{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/003/0030453.htm","path":"chr/ecf/003/0030453.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/003/0030453.htm","text":"Chapter VII.\u2014St. Paul\u2019s Phraseology Often Suggested by the Jewish Scriptures. Christ Our Passover\u2014A Phrase Which Introduces Us to the Very Heart of the Ancient Dispensation. Christ\u2019s True Corporeity. Married and Unmarried States. Meaning of the Time is Short. In His Exhortations and Doctrine, the Apostle Wholly Teaches According to the Mind and Purposes of the God of the Old Testament. Prohibition of Meats and Drinks Withdrawn by the Creator.\n\u201cAnd the hidden things of darkness He will Himself bring to light,\u201d 5472 even by Christ; for He has promised Christ to be a Light, 5473 and Himself He has declared to be a lamp, \u201csearching the hearts and reins.\u201d 5474 From Him also shall \u201cpraise be had by every man,\u201d 5475 from whom proceeds, as from a judge, the opposite also of praise. But here, at least, you say he interprets the world to be the God thereof, when he says: \u201cWe are made a spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men.\u201d 5476 For if by world he had meant the people thereof, he would not have afterwards specially mentioned \u201cmen.\u201d To prevent, however, your using such an argument as this, the Holy Ghost has providentially explained the meaning of the passage thus: \u201cWe are made a spectacle to the world,\u201d i.e. \u201cboth to angels,\u201d who minister therein, \u201cand to men,\u201d who are the objects of their ministration. 5477 Of course, 5478 a man of the noble courage of our apostle (to say nothing of the Holy Ghost) was afraid, when writing to the children whom he had begotten in p. 443 the gospel, to speak freely of the God of the world; for against Him he could not possibly seem to have a word to say, except only in a straightforward manner! 5479 I quite admit, that, according to the Creator\u2019s law, 5480 the man was an offender \u201cwho had his father\u2019s wife.\u201d 5481 He followed, no doubt, 5482 the principles of natural and public law. When, however, he condemns the man \u201cto be delivered unto Satan,\u201d 5483 he becomes the herald of an avenging God. It does not matter 5484 that he also said, \u201cFor the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord,\u201d 5485 since both in the destruction of the flesh and in the saving of the spirit there is, on His part, judicial process; and when he bade \u201cthe wicked person be put away from the midst of them,\u201d 5486 he only mentioned what is a very frequently recurring sentence of the Creator. \u201cPurge out the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened.\u201d 5487 The unleavened bread was therefore, in the Creator\u2019s ordinance, a figure of us (Christians). \u201cFor even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us.\u201d 5488 But why is Christ our passover, if the passover be not a type of Christ, in the similitude of the blood which saves, and of the Lamb, which is Christ? 5489 Why does (the apostle) clothe us and Christ with symbols of the Creator\u2019s solemn rites, unless they had relation to ourselves? When, again, he warns us against fornication, he reveals the resurrection of the flesh. \u201cThe body,\u201d says he, \u201cis not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body,\u201d 5490 just as the temple is for God, and God for the temple. A temple will therefore pass away 5491 with its god, and its god with the temple. You see, then, how that \u201cHe who raised up the Lord will also raise us up.\u201d 5492 In the body will He raise us, because the body is for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. And suitably does he add the question: \u201cKnow ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ?\u201d 5493 What has the heretic to say? That these members of Christ will not rise again, for they are no longer our own? \u201cFor,\u201d he says, \u201cye are bought with a price.