent, 1 and many, blue and non-blue, etc and are conceived of as being used so that if the term applies the opposite necessarily does not.\n224. rnam par brtags.\n225. Verbal and phenomenal characteristics are lumped together in these conceptions, and there is a blurring of what can be properly said of linguistic and conceptual entities and about experiences and objects, even though we claim to believe that nothing can be a common basis of both kinds of characteristics. Therefore, our everyday statements will not stand up to analysis.\n226. ldog pa.\n227. 'jug ldog.\n228. gnas tshul. Here the term does not refer to the way things are in absolute truth, emptiness, but to how they are in their everyday relative apparent natures.\n229. snang ba dang sel ba.\n230. ngo bo nyid kyis stong pa nyid: This might literally mean that they are empty of essence, that their essences are empty or that their essences are emptiness. Generally unless a special point is being made about the emptiness of emptiness etc all of those are taken as equivalent.\n231. rang bzhin gyis grub pa...med: their nature does not [truly] exist, they do not exist intrinsically/ concretely/ spontaneously/ independently/ truly. This is pretty much synonymous with emptiness. Exactly what this term is taken to mean can vary somewhat with context and school etc. However to say all things are natureless in terms of the absolute analysis of madhyamaka is not to be simply and directly equated with saying they don't exist, ma grub, in the ordinary relative sense. All exponents agree on that. Otherwise things that exist would be existent by nature absolutely, while the term is used so that the natures involved in ascertaining both existence and nonexistence of things are equally rang bzhin gyis ma grub.\n232. Emptiness, marklessness and wishlessness, stong pa nyid, mtshan nyid med pa, smon lam med pa.\n233. An argument analyzing cause as emptiness like vajra slivers that work their way into and destroy the mountain of wrong views of non-empty true existence, whose reason shows the gate of liberation of marklessness: Things like a sprout have no true arising, because they do not arise from themselves, something other than themselves, both, or neither [ie without cause].\nIn Buddhist logic those possibilities are considered as exhaustive, and denying all of them means that there is no way for things truly to arise at all. This is classified as a reason of non-observation of a non-apparent related cause, one of the gtan tshigs chen po lnga.\n234. mtshan ma med pa.\n235. smon pa med pa, 1 of the three gates of liberation. According to madhyamaka absence of the four extremes of existence or arising follows from arising from causes and conditions = interdependent arising.\n236. The third of the 3 gates of liberation.\n237. chos nyid.\n238. dam bcas.\n239. yang dag par khong du chud.\n240. The skandhas are the components of samsaric experience which intrinsically involves suffering.\n241. 'phrog par byed.\n242. sgrub pa'i mtshan nyid. mtshan nyid can also be definitions. Translating it that way would be appropriate if the primary model of Buddhist logic was the certainty of tautology, EG a rose is a rose, as it is in western symbolic logic. However Buddhism uses the model of perception. A jaundiced person can be mistaken about the color of a white conch because it looks yellow, but cannot be mistaken in that way about its looking yellow. That kind of certainty is the paradigm for Buddhist logic. Blatant tautology is actually considered a logical fallacy, as presented below, for the same reason it is considered certain in the west. Its truth or falsity is independent of anything that may be the case in the world.\n243. 'phros don\n244. Perception and inference.\n245. ji ltar.\n246. gsal byed, apprehender. However the agent in this case is not a person, but a dharma or configuration of dharmas. What it means to speak of agency in such a situation is defined in detail in the context of abhidharma, but from the viewpoint of ordinary language it might sometimes be better to say cognition or apprehension to avoid confusion with persons and egos. The meaning is that of abhidharma in either case.\n247. gsal bar byed.\n248. gsal.