{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn97.htm","path":"chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn97.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/004/footnote/fn97.htm","text":"364 ki/rkoj, \"the hen-harrier,\" \"Falco,\" or \"Circus pygargus.\" Cf. Liddell and Scott, s.v.\n365 Cf. Homer, Odyss., xv. 526.\n366 kai\\ ou0 kaki/an me\\n, oi9onei de\\ kaki/an ou\\san.\n369 Cf. Homer, Odyss., iv. 685; cf. also xx. 116, 119.\n370 Cf. Homer, Odyss., xx. 120.\n371 Cf. Homer, Odyss., xvii. 541.\n372 Cf. Homer, Odyss., xvii. 545.\n373 ou!te toi=j tuxou=si tw=n a0nqrw/pwn.\n374 Cf. Lev. xix. 26. The Septuagint here differs from the Masoretic text.\n375 Cf. Deut. xviii. 14, cf. 12.\n385 [See vol. i. pp. viii., 12, this series. Observe, Origen, in Egypt, doubts the story.]\n386 a0ll' ei0 mh\\ pa=n e@rgon. \"Gelenius does not recognise these words, and Guietus regards them as superfluous.\" They are omitted in the translation.\n390 See this treatise, Book VIII, cap. xlviii., infra.\n391 What is of Faith as to Everlasting Punishment? in reply to Dr. Farrar's Challenge, 1879. By the Rev. E. B. Pusey, D.D., Oxford, 1881.\n392 Theodicy, pp. 295-311 (answer to Foster), p. 81 (to Lord Kames), p. 310 (to Tillotson). I must confess that Bledsoe is paulo iniquior when he gives no reference to Tillotson's language. If the retort is based on the sermon (xxxv. vol. iii. p. 350, ed. folio, 1720) on the \"Eternity of Torment,\" however, I do not think it just. The latitudinarian primate restricts himself therein to a very guarded statement of that reserved right by which any governor commutes or remits punishment, though he cannot modify a promise of reward. I wish modern apologists for the divine sovereignty had not gone farther.\n9 e0n toi=j kaqarwta/toij tou= ko/smou xwri/oij e0pourani/oij, h! kai\\ toi=j toi=j tou/twn kaqarwte/roij u=perourani/oij.","title":"Fn97","type":"page"}