{"collection":"chr","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/chr/ecf/214/2140180.htm","path":"chr/ecf/214/2140180.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/214/2140180.htm","text":"The election of those who are to be appointed to the priesthood is not to be committed to the multitude.\nAncient Epitome of Canon XIII.\nWhoso is chosen by seculars is ineligible.\nFrom this canon it is evident that in ancient times not only bishops but also priests were voted for by the multitude of the people. This is here forbidden.\nBishops are elected by metropolitans and other bishops. If anyone in this manner shall not have been promoted to the Episcopate, but shall have been chosen by the multitude, he is not to be admitted nor elected.\n[It is clear from this that by \u201cthe Priesthood\u201d Aristenus understands the episcopate, and I think rightly.]\nThe word in the Greek to which \u201cmultitude\u201d corresponds (\u1f44\u03c7\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2) properly signifies a tumult. 176\nWhat the fathers intend to forbid are tumultuous elections, that is, that no attention is to be paid to riotous demonstrations on the part of the people, when with acclamations they are demanding the ordination of anyone, with an appearance of sedition. Such a state of affairs St. Augustine admirably describes in his Epistola ad Albinam (Epist. cxxvi., Tom. II, col. 548, Ed. Gaume).\nAnd it is manifest that by this canon the people were not excluded from all share in the election of bishops and priests from what St. Gregory Nazianzen says, in Epistola ad C\u00e6sarienses, with regard to the election of St. Basil. From this what could be more evident than that after this canon was put out the people in the East still had their part in the election of a bishop? This also is clear from Justinian\u2019s \u201cNovels\u201d (Novell\u00e6, cxxiij., c.j., and cxxxvij., c. ij.)\nThis canon is found in the Corpus Juris Canonici, Gratian\u2019s Decretum, Pars I., Dist. lxiii., can. vj,, but in proof of the proposition that laymen were hereby forbidden to have any share in elections. Van Espen notes that Isidore\u2019s version favours Gratian\u2019s misunderstanding, and says that \u201cno doubt that this version did much to exclude the people from the election of bishops.\u201d\nMore accurately \u201ca tumultuous and riotous mob\u201d vide Liddell and Scott.","title":"Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Ser. II, Vol. XIV: The Ca...","type":"page"}