\n249. phwya ba.\n250. bcad shes.\n251. 'du bar bshed.\n252. gshal bya.\n253. rang mtshan, spyi mtshan.\n254. rang gi ngo bo: variously translated self-nature, own being etc. svabhava.\n255. a'dra ba thun mong. EG two cars might both be white or they might not.\n256. gshal bya mngon gyur.\n257. gzhal bya lkog gyur.\n258. gzugs bzang, pleasing form & face, a good body.\n259. kun rdzob/ samv.riti satya and don dam paramartha satya.\n260. rang rang gi ngo bo.\n261. This is formless direct perception of emptiness.\n262. The first moment of perception is said to be non-conceptual, in the sense of being pure sense conscious unmixed with mental consciousness, which however does arise in the second instant.\n263. The explanation is usually given that the mental perception involves a mental image \"like\" the original perception which is used as a mental \"sample\" of what sort of thing it is. The same kind of explanation is given in classical western empiricism. If this is considered various doubts begin to arise: For example If we could mislabel or misidentify a perception, why would we not do the same with the sample, or make a mistake about the sameness of our sample and the perception. Empiricism and abhidharma take place on the level where we are satisfied with \"sample\" analogy and its promise of certain knowledge. Modern analytic philosophy, and madhyamaka involves not being satisfied with the proffered certainty of that example.\n264. Or the definition of a real thing is that which exists with a productive power. This is from the sautrantika point of view.\n265. spyi'i mtshan nyid.\n266. don. Classical buddhist understanding of logic is in terms of the objects or dharmas of abhidharma. When madhyamaka questions these or limits the scope of their validity, it does the same to buddhist logic.\n267. rtog pa.\n268. ngos bzung.\n269. khyad par du phye ba.\n270. sngar ma rtogs pa'i don.\n271. Unconfused by obscurity, illusion, etc.\n272. gzugs can.\n273. 'khrul.\n274. Experience as such is just what it is. It makes no sense to speak of mistakes here. EG What sense is there is saying that a person presently stating \"this conch looks yellow to me\" reports what is experienced? Perhaps it is a doubt whether this person remembered what the words mean.\n275. rtog.\n276. rtsing zhib.\n277. rigs.\n278. According to this account, use of language does not in itself involve conception. Linking a perceived token or name to a perception or kind of perception is not seen as conceptual. It seems to follow that there could be a non-conceptual use of language where everything that was said was linked to reality in this way.\n279. spel.\n280. dbang mngon gyi rgyun mthar.\n281. bzhad zin pa'i ngo bo'i rnam pa gzhan shig yod do.\n282. khong du chud.\n283. blo.\n284. gsal.\n285. don rig shes pas vs rang rig next.\n286. It makes distinctions about it, in particular that it is of something other than oneself, external etc.\n287. Self-awareness in the case of dreams is often not known to be such, but thought to be sense perception.\n288. yid.\n289. rab 'byams.\n290. blo mas.\n291. bzhad pa and a'jug pa.\n292. kyang bshad du med.\n293. sgra bshad du med.\n294. mtha'.\n295. yul shes bzhin du or awareness of objects\n296. rang rig.\n297. gsal rig: [ apprehending] consciousness. One can say luminous insight to emphasize the shift in quality and increased energy that comes from not fixating objects as other.\n298. rab tu skye ba.\n299. gsal dang rig.\n300. rig par byed pa la.\n301. nges par byas.\n302. That is if all these terms are equivalent so that self awareness = non-confusion = ultimate [pure] experience.\n303. This is a traditional example like the ox-herding pictures. At first one may see various signs of an elephant. Finally one sees the beast itself.\n304. mngon sum don rig.\n305. tshur mthong tshad ma, as opposed to the pure pramana of the noble ones.\n306. mngon du gyur ba.\n307. It is worth reminding ourselves sometimes that this doesn't make much sense unless the distinction between existence and true existence is given a special significance. In ordinary usage the terms would usually be synonymous. Otherwise it is as satisfying as someone saying, I'll give you a hundred dollars, I just won't really give you a hundred dollars, and then if you complain saying with a supercilious air that you don't understand the subtleties of enlightened logic.