\u201d 5494 A price! surely none at all was paid, since Christ was a phantom, nor had He any corporeal substance which He could pay for our bodies! But, in truth, Christ had wherewithal to redeem us; and since He has redeemed, at a great price, these bodies of ours, against which fornication must not be committed (because they are now members of Christ, and not our own), surely He will secure, on His own account, the safety of those whom He made His own at so much cost! Now, how shall we glorify, how shall we exalt, God in our body, 5495 which is doomed to perish? We must now encounter the subject of marriage, which Marcion, more continent 5496 than the apostle, prohibits. For the apostle, although preferring the grace of continence, 5497 yet permits the contraction of marriage and the enjoyment of it, 5498 and advises the continuance therein rather than the dissolution thereof. 5499 Christ plainly forbids divorce, Moses unquestionably permits it. 5500\nNow, when Marcion wholly prohibits all carnal intercourse to the faithful (for we will say nothing 5501 about his catechumens), and when he prescribes repudiation of all engagements before marriage, whose teaching does he follow, that of Moses or of Christ? Even Christ, 5502 however, when He here commands \u201cthe wife not to depart from her husband, or if she depart, to remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband,\u201d 5503 both permitted divorce, which indeed He never absolutely prohibited, and confirmed (the sanctity) of marriage, by first forbidding its dissolution; and, if separation had taken place, by wishing the nuptial bond to be resumed by reconciliation. But what reasons does (the apostle) allege for continence? Because \u201cthe time is short.\u201d 5504 I had almost thought it was because in Christ there was another god! And yet He from whom emanates this shortness of the time, will also send what suits the said brevity. No one makes provision for the time which is another\u2019s. You degrade your god, O Marcion, when you make him circumscribed at all by the Creator\u2019s time. Assuredly also, when (the apostle) rules that marriage should be \u201conly in the Lord,\u201d 5505 that no Christian should intermarry with a p. 444 heathen, he maintains a law of the Creator, who everywhere prohibits marriage with strangers. But when he says, \u201calthough there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth,\u201d 5506 the meaning of his words is clear\u2014not as if there were gods in reality, but as if there were some who are called gods, without being truly so. He introduces his discussion about meats offered to idols with a statement concerning idols (themselves): \u201cWe know that an idol is nothing in the world.\u201d 5507 Marcion, however, does not say that the Creator is not God; so that the apostle can hardly be thought to have ranked the Creator amongst those who are called gods, without being so; since, even if they had been gods, \u201cto us there is but one God, the Father.\u201d 5508 Now, from whom do all things come to us, but from Him to whom all things belong? And pray, what things are these? You have them in a preceding part of the epistle: \u201cAll things are yours; whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come.\u201d 5509 He makes the Creator, then the God of all things, from whom proceed both the world and life and death, which cannot possibly belong to the other god. From Him, therefore, amongst the \u201call things\u201d comes also Christ. 5510 When he teaches that every man ought to live of his own industry, 5511 he begins with a copious induction of examples\u2014of soldiers, and shepherds, and husbandmen. 5512 But he 5513 wanted divine authority. What was the use, however, of adducing the Creator\u2019s, which he was destroying? It was vain to do so; for his god had no such authority! (The apostle) says: \u201cThou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn,\u201d 5514 and adds: \u201cDoth God take care of oxen?\u201d Yes, of oxen, for the sake of men! For, says he, \u201cit is written for our sakes.\u201d 5515 Thus he showed that the law had a symbolic reference to ourselves, and that it gives its sanction in favour of those who live of the gospel. (He showed) also, that those who preach the gospel are on this account sent by no other god but Him to whom belongs the law, which made provision for them, when he says: \u201cFor our sakes was this written.\u201d 5516 Still he declined to use this power which the law gave him, because he preferred working without any restraint. 