{"collection":"cfu","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/cfu/sbe03/sbe03101.htm","path":"cfu/sbe03/sbe03101.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/cfu/sbe03/sbe03101.htm","text":"IT is not according to the truth of things to class the Sung of L\u00fb among the sacrificial odes, and I do not call them such. K\u00fb Hs\u00ee says:--'King Kh\u0103ng, because of the great services rendered by the duke of K\u00e2u, granted to Po-khin, (the duke's eldest son, and first marquis of L\u00fb), the privilege of using the royal ceremonies and music, in consequence of which L\u00fb had its Sung, which were sung to the music in its ancestral temple. Afterwards, they made in L\u00fb other odes in praise of their rulers,\nwhich they also called Sung.' In this way it is endeavoured to account for there being such pieces in this part of the Shih as the four in this division of it. Confucius, it is thought, found them in L\u00fb, bearing the name of Sung, and so he classed them with the true sacrificial odes, bearing that designation. If we were to admit, contrary to the evidence in the case, that the Shih was compiled by Confucius, this explanation of the place, of the Sung of L\u00fb in this Part would not be complimentary to his discrimination.\nWhether such a privilege as K\u00fb states was really granted to the first marquis of L\u00fb, is a point very much controverted. Many contend that the royal ceremonies were usurped in the state,--in the time of duke Hs\u00ee (B.C. 659 to 627). But if this should be conceded, it would not affect the application to the odes in this division of the name of Sung. They are totally unlike the Sung of Shang and of K\u00e2u. It has often been asked why there are no F\u0103ng of L\u00fb in the first Part of the Shih. The pieces here are really the F\u0103ng of L\u00fb, and may be compared especially with the F\u0103ng of Pin.\nL\u00fb was one of the states in the east, having its capital in Kh\u00fc-f\u00e2u, which is still the name of a district in the department of Yen-k\u00e2u, Shan-tung. According to K\u00fb, king Kh\u0103ng invested the duke of K\u00e2u's eldest son with the territory. According to Sze-ma Khien, the duke of K\u00e2u was himself appointed marquis of L\u00fb; but being unable to go there in consequence of his duties at the royal court, he sent his son instead. After the expiration of his 'regency, the territory was largely augmented, but he still remained in K\u00e2u.\nI pass over the first two odes, which have no claim to a place among 'sacred texts.' And only in one stanza of the third is there the expression of a religious sentiment. I give it entire, however.","title":"SBE 3: Shih King: Odes of the Temple and the Altar: III. The Praise Odes of L\u00fb: Introduction","type":"page"}