\n308. don [gyi] spyi: abstract/ generalized characteristics, presented as an exaggerated generic image.\n309. rtogs par byed.\n310. 'jug ldog.\n311. don spyi.\n312. rnam par rtog pa. The same term is often translated discursive thoughts, in which case the meaning is that the conceptions become a rambling, digressive stream; in Buddhism the discursiveness is motivated by karmic attachments to the kleshas..\n313. byed las.\n314. don rnams la blang dor gyi 'jug ldog.\n315.\n316. rtags pa'i tshul gsum.\n317. mthun pa'i phyogs.\n318. mi mthun pa'i phyogs.\n319. Qualification of the subject of the thesis by the dharma established by the reason.\n320. It is part of the meaning or definition. No one who understands the meaning can fail to be sure that this is a valid inference\n321. Syllogisms in Indian logic generally involve examples. This helps eliminate some paradoxes that might arise in unexampled inference. If there are no unicorns, is it right or wrong or what to say All unicorns are white, or no unicorns are white.\n322. rtags de sgrub shes 'dod chos can gyi steng du 'god tshul dang mthun par tshad mas nges pa'i tshul.\n323. rjes khyab.\n324. ldog khyab.\n325. phyogs.\n326. Because traditionally in buddhist thought it is said to be not produced and not impermanent.\n327. dpe ltar snang, or counterfeit example\n328. ldan 'brel and 'du brel.\n329. ngo bo...gyis khyab.\n330. ldog cha.\n331. This seems to echo madhyamaka criticism of the abhidharma notion of the intrinsically single discrete substance. How can what is intrinsically one have many characteristics?\n332. nyer len gyi rgyu.\n333. lhan cig byed pa'i rkyen.\n334. skye byed gyi rgyu.\n335. rnam par bzhag a'jog gyi rgyu.\n336. These relationships are said not to withstand madhyamaka analysis for being absolute.\n337. bdag gcig a'brel ba.\n338. sel.\n339. har byung a'gal ba.\n340. don.\n341. a'gal zla.\n342. dgnos 'gal.\n343. nye bar mkho ba'i.\n344. rtags su bkod pa rtags.\n345. la la, which often means sometimes.\n346. nyer len.\n347. Here having a cause is taken as being part of what it means to be a [sometimes] thing.\n348. dmigs rkyen.\n349. spu ris phyes pa.\n350.\n351. bdag.\n352. khyad par.\n353. bkod pa khyad par dag pa'i rang bzhin gyi rtags sbyor.\n354. gzhan la ltos pa.\n355. mi ltos par dag pa.\n356. don grub.\n357. tha snyad grub. The connection is between the meanings of the words.\n358. ma dmigs pa'i rtags sbyor.\n359. mtshan nyid and mtshan gzhi.\n360. tshad = measure. OR made into pramana.\n361. dpog mi nus.\n362. By being claimed to be proved or refuted.\n363. shes 'dod chos can.\n364. 'brel zla and 'gal zla.\n365. khyab byed ma dmigs pa.\n366. 'gal dmigs rtags.\n367. khyab bya.\n368. mes khyab par non pa'i shar gzhir chos can.\n369. khyab bya.\n370. .\n371. 'gal dmigs kyi rtags.\n372. rtag dgnos.\n373. grub.\n374. dharmin, chos can.\n375. phyogs.\n376. phyogs chos.\n377. khyab ches pa.\n378. As above one cannot be certain whether an invisible rakshasa is here.\n379. dwogs: fear doubt, uncertainty. Belief is important in Buddhist reasoning because in debate with persons of other schools arguments often take the form, \"If you believe A, than you must/ can't also believe B.\" The debate must start with premises accepted by opponents if they are to be convinced.\n380. ldog pa tha dad min pa'i thun mong ma nges pa'i rtags.\n381. phyogs gnyis ka a'jug pa.\n382. mthun phyos and mi mthun phyogs. A common usage EG for \"Sound is impermanent, because it is produced:\" the mthun phyogs = impermanent things. The mi mthun phyogs = permanent things.\n383. Two things cannot have a characteristic in common if there are not two things to begin with. In western logic tautology is often used as the exemplar of necessity. For Buddhist logic too \"son of a barren woman\" is an exemplar of something certainly impossible. However while \"parts is parts\" is an example of the obious in the west, it seems that in Buddhist logic it is fallacious. This is more a matter of proper form than it is one of a difference in logical views. \"Parts is parts is not well-formed in Buddhist logic.