{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn98.htm","path":"chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn98.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn98.htm","text":"8 Non multum remittit-probably a misprint for \"permultum.\"\n13 Isa. lvii. 15 et seq., LXX.\n14 It is taken for granted that the \"ut\" of the original is a misfor \"aut.\"\n15 Otherwise, \"has forgotten me days without number.\"\n17 Here also the emendation of \"quae\" for \"quod\" is obviously necessary.\n29 There is evident confusion here, and no place can be found for the word \"vocem.\"\n30 It has been taken for granted that \"numerosum\" is a misprint for \"nemorosum.\"\n33 Trombellius suggests \"if\" instead of \"but.\"\n34 Ezek. xxxii. 12, etc., LXX.\n50 The original has only \"ben,\" which Trombellius reasonably assumes to be meant for \"benedicti.\"\n55 \"Emendaverit,\" probably a mistake for \"emuadaverit,\" \"shall purge,\" as in the Vulg.; scil. ekkaqarh.\n56 2 Tim. ii. 16. [On true penitence see Epistle xxv. p. 304 supra.]\n57 Rev. ii. 5. [This selection of texts seems made on the same principle which dictated the compilation of texts against the Jews: a breviarium, the author calls it,- qusedam utilia collecta et digesta,-to be read with readiness, and frequently referred to.]","title":"chr/ecf/005/footnote/fn98.htm","type":"page"}