{"collection":"Hinduism","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/hin/sbe48/sbe48489.htm","path":"hin/sbe48/sbe48489.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe48/sbe48489.htm","text":"42. A minor one, thus some; (and hence they hold) the existence (of expiation), as in the case of eating. This has been explained.\nSome teachers are of opinion that even on the part of Naishthikas and the rest the lapse from chastity constitutes only a minor offence which can be atoned for by expiatory observances; in the same way as in the case of the eating of forbidden food the same pr\u00e2yaskitta may be used by the ordinary Brahmak\u00e2rin and by Naishthikas and the rest. This has been stated by the Smriti writer, 'For the others also (i.e. the Naishthikas and so on) the same (rules and\npractices as those for the Upakurv\u00e2na) hold good, in so far as not opposed to their \u00e2srama.'","title":"SBE 48: The Vedanta-Sutras with commentary by Ramanuja, George Thibaut, tr.: Fourth P\u00e2da: 42. A minor one, thus some; and hence they hold the existence of expiation, as in the case of eating.","type":"page"}