{"collection":"philosophy-ethics","full_text_available":true,"graph_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/v2/api/page/gutenberg_59023/graph","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/v2/page/gutenberg_59023","id":"gutenberg_59023","license":"Public Domain (US)","rights_basis":"gutenberg_metadata_copyright_false","source":"gutenberg","source_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/59023","summary":null,"tags":["Category: Philosophy & Ethics","Indexes"],"text":"Produced by David Widger\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nINDEX OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG\n\nWORKS OF\n\nIMMANUEL KANT\n\n\n\nCompiled by David Widger\n\n\n\n\n\nCONTENTS\n\n\n##  THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON\n\n##  THE CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON\n\n##  FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS\n\n##  THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS\n\n##  THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS\n\n##  CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT\n\n##  PERPETUAL PEACE\n\n##  PROLEGOMENA\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTABLES OF CONTENTS OF VOLUMES\n\n\n\n\n\nTHE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON\nBy Immanuel Kant\nTranslated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn\n\n\n\nCONTENTS\nPreface to the First Edition (1781)\nPreface to the Second Edition (1787)\nIntroduction\nI. Of the difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge\nII. The Human Intellect, even in an Unphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions \"a priori\".\nIII. Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of Human Knowledge \"a priori\"\nIV. Of the Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judgements.\nV. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgements \"a priori\" are contained as Principles.\nVI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason.\nVII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason.\n\n\nI. Transcendental Doctrine of Elements\nFirst Part\ufffdTRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC\n\ufffd 1. Introductory\nSECTION I. OF SPACE\n\ufffd 2. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception.\n\ufffd 3. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Space.\n\ufffd 4. Conclusions from the foregoing Conceptions.\nSECTION II. OF TIME\n\ufffd 5. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception.\n\ufffd 6. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Time.\n\ufffd 7. Conclusions from the above Conceptions.\n\ufffd 8. Elucidation.\n\ufffd 9. General Remarks on Transcendental Aesthetic.\n\ufffd 10. Conclusion of the Transcendental Aesthetic.\nSecond Part\ufffdTRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC\nIntroduction. Idea of a Transcendental Logic\nI. Of Logic in General\nII. Of Transcendental Logic\nIII. Of the Division of General Logic into Analytic and Dialectic\nIV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental Analytic and Dialectic\nFIRST DIVISION\ufffdTRANSCENDENTAL ANALYTIC\nBOOK I. Analytic of Conceptions. \ufffd 2\nChapter I. Of the Transcendental Clue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of the Understanding\nIntroductory \ufffd 3\nSection I. Of the Logical Use of the Understanding in General. \ufffd 4\nSection II. Of the Logical Function of the Understanding in Judgements. \ufffd 5\nSection III. Of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding, or Categories. \ufffd 6\nChapter II. Of the Deduction of the Pure Conception of the Understanding\nSection I. Of the Principles of a Transcendental Deduction in general \ufffd 9\nTransition to the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. \ufffd 10\nSection II Transcendental Deduction of the pure Conceptions of the Understanding.\nOf the Possibility of a Conjunction of the manifold representations given by Sense. \ufffd 11.\nOf the Originally Synthetical Unity of Apperception. \ufffd 12\nThe Principle of the Synthetical Unity of Apperception is the highest Principle of all exercise of the Understanding. \ufffd 13\nWhat Objective Unity of Self-consciousness is. \ufffd 14\nThe Logical Form of all Judgements consists in the Objective Unity of Apperception of the Conceptions contained therein. \ufffd 15\nAll Sensuous Intuitions are subject to the Categories, as Conditions under which alone the manifold Content of them can be united in one Consciousness. \ufffd 16\nObservation. \ufffd 17\nIn Cognition, its Application to Objects of Experience is the only legitimate use of the Category. \ufffd 18\nOf the Application of the Categories to Objects of the Senses in general. \ufffd 20\nTranscendental Deduction of the universally possible employment in experience of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. \ufffd 22\nResult of this Deduction of the Conceptions of the Understanding. \ufffd 23\nBOOK II. Analytic of Principles\nINTRODUCTION. Of the Transcendental Faculty of judgement in General.\nTRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE FACULTY OF JUDGEMENT OR, ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES.\nChapter I. Of the Schematism at of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding.\nChapter II. System of all Principles of the Pure Understanding.\nSection I. Of the Supreme Principle of all Analytical Judgements.\nSection II. Of the Supreme Principle of all Synthetical Judgements.\nSection III. Systematic Representation of all Synthetical Principles of the Pure Understanding.\nChapter III Of the Ground of the Division of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena.\nAPPENDIX.\nSECOND DIVISION\ufffdTRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC\nTRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC. INTRODUCTION.\nI. Of Transcendental Illusory Appearance.\nII. Of Pure Reason as the Seat of Transcendental Illusory Appearance.\nTRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC\ufffdBOOK I\ufffdOF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE REASON.\nSection I-Of Ideas in General.\nSection II. Of Transcendental Ideas.\nSection III. System of Transcendental Ideas.\nTRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC\ufffdBOOK II\ufffdOF THE DIALECTICAL PROCEDURE OF PURE REASON.\nChapter I. Of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason.\nChapter II. The Antinomy of Pure Reason.\nSection I. System of Cosmological Ideas.\nSection II. Antithetic of Pure Reason.\nSection III. Of the Interest of Reason in these Self-contradictions.\nSection IV. Of the necessity imposed upon Pure Reason of presenting a Solution of its Transcendental Problems.\nSection V. Sceptical Exposition of the Cosmological Problems presented in the four Transcendental Ideas.\nSection VI. Transcendental Idealism as the Key to theSolution of Pure Cosmological Dialectic.\nSection VII. Critical Solution of the Cosmological Problem.\nSection VIII. Regulative Principle of Pure Reason in relation to the Cosmological Ideas.\nSection IX. Of the Empirical Use of the Regulative Principle of Reason with regard to the Cosmological Ideas.\nI. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Composition of Phenomena in the Universe.\nII. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Division of a Whole given in Intuition.\nIII. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Deduction of Cosmical Events from their Causes.\nIV. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Dependence of Phenomenal Existences.\nChapter III. The Ideal of Pure Reason.\nSection I. Of the Ideal in General.\nSection II. Of the Transcendental Ideal (Prototypon Trancendentale).\nSection III. Of the Arguments employed by Speculative Reason in Proof of the Existence of a Supreme Being.\nSection IV. Of the Impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the Existence of God.\nSection V. Of the Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the Existence of God.\nSection VI. Of the Impossibility of a Physico-Theological Proof.\nSection VII. Critique of all Theology based upon Speculative Principles of Reason.\nAppendix. Of the Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason.\n\n\nII. Transcendental Doctrine of Method\nChapter I. The Discipline of Pure Reason.\nSection I. The Discipline of Pure Reason in the Sphere of Dogmatism.\nSection II. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Polemics.\nSection III. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Hypothesis.\nSection IV. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Relation to Proofs.\nChapter II. The Canon of Pure Reason.\nSection I. Of the Ultimate End of the Pure Use of Reason.\nSection II. Of the Ideal of the Summum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of Pure Reason.\nSection III. Of Opinion, Knowledge, and Belief.\nChapter III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason.\nChapter IV. The History of Pure Reason.\n\n\n\n\n\nTHE CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON\nBy Immanuel Kant\n1788\nTranslated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott\n\n\n\nCONTENTS\nPREFACE.\nINTRODUCTION.\nOf the Idea of a Critique of Practical Reason.\nFIRST PART \ufffd ELEMENTS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON.\nBOOK I. The Analytic of Pure Practical Reason.\nCHAPTER I. Of the Principles of Pure Practical Reason.\nI. DEFINITION.\nREMARK.\nII. THEOREM I.\nIII. THEOREM II.\nREMARK I.\nREMARK II.\nIV. THEOREM II.\nREMARK.\nV. PROBLEM I.\nREMARK.\nVII. FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE PURE PRACTICAL REASON.\nREMARK.\nCOROLLARY.\nREMARK.\nVIII. THEOREM IV.\nREMARK.\nREMARK II.\nPractical Material Principles of Determination taken as the Foundation of Morality, are:\nI. Of the Deduction of the Fundamental Principles of Pure\nII. Of the Right that Pure Reason in its Practical use has to an Extension which is not possible to it in its Speculative Use.