5517 Of this he boasted, and suffered no man to rob him of such glory 5518 \u2014certainly with no view of destroying the law, which he proved that another man might use. For behold Marcion, in his blindness, stumbled at the rock whereof our fathers drank in the wilderness. For since \u201cthat rock was Christ,\u201d 5519 it was, of course, the Creator\u2019s, to whom also belonged the people. But why resort to the figure of a sacred sign given by an extraneous god? 5520 Was it to teach the very truth, that ancient things prefigured the Christ who was to be educed 5521 out of them? For, being about to take a cursory view of what befell the people (of Israel) he begins with saying: \u201cNow these things happened as examples for us.\u201d 5522 Now, tell me, were these examples given by the Creator to men belonging to a rival god? Or did one god borrow examples from another, and a hostile one too? He withdraws me to himself in alarm 5523 from Him from whom he transfers my allegiance. Will his antagonist make me better disposed to him? Should I now commit the same sins as the people, shall I have to suffer the same penalties, or not? 5524 But if not the same, how vainly does he propose to me terrors which I shall not have to endure! From whom, again, shall I have to endure them? If from the Creator, What evils does it appertain to Him to inflict? And how will it happen that, jealous God as He is, He shall punish the man who offends His rival, instead of rather encouraging 5525 him. If, however, from the other god\u2014but he knows not how to punish. So that the whole declaration of the apostle lacks a reasonable basis, if it is not meant to relate to the Creator\u2019s discipline. But the fact is, the apostle\u2019s conclusion corresponds to the beginning: \u201cNow all these things happened unto them for ensamples; and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.\u201d 5526 What a Creator! how prescient already, and considerate in warning Christians who belong to another god! Whenever cavils occur the like to those which have been already dealt with, I pass them by; certain others I despatch briefly. A great argument for another god is the permission to eat of all kinds of meats, contrary to the law. 5527 Just as if we did not ourselves allow that the burdensome p. 445 ordinances of the law were abrogated\u2014but by Him who imposed them, who also promised the new condition of things. 5528 The same, therefore, who prohibited meats, also restored the use of them, just as He had indeed allowed them from the beginning. If, however, some strange god had come to destroy our God, his foremost prohibition would certainly have been, that his own votaries should abstain from supporting their lives on the resources of his adversary.\nOur author\u2019s version is no doubt right. The Greek does not admit the co-ordinate, triple conjunction of the A.V.: \u0398\u03ad\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03bd \u1f10\u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03ae\u03b8\u03b7\u03bc\u03b5\u03bd \u03c4\u1ff7 \u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03bc\u1ff3\u2014\u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f00\u03b3\u03b3\u03ad\u03bb\u03bf\u03b9\u03c2 \u03ba\u03b1\u1f76 \u1f00\u03bd\u03b8\u03c1\u03ce\u03c0\u03bf\u03b9\u03c2.\n442:5478\nNimirum: introducing a strong ironical sentence against Marcion\u2019s conceit.\n443:5479 443:5480 443:5481 443:5482 443:5483 443:5484 443:5485 443:5486 443:5487 443:5488 443:5489 443:5490 443:5491 443:5492 443:5493 443:5494 443:5495 443:5496\nConstantior: ironically predicated.\n443:5497\n1 Cor. 7:7, 8.\n443:5498\n1 Cor. 7:9, 13, 14.\n443:5499 443:5500 443:5501 443:5502\nEt Christus: Pamelius and Rigaltius here read \u201cChristi apostolus.\u201d Oehler defends the text as the author\u2019s phrase suggested (as Fr. Junius says) by the preceding words, \u201cMoses or Christ.\u201d To which we may add, that in this particular place St. Paul mentions his injunction as Christ\u2019s especially, \u03bf\u1f50\u03ba \u1f10\u03b3\u1f7c, \u03b1\u03bb\u03bb\u1fbd \u1f41 \u039a\u03cd\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf\u03c2, 1 Cor. vii. 10.\n443:5503 443:5504 443:5505 444:5506 444:5507 444:5508 444:5509 444:5510 444:5511 444:5512 444:5513 444:5514 444:5515 444:5516\nComp. 1 Cor. 9:13, 14, Deut. 18:1, 2.\n444:5517 444:5518 444:5519 444:5520 444:5521 444:5522 444:5523 444:5524 444:5525 444:5526 444:5527 445:5528","title":"Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol III: Tertullian: Part II: St. Pa...","type":"page"}