{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn90.htm","path":"chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn90.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn90.htm","text":"12 The word fu/sei which is found in the text seems out of place, and has been omitted in the translation, agreeably to the emendation of Boherellus.\n13 'Ara fa\\r h!qele fantasioume/noij toi=j a0nqrw/poij u9po= Qeou=, a0peilhfo/toj me\\n a/qro/wj th\\n kaki/an. emfu/ontoj di\\ th\\n a0reth\\n, th=n e0panoi/rqwdin gene/sqai;\n14 'Ara fa\\r h!qele fantasioume/noij toi=j a0nqrw/poij u9po= Qeou=, a0peilhfo/toj me\\n a/qro/wj th\\n kaki/an. emfu/ontoj di\\ th\\n a0reth\\n, th=n e0panoi/rqwdin gene/sqai;\n15 oi9 la\\r e0pi\\ ta\\ ne/ltista prokalou/menoi lo/foi, Qeou= au0tou\\j dedwko/toj, ei0si\\n e0n a0nqrw/poij..\n17 Wisd. Solom. i. 7, kai\\ to\\ sune/xon ta\\ pa\\nta gnw=sin e!xei fwnh=j..\n20 kai\\ para\\ tou=t' e!latton e!cein dokw=n.\n21 kaqa\\per oi9 neo/ploutoi tw=n a0nqrw/pwn e0pideiktiw=tej, pollh/n tina kai\\ pa/nu qnhth\\n filotmi/an tou= Qeou= katamarturou=si.\n26 e0n th= paradoxh= th=j qeio/thtoj.\n28 Deut. xxxii. 8, 9 (according to the LXX.).\n30 Ei0si\\ ga/r tinej ei0rmoi\\ kai\\ a0kolouqi/ai a!fatoi kai\\ a0nekdih/fhtoi peri\\ th=j kata\\ ta\\j a0nqrwti/naj yuxa\\: diafo/rou oi0konomi/aj.\n32 [The word \"reliable\" is used here. I cannot let it stand, and have supplied an English word instead].\n35 oi/k a0xrh/stouj. On Origen's views respecting rewards and punishments, cf. Huet's Origeniana, book ii. question xi.\n37 di/khn basanistou= pu=r fe/rwn.\n38 [Note this testimony to the authorship of Koheleth, and that it is Scripture.]\n40 ei0 xph\\ e0pisthsanta toi=j xro/noij ei0pei=n.\n41 a0ne/tlasan kata\\ perio/odou: tauto/thtasj kai\\ a0paralla/ktouj toi=j i0di/oij poioi=j kai toi=j sumbebhko/sin au0toi=j.\n42 kaki/an e0ti\\ plei=on xeome/nhn.\n45 [On this figure (anthropopathy) see vol. ii. p. 363, this series.]\n53 th\\n tou= xrusou= (i#n' ou#twj o0noma/sw), fu/sin th=j yux h=j, h@ th=n a0rgu/rou, dolwsa/ntwn.\n54 [See note supra, cap. x. S.]\n55 9O Qeo\\j a0gaqo/j e0sti, kai\\ kalo\\j, kai= e0dai/mwn, kai\\ e0n tw=| kalli/stw. kai\\ a0ri/stw|.\n57 th= pronoi/a| kai\\ th= oikonomi/a|.\n61 The reading in the text is, e0pi\\ me/rouj gi/netai au0th=j, which is thus corrected by Guietus: e0pimerh\\j gi/netai au0to\\j.\n65 [Gieseler cites this chapter (and cap. xix. infra) to show that Origen taught that the Logos did not assume a human body. Could words be stronger to the contrary? \"He becomes, as it were, flesh,\" is used below to guard against transmutation.]\n69 [The transfiguration did not conflict with his mortal nature, nor the incarnation with his immortality.]","title":"chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn90.htm","type":"page"}