{"collection":"Islam","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/browse/isl/mishkat/msh07.htm","path":"isl/mishkat/msh07.htm","source_url":"https://sacred-texts.com/isl/mishkat/msh07.htm","text":"On the whole it is the final section on the Veils-Tradition which, though really of the nature of an appendix, contains the most numerous and the most interesting problems for the study of Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee's inner life, thought, and convictions. This tradition speaks of \"Seventy Thousand Veils of Light and Darkness\" which veil pure Godhead from the human soul. The origin of the tradition is, it is safe to hazard, Neoplatonic, and it therefore lent itself completely to the gnostic and theosophical mode of\n{p. 7}\nthought which so soon invaded Muslim S\u00fbfism after its less successful effort to capture orthodox Christianity. Accordingly Muslim mystics seem to have seized upon the tradition with avidity, though they interpret it variously. For an entirely Neoplatonic, theosophical interpretation, as expounded by Rif\u00e2`i dervishes, the translator's \"'Way' of a Mohammedan Mystic\" may be consulted.[1] According to this version, the soul, in its upward Seven-fold Way to Union with pure Deity, is at every stage stripped of 10,000 of these Veils, the dark ones first and then the bright. After that the naked soul stands face to face with naked Deity, with Absolute Being, with an unveiled Sun, with unadulterated Light. Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee's treatment is different. According to him, these Veils are various according to the varieties of the natures which they veil from the One Real. And it is the classification of these natures, which is thus involved, that supplies rich material for an unusually inside view of Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee's real views concerning men, doctrines, religions, and sects. It\n[1. The Moslem World, year 1912, pp. 171 seqq., 245 seqq.; as separatum, Otto Harrassowitz, pp. 9, 10.]\n{p. 8}\nis not the orthodox schoolman, the fierce dogmatist, the rigid mutakallim, who is now speaking. We have the sensation of overhearing Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee as he speaks aloud to his own soul, or to a circle of initiates. It is hardly less than an outline of a philosophy of religion with which we have to do. He divides mankind into four classes: those veiled with veils of pure darkness; those veiled with veils of mixed darkness and light; those veiled with veils of pure light; and those who attain to the vision of the Unveiled. Every line of this part of the work merits and requires the closest study. It is not possible to give this detailed study here--it has been given elsewhere, and to that the reader must be referred.[1] But a summary of Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee's classification of souls and creeds may be given here, for thus, even more effectively than by an extended study, may a vivid preliminary appreciation be gained of the importance of this section for students of the Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee problem. He begins at the bottom and works up the light-ladder, rung by rung, to the very top, thus giving a gradation of\n[1. Der Islam, year 1914, in Nos. 2 and 3: by the present writer.]\n{p. 9}\nhuman natures and human creeds in respect of their approach to absolute truth. Sometimes the grades are definitely identified by the author. In other cases they may be certainly, or nearly certainly, identified from the description he gives. In the following summary Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee's own identifications are given between round brackets; inferred identifications certain or nearly certain, between square brackets.\nClass I.--Those veiled with Veils of pure Darkness\nAtheists--\n(a) Naturist philosophers whose god is Nature,\n(b) Egotists whose god is Self.\nSubdivisions of (b):--\n(1) Seekers after sensual pleasures (the bestial attributes).\n(2) Seekers after dominion (\"Arabs, some Kurds, and (the very numerous Fools\").