{"collection":"philosophy-ethics","full_text_available":true,"graph_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/v2/api/page/wikisource_Culture_vs_Copyright_Chapter_1/graph","html_url":"https://unchartedknowledge.5gfusion.net/v2/page/wikisource_Culture_vs_Copyright_Chapter_1","id":"wikisource_Culture_vs_Copyright_Chapter_1","license":"Public Domain / CC-BY-SA (see source)","rights_basis":"wikisource_site_inclusion_policy","source":"wikisource","source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Culture_vs._Copyright/Chapter_1","summary":null,"tags":["Subpages"],"text":"CHAPTER 1\n\nFirst Graders on the Magic Planet\n\nOnce, as I was sleeping, I had a dream. There was a strange planet.\nSomething magic happened there every time an artist created new\nwork. At the very moment the artist took his work out of his house, it\nbecame as widely known to the public as it was brilliant. There was a\nlaw there also: nobody was required to pay the artist while using, in\nany imaginable way, his work.\n\nAmazed, I woke up and tossed and turned for the rest of the night,\ntrying to grasp if there was any way for an artist to make money\nthere. I could not wait to bring this up with my first graders. They do\nso love magic! So the next morning, I asked them about it, and look\nat what I got.\n\nWho Gets Money and Why?\n\nAlpha: There is nothing to talk about here. If nobody has to pay an\nartist, then nobody will, no matter how famous he is. I say, the more\nfamous an artist is, the more money he loses on that stupid planet.\n\nBeta: He ain\u2019t losin\u2019 money because nobody gets money there.\n\nGamma: How come?\n\nBeta: If nobody has to pay for the use of artwork, then everybody may\ncopy it and have it for free.\n\nDelta: Yeah, except for the money spent on copying.\n\nGamma: So somebody does get money? The copy machines! Ha ha ha!\n\nKappa: And somebody owns those machines.\n\nBeta: People could sell or rent copy machines and other things you\nneed, right? By the way, if copying takes money and time, then\npeople may come along and do it for others, right? What are those\npeople called, that copy for others?\n\nTeacher: Publishers?\n\nBeta: Publishers.\n\nAlpha: So what? The artist still gets nothing. Only your \u201cpublishers\u201d and the factories that make those copy machines. \u2026 That\u2019s not fair!\n\nBeta: Hmm, this is interesting. \u2026 This planet by magic momentarily makes a work as famous as it is good, right?\n\nDelta: Right. So?\n\nBeta: If it is known, then people want it \u2026\n\nDelta: Hey, hey, I\u2019m starting to get where you\u2019re heading. The more people want it, the more those publishers get, right?\n\nBeta: Right, and they start to compete.\n\nDelta: Yeah! \u2026 To make people buy more copies!\n\nAlpha: What baloney! How can they have a competition if the work is the same for everybody?\n\nBeta: How? How do they always compete? Some put lots of ads on TV\u2014that\u2019s how they compete. Some sell their copies cheaper\u2014 that\u2019s how they compete. Some make their books in hardcover\u2014 that\u2019s how! Everybody understands that!\n\nAlpha: OK, OK. Publishers get money. They compete and steal each other\u2019s business. \u2026 All right, who cares? They don\u2019t bug me. What about the artists?\n\nBeta: What about them? Use your imagination, Alpha.\n\nAlpha: Use yours.\n\nBeta: I am. They all live there and know how it works \u2026\n\nAlpha: We know too. So?\n\nBeta: So? Publishers know. The very moment a work leaves the house, it becomes available for everybody.\n\nAlpha: Yes, and you don\u2019t understand, Beta. That\u2019s the catch\u2014the artist loses it right away!\n\nWhat Does an Artist Get?\n\nDelta: Careful there! To become famous for your work does not mean to lose it! It is the best thing that can happen to an artist!\n\nAlpha: I love it! Everybody gets money, and the artist gets famous and hungry! What luck! Thank you sooo much!\n\nGamma: Hold on. Let Beta finish his train of thought. He was on to something.\n\nBeta: I still am. And we are close \u2026\n\nFirst Graders on the Magic Planet 3\n\nDelta: I know, I know! I used my imagination! I got it\u2014the publishers\nwill line up in front of the artist\u2019s house to get the next work first and\nhave an advantage on the market!\n\nBeta: And?\n\nDelta: And they will pay to access it before it gets out of the house! They will fight and try to kill each other to get it today because it will be\nfor everybody tomorrow!\n\nTeacher: Well, not quite. Remember, it only becomes as popular as it is\nbrilliant.\n\nDelta: Yes, yes, I got it. The more talented it is, the more fierce the\ncompetition!