\n384. In the text the examples actually follow below.\n385. mnyan bya.\n386. rig sgra bzhin lta bu mthun phyogs yod kyang ma mthong.\n387. blo ltos lhag ldan thun mong ma nges gi rtags.\n388. phyogs gnyis ka la cha gnyis su 'jug pa'o.\n389. lhag ldan.\n390. That the syllogism is certainly invalid is beside the point here. What is in question is only the relationship of the reason, being a speaker, to the according and non-according dharmas, omniscience and non omniscience. It is assumed that if there are Buddhas, they speak. I suppose mutes that would invalidate the reverse pervasion are also ignored. (Interestingly enough some sutra passages say that in some of the limitless worlds of the universe beings including buddhas do not literally speak, although they do communicate in other ways.)\n391. don gyis.\n392. rtags rigs.\n393. a'jug tshul.\n394. so so rang gis rig par bya'o. KPSR is very firm about translating the term this way rather than as discriminating awareness or self-awareness.\n395. rang gi ngo bo nyis kyis stong pa. OR empty of their own nature, empty of themselves. In any case the point is that they and any purported nature of them will not bear madhyamaka's analysis for the absolute\n396. rang mtshan.\n397. Obviously there is a sense in which it can be expressed, since it has just been done, and Mipham does not regard this statement as self-refuting on its own level. If an exponent of madhyamaka accepts that it is proper to say \"absolute truth is beyond concept\" and deny the reverse, one must hold that there must be a level in which it is proper to make valid and invalid propositions, as well as a non-conceptual way to make sense of things, and that it is possible for the two kinds of validity these have to co-exist, because their criteria and meanings are different. This is in fact Mipham's position\n398. yongs chod du.\n399. mtshan gzhi. what is characterized, things that are examples of it or to which the definition applies.\n400. snang yul du gyur ba'i rang mtshan rnams.\n401. In English negation and denial are distinguished from refutation, a valid proof of a negation or denial. dgag in Tibetan can typically mean either. in same way sgrub can refer to assertion of existence or truth or proof of these.\n402. In Buddhist logic affirming negation is like \"this is not a horse.\" It is understood as presupposing the thing called \"this\" in such a way that it affirms \"This is something other than a horse. Cf, \"I am no fool.\" Non-affirming negation is like \"There ain't no Santa Claus.\" It is understood as denying Santa Claus and not affirming anything.\n403. rang rgyud.\n404. rgol gshan dag.\n405. gzhal bya'i gnas lugs.\n406. .\n407. chos mthun pa nyid can dang chos mi mthun pa nyid can no.\n408. chos mthun sbyor gyi sgrub ngag [[EG what is produced is impermanent, like a vase, 1 of the {sgrub ngag yan lag gnyis ldan}]].\n409. blo skyon.\n410. don skyon.\n411. tshig skyon.\n412. blo bde.\n413. sems med.\n414. phyogs dang mthun phyogs gang rung yin pa'i phyir.\n415. dam bca'.\n416. That is accepted by both disputants.\n417. sun 'byin ltar snang.\n418. skyon la skyon du brjod. Either one says there is a mistake where there is none, or one identifies a fault that could be validly refuted, but the reasons one gives are not in fact valid.\n419. For logical reasons, rather than because there are reasons but the opponent failed to think of them.\n420. Again this is logical rather than a question of what the opponent actually does.\n421. mtha' gcig tu khyab.\n422. skabs su babs pa'i don.\n423. mi srid. The absolute refutes everything is impossible, but that viewpoint alone loses the distinction between valid and invalid conventional pramana.\n424. If one presses the eyeball while looking at the moon one seems to see two moons.\n425. Because it deals with distinctions in the conventional or relative spheres all of which do not bear analysis for absolute truth.\n426. Or their essence is established as emptiness. ngo bo nyid kyis stong. In conventional pramana the two may have a different sense, but here the absolute pramana free from all complexities of characteristics is meant.\n427. de la don dam par ma grub pas so.