{"collection":"Hinduism","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/hin/sbe08/sbe0862.htm","path":"hin/sbe08/sbe0862.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0862.htm","text":"Brahman said:\nWell then, I will declare to you what you ask of me, O best (of men)! Learn what a preceptor told a pupil who went to him. Hearing it all, deliberate on it properly. Non-destruction of all creatures, that is deemed to be the greatest duty 1. This is the highest seat 2, free from vexation and holy in character. The ancients who perceived the established (truth) call knowledge the highest happiness. Therefore by pure knowledge one is released from all sins. And those who are constantly engaged in destruction, and who are infidels 3 in their conduct, and who entertain avarice and delusion, go verily to hell. Those who without sloth perform actions with expectations, rejoice in this world, being born again and again. But those wise and talented men, who perform actions with faith, free from any connexion with expectations, perceive correctly 4. Now I will proceed to, state how the association and dissociation of Kshetrag\u00f1a and nature (take place). Learn that, O best (of men)! The relation here is said to be that between the object and subject 5. The subject\nis always the being, and nature is stated to be the object. It has been explained in the above mode, as (having the relation) of the gnat and the udumbara 1. Nature which is non-intelligent knows nothing, though it is the object of enjoyment 2. Who enjoys and what is enjoyed 3 is learnt from the S\u00e2stras. Nature is said always to abound in the pairs of opposites, and to be constituted of the qualities; the Kshetrag\u00f1a is free from the pairs of opposites, devoid of parts, and in essence free from the qualities. He abides in everything alike 4, and is connected with (all) knowledge 5; and he always enjoys nature as a lotus-leaf (enjoys) water. Even brought into contact with all qualities, a learned man remains untainted 6. There is no doubt that the being is unattached just like the unsteady drop of water placed upon a lotus-leaf 7. It is established that nature is the property 8 of the being. And the relation of the two is like that of matter and the maker 9. As one goes into (a) dark (place) taking a light (with him), so those who wish for the supreme go with the light of nature 10. While there is oil\nand wick 1, the light shines; but the flame is extinguished when the oil and wick are exhausted. Thus nature is perceived 2; the being is laid down (as being) unperceived. Understand this, O Br\u00e2hmanas! Well now, I will tell you something more. One who has a bad understanding does not acquire knowledge even with a thousand (admonitions). And one who is possessed of knowledge enhances (his) happiness even with a fourth share 3. Thus should one understand the accomplishment of piety by (apt) means. For the talented man who knows (these) means, attains supreme happiness 4. As a man travelling along some way without provisions for the journey, travels with great discomfort, and may even be destroyed on the way, so should one understand, that by action 5 the fruit is or is not produced. For a man to see within (his) self 6 what is agreeable and what is disagreeable to him is good. And as one who is devoid of a perception of the truth rashly travels on foot by a long way unseen before 7, while (another) goes by the same\nway in a carriage 1 drawn by horses, and going swiftly, such is the progress of the men of understanding. Having climbed up a mountain one should not look at the surface of the earth 2. One sees a man travelling in a chariot, and void of intelligence, afflicted by reason of the chariot. As far as there is a carriage-path, he goes in the carriage; where the carriage-path stops, a learned man goes on abandoning the carriage. So travels the talented man, who understands the procedure respecting (knowledge of the) truth and devotion 3, and who knows about the qualities, comprehending the gradations 4 one above the other. As one who without a boat dives into the ocean with his arms only, through delusion, undoubtedly wishes for destruction; while a wise man likewise knowing distinctions 5 and having a boat with good oars, goes in the water without fatigue, and soon crosses the reservoir, and having crossed (it) goes to the other shore, throwing\naside the boat, and devoid of (the thought that this or that is) mine. This has been already explained by the parallel of the carriage and pedestrian. One who has come by delusion through affection, adheres to that like a fisherman to his boat, being overcome by (the thought that this or that is) mine. It is not possible to move on land after embarking in a boat. And likewise one cannot move in water after entering a carriage. Thus there are various actions in regard to different objects 1. And as action is performed in this world, so does it result to them 2. That which sages by their understanding meditate upon, which is void of