\n(3) Seekers after filthy lucre\n(4) Seekers after vainglory\n(2-4) (the ferocious attributes).\nClass II.--Those veiled with Veils of mixed Darkness and Light\n{p. 10}\nA. THOSE WHOSE DARKNESS ORIGINATES IN THE SENSES\n(1) Image-worshippers. [Polytheists of the Hellenic (? and Indian) type.]\n(2) Worshippers of animate objects of physical beauty. (Some of the most remote Turkish tribes.)\n(3) Fire-worshippers. [Magians.]\n(4) Astrologizing Star-worshippers. [Star-worshippers of Harran: ?Sab\u00eeans.]\n(5) Sun-worshippers.\n(6) Light-worshippers, with their dualistic acknowledgement of a supreme correlative Darkness. (Zoroastrians of the cult of Ormuzd and Ahrim\u00e2n.)\nB. THOSE WHOSE DARKNESS ORIGINATES IN THE IMAGINATION\n(who worship a One Being, sitting [spatially] on his throne).\n(1) Corporealists. {p. 11}\n[Extreme Hanbalites: Z\u00e2hirites.]\n(2) Karr\u00e2mites.\n(3) Those who have eliminated all spatial ideas in regard to All\u00e2h except the literal \"up-above\".\n[Ibn Hanbal.[1] Hanbalites.[2]]\nC. THOSE WHOSE DARKNESS ORIGINATES IN THE [DISCURSIVE][3] INTELLIGENCE\n[Various sorts of Mutakallim\u00een]\n(1) Anthropomorphists in respect of the Seven Attributes of Allah, \"Hearing, Seeing,\" etc., and especially the \"Word\" of Allah.\n(Those who said that the Word of Allah has letters and sounds like ours.) [Early literalists; Hanbalites: early Ash`arites.]\n(2) Those who said that the word of Allah\n[1. Faisal al-Tafriqa, p. 10.\n2. Averroes adds to these (with justice) the Koran; Mohammed himself; the \"Early Fathers\"; al-Ash'ari; and the early Ash`arites--before the time of Abul Ma'\u00e2li,\" says Averroes, loc. cit. i.e. of al-Juwain\u00ee, The Im\u00e2m al-Haramain, our author's Shaikh, d. 478 (see his al-Kashf 'an man\u00e2hij al-adill\u00e2', ed. M\u00fcller, p. 65, Cairo ed., p. 54.)\n3. For according to Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee the genuine axiomata of the pure intelligence are infallible. See p. [10], and an important autobiographical passage near the beginning of the Munqidh.]\n{p. 12}\nis like our mental speech (hadith al-nafs.)\n[Later Ash`arites.]\nClass III.--Those veiled by pure Light\n[i.e. purged of all anthropomorphism (tashb\u00eeh)]\n(1) Those whose views about the Attributes were sound, but who refused to define Allah by means of them: replying to the question \"What is the Lord of the World?\" by saying, \"The Lord, who transcends the ideas of those attributes; He, the Mover and Orderer of the Heavens.\"\n[Hasan al-Basr\u00ee, al-Sh\u00e2fi`\u00ee, and others of the bil\u00e2 kaifa school.]\n(2) Those who mounted higher than the preceding, in declaring that Allah is the mover of only the primum mobile (the Ninth and outermost Heaven), which causes the movement of the other Eight, mediated by their respective Angels.\n[S\u00fbf\u00ee philosophers. (?) Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee.]\n(3) Those who mount higher than these {p. 13} again, in putting a supreme Angel in place of Allah, Who now moves the heavens by commanding this supreme Angel, but not immediately by direct action.\n[S\u00fbf\u00ee philosophers. Al-Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee himself when coram populo (Munqidh, p 11)!]\nClass IV.--The Unveiled who Attain\nThose who will predicate nothing whatsoever of Allah, and refuse to allow that He even issues the order for the moving of the primum mobile. This Commander (Mut\u00e2`) is now a Vicegerent, who is related to the Absolute Being as the sun to Essential Light or live coal to the Element of Fire.\n(1) Adepts who preserve self-consciousness in their absorption in this Absolute, all else being effaced.\n(2) Adepts whose self-consciousness is also effaced (\"the Fewest of the Few\") [al-Hall\u00e2j and the extreme Mystics],\n(a) who attain to this State with a single leap--as Abraham \"al-Khal\u00eel\" did, {p. 14}\n(b) who attain to it by stages,--as Mohammed \"al-Hab\u00eeb\" did [at the Mi`r\u00e2j].","title":"III. A Ghazzalian Philosophy Of Religion","type":"page"}