This is a historical essay on the "Powder of Sympathy," a 17th-century surgical superstition, written in the tradition of popular medical history — tracing the evolution of medicine from superstition to science. The central subject is Sir Kenelm Digby (1603–1665), a colorful English polymath who popularized a cure for wounds based on applying vitriol (ferrous sulphate) not to the wound itself but to a blood-stained object from the wound, such as a bandage or garter, while keeping the wound simply clean. The essay recounts Digby's own lengthy first-person account of supposedly curing a writer's infected hand wound this way, including dramatic real-time observations of the patient feeling relief and pain at a distance as the treated cloth was alternately wetted and dried. The author traces the sympathetic cure tradition further back through Paracelsus's weapon-salve and quotes Francis Bacon's skeptically curious but inconclusive discussion of the same phenomenon. A notable analytical thread is the essay's effort to explain the underlying logic: the belief that acting on a part or symbol of something magically affects the whole — identified as the root idea of all magic — though Digby himself attempted a quasi-scientific corpuscular explanation. The essay's distinctive value is its blend of primary sources, biographical color on Digby, and genealogical tracing of a belief that was simultaneously folk magic, earnest natural philosophy, and, incidentally, sound wound-care practice (keeping wounds clean rather than packing them with dangerous substances).