{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn94.htm","path":"chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn94.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn94.htm","text":"227 lata\\ th\\n prw/thn e0kdoxh/n.\n228 tou\\j spermatikou\\j lo/gouj.\n229 kata\\ to\\n prohgou/menon noh=n.\n230 Cf. 1 Cor. ix. 9, 10, and Deut. xxv. 4.\n231 Cf. Eph. v. 31, 32. Cf. Gen. ii. 24.\n234 problh/mata kai\\ parabolai/.\n237 e0pa\\n e0pakou/sh|tou= par' e9autou= pa/nta poih/santoj.\n242 Cf. 2 Tim. iii. 8. [Note this testimony concerning Numenius.]\n246 The reading in the text of Spencer and of the Benedictine ed. is kataleifqei=san, for which Lommatzsch has adopted the conjecture of Boherellus, katalhfqei=san.\n248 u9p' e0nuparxou/shj a0fanta/stou fu/sewj dioikoume/w/.\n249 pro\\j xrei/an ou0k eu0katafro/nhton.\n250 o#pwj pote\\ a!llwj o!ntwn.\n255 pe/mpthj para\\ ta\\ te/ssara stouxei=a ei\\nai fu/sewj.\n261 kainh=j diadecame/nhj o9dou= kai\\ a0lloi/aj, etc. For diadecaue/nhj, Boherellus would read a0pokata/stasij. Cf. Origen, de Princip., iii. c. 5; ii. c. 3. [See also Neander's Church History, vol. 1. p. 328, and his remarks on \"the general a0pokata/stasij\" of Origen. S.]\n263 Cf. Pliny, x. c. 66: \"Anguem ex medull\u00e2 hominis spinae gigni accepimus a multis.\" Cf. also Ovid, Metamorphos., xv. fab. iv.\n266 kai\\ mi/a ei0j a0moibh\\n pali/ntropon i0ou=sa kai\\ e0paniou=sa.\n268 ou!tw de\\ kai\\ to\\ a0pollu/menon ei0j metabolh\\n diame/nei.\n269 diele/gxetai ou0k e0pidexo/mena to\\ gennai=on kai\\ a!a/ti/r0r9hton.\n270 o9 th\\n a0lh/qeia/ e0kperilamba/nwn.","title":"chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn94.htm","type":"page"}