any smell whatever, void of taste, and void of colour, touch, or sound, that is called the Pradh\u00e2na 3. Now that Pradh\u00e2na is unperceived; a development of the unperceived is the Mahat; and a development of the Pradh\u00e2na (when it is) become Mahat is egoism. From egoism is produced the development, namely, the great elements; and of the elements respectively, objects of sense are verily stated to be the development 4. The unperceived is of the nature of seed 5, and also productive in its essence. And we have heard\nthat the great self is of the nature of seed and a product. Egoism is of the nature of seed and a product also again and again. And the five great elements are verily of the nature of seed and products. The objects of the five elements are of the nature of seed 1, but they do not yield products. Learn about their properties. Now space has one quality, air is said to have two qualities; it is said that light has three qualities; and water, too, is of four qualities; and earth, abounding with movables and immovables, the divine source of all entities, full of examples of agreeable and disagreeable (things), should be understood to be of five qualities 2. Sound, touch, colour likewise, taste, and smell as the fifth--these, O best of the twice-born! should be understood to be the five qualities of earth. Smell always belongs to the earth 3; and smell is stated to be (of) numerous descriptions. I will state at length the numerous qualities of smell 4. Smell is agreeable or disagreeable, sweet, sour, and bitter likewise, diffusive and compact also, soft, and rough, and clear also, 5--thus should\nsmell, which belongs to the earth, be understood to be of ten descriptions. Sound, touch, and colour likewise, and taste, are stated to be the qualities of water. I will now give (some) information about taste. Taste is stated to be of numerous descriptions. Sweet 1, sour, bitter, sharp, astringent, and saltish likewise-thus are the forms of taste, which is a development of water, said to be of six descriptions. Sound, touch, and likewise colour; thus is light said to have three qualities. The quality of light is colour, and colour is stated to be of numerous descriptions. White, black, red likewise, green, yellow, and grey likewise, short long, narrow 2, broad, square, and circular-thus is the colour of light said to be of twelve forms. It should be understood 3 by aged Br\u00e2hmanas, who speak the truth, and are conversant with piety. Sound and touch also should be understood; air is said to have (these) two qualities. And touch is the quality of air, and touch is stated to be of numerous descriptions. Rough, cold and hot likewise, tender and clear also, hard, glutinous, smooth, slippery, hurtful, and soft 4--thus the quality of air is properly said by Br\u00e2hmanas who have reached perfection, who are conversant with piety and perceive the truth, to be of twelve descriptions. Now space has one quality,\nand that is stated to be sound only. I will speak at length of the numerous qualities of sound. Shadga, Rishabha, together with G\u00e2ndh\u00e2ra, Madhyama, and likewise Pa\u00f1kama, and beyond. these should be understood to be Nish\u00e2da and Dhaivata likewise 1; agreeable and disagreeable sound also, compact, and of (many) ingredients 2. Thus sound, which is produced in space, should be understood to be of ten descriptions. Space is the highest element 3, egoism is above that; above egoism is understanding, and above that understanding is the self 4; above that is the unperceived, and above the unperceived is the being. One who knows which is superior and inferior among entities, and who knows the proper procedure in all actions, and who identifies himself with every being 5, repairs to the imperishable self.\n378:1 See p. 291 supra, and note 3 there.\n378:2 So literally; the sense is--that which one is to aim at.\n378:3 The original is n\u00e2stika, the contrary of that '\u00e2stikya,' which at G\u00eet\u00e2, p. 126, we have rendered by 'belief (in a future world),' following Sr\u00eedhara. R\u00e2m\u00e2nuga, whose commentary came to hand too late for any other than a very occasional use in the translation of the G\u00eet\u00e2, renders it by 'belief in the truth of the teaching of the Vedas'.\n378:4 I. e. learn the truth.\n378:5 I use the terms subject and object here in the philosophical sense explained by Sir W. Hamilton, viz. the thinking agent and the object of thought respectively. And cf. also the passage referred to in note 3 on p. 379 infra.\n379:1 p. 374 supra. The relation is one of close connexion, coupled with some identity of nature (because, says N\u00eelakantha, an entirely extraneous thing could not get into the inside of the fruit, and the gnat's body therefore must have come from the fruit itself), but still the elements are distinct.\n379:2 See p. 371, supra, note 4.\n379:3 Cf. Maitr\u00ee, p. 109.\n379:5 Knowledge of the Kshetrag\u00f1a forms part of all real knowledge. Arguna Misra's reading and interpretation are different. He says, 'As he is seen coming to light everywhere alike, so,' &c.