{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/201/2010134.htm","path":"chr/ecf/201/2010134.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/201/2010134.htm","text":"p. 203 Chapter XXV.\u2014Philip and Modestus.\nPhilip who, as we learn from the words of Dionysius, 1272 was bishop of the parish of Gortyna, likewise wrote a most elaborate work against Marcion, 1273 as did also Iren\u00e6us 1274 and Modestus. 1275 The last named has exposed the error of the man more clearly than the rest to the view of all. There are a number of others also whose works are still presented by a great many of the brethren.\nPhilip\u2019s work against Marcion which Eusebius mentions here is no longer extant, and, so far as the writer knows, is mentioned by no other Father except Jerome (de vir. ill. 30), who tells us only what Eusebius records here, using, however, the adjective pr\u00e6clarum for Eusebius\u2019 \u03c3\u03c0\u03bf\u03c5\u03b4\u03b1\u03b9\u03cc\u03c4\u03b1\u03c4\u03bf\u03bd\n203:1274\nOn Iren\u00e6us, see above, chap. 21, note 9.\n203:1275\nModestus, also, is a writer known to us only from Eusebius (here, and in chap. 21) and from Jerome (de vir. ill. 32). According to the latter, the work against Marcion was still extant in his day, but he gives us no description of it. He adds, however, that a number of spurious works ascribed to Modestus were in circulation at that time (Feruntur sub nomine ejus et alia syntagmata, sed ab eruditis quasi \u03c8\u03b5\u03c5\u03b4\u03cc\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03c6\u03b1 repudiantur). Neither these nor the genuine works are now extant, so far as we know.","title":"Nicene and Ante-Nicene Fathers, Ser. II, Vol I: The Churc...","type":"page"}