{"collection":"Hinduism","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/hin/sbe33/sbe3324.htm","path":"hin/sbe33/sbe3324.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe33/sbe3324.htm","text":"The Minor Law Books (SBE33), by Julius Jolly, [1889]\n230. Where, however, an equal number of witnesses possessed of a good memory is found on both sides, the evidence of the witnesses is entirely valueless, on account of the subtle nature of the law of evidence.\n231. But wherever a litigant has been abandoned by his own witnesses through the act of fate, the sages have declared that he cannot be absolved by (the performance of) an ordeal even.\n* 232. Where, the time forgiving testimony having arrived, a witness does not make a consistent statement with reference to the questions under notice, his testimony is as good as ungiven.\n* 233. If the witnesses were to disagree with one another as to place, time, age, matter, quantity, shape, and species, such testimony is worthless likewise.\n* 234. If the witnesses wrongly name too low or too high a sum, this too must be known to make no evidence. This is the rule of witnesses.","title":"The Minor Law Books (SBE33): First Title: The Law of Debt: 17. Invalid Evidence","type":"page"}