\n379:7 Again the common simile.\n379:8 The original is dravya, rendered 'matter' in the next sentence. Arguna Misra paraphrases it by 'upakarana,' paraphernalia.\n379:9 So the original, the sense is not clear. But see Svet\u00e2svatara, p. 368.\n379:10 Knowledge, which, says N\u00eelakantha, is a manifestation of nature. Arguna Misra says the knowledge of the truth which the p. 380 self acquires is by means of nature. Cf. S\u00e2nkhya-k\u00e2rik\u00e2 56, and comment.\n380:1 So N\u00eelakantha. Arguna Misra does not take guna here to mean 'wick.'\n380:2 I. e., I presume, in its manifestations; it is perceived for some time and then vanishes. Cf. S\u00e2nkhya-k\u00e2rik\u00e2 59-61; the Purusha is not 'perceived' in this sense.\n380:3 Viz. of admonition, Arguna Misra.\n380:4 Cf. G\u00eet\u00e2, p. 70, where the same phrase occurs.\n380:5 The fruit of this is uncertain; knowledge which is in one's self is the thing to be worked for.\n380:6 I. e. the mind, N\u00eelakantha. The meaning is, he should not care for external pleasure and pain. Cf. G\u00eet\u00e2, inter alia, p. 50.\n380:7 This seems to be so left imperfect in the original. The construction seems to be this: the progress of the latter is as great as that of one who drives in a chariot as compared with that of one who goes on foot with much suffering. Cf. the construction on next page.\n381:1 I. e. the S\u00e2stras, says N\u00eelakantha. Cf. G\u00eet\u00e2, p. 117.\n381:2 When one has arrived at knowledge,--the highest seat, says N\u00eelakantha,--one need not perform the dictates of the S\u00e2stras, which are only preliminary to the acquisition of knowledge. Cf. G\u00eet\u00e2, pp. 48, 73. Cf. as to this figure of the chariot and the next one about the boat, Brihad\u00e2ranyaka, p. 695.\n381:3 I adopt Arguna's rendering of the original here, viz. Yoga. The meaning, on that rendering, is the same as it is in the G\u00eet\u00e2.\n381:4 According to Arguna Misra, action with desire, action without desire, and lastly, knowledge. According to N\u00eelakantha, action laid down in the S\u00e2stras, then Yoga, and then the condition of Hamsa, Paramahamsa, &c.\n381:5 Literally, one knowing divisions. I presume the meaning is distinctions between various things as to which suits which, and so forth. The boat, says N\u00eelakantha, is a preceptor, and even a preceptor is not to be sought for after a man has achieved Yoga; hence the text proceeds to speak further on of casting aside the boat. Wishes for destruction = is sure to meet destruction.\n382:1 I. e. appertaining to the various orders of householders, &c., N\u00eelakantha. But I am not aware of any authority for this sense of vishaya.\n382:2 I. e. those who perform them.\n382:3 N\u00eelakantha says, 'Having stated above the means of knowledge, he now states the proper object of knowledge.'\n382:4 See p. 332 supra. The original for development is guna, literally quality.\n382:5 The meaning of this passage seems to be identical with that of S\u00e2nkhya-k\u00e2rik\u00e2 3. Productive (Prasav\u00e2tmakam) is probably to be explained as Prasavadharmi is at S\u00e2nkhya-k\u00e2rik\u00e2 II (see commentary of V\u00e2kaspati, pp. 59, 60), viz. always undergoing development. The great elements are of course the tanm\u00e2tras.\n383:1 This is not clear, unless 'product' above means productive, and seed means a product, it being a product of the ankura or sprout. N\u00eelakantha says, 'seed = cause; product = effect. The unperceived is an effect, and so the contrary doctrine of the S\u00e2nkhya is here shown to be wrong. The objects are causes, as their enjoyment causes an impression.'\n383:3 That is to say, smell is the special property of the earth only, the other qualities are common to it with the other elements. The word in the original is guna or quality everywhere.\n383:4 See S\u00e2nti Parvan (Moksha Dharma), chap. 184, st. 27.\n383:5 Bitter, N\u00eelakantha exemplifies by the smell of the chili, apparently interpreting katvi, as it may be interpreted, to mean sharp; diffusive = overcoming all other smells, like Asafoetida; compact = made up of many smells, N\u00eelakantha adds, that soft is like that of p. 384 liquid ghee, rough of the oil of mustard, and clear as of cooked rice. The S\u00e2nti Parvan passage omits 'sour.'\n384:2 Literally, lean and fat. These are rather unusual qualities to attribute to colour. The S\u00e2nti Parvan passage gives more.\n384:3 Sic. Does it mean 'it is understood?' Cf. P\u00e2nini III, 3, 113.\n384:4 Tender = like the touch of a son, &c.; clear = like that of an excellent cloth, N\u00eelakantha; glutinous = like that of oil, smooth = like that of a gem; slippery = not really smooth, but appearing to be such, like that of saliva (?), Arguna Misra. The enumeration of these in the S\u00e2nti Parvan loc. cit. is again different.","title":"Sacred Books of the East Vol. 8: The Bhagavad-G\u00eet\u00e2: Anug\u00eet\u00e2: Chapter XXXV","type":"page"}