Texts of Islam

Arabian Poetry: The Moallakát: The Poem of Hareth: The Argument

Summary only - full text stays on its own separately-gated source. Read the full text at the source »

This is a scholarly introduction from W. A. Clouston's 1881 anthology *Arabian Poetry*, contextualizing an ancient Arabic oration-poem delivered by the poet Hareth during a tribal dispute adjudicated before a king. The poem was composed as a rebuttal to the poet Amru's panegyric on the tribe of Tagleb, and Hareth's central argument is that the Becrites bore no just blame for the Taglebites' misfortunes, which he attributes instead to their own failings. Clouston emphasizes the rhetorical sophistication of Hareth's strategy — opening with calculated flattery of the queen and king before shifting to pointed sarcasm — and contrasts it with Amru's counterproductive belligerence toward the very judge whose favor he sought. A notable claim is that Hareth was reportedly over a hundred years old yet delivered the poem with such passion that he cut his hand on his bow unawares, lending the moment legendary quality. The commentary also draws a striking cross-cultural parallel between the king's fatal underestimation of Amru's fury and Caesar's underestimation of Brutus, framing both as cautionary examples of rulers who failed to read dangerous temperaments revealed through oratory. The introduction closes with technical notes on the poem's classical meter, positioning it within Greco-Roman prosodic categories — suggesting an audience of readers versed in classical literature being introduced to Arabic poetry as a comparable tradition.

Arabian Poetry: The Moallakát: The Poem of Hareth: The Argument

Related pages View as graph →