\n\nAlpha: Oh yeah, exactly! I wouldn\u2019t stay in this line. No publisher\nwould! What are the conditions for business here? No, thank you!\n\nGamma: Nobody would do publishing?\n\nAlpha: Nobody!\n\nBeta: Great! Does anybody know where to buy a ticket to fly there?\n\nAlpha: Are you that stupid? What are you going to do there?\n\nDelta: I know\u2014he is going to be the very first and the only publisher\nthere! Right, Beta?\n\nBeta: You bet.\n\nDelta: He will become a multibillionaire in one month and hire all of us!Hey, Beta, do I deserve a good salary?\n\nBeta: You bet. Everybody does, even Alpha.\n\nDelta: What for?\n\nGamma: What for? I\u2019ll tell you. Who was igniting all of the talk? It\u2019s\nworth paying for!\n\nDelta: Igniting? Do you mean like a car?\n\nBeta: Yeah, like a fire.\n\nAlpha: You\u2019re all crazy. I\u2019m not going.\n\nKappa: All right, get serious.\n\nAlpha: Yeah, I\u2019m still wondering whether the artist really gets paid.\n\nGamma: Wasn\u2019t it convincing\u2014that long line of publishers under the\nartist\u2019s window?\n\nDelta: It actually was. . . . They will line up, 100 percent . . . after they learn that Beta bought a ticket and is going to cut them off!\n\nAlpha: Hey, we wanted to be serious, didn\u2019t we?\n\nBeta: We are, Alpha. And we haven\u2019t finished yet.\n\nWhat Does a Publisher Get?\n\nGamma: Hold on, all of you. I want to ask Alpha what was wrong with this picture? Can you put forward some argument and keep the exclamations to yourself?\n\nDelta: Gamma, you always sound so smart.\n\nGamma: I was watching the news with my parents last night.\n\nBeta: Well anyway, I don\u2019t mind the exclamations, but I would like to get some more logical \u201cignition,\u201d as well.\n\nDelta: Me too. Say something, Alpha.\n\nAlpha: What, you can\u2019t remember? I told you\u2014nobody will pay an artist, all right?\n\nGamma: But how about a fat publisher that can pay to be the first?\n\nAlpha: I don\u2019t buy it.\n\nGamma: That\u2019s all?\n\nAlpha: All right. But he won\u2019t pay much because any advantage expires at the moment that the work gets out!\n\nBeta: Hey, Alpha, if you understand business so well, why don\u2019t you use your imagination a bit more?\n\nAlpha: I take that as an insult.\n\nKappa: Cool down, guys.\n\nDelta: Hey, hey, I get it! The publisher may pay the artist very well so that he keeps the work inside!\n\nAlpha: So what? It gets outside when it gets published anyway!\n\nDelta: So what yourself! The first is the first! Customers value that! This is how a brand develops! It pays, all right.\n\nAlpha: So what? So your fat publisher develops a brand. Oh, he makes money all right, but what about the artist?\n\nDelta: Are you nuts? Who can\u2019t remember now? How does the publisher gain all these things? He pays the artist, remember? He has to pay very well, remember!\n\nKappa: Cool down, guys.\n\nSome More for the Artist\n\nBeta: I have some more for the artist.\n\nAlpha: More baloney, I\u2019m sure.\n\nKappa: We are listening, Beta.\n\nBeta: Yeah, listen and judge for yourselves. First of all, that fat publisher will print on the cover that he paid for the work, that he didn\u2019t get it for free like others.\n\nDelta: I know! I know! Hurray! Beta, you are a genius! All artists of all ages from around the world should pool money together to raise a monument to you! I will personally donate a few bucks.\n\nAlpha: Oh yes. I\u2019ll put in a few more to have all of your names carved in the pedestal along with the inscription \u201cThis is for a few stupid kids who wanted artists to starve and art to die.\u201d\n\nKappa: Delta, why don\u2019t you step down from your desk? Alpha, you complain, but are the first to insult others.\n\nGamma: Delta, what did you want to say?\n\nDelta: Don\u2019t you get it? Any publisher can pay the artist to write it on the cover!\n\nGamma: Why should they? They have it for free!\n\nDelta: They sure do. But then why does the first one pay? Whoever wants it for free, can use it for free. Whoever wants to develop a brand will pay! Get me? They pay for marketing anyway. Paying the author will be just one out of many marketing strategies. I would even say that any publisher would want to pay the author to have it on the cover that they paid. Only those who cannot afford it won\u2019t pay the author. Get me?\n\nGamma: Are you saying that any publisher can reprint the same work and the author will get paid by each of them?\n\nDelta: Yeah, and the work spreads like crazy. The author gets exposure at unimaginable heights!\n\nAlpha: Yeah, unimaginable. That\u2019s the word. Good fantasy.