{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/006/footnote/fn23.htm","path":"chr/ecf/006/footnote/fn23.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/006/footnote/fn23.htm","text":"20 In Georgius Syncellus, Chron., p. 106, al 85.\n21 In the same, p. 148, al. 118, from the Third Book of the Chron. of Africanus.\n23 Others write Ogyges. Josephus (in Apionem), Euseb. (de Praepar.). Tatian [vol. ii. p. 81], Clemens [not so, vol. ii. p. 324], and others write Ogygus.\n24 The text is, o@j toy= prwtou= prwtou= kataklusmou= gegonen epw/numoj. The word e0pw/numoj is susceptible of two meanings, either \"taking the name from\" or \"giving the name to.\" 'Wgugia kaka/ was a proverbial expression for primeval ills.\n25 The text is here, kata\\ th\\n e9c Ai@gupton tou= laou= meta\\ Mwu>\\se/wj i@codon gene/sqai, for which we may read kata\\ th\\n e9c Ai0guptou, etc.\n26 9Wgugon 9Aktai=on h= ta\\ pgasso/mena tw=n o0noma/twn. Compare xiii. 6, where we have to\\n ga\\r meta\\ 9Wgugon 9Aktai=on, etc.\n27 From Georgius Syncellus, Chron., Third Book. In Euseb., Praepar., x. 40. [Compare vol. ii. pp. 324-334.]\n29 There is a difficulty in the text; Viger omits \"Athenian.\"\n30 The Latin translator expunges the \"and\" (kai/), and makes it = more careful than all the Attic writers.\n31 The original here, as in the same passage above, is corrupt. It gives kata\\ thn Ai@gupton, which Migne would either omit entirely or replace by a0p' Ai@guptou.\n32 These words are inserted according to Viger's proposal, as there is a manifest omission in the text.\n33 From Georgius Syncellus, Third Book. In the Chron. Paschal., p. 104, ed. Paris, 84 Venet.\n34 From the same, Book III., and from Book IV. In Syncellus p. 197, al. 158.\n35 The text is, a0nagrafh=nai de\\ prw/thn th\\n tessareskaideka/thn. etc.\n36 From Book v. In Eusebius, Demonst. Evang., Book VIII ch. ii. p. 389, etc. The Latin version of this section is by Bernardinus Donatus of Verona. There is also a version by Jerome given in his commentary on Dan ix. 24.\n37 Jerome in his version gives the 15th (quintum decimum).\n38 In Syncellus, p. 307, al. 244.\n39 The sense is doubtful here: kai\\ w9j ou0den h0ci/ou pisteu/esqai e@st' a@n kataxqh|\\ ei0j tn\\n e9autou= a0rxh/n, etc.\n40 There is a break here in the original.\n41 This is according to the rendering of the Latin version.\n42 Here again there is a blank in the original.\n43 The text is corrupt here. It gives, e0n tw|= mesaioli/w|, a word unknown in Greek. Scaliger reads Maisaio/lion. Goarus proposes Mauswlaion, which we adopt in the translation.\n45 Samaria was so named in reference to its restoration by Gabinius, the proconsul of Syria. See Josephus (Antiq., book xiv. ch. x. ), who states that Gabinius traversed Judea, and gave orders for the rebuilding of such towns as he found destroyed; and that at this way Samaria, Azotus, Scythopolis, Antedon, Raphia, Dora, Marissa, and not a few others, were restored.\n46 The text is: h@n 'Olumpia\\j rpq 9, h@tij pro/j 9 kalansw=n Marti/wn kata\\ 'Antioxei/j kd 9 e@tei h@cqh, di' h9j e0pi\\ tw=n i/di/wn o9ri/wn w@sth o9 e\\niauto/j. In every fourth year the 24th day of February ( = vi. Cal. Mart.) was reckoned twice. There were three different eras of Antioch, of which the one most commonly used began in November 49 B.C. Migne refers the reader to the notes of Goarus on the passage, which we have not seen. The sense of this obscure passage seems to be, that that period formed another fixed point in chronology.\n47 In Georgius Syncellus, Chron., p. 322 or 256.\n48 e@n kata\\ th\\n o@yin. [Vol. iii. p. 58, Elucid. V., this series.]\n50 Or, on a table; w9j e0n grafh|=.\n51 The text in the beginning of this section is hopelessly corrupt. Scaliger declares that neither could he follow these things, nor did the man that dreamt them understand them. We may subjoin the Greek text as it stands in Migne: Metacu/ de\\ tou= le/gein to\\n e0niauto\\n h/merw=n tce, kai\\ tetramori/ou, kai tw=n a0po\\ iq' th=j nuxqhme/rou, merw=n e0...ei0j ta\\ uoe/, hme/rai to\\ para/llhlon ei0si\\ j/, kai\\ tetramorion. 9Eti ge mh\\n to\\n th=j selh/nhj mh=na kata\\ th\\n a0kribh= leptologi/an eu/ri/skomen kq', kai\\ h\\me/raj kai\\ nukto/j diaireqei/shj ei/j me/rh se/, tou/twn ta\\ o', kai\\ h@misu ...a@ gi/netai e0nnenhkostotetarta tri/a.\n56 In Basil, De Spiritu Sancto, ch. xxix. \u00a7 73; Works, vol. iii. p. 61, edit. Paris. [Elucidation II.]\n57 For r0hmatwn, words, three Mss. give r/htw=n, sayings.\n58 For h9mi=n Patri/ there is another reading, h9mwn patra/si = to Him who gave to our fathers.\n59 These words, \"and our Lord,\" are wanting in three mss..\n1 Gallandi, Bibl. Patrum, vol. i. Proleg. p. lxxi. and p. 329.\n2 See Eusebius, Life of Constatine, ii. 50.\n3 The Martyrologies celebrate their memory on the 10th June: one of the Colbert Mss. gives Zoticus for Getulius.\n4 A Colbert ms. gives \"laudantes\" = praising.\n5 This response, along with the next interrogation, is wanting in the Colbert manuscript.","title":"chr/ecf/006/footnote/fn23.htm","type":"page"}