\nCHAPTER II. Of the Concept of an Object of Pure Practical Reason.\nTable of the Categories of Freedom relatively to the Notions of Good\nOf the Typic of the Pure Practical Judgement.\nCHAPTER III. Of the Motives of Pure Practical Reason.\nCritical Examination of the Analytic of Pure Practical Reason.\nBOOK II. Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason.\nCHAPTER I. Of a Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason Generally.\nCHAPTER II. Of the Dialectic of Pure Reason in defining the Conception of the \"Summum Bonum\".\nI. The Antinomy of Practical Reason.\nII. Critical Solution of the Antinomy of Practical Reason.\nIII. Of the Primacy of Pure Practical Reason in its Union with the Speculative Reason.\nIV. The Immortality of the Soul as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason.\nV. The Existence of God as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason.\nVI. Of the Postulates of Pure Practical Reason Generally.\nVII. How is it possible to conceive an Extension of Pure Reason in a Practical point of view, without its Knowledge as Speculative being enlarged at the same time?\nVIII. Of Belief from a Requirement of Pure Reason.\nIX. Of the Wise Adaptation of Man's Cognitive Faculties to his Practical Destination.\nSECOND PART. -- METHODOLOGY OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON.\nMethodology of Pure Practical Reason.\nCONCLUSION.\n\n\n\n\n\nFUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS\nBy Immanuel Kant\n1785\nTranslated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott\n\n\nCONTENTS\nPREFACE\nFIRST SECTION\ufffdTRANSITION FROM THE COMMON RATIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF MORALITY TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL\nSECOND SECTION\ufffdTRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS\nThe Autonomy of the Will as the Supreme Principle of Morality\nHeteronomy of the Will as the Source of all spurious Principles of Morality\nClassification of all Principles of Morality which can be founded on the Conception of Heteronomy\nTHIRD SECTION\ufffdTRANSITION FROM THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS TO THE CRITIQUE OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON\nThe Concept of Freedom is the Key that explains the Autonomy of the Will\nFreedom must be presupposed as a Property of the Will of all Rational Beings\nOf the Interest attaching to the Ideas of Morality\nHow is a Categorical Imperative Possible?\nOf the Extreme Limits of all Practical Philosophy.\nCONCLUDING REMARK\n\n\n\n\n\nTHE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS\nBy Immanuel Kant\n1780\nTranslated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott\n\n\nCONTENTS\nPREFACE\nINTRODUCTION TO THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS\nI. Exposition of the Conception of Ethics\nII. Exposition of the Notion of an End which is also a Duty\nREMARK\nIII. Of the Reason for conceiving an End which is also a Duty\nIV. What are the Ends which are also Duties?\nV. Explanation of these two Notions\nA. OUR OWN PERFECTION\nB. HAPPINESS OF OTHERS\nVI. Ethics does not supply Laws for Actions (which is done by Jurisprudence), but only for the Maxims of Action\nVII. Ethical Duties are of indeterminate, Juridical Duties of strict, Obligation\nVIII. Exposition of the Duties of Virtue as Intermediate Duties\n(1) OUR OWN PERFECTION as an end which is also a duty\n(2) HAPPINESS OF OTHERS as an end which is also a duty\nIX. What is a Duty of Virtue?\nX. The Supreme Principle of Jurisprudence was Analytical; that of Ethics is Synthetical\nXI. According to the preceding Principles, the Scheme of Duties of Virtue may be thus exhibited\nXII. Preliminary Notions of the Susceptibility of the Mind for Notions of Duty generally\nA. THE MORAL FEELING\nB. OF CONSCIENCE\nC. OF LOVE TO MEN\nXIII. General Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals in the treatment of Pure Ethics\nXIV. Of Virtue in General\nXV. Of the Principle on which Ethics is separated from Jurisprudence\nREMARKS\nOf the Doctrine of Virtue on the Principle Of Internal Freedom.\nXVI. Virtue requires, first of all, Command over Oneself\nXVII. Virtue necessarily presupposes Apathy (considered as Strength)\nREMARK\nON CONSCIENCE\n\n\n\n\n\nOF THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS\nBy Immanuel Kant\n\n\n\nCONTENTS\nOF THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS\nI. Deduction of the Editor's Right against the Counterfeiter\nProof of the Major\nProof of the Minor\nII. Refutation of the Counterfeiter's pretended Right against the Editor.