\n\nKappa: I like that magic.\n\nWhat if It Is Not Magic?\n\nBeta: Actually, now I do not understand why that magic was even necessary.\n\nGamma: Why? Beta, what\u2019s come over you? How was that artist initially exposed? Remember all the nifty stuff they just got! All the riches, the champagne pouring from the sky! If it were not for the magic, then there would be no publishers in line, no money for the first sale, not the slightest interest in proudly putting on the cover \u201cI sponsored this author!\u201d Nothing, Beta, nothing, just empty pockets!\n\nDelta: Hmm \u2026 well, actually, if an artist is not known to the public, there is no way for him to get paid on any planet.\n\nAlpha: How do they get rich then?\n\nBeta: Frankly, I don\u2019t care how it happens down here.\u2026 By the way, I\u2019ve heard many times that only a handful of artists get considerable money. The great majority of them are starving artists anyway.\n\nAlpha: So? A talented one gets money, untalented\u2014does not. What\u2019s wrong with that?\n\nDelta: What\u2019s wrong with it is that it ain\u2019t true. As simple as that. My father says that it is a rare coincidence when real talent gets real money.\n\nGamma: This is not the case on the Magic Planet! I am dying to learn how Beta was going to provide the magic without magic!\n\nAlpha: I\u2019m not. All you fantasized before wouldn\u2019t work! And anyway, it\u2019s impossible.\n\nDelta: Oh, that\u2019s clever. You do not want to hear what Beta is up to because you think it wouldn\u2019t work?\n\nKappa: It is too early to judge. Beta, what was it that you wanted to tell us?\n\nBeta: Look, can you imagine that publishers and others who want to use a work of art are free to do so?\u2026\n\nDelta: Like on the Magic Planet!\n\nKappa: Delta, do not interrupt, please! You\u2019ll never hear the answer!\n\nBeta: OK, I\u2019ll continue. Everybody is free to use it but is obliged to attribute the work to its author.\n\nAlpha: So?\n\nDelta: Ah \u2026 the author gets exposed with every single use of his work.\n\nGamma: Hmm. Let me see. \u2026 If artworks were not free to use, each publisher would have his own stack of books.\n\nTeacher: Oh yes, that\u2019s true on our planet. Publishers feel safe with their portfolios.\n\nGamma: Yeah, but if it\u2019s free to use by anyone, no publisher feels safe with his own \u201cportfolio\u201d and has to search continually for more good stuff \u2026\n\nAlpha: So?\n\nBeta: So, any new work gets attention, no matter what!\n\nDelta: Yes, yes! If it is downright brilliant, there is always someone to grab it and show it off!\n\nKappa: Delta, get down off your desk, please. Why are you getting excited so easily?\n\nA Flaw in the Common Perception\n\nAlpha: I don\u2019t understand why they are free to use a work. Why shouldn\u2019t they pay the author? It is so simple and reasonable.\n\nGamma: Is it? That\u2019s what I thought yesterday too, but now I\u2019m not so sure.\n\nBeta: Why should they pay if it works anyway?\n\nAlpha: \u2026 An author can be granted exclusive rights for publishing and trade them off \u2026\n\nBeta: And how does he get exposed then?\n\nAlpha: Listen, Beta, I\u2019m not calling you nuts now, but you don\u2019t understand the simplest things. The author sells his rights, the buyer advertises and sells the work. Is that so complicated to you?\n\nBeta: It isn\u2019t, except it won\u2019t work for the author!\n\nAlpha: Why on the earth won\u2019t it!\n\nBeta: Because, with your scenario, the author depends entirely on that one buyer, his capabilities, intentions, and good will. The author\u2019s fame is limited and cannot be anywhere near that fame he could enjoy from the entire competing publishing community!\n\nTeacher: We can say \u201cexposure\u201d instead of \u201cfame.\u201d\n\nBeta: OK, \u201cexposure.\u201d The author\u2019s exposure is limited in Alpha\u2019s scenario.\n\nAlpha: I don\u2019t buy it!\n\nKappa: That\u2019s easy to say, Alpha.\n\nWord to the Reader\n\nWell, my first graders did not make exceedingly clear points, but who expected them to? I was intrigued. I started to ask myself what I honestly knew about the subject and where to dig for these not-so-simple answers. All of a sudden, I realized that we were discussing pretty strange things, things which are totally different from material objects. \u2026 But I only found slight reference to this subject in all the commotion around copyright-related issues. Finally, I found myself thinking about this question: What is the nature of art?","title":"Culture vs. Copyright/Chapter 1","tradition":"philosophy-ethics","translated_text":null,"word_count":2276}