\n428. Here the distinction is not the vision of noble ones vs ordinary beings, but what is normally called true and false by ordinary beings. Here too someone might argue that Buddhism needs only the distinction between absolute truth and what is not true and does not need the further distinction of what confused beings who know only the conventional truth of the world call true and false.\n429. rang gis rang tshugs. This autonomy is not like proving the existence of God or a first cause in rationalist philosophy so much as a claim that the features of our conceptual structure that madhyamaka uses to establish emptiness are intrinsic to language.\n430. yang dag mtha'.\n431. The kayas are the object and the perceiver is wisdom.\n432. blo gros,\n433.\n434. We will rely on the individual rather than the dharma etc.\n435. .\n436. brda sbyor yin pa'i phyir.\n437. skabs don gyi tshig.\n438. lhur len.\n439. bor: literally thrown away.\n440. chos mtshungs: This could mean \"It is the same with the dharma.\" That does not change the meaning much.\n441. 'chel.\n442. spros pa lhur len.\n443. shing 'on shig. shing = tree/ wood; 'on = bring take, get, carry.\n444. rab tu phyungs.\n445. A nyingma translator.\n446. dgongs gshi gang la dgongs nas su.\n447. See below.\n448. thod rgal. Though the same term is used for a very profound stage of realization in ati, here the connotation is negative.\n449. Of suffering.\n450. dka' thub.\n451. gzhal.\n452. rlom\n453. cung zad.\n454. kha drangs par ma yin pa'i tshul dgos ched dang bcas par rtogs pa.\n455. dgongs pa bzhi.\n456. mnyam pa nyid: ES: even mindedness\n457. don gzhan\n458. dus gzhan.\n459. intentions concerning other individuals.\n460. What one means by and hopes to accomplish by giving a certain teaching etc. dgongs gzhi gzhan lo dgongs pa. dgongs gzhi gzhan la dgongs pa: intending another intention.\n461. The first buddha of this kalpa.\n462. bzung, the sense is just hearing, reading etc.\n463. Feminists must deal with the fact that traditionally it is said that all buddhas must be male.\n464. The four concealed intentions are bzhugs pa ldem por dgongs pa, mtshan nyid..., gnyen po, bsgyur ba...\n465. 'khyog.\n466. gnas skabs theg pa gsum.\n467. bslab pa rnam gyyengs med la nan tan.\n468. dgongs and ldem dgongs.\n469. dgongs gshi dgongs nas.\n470. spyi don.\n471. stegs yin tshul.\n472. sgra mthun don 'phags kyi gtan tshigs: cf commentary below.\n473. tshad ma bka' gsung.\n474. bdag pa chen po.\n475. rgyud rnams.\n476. These are: dbyings don dam: absolute truth of space/ the dhatu, ye shes don dam: absolute truth of wisdom, and a'bras bu don dam the absolute truth of the fruition, which has the five categories of the body, speech, mind, quality and action of buddhahood. GD.\n477. dpyod.\n478. {gsung rab kyi yan lag bcu gnyis 12 branches of the [Buddhist] scriptures, 12 kinds of excellent speech (1 {mdo a'i sde}. = general teachings. 2 {dbyangs kyis bsnyad pa'i sde}. = hymns & praises. 3 {lung du bstan pa'i sde}. = prophecies. 4 {tshigs su bcad pa'i sde}. = teaching in verse. 5 {ched du brjod pa'i sde}. = aphorisms. 6 {gleng gzhi'i sde}. = pragmatic narratives. 7 {rtogs pa brjod pa'i sde}. = biographical narratives. 8 {de sta bu byung ba'i sde}. = narratives of former events as examples. 9 {skyes pa'i rabs kyi sde}. = {jataka.m} narratives of former births. 10 {shen tu rgyas pa'i sde}. = extensive teachings. 11 {rmad du byung ba'i sde}. = narratives of marvels. 12 {gtan la dbab pa'i sde}. = teachings in profound doctrines.\n479. in tshul khrims, discipline; shes rab, prajna; and sems, mind = meditation GD.\n480. gzhol.\n481. chu bur, also bubble.\n482. gzhol bar shes.\n483. .\n484. gzu bo'i blos]lit by genuine mind/ thoughts.\n485. phyag mtshan.\n486. \"profound and extensive\" cut for metrical reasons.\n487. rol mtsho are lakes of play of chang curds etc where the naga kings live.\n488. The following passage compares the eight treasures of confidence to the eight auspicious symbols.\n489.\n490. 'khyug.\n491. spyi brtol..\n492. through the ten directions [cut for metrical reasons.\n??\nTHE BLAZING LIGHTS OF THE SUN AND MOON\n4\n1\nTHE BLAZING LIGHTS OF THE SUN AND MOON\nTHE SWORD OF PRAJQA","title":"Sraltext","type":"page"}