{"collection":"Hinduism","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/hin/brk/brk16.htm","path":"hin/brk/brk16.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/hin/brk/brk16.htm","text":"Brahma Knowledge, by L. D. Barnett, [1911]\n\u00a7 13. Brahma is Incogitable.\u2014Brahma or \u0100tm\u0101, being an absolute Reality, the supreme Thing-in-Itself, is therefore inconceivable by the reason, and only capable of being comprehended by an inspired intuition. The Self, whether universal or individual, is a single subject of thought, and so cannot be an object of thought; and it is by nature absolute, above all conditions of finite determination. This negative conception is most forcibly expressed by the famous formula ascribed to Y\u0101jnavalkya, neti neti, \"not so, not so,\" a denial of all possible predicates to the Self (B.A. IV. ii. 4, IV. 22, v. 15, etc.), and also by frequently describing Brahma or \u0100tm\u0101 in contradictory terms as limitless, infinitely extended and yet immeasurably limited in space and time, and denying to it all activity as cause or effect. See also B.A. II. iv. 14, III. iv. 2, vii. 23, viii. 11, Ch. III. xiv. 2, VII. xxiv. 1, Kena. III., XI., Ka\u1e6dh. VI. 12 f. \u015aankara (on Brahma-s\u016btra II. iii. 29) explains these contradictions in the description of the size of the Self by asserting that the mention of it as immeasurably small refers to its condition as empiric soul, when it is limited by \"determinations\" (\u00a7 12) and is conceived under the attributes of the \"determination\" of intelligence, buddhi (\u00a7 18).\n\u015aankara (on Brahma-s\u016btra III. ii. 17) tells a tale of a sage who, on being asked to teach the doctrine of Brahma, remained silent, and on the request\nbeing thrice repeated said simply, \"I have told you, but you understand not; this Self is still\" (cf. Ch. III. xiv. 1).","title":"Brahma Knowledge: Part I: Brahma is Incogitable","type":"page"}