{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn67.htm","path":"chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn67.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn67.htm","text":"16 See Elucidation III. p. 154, supra.\n17 Cyprian facetiously remarks (see Ep. xlviii. p. 325) that Novatus reserved his greater crimes for the greater city; \"since Rome, from her magnitude, ought to take precedence of Carthage.\"\n18 Lombard., Sentences, p. 394, ed. Migne. Compare Aquinas.\n19 Macarius, Theologie Orthodoxe, vol. iii. p. 244.\n20 Catechism of the Council of Trent, cap. vii. quest. 2.\n21 A monstrous statement. See Ignatius passim.\n22 L'Union Chretienne, p. 69, 1870.\n23 A Letter to Pius the Ninth, Bishop of Rome, etc., published by Parker, London, r8ya. It also appeared in most of the languages of Europe, and was circulated by the Greeks in their own tongue.\n24 Same epistle and section, farther on. It seems needless to say that these Punic \"Africans\" were Asiatics, in fact.\n28 Cap. xx. p. 252, note 7, etc. See vol. iii., this series.\n29 Vol. iii. p. 260, cap, xxxvi. and note 13.\n31 This canon of the Council of Milevis ( a.d. 402), at a much later date, maintains the ancient principle.\n32 Calvin, De necessitate reformanda ecclesia, Works, vol. viii. p. 60. Amstelodami, 1667.\n33 Elucidation III. p. 411, supra.\n34 Bingnam, Antiquities, book iii. capp. ii., iii.\n35 Eusebius, H. E., book vi. cap, xliii.\n36 Consult Cave, Dissertation on the Ancient Church Government, appended to his Primitive Christianity, p. 366.\n38 Burgon, Letters from Rome, p. 34. London, 1862.\n39 Introduction to Criticism, etc., p. 453, also 564. Compare the Treatise on Unity, sec. 6, p. 423, infra.\n40 Calling attention to evidence that verse 8 is a sort of apodosis implying the protasis of verse 7, as read in the Vulgate and English Received.","title":"chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn67.htm","type":"page"}