\nProof of the Major\nProof of the Minor\nUniversal Observation\n\n\n\n\n\nKANT'S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT\nTranslated With Introduction And Notes\nBy J. H. Bernard, D.D., D.C.L. Bishop Of Ossory\nCONTENTS\nEditor's Introduction \txi\nPreface \t1\nIntroduction \t7\nI. \tOf the division of Philosophy \t7\nII. \tOf the realm of Philosophy in general \t11\nIII. \tOf the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole \t14\nIV. \tOf Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori \t17\nV. \tThe principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgement \t20\nVI. \tOf the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature \t27\nVII. \tOf the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature \t30\nVIII. \tOf the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature \t35\nIX. \tOf the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgement \t39\nFirst Part.\ufffdCritique of the Aesthetical Judgement \t43\nFirst Division.\ufffdAnalytic of the Aesthetical Judgement \t45\nFirst Book.\ufffdAnalytic of the Beautiful \t45\nFirst Moment of the judgement of taste, according to quality \t45\n\ufffd ?1. \tThe judgement of taste is aesthetical \t45\n\ufffd ?2. \tThe satisfaction which determines the judgement of taste is disinterested \t46\n\ufffd ?3. \tThe satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest \t48\n\ufffd ?4. \tThe satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest \t50\n\ufffd ?5. \tComparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction \t53vi\nSecond Moment of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity \t55\n\ufffd ?6. \tThe Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction \t55\n\ufffd ?7. \tComparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic \t57\n\ufffd ?8. \tThe universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective \t59\n\ufffd ?9. \tInvestigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object \t63\nThird Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein \t67\n\ufffd 10. \tOf purposiveness in general \t67\n\ufffd 11. \tThe judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) \t69\n\ufffd 12. \tThe judgement of taste rests on a priori grounds \t70\n\ufffd 13. \tThe pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion \t72\n\ufffd 14. \tElucidation by means of examples \t73\n\ufffd 15. \tThe judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection \t77\n\ufffd 16. \tThe judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure \t81\n\ufffd 17. \tOf the Ideal of Beauty \t84\nFourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object \t91\n\ufffd 18. \tWhat the modality in a judgement of taste is \t91\n\ufffd 19. \tThe subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgement of taste is conditioned \t92\n\ufffd 20. \tThe condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense \t92\n\ufffd 21. \tHave we ground for presupposing a common sense? \t93\n\ufffd 22. \tThe necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense \t94\nGeneral remark on the first section of the Analytic \t96vii\nSecond Book.\ufffdAnalytic of the Sublime \t101\n\ufffd 23. \tTransition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime \t101\n\ufffd 24. \tOf the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the Sublime \t105\nA.\ufffdOf the Mathematically Sublime \t106\n\ufffd 25. \tExplanation of the term \"Sublime\" \t106\n\ufffd 26. \tOf that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime \t110\n\ufffd 27. \tOf the quality of the satisfaction in our judgements upon the Sublime \t119\nB.\ufffdOf the Dynamically Sublime in Nature \t123\n\ufffd 28. \tOf Nature regarded as Might \t123\n\ufffd 29. \tOf the modality of the judgement upon the sublime in nature \t130\nGeneral remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgement \t132\nDeduction of [pure] aesthetical judgements \t150\n\ufffd 30. \tThe Deduction of aesthetical judgements on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful \t150\n\ufffd 31. \tOf the method of deduction of judgements of taste \t152\n\ufffd 32. \tFirst peculiarity of the judgement of taste \t154\n\ufffd 33. \tSecond peculiarity of the judgement of taste \t157\n\ufffd 34. \tThere is no objective principle of taste possible \t159\n\ufffd 35. \tThe principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgement in general \t161\n\ufffd 36. \tOf the problem of a Deduction of judgements of Taste \t162\n\ufffd 37. \tWhat is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgement of taste \t164\n\ufffd 38. \tDeduction of judgements of taste \t165\n\ufffd 39. \tOf the communicability of a sensation \t167\n\ufffd 40. \tOf taste as a kind of sensus communis \t169\n\ufffd 41. \tOf the empirical interest in the Beautiful \t173\n\ufffd 42. \tOf the intellectual interest in the Beautiful \t176\n\ufffd 43. \tOf Art in general \t183\n\ufffd 44. \tOf beautiful Art \t185\n\ufffd 45. \tBeautiful art is an art in so far as it seems like nature \t187\n\ufffd 46. \tBeautiful art is the art of genius \t188\n\ufffd 47. \tElucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius \t190viii\n\ufffd 48. \tOf the relation of Genius to Taste \t193\n\ufffd 49. \tOf the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius \t197\n\ufffd 50. \tOf the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art \t205\n\ufffd 51. \tOf the division of the beautiful arts \t206\n\ufffd 52. \tOf the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product \t214\n\ufffd 53. \tComparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts \t215\n\ufffd 54. \tRemark \t220\nSecond Division.\ufffdDialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement \t229\n\ufffd 55. \t  \t229\n\ufffd 56. \tRepresentation of the antinomy of Taste \t230\n\ufffd 57. \tSolution of the antinomy of Taste \t231\n\ufffd 58. \tOf the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgement \t241\n\ufffd 59. \tOf Beauty as the symbol of Morality \t248\n\ufffd 60. \tAppendix:\ufffdOf the method of Taste \t253\nSecond Part.\ufffdCritique of the Teleological Judgement \t257\n\ufffd 61. \tOf the objective purposiveness of Nature \t259\nFirst Division.\ufffdAnalytic of the Teleological Judgement \t262\n\ufffd 62. \tOf the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material \t262\n\ufffd 63. \tOf the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature \t268\n\ufffd 64. \tOf the peculiar character of things as natural purposes \t272\n\ufffd 65. \tThings regarded as natural purposes are organised beings \t275\n\ufffd 66. \tOf the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings \t280\n\ufffd 67. \tOf the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes \t282\n\ufffd 68. \tOf the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science \t287\nSecond Division.\ufffdDialectic of the Teleological Judgement \t292ix\n\ufffd 69. \tWhat is an antinomy of the Judgement? \t292\n\ufffd 70. \tRepresentation of this antinomy \t293\n\ufffd 71. \tPreliminary to the solution of the above antinomy \t296\n\ufffd 72. \tOf the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of Nature \t298\n\ufffd 73. \tNone of the above systems give what they pretend \t302\n\ufffd 74. \tThe reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable \t306\n\ufffd 75. \tThe concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgement \t309\n\ufffd 76. \tRemark \t313\n\ufffd 77. \tOf the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible \t319\n\ufffd 78. \tOf the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature \t326\nAppendix.\ufffdMethodology of the Teleological Judgement \t334\n\ufffd 79. \tWhether Teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of nature \t334\n\ufffd 80. \tOf the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose \t336\n\ufffd 81. \tOf the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product \t342\n\ufffd 82. \tOf the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings \t346\n\ufffd 83. \tOf the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system \t352\n\ufffd 84. \tOf the final purpose of the existence of a world, i.e. of creation itself \t359\n\ufffd 85. \tOf Physico-theology \t362\n\ufffd 86. \tOf Ethico-theology \t370x\n\ufffd 87. \tOf the moral proof of the Being of God \t377\n\ufffd 88. \tLimitation of the validity of the moral proof \t384\n\ufffd 89. \tOf the use of the moral argument \t392\n\ufffd 90. \tOf the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God \t395\n\ufffd 91. \tOf the kind of belief produced by a practical faith \t403\nGeneral remark on Teleology \t414\n\n\n\n\n\nPERPETUAL PEACE, A PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY\nBy Immanuel Kant\n1795\nTranslated With Introduction And Notes By M. Campbell Smith\nCONTENTS\nPAGE\nPREFACE BY PROFESSOR LATTA \tv\nTRANSLATOR'S INTRODUCTION \t1\nPERPETUAL PEACE \t106\nFIRST SECTION CONTAINING THE PRELIMINARY ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE BETWEEN STATES \t107\nSECOND SECTION CONTAINING THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE BETWEEN STATES \t117\nFIRST SUPPLEMENT CONCERNING THE GUARANTEE OF PERPETUAL PEACE \t143\nSECOND SUPPLEMENT-A SECRET ARTICLE FOR PERPETUAL PEACE \t158\nAPPENDIX I.-ON THE DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN MORALS AND POLITICS WITH REFERENCE TO PERPETUAL PEACE \t161\nAPPENDIX II.-CONCERNING THE HARMONY OF POLITICS WITH MORALS ACCORDING TO THE TRANSCENDENTAL IDEA OF PUBLIC RIGHT \t184\nINDEX \t197\n\n\n\n\n\nPROLEGOMENA\nBy Kant\nEdited In English By Dr. Paul Carus\nCONTENTS\nPUBLISHERS' PREFACE.\nINTRODUCTION.\nPROLEGOMENA.\nPREAMBLE ON THE PECULIARITIES OF ALL METAPHYSICAL COGNITION.\nFIRST PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.\nHOW IS PURE MATHEMATICS POSSIBLE?\nSECOND PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.\nHOW IS THE SCIENCE OF NATURE POSSIBLE?\nTHIRD PART OF THE MAIN TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.\nHOW IS METAPHYSICS IN GENERAL POSSIBLE?\nSCHOLIA.\nSOLUTION OF THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE PROLEGOMENA, \"HOW IS METAPHYSICS POSSIBLE AS A SCIENCE?\"\nAPPENDIX.","title":"Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of Immanuel Kant","tradition":"philosophy-ethics","translated_text":null,"word_count":3702}